Skip navigation

DSpace JSPUI

DSpace preserves and enables easy and open access to all types of digital content including text, images, moving images, mpegs and data sets

Learn More
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Publication Year
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Advisor
  • Search TDR
  • Rights Q&A
    • My Page
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 商學研究所
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84284
Full metadata record
???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield???ValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor陳家麟(Chia-Lin Chen)
dc.contributor.authorLi-Wen Huangen
dc.contributor.author黃莉雯zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-19T22:07:45Z-
dc.date.copyright2022-07-05
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.submitted2022-06-15
dc.identifier.citationAl-Najjar, S.M., & Kalaf, K.H.(2012). Designing a Balanced Scorecard to Measure a Bank's Performance: A Case Study. International Journal of Business Administration, 3, 44-53. Epstein, M. J. & Wisner, P. S.(2001). Using a Balanced Scorecard to Implement Sustainability. Environmental Quality Management, 11(2), 1-10. Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M.(2002). The sustainability balanced scorecard–linking sustainability management to business strategy. Business strategy and the Environment, 11(5), 269-284. Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M.(2002). Development of a Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Value-Based Sustainability Management. Journal of the Asia-Pacific Centre for Environmental Accountability, 8(1), 3-16. Hansen, E.G., Schaltegger, S.(2016). The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Review of Architectures. J Bus Ethics, 133, 193-221. Jassem, S.; Azmi, A.; Zakaria, Z.(2018). Impact of Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Types on Environmental Investment Decision-Making. Sustainability, 10(2), 541. Jelavic, S. R., & Vulić, M. P.(2021). Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: Four performance perspectives or more?. Strategic Management-International Journal of Strategic Management and Decision Support Systems in Strategic Management, 26(4). Johnson, S.D.(1998). Identification and Selection of Environmental Performance Indicators: Application of the Balanced Scorecard Approach. Corporate environmental strategy, 5, 34-41 Kalender, Z. T., & Vayvay, Ö.(2016). The fifth pillar of the balanced scorecard: Sustainability. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 76-83. Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P.(1992). The Balanced Scorecard: Measures That Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79 Krivokapic, Z., & Jovanovic, J.(2009). Using Balanced Scorecard to improve Environmental management system. Strojniški vestnik, 55(4), 262-271. Mooraj, S., Oyon, D., Hostettler D.(1999). The balanced scorecard: a necessary good or an unnecessary evil? European Management Journal, 17(5), 481-491. Radcliffe, M.(1999). Using the Balanced Scorecard to develop metrics for Sustainable Development. Greening of Industry Network. Bieker, T. & Waxenberger, B.(2002). Sustainability Balanced Scorecard and Business Ethics - Developing a Balanced Scorecard for Integrity Management. Greening of Industry Network Conference, Göteborg, Sweden. Bieker, T. (2003). Sustainability management with the Balanced Scorecard. Proceedings of 5th international summer academy on technology studies, 17-34. Gminder, C. U., & Bieker, T.(2002). Managing corporate social responsibility by using the ‘sustainability-balanced scorecard’. Greening of Industry Network Conference, Göteborg, Sweden. 沈秉寬(2004)。探討組織間績效評估因子之關聯性-以台灣半導體產業為例 [碩士論文,東海大學] 。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 施婉婷(2007)。平衡計分卡之研究-以新竹市環境保護局為例 [碩士論文,中華大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 翁崧華(2014)。整合平衡計分卡與品質機能展開建構策略地圖及績效衡量指標-以台灣半導體IC封測廠C公司為例 [碩士論文,國立成功大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 Boerrigter, S.(2015). The use of the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Framework for Dutch SMEs as a tool for measuring the performance of their sustainability strategy [Bachelor’s thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands]. https://www.semanticscholar.org Zingales, F. G., & Hockerts, K.(2003). Balanced scorecard and sustainability: examples from literature and practice. Fontainebleau: Insead. Roy, J., & Wetter, M.(2001). Performance drivers: A practical guide to using the balanced scorecard. John Wiley & Sons. 104玩數據(2022)。半導體人才荒!每位求職者可分3.7份工作3年新高 揭密非理工可從5大職務切入。104職場力。https://blog.104.com.tw/104data-semiconductor-arts-job/ CSRone(2021)。一個老項目「利害關係人議合」,為何此刻變得如此重要?。CSRone 網站。https://csrone.com/topics/6990 TechNews 編輯部(2021)。波瀾壯闊的台灣半導體產業,是場始於豆漿店的產業革命。科技新報網站。https://technews.tw/2021/04/13/taiwan-magnificent-semiconductor-industry/ 中華民國企業永續發展協會(2020)。GRI 207: 稅務(2019)正體中文版。中華民國企業永續發展協會網站。https://bcsd.org.tw/special-promoted/special-prints/gri-207 毛穎崙(2006)。成功導入綠色供應鏈管理工具的關鍵思考。CTIMES。https://www.ctimes.com.tw/DispArt-tw.asp?O=HJQ528OB77BAR-STDY 台積公司(2020)。台積公司109年度企業社會責任報告書。https://esg.tsmc.com/ch/update/general/news/7/index.html 台積公司(2020)。台積公司109年度氣候相關財務揭露報告。https://esg.tsmc.com/download/file/TSMC_TCFD_Report_C.pdf 台積公司(2020)。台積公司民國109年度環境損益分析報告。https://esg.tsmc.com/download/file/TSMC-2020-EPL_c.pdf 台灣智泉國際事業有限公司(2022)。ESG 零碳賽局,唯有綠色企業才是最後贏家。iGroup Taiwan網站。https://www.igroup.com.tw/esg。 台灣證券交易所(2022)。第9屆(111年)公司治理評鑑。台灣證券交易所公司治理中心網站。https://cgc.twse.com.tw/evaluationCorp/listCh  安侯建業聯合會計師事務所(2021)。《2021年全球半導體產業大調查》:2021年半導體領導者信心提升。安侯建業聯合會計師事務所網站https://home.kpmg/tw/zh/home/media/press-releases/2021/03/tw-semiconductor-industry-outlook-2021.html 林玠均(2022)。想留住人才?疫後10大職場趨勢。天下雜誌網站。https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5120074 孫文臨(2021)。台灣已升溫1.6°C 中研院分析減碳最好、最差狀況:世紀末前我們可能失去冬天。環境資訊中心。 https://e-info.org.tw/node/231936。 財政主計金融處(2020)。推動「公司治理3.0–永續發展藍圖」。行政院網站。https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/448DE008087A1971/ef4a599f-0acd-4ee7-abab-2809146764ff 國家發展委員會(n.d.)。臺灣2050淨零排放路徑。國家發展委員會網站。擷取於5月22日2022年 https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=FD76ECBAE77D9811&upn=5CE3D7B70507FB38 張啟煌、黃毓智、王琪(2021)。台積公司發起並協助SEMI制定「晶圓設備資安標準」,強化全球半導體產業資安防護效能。台灣積體電路製造股份有限公司網站。 https://esg.tsmc.com 張德齡(2015)。全球公認最具效力的管理學工具─平衡記分卡原創者。遠見雜誌。https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/28185 陳蕙綾(2020)。上市櫃公司注意!「公司治理3.0」懶人包出爐,2021年將建置永續版。今周刊。https://esg.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/180689 陸孝立(2021)。ESG,企業永續經營的關鍵DNA。勤業眾信通訊。https://www2.deloitte.com/tw/tc/pages/sustainability-services-group/articles/ssg-update-2108.html 富時羅素(2021)。ESG投資持續發燒:從概念邁向行動。CSR天下。https://csr.cw.com.tw/article/42154 楊筱筠、尹慧中(2021)。878億 台積簽ESG連結貸款。經濟日報。https://money.udn.com/money/story/12926/5901665 資誠聯合會計師事務所(2021)。疫情時代下 全球半導體產業面臨的機會與挑戰。資誠聯合會計師事務所網站。https://www.pwc.tw/zh/topics/trends/industry-trends-20211224.html 臺北大學企業永續發展研究中心(2021)。「ESG X 商模核心能力」線上研究會。臺北大學企業永續發展研究中心。http://www.aacsb.ntpu.edu.tw/twsvi/view.php?id=NTA=。 聯華電子(2020)。2020年企業社會責任報告書。https://www.umc.com/upload/media/07_Sustainability/72_Reports_and_Results/ CFA Institute. (n.d.). ESG Factors. Retrieved 20 April, 2022, from https://www.cfainstitute.org/en/research/esg-investing Kaplan, R. S. and McMillan, D.(2021). Reimagining the Balanced Scorecard for the ESG Era. Harvard Business https://hbr.org Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P.(1992). The Balanced Scorecard—Measures that Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/1992/01/the-balanced-scorecard-measures-that-drive-performance-2 Knoepfel, I.(2004). Who cares wins: connecting financial markets to a changing world. The Global Impact. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/280911488968799581/pdf/113237-WP-WhoCaresWins-2004.pdf MSCI(n.d.). The Evolution of ESG Investing. Retrieved 20 April, 2022 from https://www.msci.com/esg-101-what-is-esg/evolution-of-esg-investing S&P Global(n.d.). ESG Scores. Retrieved 18 May, 2022 from https://www.spglobal.com/esg/solutions/data-intelligence-esg-scores SGS. (2022). ESG in the Supply Chain – Why Now?. https://www.sgs.com/en/news/2022/02/esg-in-the-supply-chain-why-now Taylor, A. & Bancilhon, C. & Oger, C. & MORRIS, J.(2019)Five-Step Approach to Stakeholder Engagement. BSR. https://www.bsr.org/en/our-insights/report-view/stakeholder-engagement-five-step-approach-toolkit The SIGMA Project(2003). The SIGMA Guidelines-Toolkit: Sustainability Scorecard. The SIGMA Project. https://library.uniteddiversity.coop Zingales, F and Hockerts, K.(2003). Balanced Scorecard and Sustainability: Examples from Literature and Practice. Center for the Management of Environmental Resources. https://flora.insead.edu
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84284-
dc.description.abstract2021年台灣雖壟罩於COVID-19疫情,經濟成長率卻達6.28%,創下11年新紀錄。其中最主要的推手莫過於臺灣之半導體產業,依工研院產科國際所統計台灣2021年半導體產值達4.08兆新台幣,占台灣GDP比重高達20%。自中美科技戰展開以來,世界對於晶片需求便不斷攀升,而2020年疫情爆發與其後車用電子發展更進一步提升晶片需求,再次證明台灣半導體產業對於全球供應鏈的重要性,半導體產業亦逐步成為台灣經濟命脈。   然近年來永續發展議題與ESG(環境、社會、公司治理)概念成為趨勢,社會與投資人不再單看企業經濟績效,而是同步檢視企業於環境、社會與公司治理三大面向表現。對於高耗能資源且生產過程產生大量二氧化碳與廢棄物之半導體產業,勢必須重新於永續角度訂定發展策略。有鑑於此,本研究透過廣泛文獻探討瞭解企業普遍認同可增進企業策略落地與經營績效之平衡計分卡(Balanced Scorecard)後,依據 The SIGMA Project(2003)建議運用永續性平衡計分卡架構結合 ESG三大面向形成4乘3矩陣。其後,參考永續表現優異之台灣積體電路製造公司定義出之「重大議題」作為主要度量,結合其他重要永續議題,整合出共26項「永續性平衡計分卡」度量,並依台積電實際永續舉措將度量拆分為共81項之度量子項目,以做為永續性平衡計分卡標竿架構。最後,為使標竿架構更具可信度,本研究將台灣第二大晶圓代工企業-聯華電子公司之永續舉措與成效帶入標竿架構,除證實永續表現優異之企業於各子面向皆予以實施外,更可透過此架構檢視企業待改進之處。   本研究期望透過此「永續性平衡計分卡標竿架構」之建立,協助台灣半導體產業檢視自身永續績效並補足缺失之處,使台灣半導體產業得於國際市場中持續立足,並提升永續競爭力。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn 2021, the annual growth rate of the GDP in Taiwan amounted to approximately 6.28%. Despite the global COVID-19 pandemic, Taiwan was able to maintain high economic growth due to the strong global demand of products from semiconductor industry, chips. According to the statistics of Industrial Technology Research Institute in Taiwan, Taiwan's semiconductor output value in 2021 reached NT$4.08 trillion, accounting for 20% of Taiwan's GDP, proving the importance of Taiwan's semiconductor industry to the global supply chain and its crucial role to Taiwan's economy. However, in recent years, ESG(environment, society, and corporate governance)investing is going mainstream, which means the society and investors look not only at a company’s economic performance, but also at the social and environmental value it creates. As being in energy and resource intensive industry, it is imperative for semiconductor companies to reformulate a more “sustainable” development strategy. Thus, this study attempts to build a sustainability balanced scorecard(SBSC) by using the structure suggested by The SIGMA Project(2003)and combing the three aspects of ESG into the structure. Afterwards, referring to the 'material issues' defined by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company(TSMC), which excel at sustainability performance, as the main metric, and along with other important sustainability issues, a total of 26 metrics were defined. And the 26 metrics are further divided into a total of 81 sub- metrics according to the actual sustainability measures of TSMC, so as to provide a clearer guide for evaluating a company’s performance in each perspective of the SBSC. Finally, in order to verify the usability of the benchmark SBSC structure, this study places the actual sustainability measures of UMC, the second largest foundry in Taiwan, into each grid of it, which turns out well-fitted, and it can also help examine the areas for improvement in the company. This study hopes that through the establishment of the benchmark framework of SBSC, companies in semiconductor industry of Taiwan can find a way to review and evaluate their own sustainability performance, so that Taiwan can keep improving sustainability and remaining to be the leading global force in semiconductor manufacturing.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T22:07:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-1506202216375000.pdf: 3289994 bytes, checksum: 1693e2a3929d7408a118a631e25c234f (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2022
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 i 誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 目錄 vi 圖目錄 viii 表目錄 ix 第一章 緒論 1 1.1研究背景與動機 1 1.2研究目的 2 1.3研究範圍與限制 4 1.4章節架構 4 第二章 文獻探討 6 2.1半導體產業之發展現況與永續議題分析 6 2.2 永續性平衡計分卡 10 2.2.1傳統平衡計分卡之起源、架構與應用 10 2.2.2永續性平衡計分卡之起源與架構 17 2.2.3永續性平衡計分卡之建構、指標與衡量 25 2.2.4永續性平衡計分卡企業案例探討 28 2.3 ESG起源與概念 35 第三章 研究架構與方法 38 3.1永續性平衡計分卡構面與ESG構面之結合 38 3.2台積電重大議題與永續性平衡計分卡ESG矩陣之結合 42 第四章 個案討論與永續性平衡計分卡標竿架構建立 54 4.1永續性平衡計分卡標竿架構建立-以台積電為標竿 54 4.1.1永續構面度量拆分 55 4.1.2利害關係人構面度量拆分 58 4.1.3內部流程構面度量拆分 61 4.1.4學習成長構面度量拆分 66 4.2永續性平衡計分卡標竿架構之應用-以聯華電子為例 69 4.2.1永續構面度量帶入 70 4.2.2利害關係人構面度量帶入 73 4.2.3內部流程構面度量帶入 76 4.2.4學習成長構面度量帶入 80 第五章 研究結果與討論 85 5.1 建立永續性平衡計分卡標竿架構 85 5.2 永續性策略地圖繪製 90 第六章 結論與建議 92 6.1研究結論 92 6.2未來研究方向及建議 93 參考文獻 97
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject半導體產業zh_TW
dc.subject永續性平衡計分卡zh_TW
dc.subject聯電zh_TW
dc.subject台積電zh_TW
dc.subjectESGzh_TW
dc.subjectUMCen
dc.subjectSustainability balanced scorecard (SBSC)en
dc.subjectESGen
dc.subjectSemiconductor industryen
dc.subjectTSMCen
dc.title半導體產業永續性平衡計分卡標竿架構之建構-以台灣積體電路製造與聯華電子為例zh_TW
dc.titleEstablishment of Sustainability Balanced Scorecard for Companies in Semiconductor Industry - Example of TSMC and UMCen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear110-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee余峻瑜(Jiun-Yu Yu),陳坤志(Kun-Chih Chen)
dc.subject.keyword永續性平衡計分卡,ESG,半導體產業,台積電,聯電,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordSustainability balanced scorecard (SBSC),ESG,Semiconductor industry,TSMC,UMC,en
dc.relation.page103
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202200963
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)
dc.date.accepted2022-06-20
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept商學研究所zh_TW
dc.date.embargo-lift2022-07-05-
Appears in Collections:商學研究所

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
U0001-1506202216375000.pdf
Access limited in NTU ip range
3.21 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved