Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 會計學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84281
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor曾智揚(Chih-Yang Tseng)
dc.contributor.authorI-Te Huangen
dc.contributor.author黃議德zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-19T22:07:41Z-
dc.date.copyright2022-07-05
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.submitted2022-06-17
dc.identifier.citation曾聯洲. (2003). 銷管費用僵固性研究. 國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文. 林有志, 傅鍾仁, & 陳筱平. (2011). 成本僵固性之實證研究. 當代會計, 12(2), 191-220. 陳建中. (2016). 銷管費用僵固性, 帝國建立動機與公司治理個別機制之成效. 當代會計, 17(2), 131-171. 朱炫璉, 葉淑玲, & 楊婷雯. (2021). 公司策略與成本僵固性: 高階經理人過度自信之調節角色. 會計評論, (72), 83-117. Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., & Janakiraman, S. N. (2003). Are selling, general, and administrative costs “sticky”?. Journal of accounting research, 41(1), 47-63. Arasa, R. M., Aosa, E. O., & Machuki, V. N. (2011). Participatory orientation to strategic planning process: Does it pay?. Balakrishnan, R., Sivaramakrishnan, K., & Sprinkle, G. (2008). Managerial accounting. John Wiley & Sons. Banker, R. D., & Byzalov, D. (2014). Asymmetric cost behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 43-79. Banker, R. D., Byzalov, D., & Plehn-Dujowich, J. M. (2014). Demand uncertainty and cost behavior. The Accounting Review, 89(3), 839-865. Beaver, G. (2007). The strategy payoff for smaller enterprises. Journal of Business Strategy. Byrd, T. A. (2001). Information technology, core competencies and sustained competitive advantage. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 14(2), 27-36. Bengtsson, J. (2001). Manufacturing flexibility and real options: A review. International Journal of Production Economics, 74(1-3), 213-224. Chen, C. X., Lu, H., & Sougiannis, T. (2012). The agency problem, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(1), 252-282. Connolly, T., & Thorn, B. K. (1990). Discretionary Databases: Theory, Data, and Implications in Organizations and Communication Technology; Fulk, J., Steinfield, JC, Eds. Cooper, R. (1998). Kaplan: The design of cost management systems. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm (Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 169-187). Duncan, N. B. (1995). Capturing flexibility of information technology infrastructure: A study of resource characteristics and their measure. Journal of management information systems, 12(2), 37-57. Effiok, S., & Bessong, B. (2016). Cost information and business strategy: A synergistic approach of ensuring valid business decision and growth. European Journal of Business and Innovation Research, 4(2), 1-10. Eichholtz, P., & Yönder, E. (2015). CEO overconfidence, REIT investment activity and performance. Real Estate Economics, 43(1), 139-162. Galasso, A., & Simcoe, T. S. (2011). CEO overconfidence and innovation. Management Science, 57(8), 1469-1484. Gupta, Y. P., & Goyal, S. (1989). Flexibility of manufacturing systems: concepts and measurements. European journal of operational research, 43(2), 119-135. Holzhacker, M., Krishnan, R., & Mahlendorf, M. D. (2015). The impact of changes in regulation on cost behavior. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(2), 534-566. Hall, J.A. (2008). Accounting Information Systems, 6e, South-Western, USA. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of management review, 9(2), 193-206. Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, N. (1994). Strategic alignment: a model for organizational transformation via information technology. Oxford University Press: New York. (pp. 202-220). Hiltz, S. R., & Wellman, B. (1997). Asynchronous learning networks as a virtual classroom. Communications of the ACM, 40(9), 44-49. Hope, J., & Hope, T. (1997). Competing in the third wave: the ten key management issues of the information age. Harvard Business Press. Hunter, W. C., & Timme, S. G. (1991). Technological change in large US commercial banks. Journal of Business, 339-362. Kallapur, S., & Eldenburg, L. (2005). Uncertainty, real options, and cost behavior: Evidence from Washington state hospitals. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(5), 735-752. Keen, P. G. (1991). Shaping the future: Business design through information technology. Harvard Business School Press. Khouja, M., & Kumar, R. L. (2002). Information technology investments and volume-flexibility in production systems. International Journal of Production Research, 40(1), 205-221. Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005). CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. The journal of finance, 60(6), 2661-2700. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Organizations. John wiley & sons. Mehta, N., Hall, D., & Byrd, T. (2014). Information technology and knowledge in software development teams: The role of project uncertainty. Information & Management, 51(4), 417-429. McKay, D. T., & Brockway, D. W. (1989). Building IT infrastructure for the 1990s. Stage by stage, 9(3), 1-11. Moran, P., & Ghoshal, S. (1996, August). VALUE CREATION BY FIRMS. In Academy of management proceedings (Vol. 1996, No. 1, pp. 41-45). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. Nelson, K. M., & Ghods, M. (1998). Measuring technology flexibility. European Journal of Information Systems, 7(4), 232-240. Nidumolu, S. R. (1996). A comparison of the structural contingency and risk-based perspectives on coordination in software-development projects. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(2), 77-113. Noreen, E. (1991). Conditions under which activity-based cost systems provide relevant costs. Journal of management accounting research, 3(4), 159-168. Noreen, E., & Soderstrom, N. (1997). The accuracy of proportional cost models: evidence from hospital service departments. Review of accounting Studies, 2(1), 89-114. Papadakis, V., & Bourantas, D. (1998). The chief executive officer as corporate champion of technological innovation: an empirical investigation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(1), 89-110. Ross, J. W. (2003). Creating a strategic IT architecture competency: Learning in stages. Available at SSRN 416180. Schilling, M. A. (2000). Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Academy of management review, 25(2), 312-334. Stickney, C. P., & Brown, P. R. (1999). Financial Reporting and Statement Analysis, 4. Auflage, USA. Tallon, P. P. (2008). Inside the adaptive enterprise: an information technology capabilities perspective on business process agility. Information technology and management, 9(1), 21-36. Tippins, M. J., & Sohi, R. S. (2003). IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link?. Strategic management journal, 24(8), 745-761. Tiwana, A., Bharadwaj, A., & Sambamurthy, V. (2003). The antecedents of information systems development capability in firms: a knowledge integration perspective. ICIS 2003 Proceedings, 21. Topor, D., Ioana, D., & Putan, A. (2011). The role of cost information in decision-making. Case study. Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 13(2), 315. Weidenmier, M. L., & Subramaniam, C. (2003). Additional evidence on the sticky beha
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84281-
dc.description.abstract在一般會計學中,常將成本分為變動成本及固定成本,且成本變動幅度會和成本動因呈現線性關係。但近年有實證結果顯示,當成本動因上升時,成本上升幅度會大於成本動因下降時的成本下降幅度,此一現象即被稱作成本僵固性。 近年來,企業資訊化聲量不減反升,尤其在疫情爆發後,上市櫃公司執行長有92%認為資訊分析能力是不可或缺的技能。因此本研究以 2014 年至 2020 年臺灣上市櫃公司作為研究樣本,以 Anderson et al. (2003) 之模型做為研究基礎並進行調整,結合 Hambrick et al. (1984) 針對教育背景在企業營運程度上反映了經理人專業知識、領域技能以及特質 (高層理論),來探討企業高階經理團隊經理人的學歷是否會因為資訊和非資訊背景而影響企業營運及效率。 實證結果支持,在經理人學歷中,具備資訊背景的經理人相較於非資訊背景的經理人,會展現出更高的成本彈性以及更低的成本僵固性。另外在額外測試部分,本研究發現具備資訊背景經理人對於非裁決性成本控管相較於裁決性成本更能夠提升其成本彈性以及降低成本僵固性。電子產業相較於非電子產業,反而會有更低的成本彈性結構。企業當年度更換為資訊背景經理人,會有較高之成本彈性,但對成本僵固性沒有顯著影響。最後是當企業經理人中,大學學歷占比越高會降低成本彈性、碩士學歷占比越高會降低成本僵固性、博士學歷占比越高反而會降低成本彈性以及提高成本僵固性。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn traditional accounting, costs are divided into variable and fixed costs. The change in the cost will have a linear relationship with the cost driver. However, in recent years, the empirical results have shown that in some cases, when the cost driver increases, the rate of increase in cost will be greater than that when the cost driver decreases. This phenomenon is called 'stickiness of cost.' In recent years, the volume of enterprise digital transformation has been increasing. Especially after the epidemic, 92% of CEOs believe that information analysis ability is an indispensable skill. Therefore, this research takes Taiwan-listed companies from 2014 to 2020 as the research sample, using the research model of Anderson et al. (2003) as the basis to adjust. Then we combine the concept that education background can reflect one's expertise, domain skills, and personal traits, (Upper-Echelons Theory) (Hambrick et al. 1984) to explore whether the managers' information and non-information education background will affect the operation and efficiency of the company. Empirical results support that managers with information backgrounds exhibit higher cost elasticity and lower cost stickiness than managers with non-information backgrounds. In the additional test, we found that managers with information backgrounds are more effective in controlling nondiscretionary costs than discretionary costs. Also, we found that compared with the non-electronic industry, the electronic one will have lower cost elasticity. If enterprises change to managers with information background, it will generate more excellent cost elasticity but will have no effect on cost stickiness that year. Finally, if the company wanted to improve cost elasticity and reduce cost stickiness effectively. It must hire more managers with an information master's degree since a bachelor's degree will decrease the cost elasticity and a doctor's degree will decrease the cost elasticity and increase cost stickiness.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T22:07:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-1706202213210000.pdf: 1928676 bytes, checksum: a5abbaf975a131789d51539125d5878c (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2022
en
dc.description.tableofcontents目錄 致謝 i 摘要 ii Abstract iii 第一章緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 研究架構 3 第二章文獻探討 5 第一節 成本習性以及成本僵固性 5 第二節 經理人以及資訊不確定性 7 第三章假說建立 11 第一節 經理人資訊背景對成本彈性的影響 11 第二節 經理人資訊背景對成本僵固性的影響 11 第四章研究方法 13 第一節 樣本選取 13 第二節 實證模型與變數衡量 15 第五章實證結果與分析 19 第一節 敘述性統計 19 第二節 迴歸結果分析 – 成本彈性 22 第三節 迴歸結果分析 – 成本僵固性 22 第六章額外測試 26 第一節 具備資訊背景經理人與各成本要素間之關聯 26 第二節 產業類別對成本彈性以及成本僵固性的影響 31 第三節 更換資訊背景經理人對成本彈性及成本僵固性的影響 34 第四節 學歷對成本彈性及成本僵固性的影響 37 第七章結論 42 第一節 研究結論 42 第二節 研究限制及建議 43 參考文獻 44 表目錄 表一 樣本篩選表 13 表二 樣本公司產業分布表 14 表三 變數解釋表 18 表四 各變數敘述性統計 20 表五 變數相關係數表 21 表六 共線性分析 21 表七 主要迴歸模型結果 - 成本彈性模型 24 表八 主要迴歸模型結果 - 成本僵固性模型 25 表九 額外測試一 變數解釋表 26 表十 額外測試一模型結果 – 成本彈性模型 29 表十一 額外測試一模型結果 – 成本僵固性模型 30 表十二 額外測試二 變數解釋表 31 表十三 額外測試二模型結果 – 成本彈性模型 32 表十四 額外測試二模型結果 – 成本僵固性模型 33 表十五 額外測試三 變數解釋表 34 表十六 額外測試三模型結果 – 成本彈性模型 35 表十七 額外測試三模型結果 – 成本僵固性模型 36 表十八 額外測試四 變數解釋表 38 表十九 額外測試四模型結果 – 成本彈性模型 40 表二十 額外測試四模型結果 – 成本僵固性模型 41
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject成本習性zh_TW
dc.subject成本僵固性zh_TW
dc.subject經理人學歷zh_TW
dc.subject經理人資訊化背景zh_TW
dc.subject高層理論zh_TW
dc.subjectUpper-Echelons Theoryen
dc.subjectCost Structureen
dc.subjectCost Stickinessen
dc.subjectManagers' Educational Backgrounden
dc.subjectManagers' Informational Backgrounden
dc.title具資訊背景經理人與公司成本決策關聯性之研究zh_TW
dc.titleResearch of The Correlation between Managers with Information Background and Company Cost Decisionen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear110-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳耀宗(Yao-Tsung Chen),謝昇峯(Sheng-Feng Hsieh)
dc.subject.keyword成本習性,成本僵固性,經理人學歷,經理人資訊化背景,高層理論,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordCost Structure,Cost Stickiness,Managers' Educational Background,Managers' Informational Background,Upper-Echelons Theory,en
dc.relation.page48
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202200988
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)
dc.date.accepted2022-06-21
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept會計學研究所zh_TW
dc.date.embargo-lift2022-07-05-
顯示於系所單位:會計學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
U0001-1706202213210000.pdf
授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務)
1.88 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved