請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/83979完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 郭瑞祥(Ruey-Shan Guo) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Alicia Say | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 史蘭亭 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T21:26:06Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-07-05 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-06-14 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Akbar P., Mai R. & Hoffmann S. (2016). When do materialistic consumers join commercial sharing systems. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4215–4224. Albinsson, P. A., & Yasanthi Perera, B. (2012). Alternative marketplaces in the 21st century: Building community through sharing events. Journal of consumer Behaviour, 11(4), 303-315. Alboher, M. (2007). One Person Multiple Careers. PT Mizan Publika. Alemi, F., Circella, G., Handy, S., & Mokhtarian, P. (2018). What influences travelers to use Uber? Exploring the factors affecting the adoption of on-demand ride services in California. Travel Behaviour and Society, 13, 88-104. Anthony, D., Smith, S.W., & Williamson, T. (2009). Reputation and reliability in collective goods the case of the online encyclopedia wikipedia. Rationality and Society, 21(3), 283–306. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of management review, 14(1), 20-39. Ashforth, B. E., & Schinoff, B. S. (2016). Identity under construction: How individuals come to define themselves in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 111-137. Aspara, J. & Wittkowski, K. (2018). Sharing-dominant logic? Quantifying the association between consumer intelligence and choice of social access modes. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(2), 201-222. Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. (2012). Access based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 881–898. Baston, C. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Psychology Press. Baston, C., & Coke, J. (1981). A source of altruism and helping behavior: Social, personality and developmental perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological bulletin, 117(3), 497. Bergkvist, L., & Rossiter, J. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple item versus single-item technology of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 175-184. Bhattacherjee A. (2002). Individual trust in online firms: scale development and initial test. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1), 211–241. Belk, R. W. (2007). Why not share rather than own? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611(1), 126–140. Belk, R. W. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 715–734.?Belk, R. W. (2013). Extended self in a digital world. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 477–500.? Belk, R. W. (2014). Sharing Versus Pseudo-Sharing in Web 2.0. Anthropologist, 18(1), 7-23. Belk, R. W. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595–1600. Bellotti, V., Ambard, A., Turner, D., Gossmann, C., Demkova, K., & Carroll, J. M. (2015). A muddle of models of motivation for using peer-to-peer economy systems. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1085-1094. Benoit, S., Baker, T. L., Bolton, R. N., Gruber, T., & Kandampully, J. (2017). A triadic framework for collaborative consumption (CC): Motives, activities and resources & capabilities of actors. Journal of Business Research, 79, 219-227. Bergkvist, L., & Rossiter, J. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple item versus single-item technology of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 175-184. Berry, J. W., Segall, M. H., & Kagitcibasi, C. (1997). Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Social behavior and applications (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley. Bock, G.-W., Zmud, R.W., Kim, Y.-G., & Lee, J.-N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87–111. Botsman, R. & Rogers R. (2010), What’s Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption. New York: Harper- Collins. Botsman, R. (2013). The sharing economy lacks a shared definition. http://www.fastcoexist.com/3022028/the-sharing-economy-lacks-a-shared-definition Briscoe, J. P., & Hall, D. T. (2006). The interplay of boundaryless and protean careers: Combinations and implications. Journal of vocational behavior, 69(1), 4-18. Bucher, E., Fieseler, C., & Lutz, C. (2016). What's mine is yours (for a nominal fee)–Exploring the spectrum of utilitarian to altruistic motives for Internet-mediated sharing. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 316-326. Chai S., Das S. & Rao H. R. (2012). Factors affecting blogger’s knowledge sharing: an investigation across gender. Journal of Management and Information Systems, 28(3), 309–341. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative research. Sage Publications Ltd, London. Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278–321. Comte, A. (1852). Cat?chisme positiviste or Catechism of positivism, trans. R. Congreve (London: Kegan Paul, 1891). Cropanzano, R. & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900. Cusumano, M. A. (2015). How traditional firms must compete in the sharing economy. Communications of The ACM, 58 (1), 32-34. Davidson, A., Habibi, M. R. & Laroche, M. (2018). Materialism and the sharing economy: A cross-cultural study of American and Indian consumers. Journal of Business Research, 82, 364-372. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of research in personality, 19(2), 109-134. Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., & Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: a predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 434–449. Dredge, D., & Gyim?thy, S. (2015). The collaborative economy and tourism: Critical perspectives, questionable claims and silenced voices. Tourism Recreation Research, 40(3), 286-302. Drolet, A. L., & Morrison, D. G. (2001). Do we really need multiple-item measures in service research? Journal of Service Research, 3(3), 196-204. Eckhardt, G. M. & Bardhi F. (2015). The Sharing Economy Isn’t About Sharing at All. Harvard Business Review. Fan, Y. (2000). A classification of Chinese culture. Cross Cultural Management, 7(2), 3-10. Fricker, R. D. (2008). Sampling methods for web and e-mail surveys. The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods, 195-216. Fuchs, C., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2009). Using single-item measures for construct measurement in management research: Conceptual issues and application guidelines. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 69(2), 195. Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L., Dunham, R. B., & Pierce, J. L. (1998). Single-item versus multiple-item measurement scales: An empirical comparison. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(6), 898-915. Gansky, L. (2010). The mesh: Why the future of business is sharing. Penguin. Gibbs, G. (2002). Qualitative data analysis: Explorations with NVivo (Understanding social research) (p. 100). Buckingham: Open University Press. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge. Goulding, C. (2005). Grounded theory, ethnography and phenomenology: A comparative analysis of three qualitative strategies for marketing research. European journal of Marketing. Gupta, M., Esmaeilzadeh, P., Uz, I., & Tennant, V. M. (2019). The effects of national cultural values on individuals' intention to participate in peer-to-peer sharing economy. Journal of business research, 97, 20-29. Habibi, M. R., Kim, A., & Laroche, M. (2016). From sharing to exchange: An extended framework of dual modes of collaborative nonownership consumption. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 1(2), 277-294. Habibi, M. R., Davidson, A., & Laroche, M. (2017). What managers should know about the sharing economy. Business Horizons, 60(1), 113-121. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis 6th Edition. Pearson Prentice Hall. New Jersey. Hall, D. T. (1976). Careers in organizations. Goodyear Pub. Co. Hall, D. T. (1996a). The Career Is Dead--Long Live the Career. A Relational Approach to Careers. The Jossey-Bass Business & Management Series. Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers, 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104. Hall, D. T. (1996b). Protean careers of the 21st century. The academy of management executive, 10(4), 8-16. Hall, D. T., & Moss, J. E. (1998). The new protean career contract: Helping organizations and employees adapt. Organizational dynamics, 26(3), 22-37. Hamari, J., Mimmi S. & Antti U. (2016). The Sharing Economy: Why People Participate in Collaborative Consumption. Journal of The Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2047–2059. Handgraaf, M. J., Van Dijk, E. & De Cremer, D. (2003). Social utility in ultimatum bargaining. Social Justice Research, 16(3), 263-283. Hawlitschek, F., Teubner, T. & Gimpel, H. Understanding the Sharing Economy–Drivers and Impediments for Participation in Peer-to-Peer Rental. In Proceedings of the 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Koloa, HI, USA, 5–8 January 2016; pp. 4782–4791. Hofstede G. Cultural Dimension/National Culture. https://www.geert-hofstede.com Hwang, K. K. (2001). The deep structure of Confucianism: A social psychological approach. Asian Philosophy, 11(3), 179-204. Ilieva, J., Baron, S., & Healey, N. M. (2002). Online surveys in marketing research. International Journal of Market Research, 44(3), 1-14. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). On the interpretation of intuitive probability: A reply to Jonathan Cohen. Cognition, 7(4), 409-411. Karlsson, L. & Dolnicar, S. Someone’s been sleeping in my bed. Ann. Tour. Res. 2016, 58, 159–162. Kirkland, J. R. (1986). The roots of altruism in the Taoist tradition. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 54(1), 59-77. Koustas, D.K. (2019). What do big data tell us about why people take gig economy jobs? In AEA Papers and Proceedings, 109, 367-71. Krebs, D. L. (1991). Altruism and egoism: A false dichotomy. Psychological Inquiry, 2, 137-139. Lamberton C. P. & Rose R. L. (2012). When is ours better than mine? A framework for understanding and altering participation in commercial sharing systems. Journal of Marketing 76, 109–125. Lavieri, P. S., & Bhat, C. R. (2019). Investigating objective and subjective factors influencing the adoption, frequency, and characteristics of ride-hailing trips. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 105, 100-125. Lawson, S. J., Gleim, M. R., Perren, R., & Hwang, J. (2016). Freedom from ownership: An exploration of access-based consumption. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2615-2623. Liu, F., Johnson, Z., Massiah, C., & Lowrey, T. M. (2020). Nonmonetary and nonreciprocal freecycling: Motivations for participating in online alternative giving communities. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 1-12. Markus, H. R. & Kitayama S. (1991). Culture and Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–53. Mayhew, M. G., Gardner, J., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2010). Measuring individuals’ need for identification: Scale development and validation. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(5), 356-361. Meeker, B. F. (1971). Decisions and exchange. American Sociological Review 36, 485-495. Milanova, V. & Maas, P. (2017). Sharing intangibles: Uncovering individual motives for engagement in a sharing service setting. Journal of Business Research, 75, 159-171. Moeller S. & Wittkowski K. (2010). The burdens of ownership: reasons for preferring renting. Managing Service Quality, 20(2): 176–191. M?hlmann, M. (2015). Collaborative consumption: determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 14, 193–207. Montgomery, C. A., J. Weber & E. A. Watkins, 2015. The On-Demand Economy. Harvard Business School. Neunhoeffer, F., & Teubner, T. (2018). Between enthusiasm and refusal: A cluster analysis on consumer types and attitudes towards peer-to-peer sharing. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 17(2), 221-236. Ozanne L. K. & Ballantine P. W. (2010). Sharing as a form of anti-consumption? An examination of toy library users. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 9(6), 485–498. Ozanne, L. K., & Ozanne, J. L. (2011). A child's right to play: the social construction of civic virtues in toy libraries. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30(2), 264-278. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, inc. Petriglieri, G., Ashford, S. J., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2018a). Agony and ecstasy in the gig economy: Cultivating holding environments for precarious and personalized work identities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 0001839218759646. Petriglieri, G., Ashford, S., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2018b). Thriving in the gig economy. Harvard Business Review, 96(2), 140-143. Philip, H. E., Ozanne, L. K., & Ballantine, P. W. (2015). Examining temporary disposition and acquisition in peer-to-peer renting. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(11-12), 1310-1332. Philip, H. E., Ozanne, L. K., & Ballantine, P. W. (2019). Exploring online peer-to-peer swapping: a social practice theory of online swapping. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 27(4), 413-429. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y. & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879. Price, J. A. (1975). Sharing: The integration of intimate economies. Anthropologica, 17(1), 3-27. Ritzer, G., & Jurgenson, N. (2010). Production, consumption, prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’. Journal of consumer culture, 10(1), 13-36. Rossiter, J. R. (2002). The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19(4), 305–335. Rushton, P. J., Chrisjohn R. D. & Fekken C. G. (1981). The Altruistic Personality and the Self-Report Altruism Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 2 (4), 293-302. Scaraboto, D. (2015). Selling, sharing, and everything in between: The hybrid economies of collaborative networks. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(1), 152-176. Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550-562. Shavitt, S., Ashok, K. L., Jing, Z. & Carlos, T. (2006). The horizontal/vertical distinction in cross-cultural consumer research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 325–42. Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2007). Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 9-32. Straughan, R. D., & Roberts, J. A. (1999). Environmental segmentation alternatives: A look at green consumer behavior in the new millennium, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16, 558-575. Suddaby, R. (2006). From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of management journal, 49(4), 633-642. Sundararajan, A. (2016). The sharing economy: The end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism. Mit Press. Sung, E., Kim, H., & Lee, D. (2018). Why do people consume and provide sharing economy accommodation?—A sustainability perspective. Sustainability, 10(6), 2072. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychology of Intergroup Relations [ed. by S. Worchel & Austin W.G.], 7-24. Taylor, A. B., Mackinnon, D. P. & Tein, J. Y. (2008). Tests of the three-path dedicated effect. Operational Research Methods, 11(2), 241-269. Van der Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695–704. Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 247-252. Wu, W. -P., Chan, T. S., & Hwa, L. H. (2008). Does consumers' personal reciprocity affect future purchase intentions? Journal of Marketing Management, 24(3/4), 345–360. Yang, S., Song, Y., Chen, S., & Xia, X. (2017). Why are customers loyal in sharing-economy services? A relational benefits perspective. Journal of Services Marketing. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/83979 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 縱使共享經濟的全球通用定義仍有歧義，共享經濟或零工經濟不管在商業界和學術界都獲得極大的重視。 雖然大部分學者將共享經濟稱作是一種「協同的、有利於社會的、利他的、環境永續的、或體驗性的消費」，西方的實徵研究卻顯示個人效益及經濟考量仍超越道德考量。社會價值對於共享經濟參與度的貢獻非常薄弱。 本研究首先將各種型態的共享經濟商業模式依據期待獲得的報酬及物權移轉的幅度進行分類。從這個分類法中，本研究選取以營利為導向的點對點經濟，在亞洲地區進行兩項實徵研究；其一研究共享經濟中的消費者行為，其二探討個體服務提供者在共享經濟中的自我身份認同。 過去的研究已驗證個人效益為驅動共享經濟服務提供者及消費者的重要決定因素，本研究之目的是欲驗證社會效益對於東方共享經濟商業模式的影響。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Though universally accepted definition of sharing economy is yet to reach concordance, the sharing economy or gig economy business is receiving tremendous attention both from the business and academic worlds. While most recent researches address sharing economy as ‘collaborative and pro-social, altruistic and environmentally sustainable, or experiential consumption’, empirical results from the West show that personal utility and economic concerns outweigh the ethical concerns. Very little contribution of social values is seen in the adoption of sharing economy. This research firstly categorizes the variations of sharing economy business in terms of their nature of expected rewards in continuum and the ownership transfer of the shared goods. With this proposed typology, this research conducts two empirical studies of the for-profit peer-to-peer sharing businesses in the Asian context; one to investigate the consumers’ behavior in sharing activities, the other to explore the self-identification of the individual service providers in the sharing businesses. While personal utility has been confirmed to be the major determinant to drive the providers’ and consumers’ participation in sharing business, this study aims to validate the effect the social values on sharing economy business in the East. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T21:26:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1406202215380600.pdf: 3624433 bytes, checksum: c0ce8775b726fea6ef4dedd15a5ca521 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Preface ii Chinese Abstract iii English Abstract iv Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Literature Review 11 2.1. Variation of Sharing Economy 11 2.2. Motivations for Participating in P2P Economy 15 Chapter 3 Study 1: Consumers’ Motivations for Participating in P2P Economy 23 3.1. Conceptual Foundation and Hypotheses Development 24 3.1.1. Personal Utility 25 3.1.2. Altruism 26 3.1.3. Social Utility 29 3.1.4. Mediation 32 3.2. Method 34 3.2.1. Research Design 35 3.2.2. Sampling and Data Collection 36 3.2.3. Measures 38 3.3. Data analysis 45 3.4. Results 46 3.4.1. Descriptive Statistics 46 3.4.2. Model Comparison and Model Fit 47 3.4.3. Tests of Hypotheses 50 3.5. Discussion 53 3.5.1. Theoretical Implications 54 3.5.2. Managerial Implications 57 Chapter 4 Study 2: Providers’ Voyage into Gig Economy 60 4.1. The Self-Employed Gig Workers 66 4.1.1. Protean Career 68 4.1.2. Identity 70 4.2. Method 71 4.2.1. Sample and Data Collection 71 4.2.2. Data Analysis 74 4.3. Findings 81 4.3.1. Identities 82 4.3.2. The Voyage 112 4.3.3. Identity Transformation 133 4.3.4. Destination 137 4.4. Discussions 143 4.4.1. Theoretical Contributions 143 4.4.2. Managerial Implications 144 Chapter 5 General Discussion and Contributions 149 Chapter 6 Limitations and Future Studies 154 6.1. Limitations 154 6.2. Future Studies 156 References 158 Appendix 174 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 自我認同 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 共享經濟 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 點對點經濟 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 利他主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社會效益 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社會交換理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 零工經濟 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | sharing economy | en |
| dc.subject | self-identification | en |
| dc.subject | gig-economy | en |
| dc.subject | social exchange theory | en |
| dc.subject | social utility | en |
| dc.subject | altruism | en |
| dc.subject | peer-to-peer economy | en |
| dc.title | 亞洲共享經濟商業模式之社會效益探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | An Examination of Social Utility in The Asian Sharing Business | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 陳家麟(Chialin Chen) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳學良(Hsueh-Liang Wu),吳文傑(Jack Wu),姜義村(John Chiang),譚鴻仁(Bruce Tan) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 共享經濟,點對點經濟,利他主義,社會效益,社會交換理論,零工經濟,自我認同, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | sharing economy,peer-to-peer economy,altruism,social utility,social exchange theory,gig-economy,self-identification, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 180 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202200943 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-06-16 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 商學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-1406202215380600.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 3.54 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。