Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 社會科學院
  3. 經濟學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/83965
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor吳儀玲(Yi-Lin Wu)
dc.contributor.authorZhi-Xun Wangen
dc.contributor.author王之尋zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-19T21:25:28Z-
dc.date.copyright2022-07-05
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.submitted2022-06-21
dc.identifier.citationAlissa, W. Boards’ Response to Shareholders’ Dissatisfaction: The Case of Shareholders’ Say on Pay in the UK. European Accounting Review 2015;24;727-752. Armstrong, CS, Gow, ID, Larcker, DF. The efficacy of shareholder voting: Evidence from equity compensation plans. Journal of Accounting Research 2013;51;909-950. Bachelder, JE 2009. TARP, ‘Say on Pay’ and Other Legislative Developments, Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance. 2009. Balsam, S, Boone, J, Liu, H, Yin, J. The impact of say-on-pay on executive compensation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 2016;35;162-191. Bebchuk, LA, Fried, JM. Executive compensation as an agency problem. Journal of economic perspectives 2003;17;71-92. Bertrand, M, Mullainathan, S. Are CEOs rewarded for luck? The ones without principals are. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 2001;116;901-932. Brunarski, KR, Campbell, TC, Harman, YS. Evidence on the outcome of Say-On-Pay votes: How managers, directors, and shareholders respond. Journal of Corporate Finance 2015;30;132-149. Canil, J, Karpavi?ius, S, Yu, C-F. Are shareholders gender neutral? Evidence from say on pay. Journal of Corporate Finance 2019;58;169-186. Chhaochharia, V, Grinstein, Y. CEO compensation and board structure. The journal of Finance 2009;64;231-261. Coles, JL, Daniel, ND, Naveen, L. Boards: Does one size fit all? Journal of Financial Economics 2008;87;329-356. Coles, JL, Daniel, ND, Naveen, L. Co-opted Boards. The Review of Financial Studies 2014;27;1751-1796. Core, JE, Guay, W, Larcker, DF. The power of the pen and executive compensation. Journal of Financial Economics 2008;88;1-25. Cullinan, CP, Mahoney, L, Roush, PB. Are CSR activities associated with shareholder voting in director elections and say-on-pay votes? Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 2017;13;225-243. Engelberg, J, Gao, P, Parsons, C. The value of a rolodex: CEO pay and personal networks. Available at SSRN 1364595 2009. Ertimur, Y, Ferri, F, Oesch, D. Shareholder votes and proxy advisors: Evidence from say on pay. Journal of Accounting Research 2013;51;951-996. Ferri, F, Maber, DA. Say on pay votes and CEO compensation: Evidence from the UK. Review of Finance 2013;17;527-563. Iliev, P, Vitanova, S. The Effect of the Say-on-Pay Vote in the United States. Management Science 2019;65;4505-4521. Jensen, MC, Meckling, WH. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 1976;3;305-360. Kimbro, MB, Xu, D. Shareholders have a say in executive compensation: Evidence from say-on-pay in the United States. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 2016;35;19-42. Liu, Y. The impact of networks on CEO turnover, appointment, and compensation. Appointment, and Compensation (March 16, 2010) 2010. Lu, J, Wang, W. Managerial conservatism, board independence and corporate innovation. Journal of Corporate Finance 2018;48;1-16. Morgan, A, Poulsen, A, Wolf, J. The evolution of shareholder voting for executive compensation schemes. Journal of Corporate Finance 2006;12;715-737. Murphy, KJ 2013. Executive compensation: Where we are, and how we got there, Handbook of the Economics of Finance. Elsevier; 2013. Ng, L, Sibilkov, V, Wang, Q, Zaiats, N. Does shareholder approval requirement of equity compensation plans matter? Journal of Corporate Finance 2011;17;1510-1530. O'Byrne, SF. Say on Pay: Is It Needed? Does It Work? Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 2018;30;30-38. Saito, Y. Are long-tenured CEOs rent seekers? Analysis of cash compensation and post disposal performance. Advances in Accounting 2019;44;95-107. Sanchez-Marin, G, Lozano-Reina, G, Baixauli-Soler, JS, Lucas-Perez, ME. Say on pay effectiveness, corporate governance mechanisms, and CEO compensation alignment. BRQ Business Research Quarterly 2017;20;226-239. Shorter, G 2009. “Say on Pay” and Other Corporate Governance Reform Initiatives, Congressional Research Service-CRS Report to Congress. 2009. Yermack, D. Good timing: CEO stock option awards and company news announcements. The journal of Finance 1997;52;449-476. Young, MN, Peng, MW, Ahlstrom, D, Bruton, GD, Jiang, Y. Corporate Governance in Emerging Economies: A Review of the Principal–Principal Perspective. Journal of Management Studies 2008;45;196-220.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/83965-
dc.description.abstractSay-on-Pay投票制度對代理問題的影響一直備受爭議。支持者相信這一制度可以使公司股東和管理者的利益聯繫更緊密,確保董事會行使監督的職責。反對者質疑股東很難理解高管薪酬的結構設計,會影響董事會制定最優薪酬策略。在本文中,我發現當下公司確實存在代理問題,低Say-on-Pay投票支持率歸因於不匹配的高管薪酬。然後我檢驗了Say-on-Pay投票對高管接下來薪酬變動的影響,用兩個工具變數解決了內生性問題,並且用一階差值回歸解決了遺漏變數偏誤使得結論更可信。證據表明低Say-on-Pay投票支持率可以減少高管超額薪酬的增加,尤其是股權類薪酬。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe effect of the Say-on-Pay (SOP) vote on the agency problem has been a controversial issue. Proponents of the provision believe that SOP votes further align owners’ interests with managers’ interests, ensuring that board members fulfill their monitoring duty. Critics doubt that it is difficult for shareholders to understand the design of executive compensation structure, discouraging the board from developing an optimal compensation strategy. In the paper, I find that the agency problem does exist in modern firms and low SOP support is attributed to misaligned executive compensation. Then I examine the effect of SOP votes on the subsequent growth of executive composition. I solve the endogeneity problem with two instrumental variables and eliminate the omitted-variable bias with first-difference regressions to make the results more convincing. Evidence shows that low SOP support can reduce the growth of excess executive compensation, especially equity-based compensation.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T21:25:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-3105202215290100.pdf: 1623141 bytes, checksum: 65ee6b1bdfce35a9a325ada2ce169124 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2022
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 i 誌謝 ii 摘要及關鍵詞 iii Abstract & Keywords iv Table of Contents v List of Figures vii List of Tables vii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Hypothesis development 9 2.1 Voting and executive compensation 10 2.2 Hypothesis development 11 Chapter 3 Data selection and variable measure 15 3.1 Sample and data source 15 3.2 Measure of excess compensation 17 3.3 Measure of low SOP support 19 3.4 Measure of other dependent variables 22 3.5 Summary statistics 23 Chapter 4 Empirical analysis 24 4.1 The link between CEO networks and CEO compensation 25 4.2 The determinants of SOP votes 29 4.3 The impact of SOP votes on executive compensation 33 4.4 IV regression 37 4.5 Subsample analysis 43 Chapter 5 Conclusion 48 Chapter 6 References 50 Chapter 7 Appendix 52
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject公司治理zh_TW
dc.subjectSay-on-Pay制度zh_TW
dc.subject高管薪酬zh_TW
dc.subject股東投票zh_TW
dc.subject代理問題zh_TW
dc.subjectExecutive compensationen
dc.subjectShareholder votingen
dc.subjectPrincipal-agent problemen
dc.subjectSay-on-Payen
dc.subjectCorporate Governanceen
dc.title美國Say-on-Pay 投票對高管薪酬變動的影響zh_TW
dc.titleThe effect of the Say-on-Pay vote on the growth of executive compensation in the U.S.en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear110-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee黃景沂(Ching-I Huang),江淳芳(Chun-Fang Chiang), 李宗穎(Chung-Ying Lee)
dc.subject.keywordSay-on-Pay制度,高管薪酬,股東投票,代理問題,公司治理,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordSay-on-Pay,Executive compensation,Shareholder voting,Principal-agent problem,Corporate Governance,en
dc.relation.page53
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202200845
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2022-06-23
dc.contributor.author-college社會科學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept經濟學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:經濟學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
U0001-3105202215290100.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.59 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved