請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/83845完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 劉康慧(Helen K Liu) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Taku Tanaka | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 田中琢 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T21:20:21Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-07-27 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-07-26 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Akihiro, S. (2012).「日本???????????????用」『The Society for Economic Studies』, The University of Kitakyushu Working Paper Series Akira, A. (1983). 「?域行政?地方分?」『行政??換期(???????刊? 合特集 29)』, 1983 年 Akira, I. (2020). 新型???????感染症?策?地方自治 : 「日本???」?法 ?支配. 自治?研, 46(7), 1–44. Alarcon-Leiva, J., Castro-Paredes, M., & Donoso-Diaz, S. (2013). Centralism and decentralized aspirations in the organization of the Chilean school system: 1980-2011. Revista Del Clad Reforma Y Democracia(57), 157-+. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000331339400006 Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Law, J., & Walker, R. M. (2009). Centralization, organizational strategy, and public service performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 57-80. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–71. Archest.co.ltd (2021). 「日本地??白地?????無料素材集」.retrieved from https://www.chizu-seisaku.com/shirochizu/shirochizu-j-z/, access on 21th September, 2021. Bailey, D., & Wood, M. (2017). The metagovernance of English devolution. Municipality Studies, 43(6), 966-991. Bark, T. (2021). Information provision as agenda setting: A study of bureaucracy's role in higher education policy. Regulation & Governance, 15(2), 408-427. Barzelay. M. (2001). The new public management improving research and policy dialogue. University of California Press. Bednar, J. (2009). The robust federation: Principles of design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Behnke, N., & Mueller, S. (2017). The purpose of intergovernmental councils: A framework for analysis and comparison. Regional & Federal Studies, 27(5), 507– 27. Kenny, & Berman, J. S. (1980). Statistical approaches to the correction of correlational bias. Psychological Bulletin, 88(2), 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033- 2909.88.2.288 Boin, A., Busuioc, M., & Groenleer, M. (2014). Building European Union capacity to manage transboundary crises: Network or lead-agency model? Regulation & Governance, 8(4), 418-436. Borge, L. E., & Rattso, J. (1999). Municipality resource use under a centralised system of financing: The case of Norway. Municipality Studies, 25(1), 35-54. Brown, K., & Keast, R. (2005). Social services policy and delivery in Australia: Center- periphery mixes. Policy and Politics, 33(3), 505-518. Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66, s1, 44–55. Cao, Z. H., & Zhang, X. M. (2018). Structure hypothesis of authoritarian rule: Evidence from the lifespans of China's dynasties. Journal of Chinese Governance, 3(1), 1- 24. Caporaso, J. A., Kim, M. H., Durrett, W. N., & Wesley, R. B. (2015). Still a regulatory state? The European Union and the financial crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(7), 889-907. Cabinet Office Disaster Prevention Officer (2009). “Central Government Business Guideline 1st Version. ~ Focusing on the response to an earthquake directly under the Tokyo metropolitan area ~”, 2. Cheong, S. M. (2011). The role of government in disaster management: the case of the Hebei Spirit oil spill compensation. Environment and Planning C-Government and Policy, 29(6), 1073-1086. Chun-Chieh, M. A. (2012). Responding in crises: A comparative analysis of disaster responses between Mainland China and Taiwan. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 9(1), Article 31. Czada, R. (1990). Politics and administration during a nuclear-political crisis: The Chernobyl disaster and radioactive fallout in Germany. Contemporary Crises, 14(4), 285-311. Coggburn, J. D. (2001). Personnel deregulation: Exploring differences in the American states. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(2), 223-244. Cortell, A. P. (1997). Centralization, access, and influence: The Reagan administration and the semiconductor industry's trade complaints. Governance: An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions, 10(3), 261-285. Deverell, E., & Olsson, E. K. (2009). Learning from crisis: A framework of management, learning and implementation in response to crises. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 6(1), Article 85. Elgin, D. J., & Carter, D. P. (2019). Administrative (de)centralization, performance equity, and outcome achievement in rural contexts: An empirical study of US child welfare systems. Governance: An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions, 32(1), 23-43. Etsuhiro, N. (2020). 地方自治入門 / 入江容子、京俊介編著. ?????書房. Fabbrini, S. (2016). The constitutional conundrum of the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(1), 84-100. Fimreite, A. L., & Aars, J. (2007). Tensions and cooperation in a multilevel system: Integrating district councils in city government in Bergen. Municipality Studies, 33(5), 677-698. Fujitsu (2018) 「PRESS RELEASE 和歌山?、大阪府?共同?、??方改革?向 ?? RPA ?活用??自治体職員?業務?率化?有?性??証」(retrieved from https://pr.fujitsu.com/jp/news/2018/07/9.html, access on May 20, 2021) Ghuman, & Singh, R. (2013). Decentralization and delivery of public services in Asia. Policy & Society, 32(1), 7–21. Han, LaPrade, J., & Hwang, E. (2021). Is a decentralized police organization a better option in a modern democratic society? A case study from South Korea. Police Quarterly, 109861112110420–. Hansen, K. (2001). Local councillors: Between local 'government' and local 'governance'. Public Administration, 79(1), 105-123. Hermansson, H. M. L. (2016). Disaster management collaboration in Turkey: Assessing progress and challenges of hybrid network governance. Public Administration, 94(2), 333-349. Hegele, & Schnabel, J. (2021). Federalism and the management of the COVID-19 crisis: Centralisation, decentralisation and (non-)coordination. West European Politics, 44(5-6), 1052–1076. Hiroshima City (2021). “Implementation status of medical examination.” retrieved from https://www.city.hiroshima.lg.jp/site/korona/140540.html, accessed on 27 Oct, 2021 Hoffman, I. (2013). Some thoughts on the main European models of the municipal health services. Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government, 11(3), 631-650. Hoffman, I., Fazekas, J., & Rozsnyai, K. (2016). Concentrating or centralising public services? The changing roles of the Hungarian inter-municipal associations in the last decades. Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government, 14(3), 451-471. Hoffman, I., & Szatmari, A. (2019). The transformation of the municipal social benefit system in Hungary in the last decade. Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government, 17(3), 535-559. Hoggett, P. (1996). New modes of control in the public service. Public Administration, 74(1), 9-32. Imperiale, A. J., & Vanclay, F. (2020). Barriers to enhancing disaster risk reduction and community resilience: Evidence from the L'Aquila disaster. Politics and Governance, 8(4), 232-243. Juptner, P., & Klimovsky, D. (2021). Vertical and horizontal intergovernmental relations during the first wave of the COVID-19 crisis: Experience from the extremely fragmented CEE countries. Local Government Studies. Kazuhisa H., & Toshinori, O. (2021). 新型???????感染症?自治体?攻防 / 平岡和久、尾?俊紀編著. 自治体研究社. Kengo, S. (2013). 『行政?』有斐閣, 2013 Kettl, D. F. (2003). Contingent coordination: Practical and theoretical puzzles for homeland security. American Review of Public Administration, 33(3), 253–277. Kim, J. (2013). Political decentralization, subnational political capital, and intergovernmental transfer in Korea. American Review of Public Administration, 43(1), 109–129. Kouichi H. (2004).「????型????計量的分析」『理論?方法』19(1)、101-115. Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Barton, A. H. (1951). Qualitative measurement in the social sciences: Classification, typologies, and indices. Stanford University Press. “新型肺炎患者、???初確認 武漢?渡航?.” (2020, January 16th). Nikkei Shinbun. Retrieved from https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXMZO54444940W0A110C2CE0000/, access on July 21, 2021 Michio M. (1988).『地方自治』東京大?出版?、35?76 頁及?「政府間?係? 政治体制」大森?他編前?書、243?276 頁 Michio, M. (1989). 地方自治 / 村松岐夫著 ; ?新譯. 經濟日報. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (2020). 「???????」.retrieved from https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/covid-19/open-data.html, access on September 13th, 2021. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (2021). 「???????」.retrieved from https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/covid-19/open-data.html, access on September 13, 2021. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (2021). Statistics Bureau, retrieved from https://www.stat.go.jp/english/, accessed on 3 April, 2022. OECD (2020). The territorial impact of COVID-19: Managing the crisis across levels of government. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/d3e314e1-en, access on 20th September, 2021 Palak, R., & Nguyen, S. V. (2021). Centralization measures for social networks. Cybernetics and Systems, 52(5), 398-418. Razin, E., & Hazan, A. (2014). Attitudes of European local councillors towards local governance reforms: A north-south divide? Municipality Studies, 40(2), 264-291. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row. Thart, P ., Rosenthal, U., & Kouzmin, A. (1993). Crisis decision-making: The centralization thesis revisited. Administration & Society, 25(1), 12-45. Pollitt, C. (2005) Decentralization, In: E. Ferlie, L.E. Lynn, & C. Pollitt (eds.) The Oxford handbook of public management (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 371-397. Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–52. Raab, J., Mannak, R. S., & Cambr?, B. (2015). Combining structure, governance and context: A configurational approach to network effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 479–511. Ranade, W., & Hudson, B. (2008). Conceptual issues in inter-agency collaboration. Local Government Studies, 29(3), 32–50. Roca, T. S. (2010). Conception and decentralization of consumer protection in Peru: A comparative analysis with Mexico, United States, Brazil and Sweden. Revista Del Clad Reforma Y Democracia(47), 131-+. Sahori, D. (2021). The study on the factors driving to formulate superful BCP of local governments. 情報文化??誌. 18(2). Sager, F. (2005). Metropolitan institutions and policy coordination: The integration of land use and transport policies in Swiss urban areas. Governance: An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions, 18(2), 227-256. Setagaya Ward (2020). Setagaya Ward. Materials for the 11th Setagaya Ward Mayor's Regular Press Conference in FY2020. retrieved from https://www.city.setagaya.lg.jp/mokuji/kusei/001/002/003/d00190932.html, access on March 26, 2021 Shinya, S., & Takeshi, M. (2017). 2009年新型???????????地方自 治体????決定要因──神?市,仙台市,?島市?事例?──. 修道法, 39-2, 33-58. Salmon, P. (1987). Decentralization as an incentive scheme. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 3(2), 24–43. Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Boulder: Westview Press. Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9-20. Schultz, A., & Libman, A. (2015). Is there a local knowledge advantage in federations? Evidence from a natural experiment. Public Choice, 162(1-2), 25-42. Shuichiro, I,. (2002). 自治体政策過程?動態 : 政策????????波及. 慶應義塾大?出版?. Shuichiro, I. (2006). 自治体??政策革新 : 景??例??景?法?. 木鐸社 Swanson, L. E. (2001). Rural opportunities: Minimalist policy and community-based experimentation. Policy Studies Journal, 29(1), 96-107. Szatmari, A., & Hoffman, I. (2020). The transformation of the municipal social care system in Hungary in the light of the provision of home care services. Lex Localis- Journal of Local Self-Government, 18(4), 691-712. Takaaki, F. (2020, June 30th). “(新型???)院?感染、??封????? ??初??生、?生?有田病院 ”.Asahi Newspaper. Retrieved from https://xsearch.asahi.com/kiji/image/?1654174562630 Takehiko, I. (2013). 「?????????? 看護研究????活用」. 特集看 護 研究?????????????, 475-484. Tetsuo, M. (2021). 大規模災害??急?策??????地方間?係?在?方(5). 自 治研究, 97(10), 22–44. Tetsuro, I. (2020). 新型???????等?策特別措置法成立??緯?新型?? ?????感染?大時?同法?運用????. Seisan kenky?, 72(4), 279– 282. Thart, P ., Rosenthal, U., & Kouzmin, A. (1993). Crisis decision-making: The centralization thesis revisited. Administration & Society, 25(1), 12-45. Thomas, C. W. (1999). Linking public agencies with community-based watershed organizations: Lessons from California. Policy Studies Journal, 27(3), 544-564. Torres, L., Pina, V., & Yetano, A. (2011). Performance measurement in Spanish municipalities: A cross-case comparison study. Public Administration, 89(3), 1081-1109. Toshiyuki, K. (2021). ????策禍???自治体 : 災害行政?迷走?閉塞 / 金井 利 之著. 筑摩書房. Tselios, Rovolis, A., & Psycharis, Y. (2017). Regional economic development, human capital and transport infrastructure in Greece: The role of geography. In Regional upgrading in Southern Europe (pp. 151–174). Springer International Publishing. Tselios, V., & Tompkins, E. (2017). Local government, political decentralisation and resilience to natural hazard-associated disasters. Environmental Hazards-Human and Policy Dimensions, 16(3), 228-252. WakayamaPrefecture(2020).知事???????? 令和3年7月21日.Retrieved from https://www.pref.wakayama.lg.jp/chiji/message/20210721.html, access on 21 October, 2021 Yasuharu, T. (2021). 新型???????感染症?自治体?攻防 / 平岡和久、尾?俊紀編著. 自治体研究社. Yin, W. W. (2020). Climate shocks, political institutions, and nomadic invasions in early modern East Asia. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 64(6), 1043-1069. Yoo, J. (2018). Assessing central-municipality relations in contemporary South Korea: An application of Page & Goldsmith's comparative framework. Lex Localis- Journal of Local Self-Government, 16(3), 505-528. Yukio, A. (2009).『公共政策???何?』?????書房. Zhao, L. T. (2018). Mobilization and irregularity: Volatile growth of educational expenditure in China. Journal of Chinese Governance, 3(1), 49-66. ?星野雄介, & 平尾毅. (2021). 新型???????(COVID-19)????新聞社??論調 : 時系列??化?新聞社???特?. 武?野大???研究所紀要 =Musashino University Management Journal, 3, 71-92. Retrieved from https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1050005822284662912 ?角野香織, 佐藤菜?, 中芝健太, 大久敬子, 藤井伽奈, 橋本明弓, 片岡真由美, 里英子, 小林由美子, ?田理?, 張俊華, 木島優依子, 中村桂子, & 橋本英樹. (2021). 公 ?衛生的危機?況????教育研究機??保健所?連?:新型??????? 感染症??????教訓??. Nihon k?sh? eisei zasshi, 68(3), 186–194. ?調 麻佐志, 鳥谷 真佐子 & 小泉 周. (2020). 緊急小特集??? ????思考?? ?新型???????感染症?策?可視化 : 政府??門家?議??????? ?????????「理由」. 科?技術????????? = Japanese Journal of Science Communication, 23–32. ?東京都福祉保健局 (2021). 『??????』.「新型?????????情報? ? ? 」 . 22th December, 2021. Retreived from https://www.fukushihoken.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/iryo/kansen/kensa/syurui.html. Access on 16th January, 2022. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/83845 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在了解「集中化」和「分權化」對日本核酸檢測(PCR)政策實 施的影響。首先,集中化與分權化之概念是由整合、合法性和領導力所構成。再 者,本文分析了日本世田谷區、和歌山縣和廣島縣在 COVID-19 流行期間實施的 核酸檢查政策,而後探討透過 PCR 檢測措施來有效控制大流行的政策過程。在研 究方法方面,本文運用文字探勘方法的共現網絡圖(co-occurrence network diagram)協助探究以上三個地方政府究竟在何種面向上受到了集中化和分權化的 影響。研究結果顯示,地方政府應積極尋求中央政府的回應,以促進中央與地方 的融合。另一方面,PCR 檢測政策在集中化方面獲得成功,尤其是由於地方政府 基於科學證據向中央政府提出了新的政策建議,並且地方政府在過程中將中央政 府視為平等的合作夥伴。值得注意的是,在權力下放的過程中,地方政府本身也 必須發展領導力,使地方政府間形成綜合網絡關係,研究證明了這樣的關係在 PCR 檢測政策方面相當有效。最後,本研究建議,中央集權和地方分權應加強中 央和地方政府在核酸檢查政策設計中的整合和領導力,在法律基礎上明確劃分中 央政府與地方政府提案整合的義務,並通過利用地方政府的整合和領導能力來設 計地方治理業務連續性計劃(Business Continuity Plan)。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In this study, the author analyzes PCR testing policies implemented by Setagaya Ward, Wakayama prefecture, and Hiroshima prefecture in Japan during this pandemic period. This study aims to understand the effects of centralization and decentralization on implementation of PCR testing policy. These concepts are constructed by integration, legitimacy, and leadership. The text-mining-based co-occurrence network diagram helps us to observe which aspects of each local government's policies were affected by centralization and decentralization. Based on this analysis, the author found that local governments should actively seek responses from the central government to promote integration between central and local governments. The success of PCR testing policy in centralization is particularly due to the facts that local governments presented new policy proposals to the central government based on scientific evidence and that local governments treated the central government as an equal partner in the process. In the decentralization case, however, leadership should be developed among local governments. The formation of an integrated network among local governments is also effective in PCR testing policy. Finally, this study suggests that centralization and decentralization should strengthen the integration and leadership capacity of central and local governments in designing PCR testing policy. The policy recommendations clarify the central government’s obligation to integrate with local government proposals on a legal basis and developing BCPs through the use of local government integration and leadership. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T21:20:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2307202211470300.pdf: 3915210 bytes, checksum: 0d4b1b89ccc1744e9ffcc7da1c70e489 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Chapter 1 Study Background & Study Motivation -------------------------------------- 1 I. Study Motivation -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 II. Research Purpose ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Chapter 2 Literature Review ---------------------------------------------------------------- 7 I. Centralization and decentralization ----------------------------------------------------- 10 II. Centralization and decentralization under disaster management --------------------14 III. Governance network in Japan during COVID-19 pandemic ----------------------- 20 Chapter 3 Study Method -------------------------------------------------------------------- 36 I. Software KH Coder and data collection ------------------------------------------------ 38 II. Analysis method ---------------------------------------------------------------------------43 1. Detection of words from descriptive data ---------------------------------------------- 44 2. Co-occurrence analysis ------------------------------------------------------------------- 46 Chapter 4 Analysis of Research Data and Results --------------------------------------- 58 I. PCR testing management in Setagaya Ward ---------------------------------------------58 1. PCR testing management under the first state of emergency in Setagaya Ward ----67 2. PCR testing management under the second state of emergency in Setagaya Ward --70 3. PCR testing management under the third state of emergency in Setagaya Ward --- 76 II. PCR testing management in Wakayama Prefecture ----------------------------------- 80 1. PCR testing management under the first state of emergency in Wakayama Prefecture--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 89 2. PCR testing management under the second state of emergency in Wakayama Prefecture---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 92 3. PCR testing management under the third state of emergency in Wakayama Prefecture---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 97 III. PCR testing management in Hiroshima Prefecture ----------------------------------- 99 1. PCR testing management under the first state of emergency in Hiroshima Prefecture-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 108 2. PCR testing management under the second state of emergency in Hiroshima Prefecture ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 113 3. PCR testing management under the third state of emergency in Hiroshima Prefecture- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 119 Chapter 5 Discussion -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 122 I. Research Findings---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 122 1. Integration, legitimacy and leadership in PCR testing policy by coding-based co- occurrence network----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 122 2. Centralization and decentralization in the states of emergency and the factors in the disaster management model--------------------------------------------------------- 125 II. Research Comparison ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 128 1. Centralization -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 128 2. Decentralization ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 130 Chapter 6 Conclusion-------------------------------------------------------------------- 131 I. Research Contribution --------------------------------------------------------------------- 131 1. Centralization efficiency during PCR testing management -------------------------- 131 2. Decentralization efficiency during PCR testing management ----------------------- 132 3. Efficient management of PCR testing policies and their effectiveness due to infectious disease outbreaks-------------------------------------------------------------------- 133 II. Policy Suggestions-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 135 1. Centralization and decentralization ------------------------------------------------------ 135 2. Suggestions for PCR testing policy based on centralization and decentralization ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 136 References ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------143 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | COVID-19 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 災害管理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 政策網絡 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 分權化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 集權化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 核酸檢測 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | centralization | en |
| dc.subject | policy network | en |
| dc.subject | PCR testing | en |
| dc.subject | decentralization | en |
| dc.subject | disaster management | en |
| dc.subject | COVID-19 | en |
| dc.title | 了解日本中央與地方政府協作治理:以世田谷區、 和歌山縣和廣島縣COVID-19-PCR檢測政策為案例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Understanding the cooperation between the national and local government's responses in Japan:The case of the PCR testing policy for Covid19 in Setagaya Ward, Wakayama and Hiroshima | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 洪美仁(Mei Jen Hung), 陳建仁(Chien-Jen Chen) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 集權化,分權化,政策網絡,災害管理,COVID-19,核酸檢測, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | centralization,decentralization,policy network,disaster management,COVID-19,PCR testing, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 161 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202201657 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-07-26 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共事務研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 公共事務研究所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-2307202211470300.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 3.82 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
