Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 工業工程學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8368
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor黃奎隆(Kwei-Long Huang)
dc.contributor.authorChen-Yun Tsaien
dc.contributor.author蔡榛芸zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-20T00:52:54Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-04
dc.date.available2021-05-20T00:52:54Z-
dc.date.copyright2020-08-04
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.submitted2020-07-30
dc.identifier.citationC. Billington, H. L. Lee, C. S. Tang (1998). “Successful Strategies for Product Rollovers”. Spring 1998, Vol.39(3)
G.P. Cachon, M.A. Lariviere (1999b). “Capacity allocation using past sales: When to turn-and-earn”. Management Science, Vol.45(5): 685–703
E. Koca, G. C. Souza, C. T. Druehl (2010). “Managing Product Rollovers”. Decision Sciences, Vol.41(2)
P. Ghemawat, J.L. Nueno (2003). “Zara: Fast fashion. Case study”. Harvard Business School. Boston, MA
M.A. Cusumano, K. Nobeoka (1998). “Thinking Beyond Lean: How Multi-Project Management is Transforming Product Development at Toyota and Companies”. Simon and Schuster, Free Press, New York
F. Erhun, P. Concalves, J. Hopman (2007). “The art of managing new product transitions”. MIT Sloan Management Rev., Vol.48(3): 73–80
G.E. Greenley, B.L. Bayus (1994). “ A comparative study of product launch and elimination decisions in UK and US companies.”. European Journal of Marketing, Vol.28(2):5–29
L. Chao, C. Metin, P. S. Suresh (2014). “Analysis of Product Rollover Strategies in the Presence of Strategic Customers”. Management Science, Vol.60(4):805-1081
A. Dhebar (1994). “Durable-Goods Monopolists, Rational Consumers, and Improving Products”. Marketing Science, Vol.13(1): 100-120
G.P. Cachon, M.A. Lariviere (1999a). “An equilibrium analysis of linear, proportional and uniform allocation of scarce capacity”. IIE Transaction, Vol.31(9): 835-849
G.P. Cachon, M.A. Lariviere (1999c). “Capacity choice and allocation: Strategic behavior and supply chain performance”. Management Science, Vol.45(8): 1091–1108
S. Mallik, P.T. Harker (2004). “Coordinating supply chains with competition: Capacity allocation in semiconductor manufacturing”. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.159(2): 330-347
H. Zou, J.Z. Ding (2008). “Analysis of capacity allocation for sea cargo based on revenue management”. IEEE
D. Sturm, K. Fischer (2019). “A cabin capacity allocation model for revenue management in the cruise industry”. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Vol.18:441-450
M. L. Fisher (1997). “What is the right supply chain for your product?”. Harvard Bus. Rev., Vol.75:28-40
E. J. Durango-Cohen, C. A. Yano (2006). “Supplier commitment and production decisions under a forecast-commitment contract”. Management Science, Vol.52(1): 54-67
P. L. Abad (1996). “Optimal pricing and lot-sizing under conditions of perishability and partial backordering”. Management Science, Vol.42(8)
A.V. Iyer, V. Deshpande, Z. P. Wu (2003). “A postponement model for demand management.”. Management Science, Vol.49(8) : 983-1002
A. K. Chakravarty, N. Balakrishnan (2004). “Real-time revision of order quantities with capacity constraints: A single period model.”. Production Operation Management, Vol.13(2) :171-1
H.L. Lee, V. Padmanabhan, S.J. Whang (1997). “Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect”. Management Science, Vol.43(4): 546-558
Z. Liu (2012). “Equilibrium Analysis of Capacity Allocation with Demand Competition”. Naval Research Logistics, Vol.59(3-4): 254-265
J. Li, N. Yu, Z. iu, X. Cai (2017). “Allocation with Demand Competition: Uniform, Proportional, and Lexicographic Mechanisms”. Naval Research Logistics, Vol.64(2): 85-107
L. X. Lu, M.A. Lariviere (2012). “Capacity Allocation over a Long Horizon: The Return on Turn-and-Earn”. Manufacturing Service Operations Management, Vol.14(1): 24-41
D. Cohen-Vernik, D. Purohit (2014). “Turn-and-Earn Incentives with a Product Line”. Management Science, Vol.60(2): 400-414
J.A. Norton, F.M. Bass (1987). “A diffusion theory model of adoption and substitution for successive generations of high-technology products”. Management Science, Vol.33(9) : 1068-1086
A. Yossi, P. Amit (2008). “Optimal Pricing of Seasonal Products in the Presence of Forward-Looking Consumers”. Manufacturing Service Operations Management, Vol.10(3):339-359
C.W. Kuo, K.L. Huang (2011). “Dynamic pricing of limited inventories for multi-generation products”. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.217(2): 394-403
N. Kilicay-Ergin, C-Y Lin, G.E. Okudan (2015). “Analysis of dynamic pricing scenarios for multiple-generation product lines”. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, Vol.24(1):107-129
J.C. Liu, X. Zhai, L.H. Chen (2018). “The interaction between product rollover strategy and pricing scheme”. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol.201:116-135
C.K. Anderson, J.G. Wilson (2003). “Wait or Buy? The Strategic Consumer: Pricing and Profit Implications”. Cornell University School of Hotel Administration, http://scholarship.sha.cornell.edu/articles/440
X.M. Su (2007). “Intertemporal Pricing with Strategic Customer Behavior”. Management Science, Vol.53(5)
Y.T. Lin, A. K. Parlaktürk, J. M. Swaminathan (2018). “Are Strategic Customers Bad for a Supply Chain?”. Manufacturing Service Operations Management, Vol.20(3) : 389-600
J.C. Liu, X. Zhai, L.H. Chen (2018). “The interaction between product rollover strategy and pricing scheme”. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol.201:116-135
 
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8368-
dc.description.abstract由於科技快速進步與消費者消費型態的轉變,產品生命週期愈來愈短,新產品不斷推陳出新,市面上販售多世代產品現象已成為常態。假設公司生產新產品的資源有限,供應商提供新產品給下游零售商的量因而受到限制,因此廠商需做產能分配規劃,供應商依照第一期的銷售量提供第二期新產品的訂購量,其中產能分配規則包含轉嫁分配(Turn-and-earn Allocation)及固定均分(Fixed Allocation),而生產舊產品技術成熟,因此產能不受限制。當供應商有兩種不同供應策略時,其中一個為單一產品策略(Single Rollover),即在第二期供應商只提供新產品讓顧客選擇購買與否,另一個為雙產品策略(Dual Rollover),即在第二期提供新舊兩世代的產品。本研究假設一供應商在產能限制下需決定使用何種產能分配規則(Capacity Allocation)及產品導入策略(Product Rollovers),亦稱為產品滾動,並建立一個兩階段的賽局模型,每個階段中消費者皆會衡量對產品的願付價格與零售價格間的差異來使效用最大化,並決定是否購買產品,探討策略性消費者的行為會如何影響新舊產品各別的市佔率及零售商定價策略,並使零售商利潤最大化,此外,也會探討在不同參數設定下供應商之最佳策略。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractDue to rapid development of technology and the transformation of customers’ consumption habits, many firms launch their new products frequently to capture more market share and increase their profits. However, resources are limited, so new products are allocated under limited capacity. We assume the techniques of manufacturing old products are mature. Thus, they can be produced without capacity. This paper proposes a two-period game theory model. All of the customers are strategic and heterogeneous with respect to their value to of each generational product. This paper mainly studies the case when if one firm has two different rollover strategies, how their decision affects the market pricing and maximizes their profits. The firm sells the old generational products in the first phase no matter which strategy they choose. However, the difference will happen in the second phase. The firm washes out old products when the new products are released, which is called single rollover. On the other hand, the firm simultaneously sells the old generational product at a mark-down price and launches the new product at a fixed price, which is called dual rollover. Based on the above strategies and considering the utility of the consumers, we can forecast the market demand and set the optimal market price to maximize the firm’s profits.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T00:52:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-2907202000235100.pdf: 3509236 bytes, checksum: 59a11daacdf1b79398f7223ddd5fc27c (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2020
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員審定書 i
致謝 ii
摘要 iii
ABSTRACT iv
目錄 v
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機與目的 5
1.3 研究架構 7
第二章 文獻探討 8
2.1 產品導入策略 8
2.2 產能分配策略 9
2.3 多世代產品定價策略 11
2.4 策略型消費者行為對定價影響 12
第三章 問題描述與模型建構 13
3.1 問題描述與定義 13
3.1.1 供應商設定 15
3.1.2 零售商設定 16
3.1.3 消費者設定 16
3.2 模型建構與求解 17
3.2.1 單滾動策略 20
3.2.2 雙滾動策略 32
第四章 數值分析 48
4.1 利潤分析 48
4.1.1 產能限制K對利潤影響 49
4.1.2 新產品價值β對利潤影響 53
4.1.3 新產品定價p22對利潤影響 55
4.1.4 舊新產品批發價w1、w2對利潤影響 57
4.2 供應商最適策略分析 62
4.2.1 顧客期望值α、β對於供應商策略影響 63
4.2.2 舊新產品批發價w1、w2對供應商策略影響 64
4.2.3 新產品定價p22與β對供應商策略影響 65
第五章 結論 67
5.1 研究總結 67
5.2 未來研究方向 68
參考文獻 70
附錄 74
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title有限產能分配下之產品導入與最適定價策略zh_TW
dc.titleOptimal Pricing and Limited Capacity Allocation Strategies under Product Rolloversen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear108-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee郭佳瑋(Chia-Wei Kuo),羅明琇(Ming-Shiow Lo)
dc.subject.keyword產能分配,產品導入,策略性消費者,供應鏈管理,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordcapacity allocation,strategic customer,product rollovers,supply chain,en
dc.relation.page76
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202002009
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2020-07-31
dc.contributor.author-college工學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept工業工程學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:工業工程學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
U0001-2907202000235100.pdf3.43 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved