請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/83099完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 趙儀珊 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Yee-San Teoh | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蔡易衡 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yi-Heng Tsai | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-08T17:04:23Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-01-06 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-11-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 教育部統計處 (2019，12月4日)。107學年度高級中等學校教育消費支出調查。資料引自https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/ebook/Edupay/107edupay_high.pdf
教育部統計處 (2021，12月29日)。109學年度國民中學教育消費支出調查。資料引自https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/ebook/Edupay/109edupay_junior.pdf 教育部統計處 (2022，5月24日)。109學年高級中等學校應屆畢業生升學就業概況調查提要分析。資料引自https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/analysis/109high_graduate_ana.pdf Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469. Banfield, J. D., & Raftery, A. E. (1993). Model-Based Gaussian and Non-Gaussian Clustering. Biometrics, 49(3), 803. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532201 Batool, S. S., & Ghayas, S. (2020). Process of career identity formation among adolescents: Components and factors. Heliyon, 6(9), e04905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04905 Bauer, D.J. & Steinley, D. (2022). Latent Class/Cluster Analysis and Mixture Modeling [Workshop notes]. Curran-Bauer Analytics, LLC. Becht, A. I., Nelemans, S. A., Branje, S. J. T., Vollebergh, W. A. M., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2021). Daily Identity Dynamics in Adolescence Shaping Identity in Emerging Adulthood: An 11-Year Longitudinal Study on Continuity in Development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(8), 1616–1633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01370-3 Bennion, L. D., & Adams, G. R. (1986). A revision of the extended version of the objective measure of ego identity status: An identity instrument for use with late adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 1(2), 183–197. Blakemore, S.-J., & Mills, K. L. (2014). Is Adolescence a Sensitive Period for Sociocultural Processing? Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115202 Blustein, D. L., & Noumair, D. A. (1996). Self and Identity in Career Development: Implications for Theory and Practice. Journal of Counseling & Development, 74(5), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1996.tb01889.x Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 Crocetti, E., Rubini, M., & Meeus, W. (2008). Capturing the dynamics of identity formation in various ethnic groups: Development and validation of a three-dimensional model. Journal of Adolescence, 31(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.09.002 Crone, E. A., & Dahl, R. E. (2012). Understanding adolescence as a period of social–affective engagement and goal flexibility. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(9), 636–650. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3313 Eccles, J., & Roeser, R. W. (2009). Schools, Academic Motivation, and Stage-Environment Fit. Handbook of Adolescent Psychology. https://is.muni.cz/el/fss/podzim2010/PSY516/um/EcclesRoeser12.pdf Eccles, J. S. (2008). Agency and Structure in Human Development. Research in Human Development, 5(4), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427600802493973 Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis (Issue 7). WW Norton & company. Flum, H., & Blustein, D. L. (2000). Reinvigorating the study of vocational exploration: A framework for research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56(3), 380–404. Flum, H., & Kaplan, A. (2006). Exploratory Orientation as an Educational Goal. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_3 Flum, H., & Kaplan, A. (2012). Identity formation in educational settings: A contextualized view of theory and research in practice. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(3), 240–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.01.003 Geiser, C., Burns, G. L., & Servera, M. (2014). Testing for measurement invariance and latent mean differences across methods: Interesting incremental information from multitrait-multimethod studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01216 Germeijs, V., Luyckx, K., Notelaers, G., Goossens, L., & Verschueren, K. (2012). Choosing a major in higher education: Profiles of students’ decision-making process. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(3), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.12.002 Goossens, L. (2001). Global versus domain-specific statuses in identity research: A comparison of two self-report measures. Journal of Adolescence, 24(6), 681–699. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.2001.0438 Hatano, K., Luyckx, K., Hihara, S., Sugimura, K., & I. Becht, A. (2022). Daily Identity Processes and Emotions in Young Adulthood: A Five-Day Daily-Diary Method. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 51(9), 1815–1828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-022-01629-x Hatano, K., & Sugimura, K. (2017). Is adolescence a period of identity formation for all youth? Insights from a four-wave longitudinal study of identity dynamics in Japan. Developmental Psychology, 53(11), 2113–2126. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000354 Hatano, K., Sugimura, K., Crocetti, E., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2020). Diverse‐and‐Dynamic Pathways in Educational and Interpersonal Identity Formation during Adolescence: Longitudinal Links With Psychosocial Functioning. Child Development, 91(4), 1203–1218. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13301 Hatano, K., Sugimura, K., & Luyckx, K. (2020). Do Identity Processes and Psychosocial Problems Intertwine with Each Other? Testing the Directionality of Between- and Within-Person Associations. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(2), 467–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01182-0 Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 Kaplan, A., & Flum, H. (2009). Motivation and identity: The relations of action and development in educational contexts—An introduction to the special issue. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 73–77. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications. Kroger, J. (1986). The relative importance of identity status interview components: Replication and extension. Journal of Adolescence, 9(4), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1971(86)80040-9 Lee, C.-T., & Beckert, T. E. (2012). Taiwanese adolescent cognitive autonomy and identity development: The relationship of situational and agential factors. International Journal of Psychology, 47(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2011.572972 Lee, C.-T., Beckert, T. E., & Goodrich, T. R. (2010). The Relationship Between Individualistic, Collectivistic, and Transitional Cultural Value Orientations and Adolescents’ Autonomy and Identity Status. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(8), 882–893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9430-z Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A., van Geert, P., Bosma, H., & Kunnen, S. (2008). Time and identity: A framework for research and theory formation. Developmental Review, 28(3), 370–400. Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., & Beyers, W. (2006). Unpacking commitment and exploration: Preliminary validation of an integrative model of late adolescent identity formation. Journal of Adolescence, 29(3), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.03.008 Luyckx, K., Schwartz, S. J., Berzonsky, M. D., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Smits, I., & Goossens, L. (2008). Capturing ruminative exploration: Extending the four-dimensional model of identity formation in late adolescence. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(1), 58–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.04.004 Mackinnon, S. P., Curtis, R., & O’Connor, R. (2020). A Tutorial in Longitudinal Measurement Invariance and Cross-lagged Panel Models Using Lavaan [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tkzrb Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(5), 551. Mastrotheodoros, S., & Motti-Stefanidi, F. (2017). Dimensions of Identity Development Scale (DIDS): A test of longitudinal measurement invariance in Greek adolescents. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14(5), 605–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2016.1241175 McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64. Meeus, W. (1993). Occupational identity development, school performance, and social support in adolescence: Findings of a Dutch study. Adolescence, 28(112), 809–819. Meeus, W., Van De Schoot, R., Keijsers, L., Schwartz, S. J., & Branje, S. (2010). On the Progression and Stability of Adolescent Identity Formation: A Five-Wave Longitudinal Study in Early-to-Middle and Middle-to-Late Adolescence: Identity Transitions. Child Development, 81(5), 1565–1581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01492.x Meijers, F. (1998). The development of a career identity. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 20(3), 191–207. Melgosa, J. (1987). Development and validation of the occupational identity scale. Journal of Adolescence, 10(4), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1971(87)80019-2 Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. K. (2000). Integrating Person-Centered and Variable-Centered Analyses: Growth Mixture Modeling With Latent Trajectory Classes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24(6), 882–891. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb02070.x Nurmi, J.-E. (1989). Development of Orientation to the Future During Early Adolescence: A Four-Year Longitudinal Study and Two Cross-Sectional Comparisons. International Journal of Psychology, 24(1–5), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.1989.10600042 Penuel, W. R., & Wertsch, J. V. (1995). Vygotsky and identity formation: A sociocultural approach. Educational Psychologist, 30(2), 83-92. Pocuca, N., Browne, R. P., & McNicholas, P. D. (2021). mixture: Mixture Models for Clustering and Classification. R package version 2.0.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mixture Polenova, E., Vedral, A., Brisson, L., & Zinn, L. (2018). Emerging Between Two Worlds: A Longitudinal Study of Career Identity of Students From Asian American Immigrant Families. Emerging Adulthood, 6(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696817696430 Porfeli, E. J., Lee, B., Vondracek, F. W., & Weigold, I. K. (2011). A multi‐dimensional measure of vocational identity status. Journal of Adolescence, 34(5), 853–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.02.001 R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/. Rizopoulos, D. (2006). ltm: An R package for Latent Variable Modelling and Item Response Theory Analyses, Journal of Statistical Software, 17 (5), 1-25. URL https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v017.i05 Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. URL https://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/. Schmitt, N., & Kuljanin, G. (2008). Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications. Human Resource Management Review, 18(4), 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.03.003 Schwartz, S. J., Beyers, W., Luyckx, K., Soenens, B., Zamboanga, B. L., Forthun, L. F., Hardy, S. A., Vazsonyi, A. T., Ham, L. S., Kim, S. Y., Whitbourne, S. K., & Waterman, A. S. (2011). Examining the Light and Dark Sides of Emerging Adults’ Identity: A Study of Identity Status Differences in Positive and Negative Psychosocial Functioning. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(7), 839–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9606-6 Skorikov, V., & Vondracek, F. W. (1998). Vocational Identity Development: Its Relationship to Other Identity Domains and to Overall Identity Development. Journal of Career Assessment, 6(1), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/106907279800600102 Stanley, D. (2021). apaTables: Create American Psychological Association (APA) Style Tables. R package version 2.0.8. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=apaTables Stringer, K. J., & Kerpelman, J. L. (2010). Career Identity Development in College Students: Decision Making, Parental Support, and Work Experience. Identity, 10(3), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2010.496102 Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095521 Titterington, D. M., Afm, S., Smith, A. F., & Makov, U. E. (1985). Statistical analysis of finite mixture distributions (Vol. 198). John Wiley & Sons Incorporated. Walrath, C., Petras, H., Mandell, D. S., Stephens, R. L., Holden, E. W., & Leaf, P. J. (2004). Gender differences in patterns of risk factors among children receiving mental health services: Latent class analyses. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 31(3), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287292 Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York. Wickham et al., (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1686, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686 Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. Wiggins, B. J., & Christopherson, C. D. (2019). The replication crisis in psychology: An overview for theoretical and philosophical psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 39, 202–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000137 Wong, Z. Y., & Kaur, D. (2018). The role of vocational identity development and motivational beliefs in undergraduates’ student engagement. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 31(3), 294-316. Yi, C.-C., & Wu, C.-I. (2004). Teen life around the world: Introduction to teen life in Taiwan. Teen Life around the World, 223–241. Yi, C.-C., Wu, C.-I., Chang, Y.-H., & Chang, M.-Y. (2009). The Psychological Well-Being of Taiwanese Youth: School versus Family Context from Early to Late Adolescence. International Sociology, 24(3), 397–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580909102914 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/83099 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 自我認定（self-identity）發展為青少年的核心發展任務（developmental task），近年來相關學者使用五因子模型（five-factor identity process model）來捕捉自我認定歷程的變化，然而過往研究多著重在西方的文化脈絡與整體自我認定（global identity），無法確定該理論模型在台灣文化與職涯自我認定（occupational self-identity）之適用性。為此，本預先註冊（preregistered）研究收集全台灣1789名大學生職涯自我認定量表之填答資料，以了解其發展歷程上不同的潛在剖面。驗證性因素分析（confirmatory factor analysis）結果顯示職涯自我認定符合五因子結構：做出承諾（commitment making）、認同承諾（identification with commitment）、廣度探索（exploration in breadth）、深度探索（exploration in depth）及反芻型探索（ruminative exploration），且在生理女性與男性上符合測量恆等性（measurement invariance）。為增加結果之可複製性，總樣本被偽隨機分為二子樣本後進行潛在剖面分析（latent profile analysis, LPA），結果皆發現五種職涯自我認定歷程潛在剖面：確定探索型（definitive explorative）、未定探索型一與二（indefinitve explorative I & II）、延長探索型 （extended explorative）及平衡探索型（balanced explorative）。其中，任一潛在剖面皆呈現較高程度的廣度與深度探索，為先前研究所未觀察到之現象。本研究探討了台灣大學生職涯自我認定發展歷程之潛在剖面，結果可作為未來相關研究與教育政策的參考依據。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Developing one's self-identity is crucial for adolescents. Recent studies have captured the process of self-identity development using the five-factor model. However, previous studies have mostly focused on global self-identity development in Western culture. So far, there is no study using the five-factor model to explore occupational self-identity process of Taiwanese undergraduate students. To investigate the possible profiles of occupational self-identity process, this preregistered study collected the responses of 1789 Taiwanese undergraduate students on the Dimensions of Identity Development Scale for Occupational Self-identity. The result of confirmatory factor analysis supported the five-factor structure (i.e., commitment making, identification with commitment, exploration in breadth, exploration in depth, ruminative exploration). The measurement invariance for female and male was also confirmed. In addition, latent profile analysis (LPA) identified five profiles of the occupational self-identity process: definitive explorative, indefinitve explorative I & II, extended explorative, and balanced explorative. Unlike previous studies, no students demonstrated lower levels of exploration. LPA results are replicated across two subsamples drawn pseudorandomly from the entire data set. This study examined the profiles of Taiwanese undergraduate students' occupational self-identity process and discussed implications for future research and educational policy. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-01-08T17:04:22Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-01-08T17:04:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 第一章 緒論與文獻回顧 1 第一節 自我認定發展作為青少年的主要發展任務 1 第二節 自我認定歷程之測量 2 第三節 整體自我認定與子面向自我認定 6 第四節 職涯自我認定 7 第五節 社會文化對自我認定之形塑 9 第六節 台灣社會文化對大學生職涯自我認定發展之影響 10 第七節 研究問題與預期 12 第二章 研究方法 14 第一節 研究參與者 14 第二節 研究流程 15 第三節 研究工具 16 第四節 資料前處理 18 第五節 資料分析 19 第三章 研究結果 24 第一節 總樣本資料分析 24 第二節 子樣本資料分析 28 第四章 討論 37 第一節 職涯自我認定歷程的因素結構 37 第二節 生理女性與男性之測量恆等性 39 第三節 職涯自我認定之潛在剖面 39 第四節 研究優勢、限制及未來方向 44 第五節 研究結論 47 參考文獻 48 附錄一 倫理審查核可證明 57 附錄二 有效與無效樣本在變項間之比較 58 附錄三 各參數限制之模型適配度 61 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 台灣大學生 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 潛在剖面分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 職涯自我認定 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 探索 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 承諾 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 青少年 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | exploration | en |
| dc.subject | occupational self-identity | en |
| dc.subject | latent profile analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Taiwanese undergraduate students | en |
| dc.subject | adolescents | en |
| dc.subject | commitment | en |
| dc.title | 台灣大學生職涯自我認定歷程發展: 二樣本之潛在剖面分析研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Occupational Self-identity Processes in Taiwanese Undergraduate Students: A Two-Sample Replicated Latent Profile Analysis Study | en |
| dc.title.alternative | Occupational Self-identity Processes in Taiwanese Undergraduate Students: A Two-Sample Replicated Latent Profile Analysis Study | - |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳慧娟;周珮雯 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Huey-Jiuan Chen;Pei-Wern Chou | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 職涯自我認定,潛在剖面分析,台灣大學生,青少年,承諾,探索, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | occupational self-identity,latent profile analysis,Taiwanese undergraduate students,adolescents,commitment,exploration, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 61 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202210029 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-11-07 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0418221105457114.pdf | 2.31 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。