請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/82257完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 趙義隆(Yi-Long Jaw) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kuo-Feng Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王國鳳 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-25T06:34:30Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2021-11-02 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-10-19 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Adner, R. 2017. Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1): 39-58. Afuah, A. 2003. Redefining firm boundaries in the face of the internet: Are firms really shrinking?. Academy of Management Review, 28, 34-53. Ahmad, N. 2019. Improving the accounting frameworks for analyses of global value chains. Chapter 8, in Global Value Chain Development Report 2019: Technical innovation, supply chain trade, and workers in a globalized world. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. Alfaro, L., Antras, P., Chor, D., Conconi, P. 2019. Internalizing global value chains: A firm-level analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 127(2): 508-559. Agarwal, S., Ramaswami, S. N. 1992. Choices of foreign market entry mode: Impact of ownership, location and internalization factors. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1): 1-27. Amador, J., Cabral, S. 2017. Networks of value‐added trade, The World Economy, 40 (7): 1291-1313. Amit, R., Zott, C., 2001. Value creation in E-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (6/7): 493-520. Antras, P., Chor, D. 2018. On the measurement of upstreamness and downstreamness in global value chains. In L. Y. Ing, and M. Yu (Eds), World trade evolution: Growth, productivity and employment. Taylor Francis Group, 126-194. Antras, P., Chor, D., Fally, T., Hillberry, R. 2012. Measuring the upstreamness of production and trade flows. American Economic Review, 102(3): 412-416. Arndt, S. W. 1997. Globalization and the open economy. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 8: 71-79. Arndt, S. W., Kierzkowski, H. 2001. Fragmentation: New production patterns in the world economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Baccini, L., Pinto, P., Weymouth, D. 2017. The distributional consequences of preferential trade liberalization: Firm level evidence. International Organization, 71(2): 373-395. Baden-Fuller, C., Morgan, M. S. 2010. Business models as models. Long Range Planning, 43: 156-171. Baldwin, R. 2006. Globalisation: The Great Unbundling(s). Finland: Prime Minister’s Office, Economic Council of Finland. Baldwin, R. 2011. 21st century regionalism: Filling the gap between 21st century trade and 20th century trade rules. CEPR Policy Insight, 56, Centre for Economic Policy Research. Baldwin, R. 2014. Trade and industrialization after globalization’s second unbundling: How building and joining a supply chain are different and why it matters, In R.C. Feenstra and A.M. Taylor (Eds.), Globalization in an Age of Crisis: Multilateral Economic Cooperation in the Twenty-First Century, 5: 165-212. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Baldwin, R., Lopez-Gonzalez, J. 2015. Supply-chain trade: A portrait of global patterns and several testable hypotheses. The World Economy, 38(11): 1682-1721. Baldwin, R. Robert-Nicoud, R. 2014. Trade-in-goods and trade-in-tasks: An integrating framework. Journal of International Economics, 92(1): 51-62. Baldwin, R., Venables, A. J. 2013. Spiders and snakes: offshoring and agglomeration in the global economy. Journal of International Economics, 90(2): 245–254. Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120. Barney, J. B. 2001. Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 41-56. Benito, G. R., Petersen, B., Welch, L. S. 2019. The global value chain and internalization theory. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(8): 1414-1423. Berndt, C., Boeckler, M. 2009. Geographies of circulation and exchange: Constructions of markets. Progress in Human Geography, 33: 535-51. Best, Michael. 1990. The new competition. Institutions of restructuring. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Bigelow, L. S., Barney, J. B. 2021. What can strategy learn from the business model approach? Journal of Management Studies, 58(2): 528-539. Borin, A., Mancini, M. 2015. Follow the value added: Bilateral gross export accounting. Bank of Italy Working Paper, No. 1026, Bank of Italy, Rome, Italy. Borin, A., Mancini, M. 2019. Measuring what matters in global value chains and value-added trade. Policy Research Working Paper, No. 8804. WDR 2020 Background Paper. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. Borrus, M., Ernst, D., Haggard, S. 2000. International Production Networks in Asia: Rivalry or Riches?, Routledge: London and New York. Buckley, P. J. 2009a. The impact of the global factory on economic development. Journal of World Business, 44(2): 131-143. Buckley, P. J. 2009b. Internalization thinking: from the multinational enterprise to the global factory. International Business Review, 18(3): 224-235. Buckley, P. J. 2010. The role of headquarters in the global factory. In U. Andersson, U. Holm (Eds.), Managing the contemporary multinational - the role of headquarters, 60-84. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Buckley, P. J. 2011. International integration and coordination in the global factory. Management International Review, 51: 269-283. Buckley, P. J. 2012. The multinational enterprise as a global factory. In A. Verbeke, H. Merchant (Eds.), Handbook of Research on International Strategic Management, 77-92. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Buckley, P. J., Casson, M. C. 1976. The future of the multinational enterprise. London: Macmillan. Buckley, P. J., Craig, T. D., Mudambi, R. 2019. Time to learn? Assignment duration in global value chain organization. Journal of Business Research, 103(1): 508-518. Buckley, P. J., Ghauri, P. N. 2004. Globalisation, economic geography and the strategy of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2): 81-98. Buckley, P.J. Strange, R. 2015. The governance of the global factory: location and control of world economic activity. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(2): 237-249. Caliskan, K., Callon, M. 2010. Economization, part 2: A research programme for the study of markets. Economy and Society, 38: 369-98. Campa, J., Goldberg, L. S. 1997. The evolving external orientation of manufacturing: a profile of four countries. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, 3: 53-81. Casadesus-Masanell, R., Ricart, J. E. 2007. Competing through business models. IESE Business School Working Paper, 713. Casadesus‐Masanell, R., Zhu, F. 2013. Business model innovation and competitive imitation: The case of sponsor‐based business models. Strategic Management Journal, 34: 464-482. Cennamo, C., Santalo, J. 2013. Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strategic Management Journal, 34: 1331-1350. Chase, K. 2003. Economic interests and regional trading arrangements: The case of NAFTA. International Organization, 57(1): 137-174. Chesbrough, H. W. 2007a. Business model innovation: It’s not just about technology anymore. Strategy and Leadership, 35: 12-17. Chesbrough, H. W. 2007b. Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2): 22-28. Choi, N. 2019. Deeper regional integration and global value chains. In Working Paper Heliyon 7, No. e06112, Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Christensen, C. 1997. The innovator’s dilemma, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA. Climent, R. C., Haftor, D. M. 2021. Value creation through the evolution of business model themes. Journal of Business Research, 122: 353-361. Coe, N. M., Hess, M., Yeung, H. W. C., Dicken, P., Henderson, J. 2004. Globalizing regional development: A global production networks perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29: 468-484. Coe, N., Yeung, H. W. C. 2019. Global production networks: Mapping recent conceptual developments. Journal of Economic Geography, 19(4): 775-801. Coe, N. M., Yeung, H. W. C. 2015. Global production networks: Theorizing economic development in an interconnected world. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Collinson, S. C., Rugman, A. M. 2011. Relevance and rigor in international business teaching: using the CSA-FSA matrix. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 22(1): 29-37. Cooper, M. C., Ellram, L. M. 1993. Characteristics of supply chain management and the implication for purchasing and logistics strategy. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 4(2): 13-24. Cooper, M. C., Lambert, D. M., Pagh, J. D. 1997. Supply chain management: More than a new name for logistics. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 8(1) 1-14. Cooper, W. H. 2014. Free trade agreements: Impact on US trade and implications for US trade policy. Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service. Cox, J. F., Blackstone, J. H., Spencer, M. S. (Eds). 1995. APICS Dictionary, 8th ed., American Production and Inventory Control Society, Falls Church, VA. Daudin, G., Rifflart, C., Schweisguth, D. 2011. Who produces for whom in the world economy? Canadian Journal of Economics, 44(4): 1403-1437. De Backer, K., Miroudot, S. 2014. Mapping global value chains. ECB Working Paper No. 1677, European Central Bank, Frankfurt am Main. Demil, B., Lecocq, X. 2010. Business model evolution: In search of dynamic consistency. Long Range Planning, 43, 227-246. Dicken, P. 1992; 2007. Global Shift: The Internationalisation of Economic Activity, London: Paul Chapman Publishing. Dietzenbacher, E., Romero, I., Bosma, N. S. 2005. Using average propagation lengths to identify production chains in the Andalusian economy. Estudios de Economia Aplicada, 23(2): 405-22. Doganova, L., Eyquem-Renault, M. 2009. What do business models do? Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 38: 1559-1570. Dunning, J. H. 1980. Toward an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests. Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1): 9-31. Dunning, J. H. 1988. Explaining international production. London: Unwin Hyman. Dunning, J. H. 1993. The globalization of business. London and New York: Routledge. Dunning, J. H. 1994. Globalization, economic restructuring and development. Geneva: UNCTAD. Dunning, J. H. 1995. Reappraising the eclectic paradigm in the age of alliance capitalism. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3): 461-493. Dunning, J. H. 2000. The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity. International Business Review, 9(2): 163-190. Ellram, L. M., Cooper, M. C. 1990. Supply chain management, partnerships, and the shipper-third party relationship. International Journal of Logistics Management, 1(2): 1-10. Ernst, D., Ravenhill, J. 2000. Convergence and diversity: How globalization reshapes Asian production networks. In M. Borrus, D. Ernst and S. Haggard (Eds), International Production Networks in Asia: Rivalry or Riches? Abingdon: Routledge, 226–56. Escaith, H. 2017. Accumulated trade costs and their impact on domestic and international value chains. Chapter 4, in Global Value Chain Development Report 2017: Measuring and analyzing the impact of GVCs on economic development. Washington, DC. World Bank. Escaith, H., Inomata, S. 2013. Geometry of global value chains in East Asia: The role of industrial networks and trade policies. In Global Value Chains in a Changing World, edited by D. Elms and P. Low, 135-157. Geneva: WTO. Fally, T. 2011. On the fragmentation of production in the US. University of Colorado, Boulder. Fally, T. 2012. Production staging: Measurement and facts. University of Colorado-Boulder. mimeo. Feenstra, R. C. 2010. Offshoring in the global economy: microeconomic structure and macroeconomic implications. MA, MIT Press, Cambridge. Fally, T., Hillberry, R. 2018. A Coasian model of international production chains. Journal of International Economics. 114: 299-315. Feenstra, R. C. 1998. Integration of trade and disintegration of production in the global economy, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4): 31-50. Fernandez-Stark, K., Gereffi, G. 2019. Global value chain analysis: A primer (second edition). In S.Ponte, G. Gereffi, G. Raj-Reichert (Eds.). Handbook on global value chains, 54-76. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Foss, N. J., Saebi, T. 2017. Fifteen years of research on business model innovation: How far have we come, and where should we go? Journal of Management, 43(1): 200-227. Frederick, S. 2014. Combining the global value chain and global IO approaches. Discussion paper presented at the International Conference on the Measurement of International Trade and Economic Globalization, Aguascalientes, Mexico, 29. Frederick, S. 2019. Global value chain mapping. The Handbook on Global Value Chains. In Ponte, S., Gereffi, G., Raj-Reichert, G. (Eds.), Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, United Kingdom, 29-53. Fujita, M., Thisse, J., 2006. Globalization and the evolution of the supply chain: Who gains and who loses? International Economic Review, 47: 811-836. Gambardella, A., McGahan, A. M. 2010. Business-model innovation: General purpose technologies and their implications for industry structure. Long Range Planning, 43: 262-271. Gambardella, A., Torrisi, S. 1998. Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Evidence from the electronics industry. Research Policy, 27: 445-463. Geoffrion, A. M., Krishnan R. 2003. E-business and management science: Mutual impacts (Part 1 of 2). Management Science, 49(10): 1275-1286. Gereffi, G. 1994. The organization of buyer-driven global commodity chains: How U.S. retailers shape overseas production networks, in Gary Gereffi and Miguel Korzeniewicz (eds), Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism, Westport, CT: Praeger, 95-122. Gereffi, G. 1995. Global production systems and third world development. In B. Stallings (ed.), Global Change, Regional Response: The New International Context of Development, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 100-142. Gereffi, G. 1999. International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain. Journal of International Economics, 48(1): 37-70. Gereffi, G. 2001a. Beyond the producer-driven/buyer-driven dichotomy: The evolution of global value chains in the Internet era. IDS Bulletin, 32(3): 30-40. Gereffi, G. 2001b. Shifting governance structures in global commodity chains, with special reference to the Internet. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(10): 1616-1637. Gereffi, G. 2005. The global economy: organization, governance and development, in N.J. Smelser and R. Swedberg (eds), The Handbook of Economic Sociology, 2nd edition, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press and Russell Sage Foundation, 160-182. Gereffi, G. 2014. Global value chains in a post-Washington Consensus world. Review of International Political Economy, 21(1): 9-37. Gereffi, G. 2018. The emergence of global value chains: Ideas, institutions, and research communities. In Gary Gereffi, ed. Global value chains and development: Redefining the contours of 21st century capitalism. 1-39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Gereffi, G. 2019a. Economic upgrading in global value chains. In S. Ponte, G. Gereffi, G. Raj-Reichert (Eds), The handbook of global value chains. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Gereffi, G. 2019b. Global value chains and international development policy: Bringing firms, networks and policy-engaged scholarship back in. Journal of International Business Policy, 2(3): 195-210. Gereffi, G., Fernandez-Stark, K. 2011. Global value chain Analysis: A primer. Center on Globalization, Governance Competitiveness (CGGC), Durham, North Carolina, Duke University. Gereffi, G., Fernandez-Stark, K. 2016. Global value chain Analysis: A primer. Second Edition. Center on Globalization, Governance Competitiveness (CGGC), Durham, North Carolina, Duke University. Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., Kaplinsky, R., Sturgeon, T. J. 2001. Introduction: Globalisation, value chains and development. IDS Bull, 32(3): 1-8. Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., Sturgeon, T. 2005. The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1): 78-104. Gereffi, G., Korzeniewicz, M. 1990. Commodity chains and footwear exports in the semiperiphery. In: Martin, W. (Ed.), Semiperipheral states in the world economy. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 45-68. Gereffi, G., Korzeniewicz, M. 1994. Commodity chains and global capitalism. Westport, CT: Praeger. Gereffi, G. Lee, J. 2012. Why the world suddenly cares about global supply chains. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48(3): 24-32. Gereffi, G., Lee, J. 2016. Economic and social upgrading in global value chains and industrial clusters: Why Governance matters. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(1): 25-38. Gerlach, M. L. 1992. Alliance capitalism: The social organization of Japanese business. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Gibbon, P., Ponte, S. 2005. Trading down: Africa, value chains and the global economy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press. Gibbon, P., Bair, J., Ponte, S. 2008. Governing global value chains: An introduction. Economy and Society, 37(3): 315-338. Giroud, A., Mirza, H., 2015. Refining of FDI motivations by integrating global value chains’ considerations. Multinational Business Review, 23(1): 67-76. Global Value Chains Initiative. 2017. Global Value Chains Initiative [website], accessed 30 April 2019 at https://globalvaluechains.org/. Grossman, G. M., Helpman, E. 2002. Integration vs. outsourcing in industry equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1): 85-120. Grossman, G. M., Rossi-Hansberg, E. 2008. Trading tasks: A simple theory of offshoring. American Economic Review, 98: 1978-1997. Gui, L. 2010. Reshaping the boundaries of the firm: global value chains and lead firm strategies. In Pla-Barber, J. and Alegre, J. (Eds), Reshaping the Boundaries of the Firm in an Era of Global Interdependence, The Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, 5: 29-55. Hacklin, F., Marxt, C., Fahrni, F. 2009. Coevolutionary cycles of convergence: An extrapolation from the ICT industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76: 723-736. Hanson, G. H., Mataloni, R. J., Slaughter, M. J. 2005. Vertical production networks in multinational firms. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(4): 664-678. Hedman, J., Kalling, T. 2003. The business model concept: Theoretical underpinnings and empirical illustrations. European Journal of Information Systems, 12: 49-59. Helpman, E., 1984. A simple theory of trade with multinational corporations. Journal of Political Economy, 92: 451-471. Helpman, E., 2006. Trade, FDI and the organization of firms. Journal of Economic Literature, 44(3): 589-630. Henderson, J., Dicken, P., Hess, M., Coe, N., Yeung, H. W-C. 2002. Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Review of International Political Economy, 9 (3): 436-464. Hillemann, J., Gestrin, M. 2016. The limits of firm-level globalization: Revisiting the FSA/CSA matrix. International Business Review, 25(3): 767-775. Hopkins, T. H., Wallerstein, I. 1986. Commodity chains in the world economy prior to 1800. Review, 10: 157-170. Hummels, D., Ishii, J., Yi, K.-M. 2001. The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade. Journal of International Economics, 54(1): 75-96. Humphrey, J., Schmitz, H. 2002. How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters? Regional Studies, 36(9): 1017-1027. Hymer, S. H. 1976. The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Iansiti, M., Levien, R. 2004. The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Harvard Business School Press. Inomata, S. 2008. Average propagation lengths: A new concept of the ‘distance’ between industries, with an application to the Asia-Pacific region. Sangyo-Renkan, 16(1): 46-55. Inomata, S. 2017. Analytical frameworks for global value chains: An overview. In: Global Value Chain Development Report 2017: Measuring and analyzing the impact of GVCs on economic development. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, World Bank, 15-35. Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., Gawer, A. 2018. Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8): 2255-2276. Jaw, Y. L., Wang, K. F. 2018. RTAs network and market factor effects on trade: Evidence from Taiwan’s major electronics industry. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 20(8): 86-104. Jaw, Y. L., Wang, K. F. 2019. Impacts of regional network dynamics on Taiwan’s foreign trade and OFDI. Management Studies, 7(6): 624-639. Johanson, J., Vahlne, J.-E. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitment. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1): 23-32. Johanson, J., Vahlne, J.-E. 1990. The mechanism of internationalisation. International Marketing Review, 7(4): 11-24. Johanson, J., Vahlne, J.-E. 2009. The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9): 1411-1431. Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M., Kagermann, H. 2008. Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review, 86(12): 50-59. Johnson, R. C. 2018. Measuring global value chains. Annual Review Econmics, 10: 207-236. Johnson, R. C., Noguera, G. 2012a. Accounting for intermediates: Production sharing and trade in value added. Journal of International Economics, 86(2): 224-236. Johnson, R. C., Noguera, G. 2012b. Fragmentation and trade in value added over four decades. NBER Working Paper 18186. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Jones, L., Demirkaya, M., Bethmann, E. 2019. Global value chain analysis: Concepts and approaches. Journal of International Commerce and Economics, 1-29. Jones, R. W., Kierzkowski, H. 1990. The role of services in production and international trade: A theoretical framework. In R. W. Jones, A. O. Krueger (Eds.), The political economy of international trade: Festschrift in honor of Robert Baldwin. 31-48. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Jones, R. W., Kierzkowski, H. 2001a. A framework for fragmentation, Fragmentation: New production patterns in the world economy. In S. W. Arndt and H. Kierzkowski (Eds.), New York, Oxford University Press. Jones, R. W., Kierzkowski, H. 2001b. Globalization and consequences of international fragmentation. In R. Dornbusch, G. Galvo, M. Obsfeld (Eds.), Money, capital mobility and trade: Festchrift in honor of Robert A. Mundell, 365-383. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Kano, L. 2018. Global value chain governance: A relational perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(6): 684-705. Kano, L., Tsang, E. W. K., Yeung, H. W.-C. 2020. Global value chains: A review of a multi-disciplinary literature. Journal of International Business Studies, 1-46. Kaplinsky, R. 2000. Globalisation and unequalisation: What can be learned from value chain analysis? Journal of Development Studies, 37(2): 117-146. Kaplinsky, R. 2005. Globalization, poverty and inequality: Between a rock and a hard place. Malden, MA: Polity Press. Kaplinsky, R. 2013. Global value chains, where they came from, where they are going and why this is important. Innovation, Knowledge, Development Working Paper, 68: 1-25. Kim, S. K., Min, S. 2015. Business model innovation performance: When does adding a new business model benefit an incumbent? Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9: 34-57. Kogut, B. 1985. Designing global strategies: Comparative and competitive value-added chains. Sloan Management Review, 26(4): 15-28. Koopman, R., Powers, W., Wang, Z., Wei, S.-J. 2010. Give credit where credit is due: Tracing value added in global production chains. Research Working Paper, 16426. Cambridge, MA. Koopman, R., Wang, Z., Wei, S.-J. 2014. Tracing value-added and double counting in gross exports. American Economic Review, 104(2): 459-494. Krugman, P. 1995. Growing world trade: Causes and consequences. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Lakatos, I. 1970. Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge, 91-196. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Lambert, D. M. 1994. The International Center for Competitive Excellence, University of North Florida. Lanzolla, G., Markides, C. 2021. A business model view of strategy. Journal of Management Studies, 58(2): 540-553. Lazonick, W. 1991. Business organization and the myth of the market economy. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Lazonick, W. 1992. Business organization and competitive advantage: Capitalist transformation in the twentieth century. In G. Dosi, R. Giannelti P. A. Toninelli, editors, Technology and enterprise in a historical perspective, 119-63. Oxford, U.K.: Clarendon Press. Lecocq, X., Demil, B., Ventura, J. 2010. Business models as a research program in strategic management: An appraisal based on lakatos. Management, 13(4): 214-225. Lee, J. 2010. Global commodity chains and global value chains. In Denemark, R. A. (Ed.), The International Studies Encyclopedia, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 2987-3006. Lee, J. R., Chen, J. S. 2000. Dynamic synergy creation with multiple business activities: Toward a competence-based growth model for contract manufacturers. In Sanchez, R., Heene, A. (Eds), Theory Development for Competence-based Management, Advances in Applied Business Strategy, Stanford, CT: JAI Press, 6A, 209-228. Lee, J. Y., Jimenez, A., Yang, Y. S., Song, Y. 2020. Political risk, internal versus global value chain knowledge, and subsidiary operational integration. Global Strategy Journal, 10(3): 444-472. Leontief, W. 1936. Quantitative input and output relations in the economic system of the United States. The Review of Economic and Statistics, 18: 105-25. Li, F. 2020. The digital transformation of business models in the creative industries: A holistic framework and emerging trends. Technovation, 92-93, No. 102012. Li, X., Meng, B., Wang, Z. 2019. Recent patterns of global production and GVC participation, Chapter 1 in Global Value Chain Development Report 2019: Technical innovation, supply chain trade, and workers in a globalized world, World Bank Group, Washington. Lopez-Gonzalez, J., Munro, L., Gourdon, J., Mazzini, E., Andrenelli, A. 2019. Participation and benefits of SMEs in GVCs in Southeast Asia. OECD Trade Policy Paper, No. 231, OECD Publishing, Paris. Los, B., Timmer, M. P. 2018. Measuring bilateral exports of value added: A unified framework. NBER Working Paper, No. 24896. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Magretta, J., 2002. Why business models matter? Harvard Business Review, 80(5): 86-92. Markides, C. 2006. Disruptive innovation: In need of better theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23: 19-25. Markides, C. 2008. Game-changing strategies: How to create new market space in established industries by breaking the rules. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass. Markusen, J. R., Venables, A. J., 2007. Interacting factor endowments and trade costs: a multi-country, multi-good approach to trade theory. Journal of International Economics, 73: 333-354. Massa, L., Tucci, C. L. 2014. Business model innovation. In M. Dodgson, D. M. Gann N. Phillips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation management, 420-441. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Massa, L., Tucci, C. L., Afuah, A. 2017. A critical assessment of business model research. Academy of Management Annuals, 11(1): 73-104. Mathews, J. A. 2002. Competitive advantages of the late-comer firms: A resources-based account of industrial catch-up strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(4): 467-488. Mathews, J. A. 2003. Competitive dynamics and economic learning: An extended resource-based View. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(1): 115-145. Mayer, F., Gereffi, G. 2019. International development organizations and global value chains. The Handbook on Global Value Chains. In Ponte, S., Gereffi, G., Raj-Reichert, G. (Eds.), Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, United Kingdom, 570-584. Mayer, F., Phillips, N. 2017. Outsourcing governance: States and the politics of a global value chain world. New Political Economy, 22(2): 134-152. McWilliam, S. E., Kim, J. E., Mudambi, R., Nielsen, B. B. 2020. Global value chain governance: Intersections with international business. Journal of World Business, 55(4): 1-18. Mendelson, H. 2000. Organizational architecture and success in the information technology industry. Management Science, 46: 513-529. Meng, B., Ye, M., Wei, S.-J. 2020. Measuring smile curves in global value chains. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 82(5): 998-1016. Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., Zacharia, Z. G. 2001. Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2): 1-25. Michalet, C.-A. 1991. Strategic partnerships and the changing international process. In L. K. Mytelka, editor, Strategic partnerships. States, firms and international competition. London: Pinter Publishers. Miller, R. E., Temurshoev, U. 2017. Output upstreamness and input downstreamness of industries/countries in world production. International Regional Science Review, 40(5): 443-475. Moore, J. F. 1993. Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3): 75-86. Moore, J. F. 1996. The death of competition: Leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. New York: Harper Business. Mudambi, R. 2007. Offshoring: Economic geography and the multinational firm. Journal of International Business studies, 38(1): 206. Mudambi, R. 2008. Location, control and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(5): 699-725. Mudambi, R., Li, L., Ma, X., Makino, S., Qian, G., Boschma, R. 2018. Zoom in, zoom out: Geographic scale and multinational activity. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(8): 929-941. Mudambi, R., Venzin, M. 2010. The strategic nexus of offshoring and outsourcing decisions. Journal of Management Studies, 47(8): 1510-1533. Nielsen, B. B., Asmussen, C. G., Weatherall, C. D., 2017. The location choice of foreign direct investments: Empirical evidence and methodological challenges. Journal of World Business, 52(1): 62-82. Normann, R. 2001. Reframing business: When the map changes the landscape. Wiley: Chichester, U.K. North, D. C., Wallis, J. J. 1994. Integrating institutional change and technical change in economic history a transaction cost approach. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 150(4): 609-624. Ng, F., Yeats, A. 1999. Production sharing in East Asia: who does what for whom, and why?. Policy Research Working Paper, No. 2197, Washington, D.C., World Bank. OECD-WTO-World Bank Group. 2014. Global value chains: challenges, Opportunities, and implications for policy. Report prepared for submission to the G20 Trade Ministers Meeting, Sydney. OECD, 2017. TiVA 2016 Indicators: Definitions. Ornelas, E., Turner, J. L., Bickwit, G. 2021, Preferential trade agreements and global sourcing. Journal of International Economics, 128, No. 103395. Osiyevskyy, O., Dewald, J. 2015. Explorative versus exploitative business model change: The cognitive antecedents of firm level responses to disruptive innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9: 58-78. Pan, Y., Tse, D. K. 2000. The hierarchical model of market entry modes. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4), 535-554. Pananond, P., Gereffi, G., Pedersen, T., 2020. An integrative typology of global strategy and global value chains: the management and organization of cross-border activities. Global Strategy Journal, 10(3): 421-443. Piore, M. J., Sabel, C. F. 1984. The second industrial divide. New York: Basic Books. Ponte, S., Sturgeon, T. 2014. Explaining governance in global value chains: A modular theory-building effort. Review of International Political Economy, ……… | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/82257 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究開發一個「整合」和「槓桿」效應的分析架構，旨在分析全球價值鏈國際分割的現象中產品和產業的發展和演變。全球價值鏈的結構為基於全球生產和服務的相互鏈結和相互依存的網絡，本研究結合內在化和外在化的觀點以整合效應和槓桿效應來分析於全球價值鏈國際分割的參與程度。本研究的分析項目為台灣5項主要的高科技產品及3項主要的高科技產業。分析對象為台灣主要貿易夥伴：中國大陸、日本、美國和韓國。分析時期為2007至2019年。本研究主要分析方面：第一，全球價值鏈的理論探究。第二，開發「整合和槓桿效應」的分析架構來分析在全球價值鏈國際分割的參與程度。第三，建構整合及槓桿效應的參與程度的指標，並以參與程度呈現的效應來推論升級及治理的水平。於整合效應參與程度指標，以附加價值創造、全球生產網絡和出口訂單的國外及國內的生產傳播長度的四個指數來評估價值創造的分佈活動的參與程度，於槓桿效應參與程度指標，以對外及對內投資和出口訂單的國外生產的對外投資及國內生產的對內投資的四個指數來評估資源分配活動的參與程度。第四，應用「微笑曲線」概念及「供需關係」結構建立「生產者-鏈結」及「買者-鏈結」模型來衡量整合效應的參與程度和導致的升級水平的範圍，及以「生產者-拉動」及「買者-推動」模型來衡量槓桿效應的參與程度和導致的治理水平的範圍。第五，建構對整合效應參與程度指數的比較優勢影響因素及對槓桿效應參與程度指數的競爭優勢影響因素，探討此些參與程度是如何及為何受到影響。DOP指數估計結果顯示，產品類別大多數處於第3及第4價值鏈階段，而產品的國內生產趨向第2及第3價值鏈階段，產業類別之對外投資及生產趨向第3及第4價值鏈階段，而對內投資及生產趨向第1、2及3價值鏈階段。本研究採用縱橫資料的方法來估計此些影響因素對個別產品和產業的參與程度指數的影響，及個別產品和產業在貿易區塊網絡的國家的效應。估計結果顯示人力資源和效率以及人口增長的市場潛力是影響參與程度(內部和外部)的主要影響因素。在國與國之間的互動關係中，在價值創造的分佈活動的整合上與中國及美國之間的鏈結關係較為密切。在槓桿資源分配的投資活動中與周邊國家韓國、日本的配置關係較為密切，而在槓桿資源分配的訂單的生產活動的投資中與美國、日本的配置關係較為密切。本研究提出的研究架構和方法旨為填補全球價值鏈的理論基礎、實證分析和研究方法的研究缺口，對全球價值鏈的參與、升級和治理的相關研究做出貢獻，並為未來相關研究和政策制定者提供新的見解和啟示。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2022-11-25T06:34:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1910202116340900.pdf: 6970141 bytes, checksum: 302553fd36f04ce09ee11a060a51614d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | "口試委員會審定書………………………………………………………………………………….i 誌謝…………......…………………………………………………………………...............................ii 中文摘要……………………………………………………………………………………………..iii English Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………..iv List of Tables………………………………………………………………………………………...vii List of Figures………...…………………………………………………………………………….viii Chapter 1 Introduction…………………………….………………………………………………...1 1.1 Research Purpose……………………………………………........................................................1 1.2 Research Gap…………………………………………...................................................................7 1.3 Research Concept…………………………………………..........................................................14 1.31 Research concept of IL framework…………………………………………………………..16 1.32 Research conceptual framework of smile curve……………………………………………..18 1.33 Measurement model of producer-buyer interaction……………………………...…………..20 Chapter 2 Literature Review……………………………………………………………………...24 2.1 Global Value Chains……………………………………………………………………………..26 2.2 Smile Curve Concept in Global Value Chain Approach………………………………………….37 2.3 Supply-Demand Relationship in Global Value Chain Ecosystem………………………………..40 2.4 Mainstream Concept of Global Value Chains……………………………………………………41 2.5 Evolving Business Model in Global Value Chain Ecosystem………………………....................48 2.51 Evolving business model………………………………………………………….................57 Chapter 3 Theoretical Framework and Methodology….…………………………..................63 3.1 Theoretical Framework………………………………………………………………………….63 3.2 Research Framework………………………………………………………………….................65 3.3 Hypothesis ……………………………………………………………………............................66 3.4 Interpretation of DOP Indices…………………………………………………………………...72 3.41 I effect – DOP index...……………………………………………………………..................72 3.42 L effect – DOP index.……………………………………………………………...................79 3.5 Methodology.…………………………………………………………………………................83 3.51 Data source…………………………………………………………………………………..85 3.52 Empirical model……………………………………………………………………………..87 3.53 Research objects, items and variables………………………………………………………..94 Chapter 4 Estimation Results….………………………….............................................................95 4.1 Summary of DOP-Indicators Results and Producer-Buyer Interaction Models………………….95 4.2 Estimation Results of DOP-Indicators and Producer-Buyer Interaction Models………………...96 4.21 I effect DOP-indicators and PLK and BLK models………………………………………….96 4.22 L effect DOP-indicators and PUL and BUS models………………………………...............106 4.3 Estimation Results of Panel Data Regression…………………………………………………..112 4.31 I effect – panel data regression (fixed effect) estimation results of DOP……………………113 4.32 L effect – panel data regression (fixed effect) estimation results of DOP…………………...117 Chapter 5 Conclusion….………………………….........................................................................121 References.……………………………………………………………………...……….................127 List of Tables Table 1 Six Dimension of GVC Analysis…………………………………………………….................44 Table 2 Description of Data Sources……………………………………………………………………86 Table 3 Illustration of Value-Added Creation Calculation……………………………………………...88 Table 4 Elaboration of DOPs and Variables of I Effect…………………………………………………91 Table 5 Elaboration of DOPs and Variables of L Effect………………………………………………...94 Table 6 Description of Research Objects, Items and Variables…………………………………………94 Table 7 Summary of DOP Indicators Estimation Results and Producer-Buyer Interaction Models…….95 Table 8 Summary of Estimation Results of Panel Data Regression – DOP (Variables)……………………112 Table 9 Summary of Estimation Results of Panel Data Regression – DOP (Countries)……………………112 Table 10 Panel Data Regression (Fixed Effect) Estimation Results of DOPVAC – Variables…………113 Table 11 Panel Data Regression (Fixed Effect) Estimation Results of DOPVAC – Countries………...113 Table 12 Panel Data Regression (Fixed Effect) Estimation Results of DOPGPN – Variables…………114 Table 13 Panel Data Regression (Fixed effect) Estimation Results of DOPGPN – Countries…………114 Table 14 Panel Data Regression (Fixed Effect) Estimation Results of DOPPLFP – Variables…...........115 Table 15 Panel Data Regression (Fixed Effect) Estimation Results of DOPPLFP – Countries………115 Table 16 Panel Data Regression (Fixed Effect) Estimation Results of DOPPLDP – Variables……….116 Table 17 Panel Data Regression (Fixed Effect) Estimation Results of DOPPLDP – Countries……….116 Table 18 Panel Data Regression (Fixed Effect) Estimation Results of DOPFI – Variables……………117 Table 19 Panel Data Regression (Fixed Effect) Estimation Results of DOPFI – Countries……............117 Table 20 Panel Data Regression (Fixed Effect) Estimation Results of DOPDI – Variables……............118 Table 21 Panel Data Regression (Fixed Effect) Estimation Results of DOPDI – Countries……...........118 Table 22 Panel Data Regression (Fixed Effect) Estimation Results of DOPFIFP – Variables…………119 Table 23 Panel Data Regression (Fixed Effect) Estimation Results of DOPFIFP – Countries…...........119 Table 24 Panel Data Regression (Fixed Effect) Estimation Results of DOPDIDP – Variables………..120 Table 25 Panel Data Regression (Fixed Effect) Estimation Results of DOPDIDP – Countries………..120 List of Figures Figure 1 Research Concept of IL Framework………………………………………….…….................18 Figure 2 Research Conceptual Framework of Smile Curve: Value Creation, Resource Allocation and Value Chain Stage…….………………………………………………………………………20 Figure 3 Research Concept of I Effect – Producer and Buyer Linkage Model…….……………………23 Figure 4 Research Concept of L Effect – Producer-Pull Model………………….……………………..23 Figure 5 Research Concept of L effect – Buyer-Push Model…………………………………………...23 Figure 6 Framework of Fragmentation and Service Links……………………………………………...27 Figure 7 Typology of Producer-Driven and Buyer-Driven Commodity Chains………………………..31 Figure 8 Flowchart of GVC Participation and Process…………………………………………………33 Figure 9 Illustration of Production Configurations of “Snake, Spider and Sniker” in GVC…………….36 Figure 10 Conceptual framework of the Smile Curve of Value creation………………………………..38 Figure 11 Concept of Smile Curve: Resource, Capability and Industry Force Perspectives……………39 Figure 12 Economy Function with Function Specialization in Pre Post-Production activities…………...39 Figure 13 An Illustration of the supply-Demand Relationships in GVCs………………………………40 Figure 14 Five GVC Governance Type and Key Determinants of GVC Governance…………………..43 Figure 15 Concept of Accounting of Gross Exports…………………………………………................47 Figure 16 Decomposition of Gross Exports and Value-Added Exports………………………………...48 Figure 17 Business Model of Functional Upgrading Trajectory at Value Chain Stage with Smile Curve Concept...60 Figure 18 IC Industry’s Business Model at Value Chain Stage with Smile Curve Concept……………..62 Figure 19 Research Framework and Hypotheses…………………………………………….................66 Figure 20 DOP-VAC and Average Ratio of DOP-VAC of Electronic Parts Components Product…...96 Figure 21 Producer and Buyer Linkage Model of DOP-VAC of Electronic Parts Components Product….96 Figure 22 DOP-VAC and Average Ratio of DOP-VAC of Information Communication Product……96 Figure 23 Producer and Buyer Linkage Model of DOP-VAC of Information Communication Product….96 Figure 24 DOP-VAC and Average Ratio of DOP-VAC of Optical Product……………………………..97 Figure 25 Producer and Buyer Linkage Model of DOP-VAC of Optical Product………………………97 Figure 26 DOP-VAC and Average Ratio of DOP-VAC of Electrical Machinery Product………………97 Figure 27 Producer and Buyer Linkage Model of DOP-VAC of Electrical Machinery Product………..97 Figure 28 DOP-VAC and Average Ratio of DOP-VAC of Machinery Product…………………………98 Figure 29 Producer and Buyer Linkage Model of DOP-VAC of Machinery Product…………………..98 Figure 30 DOP-GPN and Average Ratio of DOP-GPN of Electronic Parts Components Product…….98 Figure 31 Producer and Buyer Linkage Model of DOP-GPN of Electronic Parts Components Product…98 Figure 32 DOP-GPN and Average Ratio of DOP-GPN of Information Communication Product……99 Figure 33 Producer and Buyer Linkage Model of DOP-GPN of Information Communication Product….99 Figure 34 DOP-GPN and Average Ratio of DOP-GPN of Optical Product…………………………….99 Figure 35 Producer and Buyer Linkage Model of DOP-GPN of Optical Product………………………99 Figure 36 DOP-GPN and Average Ratio of DOP-GPN of Electrical Machinery Product……………..100 Figure 37 Producer and Buyer Linkage Model of DOP-GPN of Electrical Machinery Product………100 Figure 38 DOP-GPN and Average Ratio of DOP-GPN of Machinery Product………………………..100 Figure 39 Producer and Buyer Linkage Model of DOP-GPN of Machinery Product…………………100 Figure 40 DOP-PLFP and Average Ratio of DOP-PLFP of Electronic Parts Components Product….....101 Figure 41 Producer and Buyer Linkage Model of DOP-PLFP of Electronic Parts Components Product...101 Figure 42 DOP-PLFP and Average Ratio of DOP-PLFP of Information Communication Product…...101 Figure 43 Producer and Buyer Linkage Model of DOP-PLFP of Information Communication Product....101 Figure 44 DOP-PLFP and Average Ratio of DOP-PLFP of Optical Product………………………….102 Figure 45 Producer and Buyer Linkage Model of DOP-PLFP of Optical Product…………………….102 Figure 46 DOP-PLFP and Average Ratio of DOP-PLFP of Electrical Machinery Product……………102 Figure 47 Producer and Buyer Linkage Model of DOP-PLFP of Electrical Machinery Product..............102 Figure 48 DOP-PLFP and Average Ratio of DOP-PLFP of Machinery Product………………………103 Figure 49 Producer and Buyer Linkage Model of DOP-PLFP of Machinery Product………………...103 Figure 50 DOP-PLDP and Average Ratio of DOP-PLDP of Electronic Parts Components Product…...103 Figure 51 Producer and Buyer Linkage Model of DOP-PLDP of Electronic Parts Components Product....103 Figure 52 DOP-PLDP and Average Ratio of DOP-PLDP of Information Communication Product…...104 Figure 53 Producer and Buyer Linkage Model of DOP-PLDP of Information Communication Product…..104 Figure 54 DOP-PLDP and Average Ratio of DOP-PLDP of Optical Product…………………………104 Figure 55 Producer and Buyer Linkage Model of DOP-PLDP of Optical Product……………………104 Figure 56 DOP-PLDP and Average Ratio of DOP-PLDP of Electrical Machinery Product…………...105 Figure 57 Producer and Buyer Linkage Model of DOP-PLDP of Electrical Machinery Product……….105 Figure 58 DOP-PLDP and Average Ratio of DOP-PLDP of Machinery Product……………………...105 Figure 59 Producer and Buyer Linkage Model of DOP-PLDP of Machinery Product………………...105 Figure 60 DOP-FI and Average Ratio of DOP-FI of Electronic Parts Components Manufacturing Industry...106 Figure 61 Producer-Pull Model of DOP-FI of Electronic Parts Components Manufacturing Industry.....106 Figure 62 DOP-FI and Average Ratio of DOP-FI of Computers, Electronic Optical Products Manufacturing Industry…………………………………………………………………...106 Figure 63 Producer-Pull Model of DOP-FI of Computers, Electronic Optical Products Manufacturing Industry...106 Figure 64 DOP-FI and Average Ratio of DOP-FI of Machinery Equipment Manufacturing Industry…...107 Figure 65 Producer-Pull Model of DOP-FI of Machinery Equipment Manufacturing Industry……107 Figure 66 DOP-DI and Average Ratio of DOP-DI of Electronic Parts Components Manufacturing Industry...107 Figure 67 Producer-Pull Model of DOP-DI of Electronic Parts Components Manufacturing Industry…107 Figure 68 DOP-DI and Average Ratio of DOP-DI of Computers, Electronic Optical Products Manufacturing Industry…………………………………………………………………...108 Figure 69 Producer-Pull Model of DOP-DI of Computers, Electronic Optical Products Manufacturing Industry...108 Figure 70 DOP-DI and Average Ratio of DOP-DI of Machinery Equipment Manufacturing Industry…..108 Figure 71 Producer-Pull Model of DOP-DI of Machinery Equipment Manufacturing Industry.…...108 Figure 72 DOP-FIFP and Average Ratio of DOP-FIFP of Electronic Parts Components Manufacturing Industry...109 Figure 73 Buyer-Push Model of DOP-FIFP of Electronic Parts Components Manufacturing Industry…109 Figure 74 DOP-FIFP and Average Ratio of DOP-FIFP of Computers, Electronic Optical Products Manufacturing Industry…………………………………………………………………...109 Figure 75 Buyer-Push Model of DOP-FIFP of Computers, Electronic Optical Products Manufacturing Industry...109 Figure 76 DOP-FIFP and Average Ratio of DOP-FIFP of Machinery Equipment Manufacturing Industry…110 Figure 77 Buyer-Push Model of DOP-FIFP of Machinery Equipment Manufacturing Industry.…...110 Figure 78 DOP-DIDP and Average Ratio of DOP-DIDP of Electronic Parts Components Manufacturing Industry...110 Figure 79 Buyer-Push Model of DOP-DIDP of Electronic Parts Components Manufacturing Industry...110 Figure 80 DOP-DIDP and Average Ratio of DOP-DIDP of Computers, Electronic Optical Products Manufacturing Industry…………………………………………………………………...111 Figure 81 Buyer-Push Model of DOP-DIDP of Computers, Electronic Optical Products Manufacturing Industry...111 Figure 82 DOP-DIDP and Average Ratio of DOP-DIDP of Machinery Equipment Manufacturing Industry..111 Figure 83 Buyer-Push Model of DOP-DIDP of Machinery Equipment Manufacturing Industry.…..111" | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 參與程度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 價值鏈階段 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 國際分割 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 供需關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 全球價值鏈 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | supply-demand relationships | en |
| dc.subject | global value chains | en |
| dc.subject | international fragmentation | en |
| dc.subject | degree of participation | en |
| dc.subject | value chain stage | en |
| dc.title | 全球價值鏈國際分割的分析:以台灣主要高科技產業為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Analysis of International Fragmentation in Global Value Chains: Evidence of Taiwan's Major High-Tech Industries | en |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 109-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 連勇智(Yung-Chih Lien) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳思寬(Hsin-Tsai Liu),葉志權(Chih-Yang Tseng),梁立霖 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 全球價值鏈,國際分割,參與程度,價值鏈階段,供需關係, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | global value chains,international fragmentation,degree of participation,value chain stage,supply-demand relationships, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 141 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202103885 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2021-10-21 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2026-10-20 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 國際企業學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-1910202116340900.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 6.81 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。