Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 醫學院
  3. 藥學專業學院
  4. 臨床藥學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/82244
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor蕭斐元(Fei-Yuan Hsiao)
dc.contributor.authorChih-Wan Linen
dc.contributor.author林芝琬zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-25T06:34:15Z-
dc.date.copyright2021-11-09
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.submitted2021-10-28
dc.identifier.citation1.Egen-Lappe V, Hasford J. Drug prescription in pregnancy: analysis of a large statutory sickness fund population. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;60(9):659-666. 2.Palmsten K, Hernández-Díaz S, Chambers CD, et al. The Most Commonly Dispensed Prescription Medications Among Pregnant Women Enrolled in the U.S. Medicaid Program. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(3):465-473. 3.Larcin L, Lona M, Karakaya G, Van Espen A, Damase-Michel C, Kirakoya-Samadoulougou F. Using administrative healthcare database records to study trends in prescribed medication dispensed during pregnancy in Belgium from 2003 to 2017. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021;30(9):1224-1232. 4.Engeland A, Bjørge T, Klungsøyr K, Hjellvik V, Skurtveit S, Furu K. Trends in prescription drug use during pregnancy and postpartum in Norway, 2005 to 2015. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018;27(9):995-1004. 5.Leong C, Chateau D, Dahl M, et al. Prescription medication use during pregnancies that resulted in births and abortions (2001-2013): A retrospective population-based study in a Canadian population. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0211319. 6.Neilson JP, West HM, Dowswell T. Betamimetics for inhibiting preterm labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014(2):Cd004352. 7.Taussig HB. A study of the German outbreak of phocomelia. The thalidomide syndrome. JAMA. 1962;180:1106-1114. 8.Lammer EJ, Chen DT, Hoar RM, et al. Retinoic acid embryopathy. N Engl J Med. 1985;313(14):837-841. 9.Cooper WO, Hernandez-Diaz S, Arbogast PG, et al. Major congenital malformations after first-trimester exposure to ACE inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(23):2443-2451. 10.Adam MP, Polifka JE, Friedman JM. Evolving knowledge of the teratogenicity of medications in human pregnancy. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2011;157c(3):175-182. 11.Lo WY, Friedman JM. Teratogenicity of recently introduced medications in human pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100(3):465-473. 12.Mitchell AA. Systematic identification of drugs that cause birth defects--a new opportunity. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(26):2556-2559. 13.Shields KE, Lyerly AD. Exclusion of pregnant women from industry-sponsored clinical trials. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(5):1077-1081. 14.Broussard CS, Frey MT, Hernandez-Diaz S, et al. Developing a systematic approach to safer medication use during pregnancy: summary of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention--convened meeting. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(3):208-214.e201. 15.Zhang J, Ung COL, Guan X, Shi L. Safety of medication use during pregnancy in mainland China: based on a national health insurance database in 2015. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):459. 16.Stephansson O, Granath F, Svensson T, Haglund B, Ekbom A, Kieler H. Drug use during pregnancy in Sweden - assessed by the Prescribed Drug Register and the Medical Birth Register. Clin Epidemiol. 2011;3:43-50. 17.Gagne JJ, Maio V, Berghella V, Louis DZ, Gonnella JS. Prescription drug use during pregnancy: a population-based study in Regione Emilia-Romagna, Italy. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;64(11):1125-1132. 18.Bakker MK, Jentink J, Vroom F, Van Den Berg PB, De Walle HE, De Jong-Van Den Berg LT. Drug prescription patterns before, during and after pregnancy for chronic, occasional and pregnancy-related drugs in the Netherlands. BJOG. 2006;113(5):559-568. 19.Liao HL, Li YC, Ho YL, Hsu CC, Hung YJ, Chang YS. Prescription of Drugs during Pregnancy in Taiwan: A NHI Database Study. Formosa Journal of Clinical Pharmacy. 2013;21(2):37-45. 20.Bjørn AM, Nørgaard M, Hundborg HH, Nohr EA, Ehrenstein V. Use of prescribed drugs among primiparous women: an 11-year population-based study in Denmark. Clin Epidemiol. 2011;3:149-156. 21.Demailly R, Escolano S, Quantin C, Tubert-Bitter P, Ahmed I. Prescription drug use during pregnancy in France: a study from the national health insurance permanent sample. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017;26(9):1126-1134. 22.World Health Organization. Preterm birth. 2018; https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/preterm-birth. Accessed 9 January, 2019. 23.Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2000-13, with projections to inform post-2015 priorities: an updated systematic analysis. Lancet. 2015;385(9966):430-440. 24.Romero R, Espinoza J, Kusanovic JP, et al. The preterm parturition syndrome. BJOG. 2006;113 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):17-42. 25.Simhan HN, Caritis SN. Prevention of preterm delivery. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(5):477-487. 26.Haas DM, Caldwell DM, Kirkpatrick P, McIntosh JJ, Welton NJ. Tocolytic therapy for preterm delivery: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2012;345:e6226. 27.Haas DM, Imperiale TF, Kirkpatrick PR, Klein RW, Zollinger TW, Golichowski AM. Tocolytic therapy: a meta-analysis and decision analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(3):585-594. 28.Younger JD, Reitman E, Gallos G. Tocolysis: Present and future treatment options. Semin Perinatol. 2017;41(8):493-504. 29.Canadian Preterm Labor Investigators Group. Treatment of preterm labor with the beta-adrenergic agonist ritodrine. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(5):308-312. 30.Leveno KJ, Cunningham FG. Beta-adrenergic agonists for preterm labor. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(5):349-351. 31.Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Middleton P. Oral betamimetics for maintenance therapy after threatened preterm labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:Cd003927. 32.Crowther CA, Brown J, McKinlay CJ, Middleton P. Magnesium sulphate for preventing preterm birth in threatened preterm labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014(8):CD001060. 33.Flenady V, Reinebrant HE, Liley HG, Tambimuttu EG, Papatsonis DN. Oxytocin receptor antagonists for inhibiting preterm labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014(6):CD004452. 34.Flenady V, Wojcieszek AM, Papatsonis DN, et al. Calcium channel blockers for inhibiting preterm labour and birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014(6):CD002255. 35.Reinebrant HE, Pileggi-Castro C, Romero CL, et al. Cyclo-oxygenase (COX) inhibitors for treating preterm labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015(6):CD001992. 36.Pryde PG, Janeczek S, Mittendorf R. Risk-benefit effects of tocolytic therapy. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2004;3(6):639-654. 37.de Heus R, Mol BW, Erwich JJ, et al. Adverse drug reactions to tocolytic treatment for preterm labour: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2009;338:b744. 38.Elliott JP, Istwan NB, Rhea D, Stanziano G. The occurrence of adverse events in women receiving continuous subcutaneous terbutaline therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(4):1277-1282. 39.European Medicines Agency. Assessment report for Short Acting Beta Agonists (SABAs) containing medicinal products authorised in obstetric indications. 2013; https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/referral/short-acting-beta-agonists-article-31-referral-prac-assessment-report_en.pdf. Accessed 9 January, 2019. 40.Taiwan Drug Relief Foundation. Drug Safety Newsletter - Use of β-adrenergic agonists for tocolysis and risks of maternal cardiovascular events. 2014; https://www.tdrf.org.tw/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Drug-Safety-Newsletter-vol48.pdf. Accessed 9 January, 2019. 41.Perry KG, Jr., Morrison JC, Rust OA, Sullivan CA, Martin RW, Naef RW, 3rd. Incidence of adverse cardiopulmonary effects with low-dose continuous terbutaline infusion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173(4):1273-1277. 42.Hibbard JU. Chronic terbutaline therapy and peripartum cardiomyopathy: a case-control study. Hypertens Pregnancy. 1996;15(2):183-191. 43.Shinohara S, Sunami R, Uchida Y, Hirata S, Suzuki K. Association between total dose of ritodrine hydrochloride and pulmonary oedema in twin pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study in Japan. BMJ open. 2017;7(12):e018118. 44.US Food and Drug Administration. FDA Drug Safety Communication: New warnings against use of terbutaline to treat preterm labor. 2011; https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-drug-safety-communication-new-warnings-against-use-terbutaline-treat-preterm-labor. Accessed 9 January, 2019. 45.European Medicines Agency. Restrictions on use of short-acting beta-agonists in obstetric indications – CMDh endorses PRAC recommendations. 2013; https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/restrictions-use-short-acting-beta-agonists-obstetric-indications-cmdh-endorses-prac-recommendations. Accessed 9 January, 2019. 46.Taiwan Food and Drug Administration. Reassessment of short acting beta agonists containing medicinal products authorised in obstetric indications. 2014; https://www.fda.gov.tw/TC/newsContent.aspx?cid=3 id=11440. Accessed 9 January, 2019. 47.Dusetzina SB, Higashi AS, Dorsey ER, et al. Impact of FDA drug risk communications on health care utilization and health behaviors: a systematic review. Med Care. 2012;50(6):466-478. 48.Georgi U, Lämmel J, Datzmann T, Schmitt J, Deckert S. Do drug-related safety warnings have the expected impact on drug therapy? A systematic review. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020;29(3):229-251. 49.Hsieh CY, Su CC, Shao SC, et al. Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database: past and future. Clin Epidemiol. 2019;11:349-358. 50.Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan. 2018 Statistics of Birth Reporting System. 2019; https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/ashx/File.ashx?FilePath=~/File/Attach/11780/File_13358.pdf. Accessed 10 July, 2020. 51.Hsing AW, Ioannidis JP. Nationwide Population Science: Lessons From the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(9):1527-1529. 52.Cheng TM. Reflections on the 20th anniversary of Taiwan's single-payer National Health Insurance System. Health Aff (Millwood). 2015;34(3):502-510. 53.Alibekova R, Huang JP, Chen YH. Adequate prenatal care reduces the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with history of infertility: a nationwide population-based study. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e84237. 54.Chang SH, Chou IJ, Yeh YH, et al. Association Between Use of Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants With and Without Concurrent Medications and Risk of Major Bleeding in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation. JAMA. 2017;318(13):1250-1259. 55.Wang MT, Liou JT, Lin CW, et al. Association of Cardiovascular Risk With Inhaled Long-Acting Bronchodilators in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Nested Case-Control Study. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(2):229-238. 56.World Health Organization. ATC/DDD Index. 2019; https://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/. Accessed 9 January, 2019. 57.Mamdani M, Sykora K, Li P, et al. Reader's guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 2. Assessing potential for confounding. BMJ. 2005;330(7497):960-962. 58.Austin PC. Using the standardized difference to compare the prevalence of a binary variable between two groups in observational research. Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2009;38(6):1228-1234. 59.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 171: Management of Preterm Labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(4):e155-164. 60.Fay MP, Feuer EJ. Confidence intervals for directly standardized rates: a method based on the gamma distribution. Stat Med. 1997;16(7):791-801. 61.Etminan M. Pharmacoepidemiology II: the nested case-control study--a novel approach in pharmacoepidemiologic research. Pharmacotherapy. 2004;24(9):1105-1109. 62.Richardson DB. An incidence density sampling program for nested case-control analyses. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61(12):e59. 63.Lubin JH, Gail MH. Biased selection of controls for case-control analyses of cohort studies. Biometrics. 1984;40(1):63-75. 64.Chen TJ, Chou LF, Hwang SJ. Patterns of ambulatory care utilization in Taiwan. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:54. 65.Hsu JC, Lu CY. The evolution of Taiwan's National Health Insurance drug reimbursement scheme. Daru. 2015;23(1):15. 66.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Practice bulletin no. 130: prediction and prevention of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(4):964-973. 67.Coomarasamy A, Devall AJ, Brosens JJ, et al. Micronized vaginal progesterone to prevent miscarriage: a critical evaluation of randomized evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(2):167-176. 68.Briggs GG, Freeman RK, Towers CV, Forinash AB. Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation: A Reference Guide to Fetal and Neonatal Risk. 11th ed: Lippincott Williams Wilkins; 2017. 69.Li DK, Ferber JR, Odouli R, Quesenberry C. Use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs during pregnancy and the risk of miscarriage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(3):275.e271-275.e278. 70.Edwards DR, Aldridge T, Baird DD, Funk MJ, Savitz DA, Hartmann KE. Periconceptional over-the-counter nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug exposure and risk for spontaneous abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(1):113-122. 71.Daniel S, Koren G, Lunenfeld E, Bilenko N, Ratzon R, Levy A. Fetal exposure to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and spontaneous abortions. CMAJ. 2014;186(5):E177-182. 72.Nielsen GL, Sørensen HT, Larsen H, Pedersen L. Risk of adverse birth outcome and miscarriage in pregnant users of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: population based observational study and case-control study. BMJ. 2001;322(7281):266-270. 73.Li DK, Liu L, Odouli R. Exposure to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during pregnancy and risk of miscarriage: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2003;327(7411):368. 74.Werler MM, Mitchell AA, Shapiro S. First trimester maternal medication use in relation to gastroschisis. Teratology. 1992;45(4):361-367. 75.Werler MM, Sheehan JE, Mitchell AA. Maternal medication use and risks of gastroschisis and small intestinal atresia. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155(1):26-31. 76.Werler MM, Sheehan JE, Hayes C, Mitchell AA, Mulliken JB. Vasoactive exposures, vascular events, and hemifacial microsomia. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2004;70(6):389-395. 77.Yau WP, Mitchell AA, Lin KJ, Werler MM, Hernández-Díaz S. Use of decongestants during pregnancy and the risk of birth defects. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(2):198-208. 78.Shaw GM, Todoroff K, Velie EM, Lammer EJ. Maternal illness, including fever and medication use as risk factors for neural tube defects. Teratology. 1998;57(1):1-7. 79.Araujo M, Vabre C, Benevent J, et al. Risk of Pregnancy Termination and Congenital Anomalies After Domperidone Exposure: A Study in the EFEMERIS Database. Drug Saf. 2021;44(7):787-796. 80.Hishinuma K, Yamane R, Yokoo I, et al. Pregnancy outcome after first trimester exposure to domperidone-An observational cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021;47(5):1704-1710. 81.Choi JS, Han JY, Ahn HK, et al. Fetal and neonatal outcomes in women taking domperidone during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;33(2):160-162. 82.Mitchell AA, Gilboa SM, Werler MM, Kelley KE, Louik C, Hernández-Díaz S. Medication use during pregnancy, with particular focus on prescription drugs: 1976-2008. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(1):51.e51-58. 83.Studdert DM, Mello MM, Sage WM, et al. Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment. JAMA. 2005;293(21):2609-2617. 84.Wu CY, Lai HJ, Chen RC. Medical malpractice experience of Taiwan: 2005 versus 1991. Intern Med J. 2009;39(4):237-242. 85.Wu CY, Weng HC, Chen RC. Time trends of assessments for medical dispute cases in Taiwan: a 20-year nationwide study. Intern Med J. 2013;43(9):1023-1030. 86.Hwang CY, Wu CH, Cheng FC, Yen YL, Wu KH. A 12-year analysis of closed medical malpractice claims of the Taiwan civil court: A retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(13):e0237. 87.Jeyabalan A, Caritis SN. Pharmacologic inhibition of preterm labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2002;45(1):99-113. 88.Vercauteren M, Palit S, Soetens F, Jacquemyn Y, Alahuhta S. Anaesthesiological considerations on tocolytic and uterotonic therapy in obstetrics. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53(6):701-709. 89.Shigemi D, Aso S, Yasunaga H. Inappropriate use of ritodrine hydrochloride for threatened preterm birth in Japan: a retrospective cohort study using a national inpatient database. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):204. 90.Shigemi D, Yasunaga H. Antenatal corticosteroid administration in women undergoing tocolytic treatment who delivered before 34 weeks of gestation: a retrospective cohort study using a national inpatient database. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):17. 91.Razaz N, Skoll A, Fahey J, Allen VM, Joseph KS. Trends in optimal, suboptimal, and questionably appropriate receipt of antenatal corticosteroid prophylaxis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(2):288-296. 92.Mahony R, McKeating A, Murphy T, McAuliffe F, O'Herlihy C, Foley M. Appropriate antenatal corticosteroid use in women at risk for preterm birth before 34 weeks of gestation. BJOG. 2010;117(8):963-967. 93.Lee HC, Lyndon A, Blumenfeld YJ, Dudley RA, Gould JB. Antenatal steroid administration for premature neonates in California. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(3):603-609. 94.Grzeskowiak LE, Grivell RM, Mol BW. Trends in receipt of single and repeat courses of antenatal corticosteroid administration among preterm and term births: A retrospective cohort study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;57(6):643-650. 95.Wong TTC, Tung JSZ, Lau HCQ, Tagore S. Antenatal corticosteroids administration: are we giving them at the right time? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;297(2):373-379. 96.Walker KF, Thornton JG. Tocolysis and preterm labour. Lancet. 2016;387(10033):2068-2070. 97.Health Canada. Notice to Hospitals - Health Canada Endorsed Important Safety Information on VENTOLIN I.M. Injection and VENTOLIN I.V. Infusion Solution for Pregnant Women Labour and Delivery. 2007; https://www.healthycanadians.gc.ca/recall-alert-rappel-avis/hc-sc/2007/14483a-eng.php. Accessed 9 January, 2019. 98.Dzakpasu S, Deb-Rinker P, Arbour L, et al. Severe maternal morbidity surveillance: Monitoring pregnant women at high risk for prolonged hospitalisation and death. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2020;34(4):427-439. 99.Yi HY, Jeong SY, Kim SH, et al. Indications and characteristics of obstetric patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a 22-year review in a tertiary care center. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018;61(2):209-219. 100.Afessa B, Green B, Delke I, Koch K. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, organ failure, and outcome in critically ill obstetric patients treated in an ICU. Chest. 2001;120(4):1271-1277. 101.Bane S, Wall-Wieler E, Lyndon A, Carmichael SL. Recurrence of severe maternal morbidity: A population-based cohort analysis of California women. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2021;35(2):155-161. 102.Caritis SN, Venkataramanan R, Darby MJ, Chiao JP, Krew M. Pharmacokinetics of ritodrine administered intravenously: recommendations for changes in the current regimen. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162(2):429-437. 103.Caritis S. Adverse effects of tocolytic therapy. BJOG. 2005;112 Suppl 1:74-78. 104.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Preterm labour and birth. 2015; http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng25. Accessed 24 March, 2021. 105.Hwang HS, Na SH, Hur SE, et al. Practice patterns in the management of threatened preterm labor in Korea: A multicenter retrospective study. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2015;58(3):203-209. 106.Choi SK, Kim YH, Kim SM, et al. Opioid analgesics are the leading cause of adverse drug reactions in the obstetric population in South Korea. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(21):e15756. 107.Knotts RJ, Garan H. Cardiac arrhythmias in pregnancy. Semin Perinatol. 2014;38(5):285-288. 108.Dennis AT, Solnordal CB. Acute pulmonary oedema in pregnant women. Anaesthesia. 2012;67(6):646-659.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/82244-
dc.description.abstract研究背景:過去的研究顯示,有相當比例的婦女會在懷孕期間使用藥物,且藥物使用比例有隨年代上升的趨勢。而與一般病人族群相比,藥品使用於懷孕婦女之效益與風險平衡需要更審慎全面的評估,除了需考量藥物可能通過胎盤進入胎兒體內,導致流產或先天性缺陷等永久性傷害,藥物不良事件也可能危害孕婦本身的健康,此外,罹患慢性疾病的婦女若因懷孕而貿然停止用藥,反而可能對母親或胎兒產生不利影響。然而,針對懷孕婦女之用藥安全資訊卻相當缺乏,主要原因來自動物試驗常無法正確預測藥物對人類的致畸胎性,且多數藥品上市前臨床試驗排除懷孕婦女。因此,為了取得更多的資訊以提供懷孕婦女更適當之用藥建議,藥品上市後研究 (如藥品處方型態研究及藥品風險研究) 至關重要。 研究目的:本研究探討臺灣懷孕婦女之藥品處方型態與相關不良事件。第一部分分析懷孕婦女整體用藥型態,以利指引後續藥品風險分析的研究方向。第二部分選定安胎藥品ritodrine為研究主題,分析其歷年使用趨勢以及藥物安全管理措施對使用型態之影響。第三部分則延續前一主題,探討使用ritodrine與懷孕婦女發生心肺不良事件之相關性。 研究方法:本研究之資料來源為臺灣之全國出生通報檔及全人口健康保險資料檔。主要研究族群為於出生通報檔有生產紀錄之懷孕20週以上的懷孕婦女 (懷孕期間以懷孕週數和新生兒出生日期定義),於不同部分的研究另納入健保資料檔中15至49歲之育齡婦女或懷孕小於20週之流產婦女作為對照組。第一部分針對懷孕婦女與流產婦女分別分析其用藥型態,研究藥品範圍涵蓋所有非外用之藥品,並採用WHO ATC classification進行藥品分類。統計分析之指標為懷孕婦女於懷孕前84天、第一孕期、第二孕期、第三孕期、以及生產後84天使用藥品之比例以及使用頻率最高之藥品,並分析前述指標隨年代變化之趨勢。第二部分針對安胎藥品ritodrine,分析其歷年使用趨勢、處方特性、以及處方合理性,並比較2014年我國食品藥物管理署採行藥品安全管理措施前後之處方型態是否改變。第三部分則探討懷孕婦女使用ritodrine發生肺水腫、心律不整與心衰竭等心肺不良事件之風險,包含絕對風險 (以育齡婦女為標準人口分析心肺不良事件之年齡標準化發生率) 以及相對風險 (採用巢式病例對照研究,病例組為懷孕期間發生心肺不良事件者,配對相同懷孕天數時未發生事件且符合配對條件之對照組,以條件邏輯式迴歸模型分析勝算比 [aOR] 與95%信賴區間 [CI])。 研究結果:首先,我國懷孕婦女使用藥品之比例相當高 (2017年高達95.9%之孕婦曾於懷孕期間使用藥品),且第二孕期與第三孕期之用藥比例有隨年代上升之趨勢。研究結果篩選出數個藥品值得進行後續研究,包含懷孕期間使用頻率最高之藥物 (progesterone與ritodrine)、流產婦女於第一孕期使用比例高於未流產婦女之藥物 (NSAIDs) 以及使用頻率高但過去懷孕風險分級為具有風險或風險資料不足之藥物 (pseudoephedrine與domperidone)。其次,本研究觀察到懷孕婦女使用ritodrine之比例隨著年代明顯上升,此趨勢主要來自口服劑型之使用率由2002年11.0% 增加至2018年達25.4%;反之,注射劑型之使用率於2010年以後微幅下降,至2018年為5.2%。然而,2014年實施藥品安全管理措施前後之ritodrine處方型態 (包含藥品使用天數、禁忌症族群使用情況等) 並未明顯改變。最後,本研究結果顯示,懷孕婦女於懷孕期間之心肺不良事件發生率並不高,但使用ritodrine之懷孕婦女相較於未使用者其心肺不良事件之風險顯著增加 (aOR 2.18 [95% CI 1.72–2.77])。其中,使用ritodrine注射劑型者心肺不良事件之風險較高 (肺水腫:aOR 10.56 [95% CI 6.39–17.45];心律不整:aOR 4.15 [95% CI 1.99–8.64];心衰竭:aOR 5.58 [95% CI 2.27–13.74]);使用ritodrine口服劑型者則仍有風險但風險較低 (肺水腫:aOR 1.76 [95% CI 1.12–2.76];心律不整:aOR 2.21 [95% CI 1.47–3.32];心衰竭:aOR 0.89 [95% CI 0.50–1.58])。 結論:本研究之特色在於針對我國藥品安全相關實證資料相當缺乏之懷孕婦女族群,採用具全國代表性且可提供完整懷孕相關資訊之資料檔,分析其用藥型態與相關藥品不良事件。研究結果有助於指引後續臺灣懷孕婦女藥品相關研究之研究方向,並可作為我國衛生主管機關執行藥品風險溝通與管理之參考。zh_TW
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2022-11-25T06:34:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-2510202117574700.pdf: 3580856 bytes, checksum: 4fe88869856ff1b8bda8f34c5ab41d56 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2021
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 I 致謝 II 摘要 III Abstract VI Contents IX Contents of Figures XII Contents of Tables XIII Chapter 1 Background 1 Chapter 2 Literature Review 3 2.1 Use of drugs among pregnant women 3 2.2 Use of tocolytic drugs among pregnant women 8 2.2.1 Tocolytic drugs for preterm labor 8 2.2.2 β-adrenergic agonists used in tocolysis 9 2.2.3 Safety regulations on β-adrenergic agonists used in tocolysis 16 Chapter 3 Study Aim 18 Chapter 4 Materials and Methods 19 4.1 Data source 19 4.1.1 National Birth Certificate Application (BCA) database 19 4.1.2 National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) 19 4.1.3 Data linkage 20 4.2 Use of drugs among pregnant women 21 4.2.1 Study population 21 4.2.2 Drug exposure 22 4.2.3 Outcome measurements and statistical analyses 22 4.3 Use of ritodrine among pregnant women 24 4.3.1 Study population 24 4.3.2 Outcome measurements and statistical analyses 24 4.4 Use of ritodrine and the risk of maternal cardiopulmonary events 27 4.4.1 Study population 27 4.4.2 Outcomes of interest 27 4.4.3 Incidence rate analyses 28 4.4.4 Nested case–control analyses 28 Chapter 5 Results 31 5.1 Use of drugs among pregnant women 31 5.1.1 Study population 31 5.1.2 Prevalence of drug use 34 5.1.3 Prevalence of drug use by ATC class 36 5.1.4 Most commonly prescribed drugs during pregnancy 40 5.2 Use of ritodrine among pregnant women 42 5.2.1 Study population 42 5.2.2 Prevalence of ritodrine use 44 5.2.3 Characteristics of ritodrine prescriptions 46 5.2.4 Patterns of ritodrine use before and after label revision 49 5.2.5 Prevalence of antenatal steroid use among pregnant women initiating ritodrine injections 51 5.3 Use of ritodrine and the risk of maternal cardiopulmonary events 52 5.3.1 Study population 52 5.3.2 Incidence rates of maternal cardiopulmonary events 52 5.3.3 Relative risk of maternal cardiopulmonary events 55 Chapter 6 Discussion 63 6.1 Use of drugs among pregnant women 63 6.2 Use of ritodrine among pregnant women 68 6.3 Use of ritodrine and the risk of maternal cardiopulmonary events 73 Chapter 7 Conclusion 79 References 80 Supplements 89
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject藥品不良事件zh_TW
dc.subject藥品處方型態zh_TW
dc.subject懷孕婦女zh_TW
dc.subject安胎藥品zh_TW
dc.subjectdrug prescribing patternsen
dc.subjecttocolytic drugsen
dc.subjectadverse drug eventsen
dc.subjectpregnant womenen
dc.title懷孕婦女之藥品處方型態與相關不良事件:以安胎藥品ritodrine為例zh_TW
dc.titlePrescribing Pattern and Adverse Events of Drugs Among Pregnant Women: Taking the Tocolytic Drug Ritodrine as an Exampleen
dc.date.schoolyear109-2
dc.description.degree博士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳建煒(Hsin-Tsai Liu),陳宜雍(Chih-Yang Tseng),陳文雯,林芳如,賴嘉鎮
dc.subject.keyword懷孕婦女,藥品處方型態,藥品不良事件,安胎藥品,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordpregnant women,drug prescribing patterns,adverse drug events,tocolytic drugs,en
dc.relation.page97
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202104165
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2021-10-28
dc.contributor.author-college醫學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept臨床藥學研究所zh_TW
dc.date.embargo-lift2026-10-01-
顯示於系所單位:臨床藥學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
U0001-2510202117574700.pdf
  未授權公開取用
3.5 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved