Skip navigation

DSpace JSPUI

DSpace preserves and enables easy and open access to all types of digital content including text, images, moving images, mpegs and data sets

Learn More
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Publication Year
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Advisor
  • Search TDR
  • Rights Q&A
    • My Page
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 醫學院
  3. 藥學專業學院
  4. 臨床藥學研究所
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/81921
Full metadata record
???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield???ValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor徐莞曾(Wan-Tseng Hsu)
dc.contributor.authorYi-Hsuan Linen
dc.contributor.author林奕軒zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-25T03:06:41Z-
dc.date.available2026-10-26
dc.date.copyright2021-11-02
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.submitted2021-10-26
dc.identifier.citationGaggin HK, Dec GW. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF HEART FAILURE. In: Hurst's The Heart, 14e. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2017. McMurray JJ, Petrie MC, Murdoch DR, et al. Clinical epidemiology of heart failure: public and private health burden. Eur Heart J. 1998;19 Suppl P:P9-16. Mosterd A, Hoes AW. Clinical epidemiology of heart failure. Heart. 2007;93(9):1137-1146. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(27):2129-2200. Redfield MM, Jacobsen SJ, Burnett JC, Jr., et al. Burden of systolic and diastolic ventricular dysfunction in the community: appreciating the scope of the heart failure epidemic. Jama. 2003;289(2):194-202. Ceia F, Fonseca C, Mota T, et al. Prevalence of chronic heart failure in Southwestern Europe: the EPICA study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2002;4(4):531-539. Bleumink GS, Knetsch AM, Sturkenboom MC, et al. Quantifying the heart failure epidemic: prevalence, incidence rate, lifetime risk and prognosis of heart failure The Rotterdam Study. Eur Heart J. 2004;25(18):1614-1619. Guo Y, Lip GY, Banerjee A. Heart failure in East Asia. Current cardiology reviews. 2013;9(2):112-122. Virani SS, Alonso A, Benjamin EJ, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2020 Update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;141(9):e139-e596. Lloyd-Jones DM, Larson MG, Leip EP, et al. Lifetime risk for developing congestive heart failure: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2002;106(24):3068-3072. van Riet EE, Hoes AW, Limburg A, et al. Prevalence of unrecognized heart failure in older persons with shortness of breath on exertion. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014;16(7):772-777. Dharmarajan K, Hsieh AF, Lin Z, et al. Diagnoses and timing of 30-day readmissions after hospitalization for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, or pneumonia. Jama. 2013;309(4):355-363. Chang HY, Wang CC, Wu YW, et al. One-year outcomes of acute decompensated systolic heart failure in Taiwan: Lessons from TSOC-HFrEF Registry. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2017;33(2):127-138. Wang TD, Huang ST, Wang CY, et al. Nationwide trends in incidence, healthcare utilization, and mortality in hospitalized heart failure patients in Taiwan. ESC Heart Fail. 2020;7(6):3653-3666. Koda-Kimble MA. Koda-Kimble and Young's applied therapeutics: the clinical use of drugs. Lippincott Williams Wilkins; 2012. Zipes DP, Libby P, Bonow RO, et al. Braunwald's Heart Disease E-Book: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2018. Forrester SJ, Booz GW, Sigmund CD, et al. Angiotensin II signal transduction: an update on mechanisms of physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol Rev. 2018;98(3):1627-1738. Arendse LB, Danser AHJ, Poglitsch M, et al. Novel therapeutic approaches targeting the renin-angiotensin system and associated peptides in hypertension and heart Failure. Pharmacol Rev. 2019;71(4):539-570. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(16):e147-239. Criteria Committee of the New York Heart Association. Nomenclature and criteria for diagnosis of diseases of the heart and great vessels. Vol 253: Boston: Little, Brown Co; 1994. Hunt SA, Baker DW, Chin MH, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: executive summary: A report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on practice guidelines (committee to revise the 1995 guidelines for the evaluation and management of heart failure) developed in collaboration with the international society for heart and lung transplantation endorsed by the heart failure society of america. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2001;38(7):2101-2113. Wang CC, Wu CK, Tsai ML, et al. 2019 Focused update of the guidelines of the Taiwan society of cardiology for the diagnosis and treatment of heart failure. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2019;35(3):244-283. Jortani SA, Prabhu SD, Valdes R, Jr. Strategies for developing biomarkers of heart failure. Clin Chem. 2004;50(2):265-278. McKie PM, Cataliotti A, Sangaralingham SJ, et al. Predictive utility of atrial, N-terminal pro-atrial, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptides for mortality and cardiovascular events in the general community: a 9-year follow-up study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86(12):1154-1160. Maisel A, Mueller C, Adams K, Jr., et al. State of the art: using natriuretic peptide levels in clinical practice. Eur J Heart Fail. 2008;10(9):824-839. Daniels LB, Clopton P, Bhalla V, et al. How obesity affects the cut-points for B-type natriuretic peptide in the diagnosis of acute heart failure. Results from the Breathing Not Properly Multinational Study. Am Heart J. 2006;151(5):999-1005. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):1-39.e14. Teichholz LE, Kreulen T, Herman MV, et al. Problems in echocardiographic volume determinations: echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence of absence of asynergy. Am J Cardiol. 1976;37(1):7-11. Quinones MA, Waggoner AD, Reduto LA, et al. A new, simplified and accurate method for determining ejection fraction with two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation. 1981;64(4):744-753. Lang RM, Badano LP, Tsang W, et al. EAE/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25(1):3-46. Voigt JU, Pedrizzetti G, Lysyansky P, et al. Definitions for a common standard for 2D speckle tracking echocardiography: consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16(1):1-11. Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016;29(4):277-314. Pieske B, Tschöpe C, de Boer RA, et al. How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFA–PEFF diagnostic algorithm: a consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal. 2019;40(40):3297-3317. Cohn JN, Ferrari R, Sharpe N. Cardiac remodeling--concepts and clinical implications: a consensus paper from an international forum on cardiac remodeling. Behalf of an International Forum on Cardiac Remodeling. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35(3):569-582. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. Circulation. 2017;136(6):e137-e161. Yılmaz İ. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors induce cough. Turk Thorac J. 2019;20(1):36-42. Kostis WJ, Shetty M, Chowdhury YS, et al. ACE inhibitor-induced angioedema: a review. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2018;20(7):55. Makani H, Messerli FH, Romero J, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials of angioedema as an adverse event of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110(3):383-391. Beavers CJ, Dunn SP, Macaulay TE. The role of angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced angioedema. Ann Pharmacother. 2011;45(4):520-524. Kuenzli A, Bucher HC, Anand I, et al. Meta-analysis of combined therapy with angiotensin receptor antagonists versus ACE inhibitors alone in patients with heart failure. PLoS One. 2010;5(4):e9946. McMurray JJ, Packer M, Desai AS, et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(11):993-1004. Writing C, Maddox TM, Januzzi JL, Jr., et al. 2021 Update to the 2017 ACC expert consensus decision pathway for optimization of heart failure treatment: answers to 10 pivotal issues about heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021. Investigators N. Clinical outcome with enalapril in symptomatic chronic heart failure; a dose comparison. Eur Heart J. 1998;19(3):481-489. Packer M, Poole-Wilson PA, Armstrong PW, et al. Comparative effects of low and high doses of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril, on morbidity and mortality in chronic heart failure. ATLAS Study Group. Circulation. 1999;100(23):2312-2318. Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, et al. The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized Aldactone evaluation study investigators. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(10):709-717. Zannad F, McMurray JJ, Krum H, et al. Eplerenone in patients with systolic heart failure and mild symptoms. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(1):11-21. Pitt B, Remme W, Zannad F, et al. Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(14):1309-1321. Vardeny O, Claggett B, Anand I, et al. Incidence, predictors, and outcomes related to hypo- and hyperkalemia in patients with severe heart failure treated with a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. Circ Heart Fail. 2014;7(4):573-579. Mullens W, Damman K, Harjola VP, et al. The use of diuretics in heart failure with congestion - a position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;21(2):137-155. Faris RF, Flather M, Purcell H, et al. Diuretics for heart failure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012(2):Cd003838. Damman K, Kjekshus J, Wikstrand J, et al. Loop diuretics, renal function and clinical outcome in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18(3):328-336. Kapelios CJ, Bonou Μ, Malliaras K, et al. Association of loop diuretics use and dose with outcomes in outpatients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies involving 96,959 patients. Heart Fail Rev. 2020. McMurray JJV, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE, et al. Dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(21):1995-2008. Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J, et al. Cardiovascular and renal outcomes with empagliflozin in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(15):1413-1424. Zannad F, Ferreira JP, Pocock SJ, et al. SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of the EMPEROR-Reduced and DAPA-HF trials. Lancet. 2020;396(10254):819-829. Dorn GW, 2nd, Robbins J, Sugden PH. Phenotyping hypertrophy: eschew obfuscation. Circ Res. 2003;92(11):1171-1175. Grossman W, Paulus WJ. Myocardial stress and hypertrophy: a complex interface between biophysics and cardiac remodeling. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(9):3701-3703. Azevedo PS, Polegato BF, Minicucci MF, et al. Cardiac remodeling: concepts, clinical impact, pathophysiological mechanisms and pharmacologic treatment. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2016;106(1):62-69. Burchfield JS, Xie M, Hill JA. Pathological ventricular remodeling: mechanisms: part 1 of 2. Circulation. 2013;128(4):388-400. Wang C, Wang X. The interplay between autophagy and the ubiquitin-proteasome system in cardiac proteotoxicity. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1852(2):188-194. Doenst T, Nguyen TD, Abel ED. Cardiac metabolism in heart failure: implications beyond ATP production. Circ Res. 2013;113(6):709-724. He Y, Huang W, Zhang C, et al. Energy metabolism disorders and potential therapeutic drugs in heart failure. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B. 2020. Azevedo PS, Minicucci MF, Santos PP, et al. Energy metabolism in cardiac remodeling and heart failure. Cardiol Rev. 2013;21(3):135-140. Münzel T, Gori T, Keaney JF, Jr., et al. Pathophysiological role of oxidative stress in systolic and diastolic heart failure and its therapeutic implications. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(38):2555-2564. Takimoto E, Kass DA. Role of oxidative stress in cardiac hypertrophy and remodeling. Hypertension. 2007;49(2):241-248. Mann DL. Innate immunity and the failing heart: the cytokine hypothesis revisited. Circ Res. 2015;116(7):1254-1268. Zannad F, Rossignol P, Iraqi W. Extracellular matrix fibrotic markers in heart failure. Heart Fail Rev. 2010;15(4):319-329. Deb A, Ubil E. Cardiac fibroblast in development and wound healing. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2014;70:47-55. Leask A. Getting to the heart of the matter: new insights into cardiac fibrosis. Circ Res. 2015;116(7):1269-1276. Luo M, Anderson ME. Mechanisms of altered Ca²⁺ handling in heart failure. Circ Res. 2013;113(6):690-708. Aimo A, Gaggin HK, Barison A, et al. Imaging, biomarker, and clinical predictors of cardiac remodeling in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. JACC Heart Fail. 2019;7(9):782-794. Wilcox JE, Fonarow GC, Yancy CW, et al. Factors associated with improvement in ejection fraction in clinical practice among patients with heart failure: findings from IMPROVE HF. Am Heart J. 2012;163(1):49-56.e42. DeVore AD, Hellkamp AS, Thomas L, et al. Improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction in outpatients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: data from CHAMP-HF. Circ Heart Fail. 2020;13(7):e006833. Park CS, Park JJ, Mebazaa A, et al. Characteristics, outcomes, and treatment of heart failure with improved ejection fraction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(6):e011077. Poglajen G, Anžič-Drofenik A, Zemljič G, et al. Long-term effects of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors on myocardial function in chronic heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;10(8). Chang HY, Chen KC, Fong MC, et al. Recovery of left ventricular dysfunction after sacubitril/valsartan: predictors and management. J Cardiol. 2020;75(3):233-241. Lupón J, Díez-López C, de Antonio M, et al. Recovered heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and outcomes: a prospective study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19(12):1615-1623. Bevan EG, Connell JM, Doyle J, et al. Candoxatril, a neutral endopeptidase inhibitor: efficacy and tolerability in essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 1992;10(7):607-613. Richards AM, Wittert GA, Espiner EA, et al. Effect of inhibition of endopeptidase 24.11 on responses to angiotensin II in human volunteers. Circ Res. 1992;71(6):1501-1507. Packer M, Califf RM, Konstam MA, et al. Comparison of omapatrilat and enalapril in patients with chronic heart failure: the Omapatrilat Versus Enalapril Randomized Trial of Utility in Reducing Events (OVERTURE). Circulation. 2002;106(8):920-926. Investigators PCftV. Intravenous nesiritide vs nitroglycerin for treatment of decompensated congestive heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;287(12):1531-1540. O'Connor CM, Starling RC, Hernandez AF, et al. Effect of nesiritide in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(1):32-43. Menendez JT. The mechanism of action of LCZ696. Card Fail Rev. 2016;2(1):40-46. Campbell DJ. Neprilysin inhibitors and bradykinin. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018;5:257. Jhund PS, McMurray JJ. The neprilysin pathway in heart failure: a review and guide on the use of sacubitril/valsartan. Heart. 2016;102(17):1342-1347. Monzo L, Lanzillo C, Tota C, et al. Sacubitril/valsartan effect on left ventricular remodeling: the case of a super-responder. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019;35(sup3):3-6. Januzzi JL, Jr., Prescott MF, Butler J, et al. Association of change in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide following initiation of sacubitril-valsartan treatment with cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Jama. 2019;322(11):1-11. Lee YH, Chiou WR, Hsu CY, et al. Different left ventricular remodeling patterns and clinical outcomes between non-ischemic and ischemic etiologies in heart failure patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan treatment. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2020. Simpson J, Jhund PS, Lund LH, et al. Prognostic models derived in PARADIGM-HF and validated in ATMOSPHERE and the Swedish Heart Failure Registry to predict mortality and morbidity in chronic heart failure. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(4):432-441. Chang HY, Feng AN, Fong MC, et al. Sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients: Real world experience on advanced chronic kidney disease, hypotension, and dose escalation. J Cardiol. 2019;74(4):372-380. Perry AS, Mann DL, Brown DL. Improvement of ejection fraction and mortality in ischaemic heart failure. Heart. 2020. Florea VG, Rector TS, Anand IS, et al. Heart failure with improved ejection fraction: clinical characteristics, correlates of recovery, and survival: results from the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2016;9(7). Hsiao FC, Wang CL, Chang PC, et al. Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: real-world experience from Taiwan. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2020;25(2):152-157. Cohen-Solal A, Jacobson AF, Piña IL. Beta blocker dose and markers of sympathetic activation in heart failure patients: interrelationships and prognostic significance. ESC Heart Fail. 2017;4(4):499-506. Felker GM, Ellison DH, Mullens W, et al. Diuretic therapy for patients with heart failure: JACC State-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(10):1178-1195. Vergaro G, Ghionzoli N, Innocenti L, et al. Noncardiac versus cardiac mortality in heart failure with preserved, midrange, and reduced ejection fraction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(20):e013441. Sacubitril/Valsartan (Entresto) for Heart Failure. Jama. 2015;314(7):722-723. Vardeny O, Claggett B, Packer M, et al. Efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan vs. enalapril at lower than target doses in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the PARADIGM-HF trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18(10):1228-1234. Martens P, Beliën H, Dupont M, et al. The reverse remodeling response to sacubitril/valsartan therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Cardiovasc Ther. 2018;36(4):e12435. Gonzalez-Torres L, Dr Diego C, Centurion R, et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition further reverses cardiac remodeling as compared to angiotensin inhibition in reduced heart failure patients. Clin Cardiol J. 2018;2:6-9. Chang PC, Wang CL, Hsiao FC, et al. Sacubitril/valsartan vs. angiotensin receptor inhibition in heart failure: a real-world study in Taiwan. ESC Heart Fail. 2020;7(5):3003-3012. Hu J, Wu Y, Zhou X, et al. Beneficial effects of sacubitril/valsartan at low doses in an Asian real-world heart failure population. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2020;76(4):445-451. Balmforth C, Simpson J, Shen L, et al. Outcomes and effect of treatment according to etiology in HFrEF: an analysis of PARADIGM-HF. JACC Heart Fail. 2019;7(6):457-465. Jones NR, Roalfe AK, Adoki I, et al. Survival of patients with chronic heart failure in the community: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;21(11):1306-1325. Okumura N, Jhund PS, Gong J, et al. Effects of sacubitril/valsartan in the PARADIGM-HF Trial (prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to determine impact on global mortality and morbidity in heart failure) according to background therapy. Circ Heart Fail. 2016;9(9). Solomon SD, Claggett B, Desai AS, et al. Influence of ejection fraction on outcomes and efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to determine impact on global mortality and morbidity in heart failure (PARADIGM-HF) trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2016;9(3):e002744. Kramer DG, Trikalinos TA, Kent DM, et al. Quantitative evaluation of drug or device effects on ventricular remodeling as predictors of therapeutic effects on mortality in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analytic approach. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(5):392-406. Mehra MR, Kobashigawa J, Starling R, et al. Listing criteria for heart transplantation: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines for the care of cardiac transplant candidates--2006. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006;25(9):1024-1042. Mehra MR, Canter CE, Hannan MM, et al. The 2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation listing criteria for heart transplantation: A 10-year update. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016;35(1):1-23. Tini G, Bertero E, Signori A, et al. Cancer mortality in trials of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(18):e016309. Lin AH, Chin JC, Sicignano NM, et al. Repeat hospitalizations predict mortality in patients with heart failure. Mil Med. 2017;182(9):e1932-e1937. Bello NA, Claggett B, Desai AS, et al. Influence of previous heart failure hospitalization on cardiovascular events in patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction. Circ Heart Fail. 2014;7(4):590-595. Swedberg K, Komajda M, Böhm M, et al. Ivabradine and outcomes in chronic heart failure (SHIFT): a randomised placebo-controlled study. Lancet. 2010;376(9744):875-885. McDonagh T, Damy T, Doehner W, et al. Screening, diagnosis and treatment of iron deficiency in chronic heart failure: putting the 2016 European Society of Cardiology heart failure guidelines into clinical practice. Eur J Heart Fail. 2018;20(12):1664-1672.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/81921-
dc.description.abstract"研究背景 心臟衰竭 (heart failure, HF) 為臨床上複雜的症候群,主要為心臟結構或功能受損,使心室充血或射血功能下降,產生相關症狀或降低運動耐受。過去近30年來有許多針對左心室射出分率低下心臟衰竭 (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, HFrEF) 治療之臨床試驗,國際心臟衰竭治療指引也根據大型試驗結果制定治療建議,且在最新指引一線治療藥物中新增了sacubitril/valsartan (S/V)。然而,在臨床使用上仍有部分病人使用S/V後預後不理想,因此欲藉由預後預測模型了解影響因子,但多數預後預測模型僅針對啟用S/V時基礎特性及併用藥,而未考慮啟用S/V後隨時間變動之用藥、心臟超音波及腎臟功能參數與住院情形。 研究目的 本研究目的有以下兩點:(1) 藉由臨床上接受S/V治療之HF病人,分析預後影響因子,建立預後之解釋與預測模型;(2) 探討啟用S/V後6個月左心室射出分率 (left ventricular ejection fraction , LVEF) 改善程度與預後之相關性,以及6個月LVEF改善程度之潛在影響因子。 研究方法 本研究回溯2017年3月1日至2019年2月28日於國立臺灣大學醫學院附設醫院啟用S/V之HF病人,根據啟用S/V前之心臟超音波參數篩選出LVEF < 40% 之HFrEF病人。同時利用臺大醫院電子病歷系統蒐集該族群啟用S/V前基礎特性、實驗室數值、治療史、住院史及相關用藥,以及啟用S/V後使用情形、併用藥物、心臟超音波與腎臟功能參數及住院情形。 本研究定義之研究終點為全因性死亡或接受心臟移植之綜合事件,藉由Cox’s proportional hazards model with time-dependent covariates (Cox’s model) 進行存活分析,啟用S/V前非隨時間變化相關參數以時間獨立共變數 (time-fixed covariate) 代入,啟用S/V後隨時間變化相關參數以時間相依共變數 (time-dependent covariate) 代入,以p-value < 0.05作為顯著標準納入最終預後之預測模型中。啟用S/V後6個月LVEF改善程度之潛在影響因子以單變項分析做初步探討,並利用Kaplan-Meier method及log-rank test了解其與綜合事件之相關性。 研究結果 針對模型之建立,初步納入333位接受S/V治療之HF病人,排除18位無法追溯啟用前用藥,並依據納入模型變項及相關定義,排除23位變項資料有缺失、1位於啟用後30天內發生事件無法分析者,最終有291位納入Cox’s model分析,在追蹤中位數33.6個月期間共有47位 (16.2%) 發生綜合事件。 本研究建立兩個模型,Cox’s model A納入啟用S/V前特性及用藥與啟用S/V後用藥,模型顯示有22個變項與較差之預後有關,包含:(1) 基礎特性:紐約心臟協會功能分級 (New York Heart Association functional class) III-IV、透析和心臟再同步節律器 (cardiac resynchronization pacemaker);(2) 啟用S/V前心臟功能與結構:LVEF低下、左心室後壁厚度較薄和二尖瓣逆流 (mitral regurgitation, MR) 較嚴重;(3) 啟用S/V前用藥:未使用angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor或angiotensin receptor blocker、使用isosorbide mononitrate、nicorandil每日劑量較高;(4) 啟用S/V後校正latency period時間點之用藥:S/V每日劑量較低、3個月內β-blocker累積劑量較低、loop-diuretic每日平均劑量較高、3個月內ivabradine劑量降低及doxazosin總累積劑量較高。 Cox’s model B除了納入啟用S/V前特性及用藥與啟用S/V後用藥情形,同時納入啟用S/V後心臟超音波、腎臟功能參數以及住院情形,並篩選具臨床意義之變項。此模型顯示有11個變項與較差之預後有關,包含:(1) 基礎特性:透析;(2) 啟用S/V後心臟功能與結構:LVEF低下、LVEF降低、左心室舒張末期內徑 (left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, LVEDD) 較小;(3) 啟用S/V後腎臟功能:肌酸酐 (creatinine, CRE) 增加、血清尿素氮 (blood urea nitrogen)/ CRE平均值較高 (未達統計顯著)、血紅素低下;(4) 啟用S/V後校正latency period時間點之用藥:S/V每日劑量較低、β-blocker每日劑量較低、nicorandil每日劑量較高。 針對探討啟用S/V後LVEF改善程度與預後之相關性,以及LVEF改善程度之潛在影響因子,共有144位具有啟用S/V前及6個月後LVEF數值。Kaplan-Meier method顯示啟用S/V後6個月LVEF改善程度 < 5% (未反應者,n = 88) 事件發生風險較高 (log-rank test之p-value = 0.0313)。單變項分析顯示未反應者啟用S/V前LVEDD (未反應者 68.0 ± 9.9 vs. 反應者62.8 ± 7.9 mm,p-value = 0.0022)、左心室收縮末期內徑 (未反應者 58.7 ± 10.0 vs. 反應者53.7 ± 6.9 mm,p-value = 0.0033) 及左心房直徑較大 (未反應者 47.6 ± 8.1 vs. 反應者44.5 ± 5.8 mm,p-value = 0.0170),MR較嚴重 (p-value = 0.0115),同時HF病程也較長 (未反應者 5.2 ± 4.4 vs. 反應者2.7 ± 4.7年,p-value < 0.0001)。 結論 臨床上接受S/V治療之HF病人其預後受到其本身基礎特性、啟用S/V前後相關用藥、心臟結構功能及腎臟功能影響。在臨床上可參考本研究之預後解釋與預測模型,以作為臨床上優化藥物治療或預測預後的依據。未來建議此模型考慮變項與預後之非線性關係,找出具有臨床意義之數值範圍或臨界值,使其解釋與預測能力更佳。同時建議未來研究可利用多變項模型分析心臟重塑恢復之相關因子,以獲得更符合實際臨床狀況之結論。"zh_TW
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2022-11-25T03:06:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-2409202115410600.pdf: 5797538 bytes, checksum: c78b119dd9ee8aac5a98bcb6bb386506 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2021
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書...i 誌謝...ii 中文摘要...iii Abstract...vi 目錄...ix 圖目錄...xii 表目錄...xiii 第一章 緒論...1 壹、心臟衰竭綜論...1 貳、心臟重塑於心臟衰竭之角色...12 參、Sacubitril/valsartan簡介...19 肆、心臟衰竭病人使用sacubitril/valsartan臨床案例討論...25 伍、當前研究之限制...29 陸、研究目的...29 第二章 研究方法...30 壹、研究架構...30 貳、研究對象之資料來源...30 參、研究族群納入與排除條件...30 肆、研究參數定義及處理...34 一、研究參數說明及定義...34 二、研究參數特殊情形與處理方式...34 三、數據整理...44 四、追蹤期間定義...45 五、研究終點定義與資料蒐集...45 六、心臟重塑恢復評估之參數與定義...46 伍、數據呈現與統計分析...47 一、收案族群數據呈現...47 二、類別組間比較...47 三、Sacubitril/valsartan治療之病人預後解釋與預測模型...48 四、心臟重塑恢復與預後相關性及其影響因子...50 第三章 結果...53 壹、研究收案結果...53 貳、收案族群相關特性與用藥情形...53 一、收案族群之基礎特性...53 二、啟用sacubitril/valsartan前最近一次處方之相關用藥...55 三、啟用sacubitril/valsartan時相關併用藥物...56 四、觀察期間內sacubitril/valsartan使用情形...57 參、心臟超音波參數變化情形...66 一、收案族群心臟超音波基礎值...66 二、收案族群心臟超音波參數變化...66 肆、NICM與ICM心臟衰竭探討...72 一、基礎特性比較...72 二、基礎心臟超音波參數比較...72 三、心臟超音波參數啟用前與啟用後變化情形...75 四、預後分析...75 伍、綜合事件發生之單變項分析...81 一、基礎特性比較...81 二、啟用sacubitril/valsartan前最近一次處方比較...85 三、啟用sacubitril/valsartan時相關併用藥物比較...85 四、心臟超音波基礎值與左心室射出分率變化比較...90 陸、建立解釋與預測sacubitril/valsartan治療病人預後之模型...93 一、Cox’s model A...93 二、Cox’s model B...94 柒、心臟重塑恢復之探討與其相關因子...95 一、生存曲線分析...95 二、單變項分析...96 第四章 討論...104 壹、收案族群相關特性與用藥情形...104 貳、心臟超音波參數變化情形...106 參、NICM與ICM心臟衰竭探討...107 肆、綜合事件發生之單變項分析...108 伍、Sacubitril/valsartan治療之病人預後解釋與預測模型...110 一、Cox’s model A之討論...110 二、Cox’s model B之討論...116 陸、心臟重塑恢復之探討與其相關因子...118 柒、臨床意義與探討...119 捌、臨床案例探討...120 第五章 研究特點與限制...122 壹、研究特點...122 貳、研究限制...122 第六章 結論與展望...125 第七章 參考文獻...127 第八章 專有名詞之中英文暨縮寫對照表...138 第九章 附錄...145
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subjectCox’s proportional hazards model with time-dependent covariateszh_TW
dc.subject心臟衰竭zh_TW
dc.subjectsacubitril/valsartanzh_TW
dc.subject左心室射出分率zh_TW
dc.subject全因性死亡zh_TW
dc.subject心臟移植zh_TW
dc.subjectHeart failureen
dc.subjectCox’s proportional hazards model with time-dependent covariatesen
dc.subjectheart transplantationen
dc.subjectall-cause deathen
dc.subjectleft ventricular ejection fractionen
dc.subjectsacubitril/valsartanen
dc.title左心室射出分率低下之心臟衰竭病人使用sacubitril-valsartan治療之死亡或心臟移植預測因子zh_TW
dc.titlePredictors of Death or Heart Transplantation in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction after Receiving Sacubitril-Valsartan Therapyen
dc.date.schoolyear109-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee李啟明(Hsin-Tsai Liu),陳盈憲(Chih-Yang Tseng)
dc.subject.keyword心臟衰竭,sacubitril/valsartan,左心室射出分率,全因性死亡,心臟移植,Cox’s proportional hazards model with time-dependent covariates,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordHeart failure,sacubitril/valsartan,left ventricular ejection fraction,all-cause death,heart transplantation,Cox’s proportional hazards model with time-dependent covariates,en
dc.relation.page149
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202103343
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2021-10-27
dc.contributor.author-college醫學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept臨床藥學研究所zh_TW
dc.date.embargo-lift2026-10-25-
Appears in Collections:臨床藥學研究所

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
U0001-2409202115410600.pdf
  Until 2026-10-25
5.66 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved