Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/81800Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 謝雨生(Yeu-Sheng Hsieh) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chia-Keey Khor | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 許佳琪 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-25T03:03:53Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-26 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2021-11-09 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-08-10 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Albertini, M., Kohli, M., and Vogel, C. (2007). Intergenerational transfers of time and money in European families: common patterns–different regimes? Journal of European social policy, 17(4):319–334. Attias Donfut, C., Ogg, J., and Wolff, F. C. (2005). European patterns of intergenerational financial and time transfers. European journal of Ageing, 2(3):161–173. Blood, R. O. and Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of family living. Free Press Glencoe. Bó, B., Zimmer, Z., and Rada, C. (2020). The structure and determinants of intergenerational support exchange flows in an Eastern European setting. Research on aging, 42(9-10):262–271. Cao, W. C. and Yeh, K. H. (2014). The intergenerational relationship under population aging: analysis on the changes in filial piety in Taiwan Society from 1994 to 2011. Sociology Studies, 2:116–144. (in Chinese). Chang, S. C., Hsu, S. C., and Li, W. H. (2018). “Good New Men” and “Good New Women”? Role obligations in contemporary Chinese marital relationship. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 50:209–261. (in Chinese). Chang, Y. H. and Chi, L. (1991). Changes in Taiwan household type: From Japanese Occupation Era to The Recession of Taiwan. Thought and Words, 29(4):85–113. Chen, X. and Silverstein, M. (2000). Intergenerational social support and the psychological well-being of older parents in China. Research on aging, 22(1):43–65. Chen, Y. H., Yi, C. C., and Lu, Y. H. (2000). Married women’s status in the family: An example of decision-making patterns. Taiwanese Journal of Sociology, 24:1–58. (in Chinese). Cheng, G. H. L., Ang, S., and Chan, A. (2021). Patterns of family support exchange and personal mastery in later life: A longitudinal study. Aging mental health, 25(4):686–694. Chesley, N. and Poppie, K. (2009). Assisting parents and in-laws: gender, type of assistance, and couples’ employment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(2):247–262. Chien, W. Y. and Yi, C. C. (2004). Consensus or discrepancy? The importance of conjugal pair as unit of study. Taiwan Sociology, 7:89–122. (in Chinese). Chien, W. Y. and Yi, C. C. (2012). Persistence and change of the marital power pattern in Taiwan. In Yi, C. C. and Chang, Y. H., editors, Social Change in Taiwan, 1985-2005: Family and Marriage, pages 125–179. Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica, Taipei. (in Chinese). Chien, W. Y. and Yi, C. C. (2014). Marital power structure in two Chinese societies: Measurement and mechanisms. Journal of comparative family studies, 45(1):93–111. Choi, H., Nam, B., Kim, S., and Park, C. (2019). Contact with parents and parents-in-law, gender, and marital satisfaction in Korea. Journal of Marriage and Family, 81(5):1192–1205. Chu, C. C., Xie, Y., and Yu, R. R. (2011). Coresidence with elderly parents: A comparative study of southeast China and Taiwan. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(1):120–135. Clogg, C. C. and Goodman, L. A. (1984). Latent structure analysis of a set of multidimensional contingency tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79(388):762–771. Cong, Z. and Silverstein, M. (2008). Intergenerational support and depression among elders in rural China: Do daughters-in-law matter? Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(3):599–612. Conger, R. D., Lorenz, F. O., Elder Jr, G. H., Simons, R. L., and Ge, X. (1993). Husband and wife differences in response to undesirable life events. Journal of Health and Social behavior, pages 71–88. Davey, A. and Eggebeen, D. J. (1998). Patterns of intergenerational exchange and mental health. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 53(2):86–95. de Jong Gierveld, J., Dykstra, P. A., and Schenk, N. (2012). Living arrangements, intergenerational support types and older adult loneliness in Eastern and Western Europe. Demographic Research, 27:167–200. Dykstra, P. A. and Fokkema, T. (2011). Relationships between parents and their adult children: A West European typology of late-life families. Ageing Society, 31(4):545–569. Eggebeen, D. J. (2005). Cohabitation and exchanges of support. Social forces, 83(3):1097–1110. England, P. (2010). The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender society, 24(2):149–166. Fingerman, K. L., Gilligan, M., VanderDrift, L., and Pitzer, L. (2012). In-law relationships before and after marriage: Husbands, wives, and their mothers-in-law. Research in Human Development, 9(2):106–125. Fingerman, K. L., Pitzer, L., Lefkowitz, E. S., Birditt, K. S., and Mroczek, D. (2008). Ambivalent relationship qualities between adults and their parents: Implications for the well-being of both parties. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 63(6):362–371. Goetting, A. (1990). Patterns of support among in-laws in the United States: A review of research. Journal of Family Issues, 11(1):67–90. Grundy, E. and Henretta, J. C. (2006). Between elderly parents and adult children: A new look at the intergenerational care provided by the ‘sandwich generation’. Ageing Society, 26(5):707–722. Guo, M., Chi, I., and Silverstein, M. (2012). The structure of intergenerational relations in rural China: A latent class analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(5):1114–1128. Hancock, P., Mangen, D. J., and McChesney, K. Y. (1988). The exchange dimension of solidarity: Measuring intergenerational exchange and functional solidarity. In Mangen, D. J., Bengtson, V. L., and Landry Jr, P. H., editors, Measurement of intergenerational relations, pages 156–186. Sage Publications, Inc. Henretta, J. C., Grundy, E., and Harris, S. (2002). The influence of socio-economic and health differences on parents’ provision of help to adult children: a British–United States comparison. Ageing Society, 22(4):441–458. Henz, U. (2009). Couples’ provision of informal care for parents and parents-in-law: Far from sharing equally? Ageing Society, 29(3):369–395. Henz, U. (2010). Parent care as unpaid family labor: How do spouses share? Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(1):148–164. Hogan, D. P., Eggebeen, D. J., and Clogg, C. C. (1993). The structure of intergenerational exchanges in American families. American journal of Sociology, 98(6):1428–1458. Hogerbrugge, M. J. and Silverstein, M. D. (2015). Transitions in relationships with older parents: From middle to later years. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70(3):481–495. Hsieh, Y. L. (2014). The representation and reality in life experience of married women. Journal of Contemporary Social Work, 6:1–49. (in Chinese). Hsieh, Y. S. and Jeng, Y. J. (2000). The application of latent structure models in behavioral science research. Chang Gung Nursing, 11(4):36–45. (in Chinese). Hsieh, Y. S. and Jou, Y. H. (2012). Worse or better? Trajectories of marital quality and their mutual influence among Taiwanese married couples. Taiwan Sociology, 23:101–154. (in Chinese). Hsu, S. C. and Huang, L. L. (2006). Beyond mother-daughter affection: Multiple harmonies for mothers- and daughters-in-law. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 26:35–72. (in Chinese). Hu, A. (2017). Providing more but receiving less: Daughters in intergenerational exchange in mainland China. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79(3):739–757. Huang, C. H. (2016). Family mainstay: Baby Boomers’ intergenerational support types. Journal of Human Development and Family Studies, 17:50–66. (in Chinese). Huang, C. H. and Lin, J. P. (2018). Adult children and their Boomer parents: The dynamics of intergenerational financial support exchange and life events. Journal of Human Development and Family Studies, 19:15–43. (in Chinese). Huang, M. L. and Hsieh, Y. S. (2014). Cohort size, educational reform and competition for educational opportunity in Taiwan. Journal of Population Studies, 49:1–40. (in Chinese). Hünteler, B. and Mulder, C. H. (2020). Geographic proximity to parents, intergenerational support exchange, and migration within Germany. European Journal of Population, 36:895–918. Ingersoll-Dayton, B., Starrels, M. E., and Dowler, D. (1996). Caregiving for parents and parents-in-law: Is gender important? The Gerontologist, 36(4):483–491. Jou, Y. H. (2020). Effect of power source and conflict coping strategy on marital relationships. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 62(3):391–420. (in Chinese). Kao, S. K. and Lin, J. P. (1998). The intergenerational exchange between rural elderly and their adult children. Review of Agricultural Extension Science, 15:77–105. (in Chinese). Keizer, R. (2014). Relationship satisfaction. In Michalos, A. C., editor, Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, pages 5437–5443. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht. Keizer, R. and Komter, A. (2015). Are “equals” happier than “less equals”? A couple analysis of similarity and well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(4):954–967. Kim, K., Birditt, K. S., Zarit, S. H., and Fingerman, K. L. (2020). Typology of parent–child ties within families: Associations with psychological well-being. Journal of Family Psychology, 34(4):448–458. Kim, K., Fingerman, K. L., Birditt, K. S., and Zarit, S. H. (2016). Capturing between and within-family differences in parental support to adult children: A typology approach. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 71(6):1034–1045. Kim, K., Zarit, S. H., Fingerman, K. L., and Han, G. (2015). Intergenerational exchanges of middle-aged adults with their parents and parents-in-law in Korea. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(3):791–805. Kroska, A. (2008). Examining husband-wife differences in the meaning of family financial support. Sociological Perspectives, 51(1):63–90. Kung, H. M. (1999). Intergenerational interaction between mothers- and daughters-in-law: A qualitative study. Research in Applied Psychology, 4:57–96. (in Chinese). Lan, P. C. (2004). Jealous madams, anxious mothers: Triangular relationships in the employment of migrant domestic workers. Taiwan Sociology, 8:43. (in Chinese). Lee, C. F. and Tang, S. M. (2013). The father-in-law and son-in-law relationship: A preliminary study. Research in Applied Psychology, 27:219–250. (in Chinese). Lee, E., Spitze, G., and Logan, J. R. (2003). Social support to parents-in-law: The interplay of gender and kin hierarchies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(2):396–403. Lee, G. R. and Ellithorpe, E. (1982). Intergenerational exchange and subjective wellbeing among the elderly. Journal of Marriage and the Family, pages 217–224. Lee, G. R., Netzer, J. K., and Coward, R. T. (1995). Depression among older parents: The role of intergenerational exchange. Journal of Marriage and the Family, pages 823–833. Lee, Y. J., Parish, W. L., and Willis, R. J. (1994). Sons, daughters, and intergenerational support in Taiwan. American journal of sociology, 99(4):1010–1041. Lee, Y. S. and Waite, L. J. (2005). Husbands’ and wives’ time spent on housework: A comparison of measures. Journal of marriage and family, 67(2):328–336. Li, T. S. and Chang, Y. Y. (2010). The intergenerational care-giving relationship: A qualitative inquiry of adult children’s experience in urban Taiwan. Formosa Journal of Mental Health, 23(1):99–124. (in Chinese). Liang, J., Krause, N. M., and Bennett, J. M. (2001). Social exchange and well-being: Is giving better than receiving? Psychology and aging, 16(3):511–523. Lin, I. F., Goldman, N., Weinstein, M., Lin, Y.-H., Gorrindo, T., and Seeman, T. (2003). Gender differences in adult children’s support of their parents in Taiwan. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(1):184–200. Lin, J. P. (2011). Types of intergenerational interaction in East Asian families. Modern China Studies, 18(1):212. (in Chinese). Lin, J. P. (2012). Intergenerational relations and a typology of intergenerational interaction between adult children and parents: Trends in Taiwanese families. In Yi, C. C. and Chang, Y. H., editors, Social Change in Taiwan, 1985-2005: Family and Marriage, pages 75–124. Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica, Taipei. (in Chinese). Lin, J. P. (2014). Intergenerational exchange between older parents and their noncoresident adult children. In Chen, W.-Q. and Wang, J.-H., editors, Family and Gender Review, volume 5, pages 86–105. Social Sciences Academic Press, Beijing. (in Chinese). Lin, J. P., Chang, T. F., and Huang, C. H. (2011). Intergenerational relations and life satisfaction among older women in Taiwan. International Journal of Social Welfare, 20:S47–S58. Lin, J. P. and Huang, C. H. (2017). Between adult children and aging parents: Intergenerational relationship and well-being in midlife. Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy, 29(3):1–34. (in Chinese). Lin, J. P. and Yi, C. C. (2011). Filial norms and intergenerational support to aging parents in China and Taiwan. International Journal of Social Welfare, 20:S109–S120. Lin, J. P. and Yi, C. C. (2013). A comparative analysis of intergenerational relations in East Asia. International Sociology, 28(3):297–315. Lu, L., Kao, S. F., and Chen, F. Y. (2006). Psychological traditionality, modernity, filial piety and their influences on subjective well-being: A parent-child dyadic design. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 25:243–278. (in Chinese). Lu, Y. H. (2011). Changes in gender-role attitudes in Taiwan, 1991-2001. Taiwanese Journal of Sociology, 48:51–94. (in Chinese). Lu, Y. H. and Jou, Y. H. (2015). The gender-role attitudes construction from adolescence to young adulthood in the 21th century’s Taiwan. Taiwanese Journal of Sociology, 58:95–155. (in Chinese). Lu, Y. H. and Yi, C. C. (2005). Conjugal resources and the household division of labor under Taiwanese social change: A comparison between the 1970s and 1990s social-cultural contexts. Taiwan Sociology, 10:41–94. (in Chinese). Ma, K. S. (2010). Close to parents or parents-in-Law? Comparing the relationship of adult children to their aging parents and in-laws in Taiwan. Journal of Taiwan Studies, 6:45–82. (in Chinese). Mangen, D. J., Bengtson, V. L., and Landry Jr, P. H. (1988). Measurement of intergenerational relations. Sage Publications, Inc. Mangen, D. J. and Westbrook, G. J. (1988). Measuring intergenerational norms. In Mangen, D. J., Bengtson, V. L., and Landry Jr, P. H., editors, Measurement of intergenerational relations, pages 187–206. Sage Publications, Inc. Merz, E. M., Consedine, N. S., Schulze, H. J., and Schuengel, C. (2009). Wellbeing of adult children and ageing parents: Associations with intergenerational support and relationship quality. Ageing and society, 29(5):783. Park, K. S., Phua, V., McNally, J., and Sun, R. (2005). Diversity and structure of intergenerational relationships: Elderly parent–adult child relations in Korea. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 20(4):285–305. Peters-Davis, N. D., Moss, M. S., and Pruchno, R. A. (1999). Children-in-law in caregiving families. The Gerontologist, 39(1):66–75. Pinquart, M. and Sörensen, S. (2011). Spouses, adult children, and children-in-law as caregivers of older adults: A meta-analytic comparison. Psychology and aging, 26(1):1–14. Polenick, C. A., DePasquale, N., Eggebeen, D. J., Zarit, S. H., and Fingerman, K. L. (2018). Relationship quality between older fathers and middle-aged children: Associations with both parties’ subjective well-being. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 73(7):1203–1213. Qian, Y. and Sayer, L. C. (2016). Division of labor, gender ideology, and marital satisfaction in East Asia. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(2):383–400. Rago, M. (2016). Family development theory. Encyclopedia of family studies, pages 1–6. Ross, C. E. (1987). The division of labor at home. Social forces, 65(3):816–833. Rossi, A. S. and Rossi, P. P. H. (1990). Of human bonding: Parent child relations across the life course. Transaction Publishers. Schenk, N. and Dykstra, P. A. (2012). Continuity and change in intergenerational family relationships: An examination of shifts in relationship type over a three year period. Advances in Life Course Research, 17(3):121–132. Shuey, K. and Hardy, M. A. (2003). Assistance to aging parents and parents-in-law: Does lineage affect family allocation decisions? Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(2):418–431. Silverstein, M. and Bengtson, V. L. (1997). Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult child-parent relationships in American families. American journal of Sociology, 103(2):429–60. Silverstein, M., Gans, D., and Yang, F. M. (2006). Intergenerational support to aging parents: The role of norms and needs. Journal of family Issues, 27(8):1068–1084. Spitze, G. and Logan, J. (1990). Sons, daughters, and intergenerational social support. Journal of Marriage and the Family, pages 420–430. Szinovacz, M. E. and Davey, A. (2008). The division of parent care between spouses. Ageing Society, 28(4):571–597. Thomas, P. A., Liu, H., and Umberson, D. (2017). Family relationships and wellbeing. Innovation in Aging, 1(3):1–11. Tsai, Y. M. and Yi, C. C. (1997). Persistence and changes in Chinese family values: The Taiwanese case. In Chang, L. Y., Lu, Y. H., and Wang, F. C., editors, Taiwanese Society in 1990s: Taiwan Social Change Survey Symposium Series II (part II), pages 123–169. The Preparatory Office of the Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica, Taipei. van Delden, H., Dykstra, P., and Stuifbergen, M. (2008). The implications of today’s family structures for support giving to older parents. Ageing and Society, 28(3):413–434. Van Gaalen, R. I. and Dykstra, P. A. (2006). Solidarity and conflict between adult children and parents: A latent class analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(4):947–960. Wang, Y. T. and Yang, W. S. (2019). Changes and trends in family structure in Taiwan, 1990 to 2010. Journal of Family Issues, 40(14):1896–1911. Weng, K. J., Yang, C. L., and Renn, S. L. (2020). Attitude-behavior gap of gender equality in the division of household labor. Journal of Population Studies, 61:97–139. (in Chinese). Whitbeck, L. B., Simons, R. L., and Conger, R. D. (1991). The effects of early family relationships on contemporary relationships and assistance patterns between adult children and their parents. Journal of Gerontology, 46(6):S330–S337. White, J. M. (2003). Family development theory. In Ponzetti, J., editor, Intergenerational Encyclopedia of Marriage and Family, volume 2, pages 572–575. Macmillan Reference USA, 2nd edition. Willson, A. E., Shuey, K. M., and Elder Jr, G. H. (2003). Ambivalence in the relationship of adult children to aging parents and in-laws. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(4):1055–1072. Wong, E. L. Y., Liao, J. M., Etherton-Beer, C., Baldassar, L., Cheung, G., Dale, C. M., Flo, E., Husebø, B. S., Lay-Yee, R., Millard, A., et al. (2020). Scoping review: Intergenerational resource transfer and possible enabling factors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21):7868. Wu, C. Y. (2004). Intergenerational ambivalent experiences of couples: “His” ambivalent experiences? “Her” ambivalent experiences? Chinese Annual Report of Guidance and Counseling, 15:123–149. (in Chinese). Wu, C. Y. and Chao, S. C. (2004). Utilizing data from multiple family members to building up intergenerational ambivalent experiences. Formosa Journal of Mental Health, 17:75–111. (in Chinese). Xie, Y. and Zhu, H. (2009). Do sons or daughters give more money to parents in urban China? Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(1):174–186. Yeh, K. H. (1997). Changes in the Taiwan people’s concept of filial piety. In Chang, L. Y., Lu, Y. H., and Wang, F. C., editors, Taiwanese Society in 1990s: Taiwan Social Change Survey Symposium Series II (part II), pages 171–214. The Preparatory Office of the Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica, Taipei City. (in Chinese). Yeh, K. H. (2003). The beneficial and harmful effects of filial piety: An integrative analysis. Progress in Asian Social Psychology: Conceptual and Empirical Contributions: Conceptual and Empirical Contributions, 42:67–82. Yeh, K. H. (2009). Intergenerational exchange behaviors in Taiwan: The filial piety perspective. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 31:97–141. (in Chinese). Yi, C. C. (1982). Sex role attitudes and ideal family size: A study of residents of Minneapolis, Minnesota. National Taiwan University Journal of Sociology, 15:172–195. Yi, C. C. (2014). The continuity and change of the intergenerational relations in Taiwan: An interplay of resources and norms. Sociological Studies, 3:189–215. (in Chinese). Yi, C. C. (2019). Changing Taiwanese families: Research concerns of family sociologists. Research on Women in Modern Chinese History, 34:219–254. (in Chinese). Yi, C. C. (2021a). Taiwan Youth Project: TYP 2017 Survey (Adult Survey Wave 3) (Public Access Data) (D00188) [data file]. Yi, C. C. (2021b). Taiwan Youth Project: TYP 2018 Spouse Survey (Spouse Survey Wave 3) (Public Access Data) (D00189) [data file]. Yi, C. C. and Chang, C. F. (2019). Family and gender in Taiwan. In Liu, J. and Yamashita, J., editors, Routledge Handbook of East Asian Gender Studies, pages 236–275. Routledge. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/81800 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究目的有二：（1）探究台灣年輕已婚夫妻與雙方父母的代間交換類型；（2）分析夫妻、雙方父母及代間特徵與代間交換類型之間的關係。分析資料來自中央研究院社會學研究所「家庭與生命歷程研究小組」推行的長期追蹤調查研究，「臺灣青少年成長歷程研究」的第二階段第三次成年期調查之成人合併樣本第三波（TYP2017）及配偶樣本第三波（TYP2018）作為分析樣本。採用潛在類別分析法界定代間交換類型，並使用五項判準描述交換內容，以概念化並命名各潛在交換類型。這五項判準分別為：夫妻交換傾向、家庭交換傾向、父母交換傾向、資源轉移流向、經常交換的百分比。再以多類別邏輯迴歸探討夫妻、父母和代間特性與潛在代間交換類型的關係。研究發現：臺灣年輕夫妻家庭的代間資源交換類型有32% 屬於「夫妻低交換型」、22% 屬於「夫妻與男方父母交換型」、18% 屬於「妻子與女方父母交換型」、15% 屬於「夫妻勞務接受型」，以及13% 屬於「丈夫高交換型」。顯示台灣年輕夫妻與雙方父母的代間交換模式結合了父權、母權和平權的特徵。此外，本研究也發現夫妻、雙方父母及代間特徵都與臺灣年輕夫妻家庭的代間交換類型有關。顯著的夫妻特徵包括同住狀態、小孩照護需求、夫妻相對個人收入、旗子的工作狀態、相對孝道態度、相對弱化父權規範態度、相對性別角色平等態度，以及有無兄弟；顯著的父母特徵包括健康狀態、婚姻狀態以及平均教育年齡；顯著的代間特徵包括夫/妻感知關係滿意度。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2022-11-25T03:03:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0808202115485900.pdf: 8923308 bytes, checksum: ea48f04fedefa281df789ad91b6091ef (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | "1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . .1 1.1 Research Background and Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 LITERATURE REVIEW . . . . . . .9 2.1 Multidimensionality of Couples’ Intergenerational Exchange Patterns 9 2.1.1 Parents and Parents-in-law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.1.2 Husband and Wife . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.1.3 Father and Mother . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.1.4 Exchanged Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2.1.5 Give and Receive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 2.1.6 Scoring and Typology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 2.1.7 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 2.2 Theoretical Explanations on Couples’ Intergenerational Exchange . 28 2.2.1 Familial Norms’ Perspective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 2.2.2 Gender Ideology Perspective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 2.2.3 Resources Perspective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 2.2.4 Practicality Needs Perspective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 2.2.5 Structural Opportunity Perspective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 2.2.6 Intergenerational Relationship Satisfaction Perspective . . . 34 2.2.7 Family Life Cycle Stage Perspective . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 2.3 Taiwan Family System and Family Relationships in Past and Present 38 3 RESEARCH DESIGN . . . . . . .43 3.1 Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 3.2 Measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 3.2.1 Dependent Variables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 3.2.2 Independent Variables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 3.2.3 Control Variables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 3.3 Sample Cleaning Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 3.4 Analytic Strategies and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 3.4.1 Typology of Intergenerational Exchange . . . . . . . . . . . 60 3.4.2 Relationship between Intergenerational Exchange and Couple, Parental, and Intergenerational Characteristics . . . . . 63 4 RESULTS . . . . . . .65 4.1 Characteristics of the Couple’s Sample . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 4.2 Intergenerational Exchange of Young Married Couples in Taiwan . . 74 4.2.1 Intergenerational Exchange Patterns of Young Taiwanese Couples . . . . 74 4.2.2 Determinants of Distinct Intergenerational Exchange Patterns 95 4.3 The Determinants of Intergenerational Exchange Patterns . . . . . . 106 5 CONCLUSION, DISCUSSION, AND SUGGESTION . . . . . . .123 5.1 Conclusion and Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 5.2 Suggestion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 References . . . . . . .135 " | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 潛在類別分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 臺灣家庭 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 代間交換 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 夫妻關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 姻親關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 親子關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | in-law relationship | en |
| dc.subject | husband-wife relationship | en |
| dc.subject | intergenerational exchange | en |
| dc.subject | Taiwan families | en |
| dc.subject | parent-child relationship | en |
| dc.subject | latent class analysis | en |
| dc.title | 臺灣年輕夫妻與父母及配偶父母的代間交換模式之異同 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Differences and Similarities in Patterns of Intergenerational Exchange with Parents and Parents-in-law between Young Married Couples in Taiwan | en |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 109-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 周玉慧(Hsin-Tsai Liu),陳玉華(Chih-Yang Tseng) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 臺灣家庭,代間交換,夫妻關係,姻親關係,親子關係,潛在類別分析, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Taiwan families,intergenerational exchange,husband-wife relationship,in-law relationship,parent-child relationship,latent class analysis, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 148 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202102187 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2021-08-11 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物產業傳播暨發展學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2024-08-26 | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 生物產業傳播暨發展學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0808202115485900.pdf | 8.71 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.