請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8135
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 簡旭伸(Shiuh-Shen Chien) | |
dc.contributor.author | Li-Cheng Tang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 湯立成 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T00:49:10Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-21 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T00:49:10Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-08-21 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-08-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 外文參考文獻 Analoui, F., Danquah, J. K. (2017). Capacity Development: The World Bank and UNDP Perceptive. In Critical Capacity Development (pp. 43–59). Springer. Arndt, C., Jones, S., Tarp, F. (2009). Aid and growth: Have we come full circle? Univ. of Copenhagen Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper, 09–22. Atkinson, J. (2014). Aid in Taiwan’s foreign policy: Putting Ma Ying-jeou’s aid reforms in historical perspective. The Pacific Review, 27(3), 409–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2014.909524 Atkinson, J. (2018). The real East Asian Aid model: Development assistance as an instrument of comprehensive security in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. Development Policy Review, 36(3), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12283 Baker, J. L. (2000). Evaluating the impact of development projects on poverty: A handbook for practitioners. The World Bank. Banerjee, A. V., Deaton, A., Lustig, N., Rogoff, K., Hsu, E. (2006). An evaluation of World Bank research, 1998-2005. Available at SSRN 2950327. Barton, M. A., Sutcliffe, K. M. (2009). Overcoming dysfunctional momentum: Organizational safety as a social achievement. Human Relations, 62(9), 1327–1356. Burnside, C., Dollar, D. (2000). Aid, policies, and growth. American Economic Review, 90(4), 847–868. Cárdenas V, H., Arturo, O. H., Anabel, P. R., Gersan, L. (2002). PRODUCCION Y COMERCIALIZACION DE CARNE DE CERDO EN HONDURAS (p. 87). Chan, G. (1997). Taiwan as an Emerging Foreign Aid Donor: Developments, Problems, and Prospects. Pacific Affairs, 70(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.2307/2761227 Chen, J. (2002). Foreign policy of the new Taiwan: Pragmatic diplomacy in Southeast Asia. Edward Elgar Publishing. Cheng, T. Y. (1994). Foreign aid in ROC diplomacy. Contemporary China and the Changing International Community, 170–184. Clark, N., Hall, A., Sulaiman, R., Naik, G. (2003). Research as Capacity Building: The Case of an NGO Facilitated Post-Harvest Innovation System for the Himalayan Hills. World Development, 31(11), 1845–1863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.04.001 Dalgaard, C., Hansen, H., Tarp, F. (2004). On the empirics of foreign aid and growth. The Economic Journal, 114(496), F191–F216. Dalgaard, C.-J., Hansen, H. (2001). On aid, growth and good policies. Journal of Development Studies, 37(6), 17–41. Doucouliagos, H., Paldam, M. (2010). Conditional aid effectiveness: A meta‐study. Journal of International Development: The Journal of the Development Studies Association, 22(4), 391–410. Drew, S. A., Smith, P. A. (1995). The learning organization:“change proofing” and strategy. The Learning Organization, 2, 4–14. Easterly, W., Levine, R., Roodman, D. (2004). Aid, policies, and growth: Comment. American Economic Review, 94(3), 774–780. Engel, P., Keijzer, N., Land, T. (2007). A balanced approach to monitoring and evaluating capacity and performance. A Proposed Framework ECDPM Maastricht. FAO. (1987). Honduras: fomento de la producción porcina: resultados y recomendaciones del proyecto (HON-82-022), FAO, Roma FAO. (2010). Enhancing FAO’s practices for supporting capacity development of member countries. Learning module 1. FAO. (2015). FAO Approaches to capacity development in programming: Processes and tools. Learning module 2 (Revised edition). Folke, C., Biggs, R., Norström, A. V., Reyers, B., Rockström, J. (2016). Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecology and Society, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08748-210341 Fukuda-Parr, S., Lopes, C., Malik, K. (Eds.). (2002). Capacity for development: New solutions to old problems. Earthscan Publications. Gibson, C. C., Andersson, K., Ostrom, E., Shivakumar, S. (2005). The Samaritan’s dilemma: The political economy of development aid. Oxford University Press on Demand. Godfrey, M., Sophal, C., Kato, T., Vou Piseth, L., Dorina, P., Saravy, T., Savora, T., Sovannarith, S. (2002). Technical Assistance and Capacity Development in an Aid-dependent Economy: The Experience of Cambodia. World Development, 30(3), 355–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00121-8 Jaycox, E. V. (1993). Capacity building: The missing link in African development. Address to the African-American Institute Conference on Capacity Building. Reston, VA. Jones, H., Hearn, S. (2009). Outcome mapping: A realistic alternative for planning, monitoring and evaluation. Overseas Development Institute. JICA. (1992). 《ホンデュラス養豚開発計画事前(コンタクト)調査団報告書》, 東京 : 国際協力事業団. Kanbur, S. R., Sandler, T., Morrison, K. M. (1999). The future of development assistance: Common pools and international public goods (Vol. 25). Overseas Development Council Washington, DC. Kuhl, S. (2009). Capacity Development as the Model for Development Aid Organizations. Development and Change, 40(3), 551–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01538.x Lee, W.-C. (1993). Taiwan’s Foreign Aid Policy. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 20(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00927678.1993.10771147 Linnell, D. (2003). Evaluation of capacity building: Lessons from the field. Alliance for Nonprofit Management. Lusthaus, C., Anderson, G., Murphy, E. (1995). Institutional assessment: A framework for strengthening organizational capacity for IDRC’s research partners. Idrc. Lusthaus, Charles, Marie-He ́le`ne Adrien and Mark Perstinger (1999) ‘Capacity Development. Definitions, Issues and Implications for Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation’. Universalia Occasional Paper No 35. Montreal: Universalia. Milward, A. S. (2003). The reconstruction of western Europe, 1945-51. Routledge. Morgan, P. (1998). Capacity and capacity development-some strategies. Hull: Canadian International Development Agency. Nair, G. G. (2003). Nurturing capacity in developing countries: From consensus to practice. Nelson, P. J. (2007). Human rights, the Millennium Development Goals, and the future of development cooperation. World Development, 35(12), 2041–2055. OECD, D. (2006). The challenge of capacity development: Working towards good practice. OECD Papers, 6(1), 1–35. OECD, D. (2011). Busan Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation. Retrieved Sept, 7, 2015. Potter, C., Brough, R. (2004). Systemic capacity building: A hierarchy of needs. Health Policy and Planning, 19(5), 336–345. Rajan, R. G., Subramanian, A. (2008). Aid and growth: What does the cross-country evidence really show? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(4), 643–665. Rich, T. S. (2009). Status for sale: Taiwan and the competition for diplomatic recognition. Issues Studies, 45(4), 159–188. Roberts, D. (2013). Managing knowledge results: An exploration of the systems and practices of development agencies. Rostow, W. W. (1990). The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto. Cambridge university press. Saad, M., Cicmil, S., Greenwood, M. (2002). Technology transfer projects in developing countries—Furthering the Project Management perspectives. International Journal of Project Management, 20(8), 617–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00024-8 Sachs, J. (2005). The end of poverty: How we can make it happen in our lifetime. Penguin UK. Sanders, A., Ramírez, A., Morazán, L. (2006). CADENAS AGRICOLAS EN HONDURAS. Escuela Agricola Panamericana, Zamorano. Sato, J., Shimomura, Y. (2013). The rise of Asian donors: Japan’s impact on the evolution of emerging donors. Routledge. Sobeck, J., Agius, E. (2007). Organizational capacity building: Addressing a research and practice gap. Evaluation and Program Planning, 30(3), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.04.003 Stachowiak, S. (2009). Pathways for Change: Theories about How Policy Change Happens. Change. Organizational Research Services. Stallings, B., Kim, E. M. (2016). Japan, Korea, and China: Styles of ODA in East Asia. In Japan’s development assistance (pp. 120–134). Springer. Stockmann, R. (1997). The sustainability of development projects: An impact assessment of German vocational-training projects in Latin America. World Development, 25(11), 1767–1784. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(97)00067-3 Svensson, J. (2000). When is foreign aid policy credible? Aid dependence and conditionality. Journal of Development Economics, 61(1), 61–84. Watson, D. (2010). Measuring capacity development. Capacity Development in Practice. London: Earthscan. Wignaraja, K. (2009). Capacity development: A UNDP primer. UNDP. US Agency for International Development. (1988). Sustainability of Development Programs: A Compendium of Donor Experience. UNDP (2009). Overview of UNDP’s approach to supporting capacity development. Capacity Development Group, Bureau for Development Policy. United Nations Development Programme. UNDP (2010). Measuring capacity. New York: United Nations Development Programme. Vallejo, B., Wehn, U. (2016). Capacity Development Evaluation: The Challenge of the Results Agenda and Measuring Return on Investment in the Global South. World Development, 79, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.044 Whittle, S., Colgan, A., Rafferty, M. (2012). Capacity Building: What the literature tells us. Dublin: The Centre for Effective Services. Wolfensohn, J. (1998). The other crisis. Address to the Board of Governors. The World Bank. 中文參考文獻 王彩雲(2003)。我國對中美洲經濟援助策略之研究——以國際合作發展基金會為例。國立台北大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班論。 林德昌(1999)。兩岸經濟發展與對外經濟援助之研究。中國大陸研究,42期,6,17–30。 林德昌(2002)。從政府發展援助到國際發展合作建構台灣對外經援的新理論架構。國科會計畫,取自http://ir.lib.nsysu.edu.tw:8080/handle/987654321/31263 林詩音(2005)。<萬事可忘,難忘者銘心一段宏都拉斯行>。台肥刊物,取自https://www.taifer.com.tw/PublicationArticleDetailC004000.aspx?Cond=6471093d-5141-46e2-bf90-1591b62a32d6 李春芳、潘博光與黃天行(2002)。〈另類農業貸款~合作生產肉豬 宏都拉斯肉豬產銷班微額農貸先鋒計畫〉,國合會訊,10。 我國海外技術合作之執行(1987)。外交部非洲司。 海外技術合作委員會工作報告(1992)。海外技術合作委員會秘書處。 鄭麗園與王維真(2009)。天地行腳 :台灣技術人員的無國界貢獻。鄭麗園、王維真以及天下雜誌專案編輯團隊撰文,國際合作發展基金會。 官俊位(2002)。台灣技術團在格瑞那達辦理小農貸款計畫成效之評估。國立屏東科技大學熱帶農業研究所碩士論文。 官麗嘉(1982)。〈用汗水、淚水與心血耘出的田地——我國駐宏都拉斯農技服務團〉,光華雜誌。取自https://www.taiwan-panorama.com/Articles/Details? Guid=72af2a08-935c-4956-995d-186601159b22 CatId=1 高小玲(2005)。《探索歷史的榮耀─台灣對外援助45周年慶紀念專刊》。台北:財團法人國際合作發展基金會。 海外技術合作委員會(1997)。《海外技術合作委員會歷經三十六年之回顧:中華民國五十年五月至八十六年六月》。 黃天行(2001)。中華民國技術團於開發中國家辦理小農貸款之研究--以宏都拉斯為例。國立屏東科技大學熱帶農業研究所碩士論文。 國合會(2010)。99年度本會赴駐宏都拉斯及薩爾瓦多技術團業務考察報告,未公開資料。 國合會(2011a)。〈援外工作觀念進階技術手冊養豬計畫篇〉,未公開資料。 國合會(2011b)。宏都拉斯養豬計畫轉移規劃書,未公開資料。 國合會(2014a)。宏都拉斯養豬計畫結案報告,未公開資料。 國合會(2014b)。「推動技術合作轉型」期中評核特別報告,未公開資料。 國合會(2018)。107年「宏都拉斯豬隻繁養殖計畫」界定任務考察報告,未公開資料。 簡旭伸與吳奕辰(2016)。全球南方觀點下的國際發展與援助,發展研究與當代台灣社會,巨流出版社。 張朱揚與官俊位(2009)。〈撐起一片天-駐宏都拉斯技術團肉豬產銷班計畫的婦女〉,載《國合會電子報》126。取自www.icdf.org.tw/epaper_file/no126/126edm6.html 葛傳宇(2003)。國際對外援助新趨勢與台灣模式。育達研究叢刊,4,127-145。 羅玲玲(2004)。配種組合與雜交優勢。豬育種策略研討會,種豬發展基金會。 劉志偉(2009)。國際農糧體制與臺灣的糧食依賴: 戰後臺灣養豬業的歷史考察。臺灣史研究,16期,2,105–160。 劉曉鵬(2005)。回顧一九六○ 年代中華民國農技外交。問題與研究,44期,2,131–145。 劉曉鵬(2009)。非洲發展援助中的台灣經驗: 馬拉威的故事。問題與研究,48期,4,127–151。 薩卡羅(2017)。台灣與宏都拉斯農牧業合作之研究(2010-2015)。淡江大學,亞洲研究所數位學習碩士在職專班。http://www.AiritiLibrary.com/Publication/Index/U0002-0706201714182300 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8135 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 台灣對外援助實行長期駐點的技術合作模式,並以協助友邦提升農業生產力著稱。2010年,國際合作發展基金會推行技術合作模式的轉型,將技術團執行的援助計畫移轉給當地合作夥伴經營。然而,移轉後合作夥伴面臨計畫成果難以維持的問題。於此,有研究認為援助組織忽視合作夥伴的能力建構,只考慮計畫執行當下的產出,是計畫結束後無法發揮中長期影響力的原因。因此,本研究以能力發展概念探討長期駐點的技術合作模式,如何協助合作夥伴能力的培養。
本研究選擇台灣駐宏都拉斯技術團之養豬計畫為案例,透過養豬計畫歷史資料與檔案紀錄爬梳,建構計畫於當地的影響力。並從援助現場的田野觀察,以及訪談計畫駐外專家與當地合作夥伴,整理及分析其能力建構的缺陷。研究結果顯示,養豬計畫擁有自給自足的營運資金與畜牧專家駐點輔導,是計畫過去長期發揮影響力的關鍵。然而,計畫移轉後之經營困境,則是來自移轉過程忽視農業生產流程,所導致的核心技術流失。再來以能力發展觀點來說,專家長期駐點的制度,僅止於個人層次的技術性能力培養。並且,專家主導計畫的常態,是合作夥伴組織層次能力無法提升的主要原因。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Taiwan's foreign aid adopted a long-term technical cooperation model to assist diplomatic allies in improving agricultural productivity. In 2010, the International Cooperation and Development Foundation(ICDF) pursued the transformation of the technical cooperation model. Furthermore, ICDF gradually phased out of the assistance project and had local partners to take ownership. However, the partners faced the difficulty of maintaining the results. Some researchers believed that developmental agencies neglected local partners' capacity building and only facilitated the output of the project implementation, which is why the impact cannot continue in the long term. Therefore, this study uses the capacity development perspective as an analysis method to examine how long-term technical cooperation cultivated capacity.
In order to examine the long-term technical cooperation model, this study takes a pig-raising project of the Taiwan technical mission in Honduras as a case. This study collects historical data and technical records of the pig-raising project to construct the context. Moreover, this study sorts out the shortcomings of its capacity building from field observations and interviews with overseas experts and local partners. The result shows that the project had a self-sufficient fund and on-site guidance by experts, which is the key to the long-term impact. However, the project's dilemma was due to the neglect of the agricultural production process, which led to the loss of core technology. From the perspective of capacity development, the long-term model is limited to technical capacity training at the individual level. Furthermore, due to the Taiwan expert seized the leading role of the project makes it impossible for local partners to improve their functional capacity at the organizational level. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T00:49:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1808202014270400.pdf: 2989072 bytes, checksum: 5b1b96e544d21f6be67fd9059e6fbfba (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 I 摘要 II ABSTRACT III 目錄 IV 圖目錄 VI 表目錄 VII 第1章 緒論 1 1.1 研究動機與背景 1 1.2 研究目的與問題 10 1.3 研究方法 10 1.4 章節安排 13 第2章 文獻回顧 14 2.1. 國際援助發展 14 2.2. 能力發展 16 2.3 小結 28 第3章 台灣技術團駐宏都拉斯養豬計畫介紹 30 3.1. 宏國養豬產業 30 3.2. 駐宏都拉斯養豬計畫 32 3.3. 計畫基金效益與影響力 39 第4章 能力發展視角下的養豬計畫 53 4.1. 養豬計畫之移轉與移轉後考察 53 4.2. 養豬中心移轉後困境之能力評估 59 4.3. 計畫設計與能力發展邏輯之間的衝突 71 第5章 結論 80 參考文獻 84 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 以能力發展角度探討台灣技術團駐宏都拉斯養豬計畫 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Case Study of Pig-Rising Project from Capacity Development Perspective | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 高小玲(Hsiao-Ling Kao),湯京平(Ching-Ping Tang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 國際援助與發展,能力發展,台灣技術團,畜牧計畫, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Development aid,Capacity development,Taiwan technical mission,Livestock project, | en |
dc.relation.page | 94 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202003969 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-08-20 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 氣候變遷與永續發展國際學位學程 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 氣候變遷與永續發展國際學位學程(含碩士班、博士班) |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-1808202014270400.pdf | 2.92 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。