Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 理學院
  3. 地理環境資源學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8119
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor周素卿(Sue-Ching Jou)
dc.contributor.authorZIHLING HUANGen
dc.contributor.author黃紫翎zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-20T00:49:03Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-20T00:49:03Z-
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.submitted2020-08-20
dc.identifier.citationAdell, G. (1999). Literature review: theories and models of the peri-urban interface: a changing conceptual landscape. Retrieved from
Allen, P., Sachs, C. (1993). Sustainable agriculture in the United States: Engagements, silences, and possibilities for transformation. Food for the future: Conditions and contradictions of sustainability, 139-167.
Barlett, P. F., Conger, K. J. (2004). Three visions of masculine success on American farms. Men and Masculinities, 7(2), 205-227.
Bock, B. (2017). 2 Gender and Mobility. Gender and Rural Globalization: International Perspectives on Gender and Rural Development, 8.
Bruce, A. B., Castellano, R. L. S. (2016). Labor and alternative food networks: challenges for farmers and consumers. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 1-14.
Bruce, A. B., Castellano, R. L. S. (2017). Labor and alternative food networks: challenges for farmers and consumers. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 32(5), 403-416.
Carney, J. A. (1992). Peasant women and economic transformation in the Gambia. Development and Change, 23(2), 67-90.
Corbett, M. (2007). All kinds of potential: Women and out-migration in an Atlantic Canadian coastal community. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(4), 430-442.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches: Sage.
Dempsey, K. (1992). A man's town: inequality between women and men in rural Australia: Oxford University Press.
Deutsch, T. (2011). Memories of Mothers in the Kitchen Local Foods, History, and Women's Work. Radical History Review, 2011(110), 167-177.
Elmhirst, R. (2015). Feminist political ecology. In The Routledge Handbook of Gender and Development (pp. 82-90): Routledge.
Halfacree, K. (1997). Contrasting roles for the post-productivist countryside. In: Cloke, P. and Little, J (eds.) Contested Countryside Culture.: London: Routledge.
Halfacree, K. (2006). From dropping out to leading on? British counter-cultural back-to-the-land in a changing rurality. Progress in Human Geography, 30(3), 309-336.
Halfacree, K. (2007a). Back-To-The-Land In The Twenty-First Century - Making Connections With Rurality. . Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 98, No. 1,, 3-8.
Halfacree, K. (2007b). Back‐to‐the‐land in the twenty‐first century–making connections with rurality. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 98(1), 3-8.
Halfacree, K. (2012). Heterolocal identities? Counter‐urbanisation, second homes, and rural consumption in the era of mobilities. Population, space and place, 18(2), 209-224.
Halfacree, K. J. P., space, place. (2012). Heterolocal identities? Counter‐urbanisation, second homes, and rural consumption in the era of mobilities. 18(2), 209-224.
Hambleton, R. (2008). Annie's project: An educator's thoughts. Small farm digest.
Haraway, D. (1991). Animal sociology and a natural economy of the body politic: A political physiology of dominance. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, New York: Routledge.
Harcourt, W. (2017). Gender and sustainable livelihoods: linking gendered experiences of environment, community and self. Agriculture and Human Values, 34(4), 1007-1019.
Harding, S. G. (1986). The science question in feminism: Cornell University Press.
Harris, L. (2015). Hegemonic waters and rethinking natures otherwise. Practicing feminist political ecologies: moving beyond the green economy, ed. W. Harcourt, and IL Nelson, 157-181.
Hassanein, N. (1999). Changing the way America farms: Knowledge and community in the sustainable agriculture movement (Vol. 12): U of Nebraska Press.
Hayes-Conroy, J., Hayes-Conroy, A. (2013). Veggies and visceralities: A political ecology of food and feeling. Emotion, Space and Society, 6, 81-90.
Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. New York: Vintage.
Jansen, K. (2000). Labour, livelihoods and the quality of life in organic agriculture in Europe. Biological agriculture horticulture, 17(3), 247-278.
Jarosz, L. (2008). The city in the country: Growing alternative food networks in Metropolitan areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 24(3), 231-244.
Jarosz, L. (2011). Nourishing women: toward a feminist political ecology of community supported agriculture in the United States. Gender, Place Culture, 18(3), 307-326.
Jochimsen, M., Knobloch, U. (1997). Making the hidden visible: the importance of caring activities and their principles for any economy. Ecological Economics, 20(2), 107-112.
Johnston, J., Baker, L. (2005). Eating outside the box: FoodShare’s good food box and the challenge of scale. Agriculture and Human Values, 22(3), 313-325.
Liepins, R. (1998). “Women of Broad Vision”: Nature and Gender in the Environmental Activism of Australia's ‘Women in Agriculture’Movement. Environment and Planning A, 30(7), 1179-1196.
Little, J. (2013). Pampering, well-being and women's bodies in the therapeutic spaces of the spa. Social Cultural Geography, 14(1), 41-58.
Little, J. (2015). Nature, wellbeing and the transformational self. The geographical journal, 181(2), 121-128.
Little, J., Panelli, R. (2003). Gender research in rural geography. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 10(3), 281-289.
Mohanty, C. T., Russo, A., Torres, L. (1991). Third world women and the politics of feminism (Vol. 632): Indiana University Press.
Murdoch, J. (2000). Networks- a New Paradigm of Rural Development. Journal of Rural Studies, 16, 407-419.
Pedersen, K. B., Kjærgård, B. (2004). Do we have room for shining eyes and cows as comrades? Gender perspectives on organic farming in Denmark. Sociologia Ruralis, 44(4), 373-394.
Pilgeram, R., Amos, B. (2015). Beyond “Inherit It or Marry It”: Exploring How Women Engaged in Sustainable Agriculture Access Farmland. Rural Sociology, 80(1), 16-38.
Sheller, M., Urry, J. (2016). Mobilizing the new mobilities paradigm. Applied Mobilities, 1(1), 10-25.
Shisler, R. C., Sbicca, J. (2019). Agriculture as carework: The contradictions of performing femininity in a male-dominated occupation. Society Natural resources, 32(8), 875-892.
Som Castellano, R. L. (2016). Alternative Food Networks and the Labor of Food Provisioning: A Third Shift? Rural Sociology, 81(3), 445-469.
Sundberg, J. (2017). Feminist political ecology. The International Encyclopedia of Geography.
Trauger, A. (2004). ‘Because they can do the work’: Women farmers in sustainable agriculture in Pennsylvania, USA. Gender, Place Culture, 11(2), 289-307.
Watts, D. C., Ilbery, B., Maye, D. (2005). Making reconnections in agro-food geography: alternative systems of food provision. Progress in Human Geography, 29(1), 22-40.
WHATMORE, S. (1991). Farming Women: gender work and family labour. In: Baskingstoke, Macmillan.
Wilbur, A. (2014). Back-to-the-house? Gender, domesticity and (dis) empowerment among back-to-the-land migrants in Northern Italy. Journal of Rural Studies, 35, 1-10.
Wilbur, A. M. (2012). Seeding Alternatives: Back-to-the-land Migration and Alternative Agro-food Networks in Northern Italy: University of Glasgow.
Wylie, J. (2005). A single day's walking: narrating self and landscape on the South West Coast Path. Transactions of the institute of British Geographers, 30(2), 234-247.
方怡茹. (2009). 我國農民對農地功能與價值認知研究-鄉村類型化差異比較. 臺北大學不動產與城鄉環境學系學位論文(2009 年), 1-117.
金惠雯. (2018). 另類農業體系與團結經濟: 以 [部落 e 購] 為例. 臺中區農業改良場特刊, 85-105.
孫治本. (2004). 個人化與生活風格社群: 唐山.
梁炳琨. (2008). 農業食物在地化:台東縣池上鄉米食產業的探討. 地理學報, 53, 85-117.
廖哲強,蕭崑杉. (2010). 西方另類食物網絡文獻回顧及其地方意涵. 臺灣鄉村研究, 127-150.
劉克智, 董安琪. (2003). 台灣都市發展的演進―歷史的回顧與展望.
鄭鈺琳. (2007). 種出綠色生活圈:志願務農者的生活方式選擇與農耕生活風格社群之形成.
蕭崑杉. (2007). 聯合報漂鳥文化之旅座談會[線上資料〕.
謝琇玲, 侯韋光, 吳靜萍, 施廣南. (2018). 知遇之恩, 湧泉相報? 社會支持的效應分析-中介式調節模式探討. 商管科技季刊, 19(2), 223-255.
鍾怡婷. (2018). 永續轉型觀點下的食農教育: 以二個學童種稻體驗活動為例. 台灣鄉村研究(13), 35-55.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8119-
dc.description.abstract在台灣當代的新農返土浪潮中,可以發現為數不少的農業移居社群,憑藉著 在鄉村農業生活中感悟的生活,重新轉譯與反轉農業在鄉村作為糧食生產的價值, 不僅在環境教育、環境倫理與永續生活上開發與賦予新的意涵,更讓人重新學習 人與自然合作共處的可能。 除了農業的價值被創新開發,更有為數不少的都會女性,不同於以往的離農 女性,反其道而行移居鄉村。但是在鄉村傳統異性戀結構與在地社群的階層化下, 女性不僅在空間分工上受到傳統的規範,公共參與尚有少有決策影響力。而當代 多數鄉村的主流意見,仍以經濟開發、工業化生產的角度來治理鄉村,未充分考 慮到受高等教育的世代,已傾向後工業社會的生活方式和價值觀,移居女性來此 如何安居就成為了從私領域到公領域的大哉問。 當女性移居者,透過移居鄉村生活,習得與自然共處並透過自耕自食滋養自 我、甚至在鄉村與自然中自得其樂,結社共享、自處或養育下一代。「返土歸農」 在以血緣為基礎的非都會生活中,更顯得社會變遷的特殊性。本研究在返土運動 的政治經濟脈絡下,關注與「返土歸農」女性互動的鄉村社會,以及城鄉關係的 轉變。研究以「女性主義政治生態學」作為研究途徑,透過深度訪談與參與觀察 理解此返土實踐的動力。研究中發現,「返土歸農」女性與自然、返土社群的共 處合作,在另類農食網絡的脈絡下透過積極參與環境、食安相關的社會倡議、農 食教育,甚至是體制外的實驗教育,找回原先在都市生活中失去的健康福祉,並 在公共領域上增加其影響力。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis research examines the motivations of the women of “back-to-the-land” migrants and sustainable smallholder farmers self-identified as “friendly farming” how they actively involved in alternative agri-food networks in Taiwan. Contemporary back-to-the-land women migrants in Yilan embody a wide spectrum of personal and professional backgrounds, complicating attempts to generalize their tendency for adopting farming and their later experiences in rural areas. Certain commonalit ies endure, notwithstanding, including a discomfort with city life and the hope of health, well-being and greater freedom in the countryside. Drawing from interviews with “back-to-the-land” women migrants situated between a metropolitan and rural area of Taiwan, it argues that they learn to live with nature and nourish themselves by starting up their business with alternative agri-food networks. 'Back-to-the-land' lifestyle in the rural based on blood relation, are more particular than urban life in Taiwan. In this context, this study focuses on the rural society interacting with 'back-tothe- land' women migrants and the transformation of urban-rural relations. The study uses 'feminist political ecology' as a research approach, and understands the motivation of “back-to-the-land” movement through in-depth interviews and participation observation. Drawing from Foucault’s ethics of self-care, these motivations express a liberatory transformation of self that is also radically responsible to others and expressive of a post-capitalist politics. Feminist care ethics contributes to feminist political ecology by focusing upon the social relations of caring practice, and also revealing how self-care is ethically embodied and politically transformative in the case of 'back-to-the-land' women migrants active in alternative agri-food networks in Taiwan.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T00:49:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0
Previous issue date: 2020
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試論文審定書............................................................................................................. i
謝辭................................................................................................................................ ii
中文摘要........................................................................................................................iii
Abstract ......................................................................................................................... iv
圖目次………………………………………………………………………………vii
表目次...........................................................................................................................vii
第一章 緒論..................................................................................................................1
第一節研究背景 .................................................................................................... 1
第二節研究意識 ...................................................................................................... 3
第二章文獻回顧............................................................................................................6
第一節城鄉中的性別與移動/居............................................................................. 6
第二節另類農食網絡與全球化 ............................................................................ 12
第三節另類農食網絡中的照護與性別分工 ........................................................ 15
第三章研究問題與研究方法....................................................................................21
第一節研究發問 .................................................................................................... 21
第二節研究取徑:女性主義政治生態學 ............................................................ 23
第三節研究方法 .................................................................................................... 31
第四章宜蘭地區的永續農業的社群與脈絡............................................................39
第一節自然與人文條件 .......................................................................................... 39
第二節另類農食網絡在台灣的發展脈絡 ............................................................ 41
第三節另類農食網絡社群組織在宜蘭 ................................................................ 45
第四節女性移居者在宜蘭歸土移民的類型............................................................ 49
第五章移動/居與性別:多層次的分析..................................................................52
第一節移居推/拉力的類型................................................................................... 52
第二節體現與感知: 透過食物與鄉村療癒疾病、育兒所需 .......................... 55
第六章另類農食網絡中的性別與永續生計............................................................70
第一節出走都市,照護自我的生計發展 ............................................................ 70
第二節移居中的社群參與合作 ............................................................................ 78
第三節另類農食網絡的永續生計創建 ................................................................ 81
第七章結論:城鄉之間移動空間的串聯與分隔....................................................86
第一節疏離化的都市、親密性的鄉村:另類農食網絡中自我關懷的重新連
結………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..86
第二節鄉村異性戀父權秩序鬆動的契機?移動空間帶來的性別角力與挑戰 91
第三節返土歸農中的女性政治生態學 ................................................................ 92
參考文獻......................................................................................................................95
附錄一:田野筆記之一..............................................................................................99
附錄二:紮跟理論分析的理論編碼取樣................................................................103
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title移居女農的情感與身體體現: 宜蘭另類農食網絡下的返土歸農zh_TW
dc.titleI-turn Female Farmers:
Emotion, Embodiment, and Alternative Agri-food Network in Ilan
en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear108-2
dc.description.degree博士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee張聖琳(Shenglin Chang),王驥懋(Chimao Wang),宋郁玲(Yuling Song),洪伯邑(Poyi Hong)
dc.subject.keyword返土歸農,另類農食網絡,女性主義政治生態學,關懷倫理,女性移居者,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordback-to-the-land,alternative agri-food networks,feminist political ecology,self-care,back-to-the-land women,en
dc.relation.page107
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202004132
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2020-08-20
dc.contributor.author-college理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept地理環境資源學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:地理環境資源學系

文件中的檔案:
沒有與此文件相關的檔案。
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved