請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/81199完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 石曜合(Yau-Huo Shr) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yi-Syun Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳羿勳 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-24T03:35:46Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-08-10 | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-11-24T03:35:46Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2021-08-10 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-08-03 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 行政院內政部，2018。「中華民國107年度空氣污染防制總檢討」。65-66。 行政院環保署，2018。「臺北都會區通勤期間之空氣汙染物暴露量調查」。26。 (https://enews.epa.gov.tw/Page/3B3C62C78849F32F/2650cb9c-feaa-4a42-8be5-cd13b0895104) (2018/05/31)。 交通部統計處，2021。「機動車輛登記數查詢網」。(https://stat.motc.gov.tw/mocdb/stmain.jsp?sys=100 funid=a3301) (2021/06/01) 交通部統計處，2017。「民眾日常使用運具狀況調查摘要分析」。5-6。 行政院內政部，2019。「109年第4季房價負擔能力指標統計成果」。(https://pip.moi.gov.tw/v3/e/scre0105.aspx) (2021/05/31) 行政院內政部，2017。「租賃住宅市場發展條例草案」，發表於行政院第3544次會議。臺北:行政院。4月13日。 高雄捷運，2019。「2019年高雄捷運公司年報」。(https://corp.krtc.com.tw/News/annual_report) (2020/06/30) 高雄市交通局，2020。「公共自行車」。(https://www.tbkc.gov.tw/) (2020/12/31) 開放臺灣民間租屋資料，2020。(https://rentalhouse.g0v.ddio.io/about-data-set/0.2/) (2021/05/30) 臺北市交通局，2019。「臺北市民眾通勤(學)使用交通工具性別與統計分析」。26-28。(https://www.dot.gov.taipei/News.aspx?n=94A32988FF5C178E sms=6ADAE2204F29C37F) (2019/04/12)。 李威，2020。「公共自行車租賃系統對租屋市場之影響」。碩士論文。 吳彥葶，2019。「臺北市租屋類型與租金之分析-雅房、分租套房、獨立套房及整層住家之差異比較」。碩士論文。 洪得洋、林祖嘉，1999。「臺北市捷運系統與道路寬度對房屋價格影響之研究」，『住宅學報』，8期，47-67。 曾尉豪，2018。「捷運站所在區位及距離影響自用住宅租金之探討」。碩士論文。 彭建文、楊宗憲、楊詩韻，2009。「捷運系統對不同區位房價影響分析-以營運階段為例」，『運輸計劃季刊』，38卷3期，275-296。 馮正民、曾平毅、王冠斐，1994。「捷運系統對車站地區房價之影響」。『都市與計劃』，21卷1期，25-45。 楊宗憲、蘇倖慧，2011。「迎毗設施與鄰避設施對住宅價格影響之研究」，『住宅學報』。20卷2期，64-80。 潘安迪，2018。「台北市房屋租金形成因素-特徵價格法的應用」。碩士論文。 Abadie, A. (2005). Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators. The Review of Economic Studies, 72(1), 1-19. Anderson, S. T., West, S. E. (2006). Open space, residential property values, and spatial context. Regional science and urban economics, 36(6), 773-789. AT Court. (1939). Hedonic price indexes with automotive examples. Brooks, T. J., Humphreys, B. R., Nowak, A. (2016). Strip Clubs, †œSecondary Effects, †and Residential Property Prices (No. 16-17). Bowes, D. R., Ihlanfeldt, K. R. (2001). Identifying the impacts of rail transit stations on residential property values. Journal of urban Economics, 50(1), 1-25. Bourassa, S. C., Peng, V. S. (1999). Hedonic prices and house numbers: The influence of feng shui. International Real Estate Review, 2(1), 79-93. Chu, J., Duan, Y., Yang, X., Wang, L. (2021). The last mile matters: Impact of dockless bike sharing on subway housing price premium. Management Science, 67(1), 297-316. Chang, K. H., Hsu, P. Y., Lin, C. J., Lin, C. L., Juo, S. H. H., Liang, C. L. (2019). Traffic-related air pollutants increase the risk for age-related macular degeneration. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 67(7), 1076-1081. Chu, K. C., Xiao, M. Y. (2017). A Study on the Correlation between Breast Cancer and Air pollution. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2017 (pp. 757-762). Congdon-Hohman, J. M. (2013). The lasting effects of crime: The relationship of discovered methamphetamine laboratories and home values. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 43(1), 31-41. Crouse, D. L., Goldberg, M. S., Ross, N. A., Chen, H., Labrèche, F. (2010). Postmenopausal breast cancer is associated with exposure to traffic-related air pollution in Montreal, Canada: a case–control study. Environmental health perspectives, 118(11), 1578-1583 Court, Andrew, 1939.”Hedonic price indexes with automobile example,”The Dynamics of the Automobile Demand.25(1):1-25 Dealy, B. C., Horn, B. P., Berrens, R. P. (2017). The impact of clandestine methamphetamine labs on property values: Discovery, decontamination and stigma. Journal of Urban Economics, 99, 161-172. Diao, M., Leonard, D., Sing, T. F. (2017). Spatial-difference-in-differences models for impact of new mass rapid transit line on private housing values. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 67, 64-77. Diao, M. (2015). Selectivity, spatial autocorrelation and the valuation of transit accessibility. Urban Studies, 52(1), 159-177. Dubé, J., Legros, D., Thériault, M., Des Rosiers, F. (2014). A spatial Difference-in-Differences estimator to evaluate the effect of change in public mass transit systems on house prices. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 64, 24-40. Dubé, J., Des Rosiers, F., Thériault, M., Dib, P. (2011). Economic impact of a supply change in mass transit in urban areas: a Canadian example. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(1), 46-62. Davidoff, I., Leigh, A. (2008). How much do public schools really cost? Estimating the relationship between house prices and school quality. Economic Record, 84(265), 193-206. Espey, M., Lopez, H. (2000). The impact of airport noise and proximity on residential property values. Growth and Change, 31(3), 408-419. Fesselmeyer, E., Liu, H. (2018). How much do users value a network expansion? Evidence from the public transit system in Singapore. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 71, 46-61. Fishman, E., Washington, S., Haworth, N. (2013). Bike share: a synthesis of the literature. Transport reviews, 33(2), 148-165. Gawande, K., Jenkins-Smith, H. (2001). Nuclear waste transport and residential property values: estimating the effects of perceived risks. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 42(2), 207-233. Horn, B. P., Joshi, A., Maclean, J. C. (2019). Substance Use Disorder Treatment Centers and Property Values (No. w25427). National Bureau of Economic Research. Haninger, K., Ma, L., Timmins, C. (2017). The value of brownfield remediation. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 4(1), 197-241. Kuminoff, N. V., Parmeter, C. F., Pope, J. C. (2010). Which hedonic models can we trust to recover the marginal willingness to pay for environmental amenities?. Journal of environmental economics and management, 60(3), 145-160. Li, H., Wei, Y. D., Wu, Y. (2019). Analyzing the private rental housing market in Shanghai with open data. Land Use Policy, 85, 271-284. LeSage, J. P., Pace, R. K. (2010). Spatial econometric models. In Handbook of applied spatial analysis (pp. 355-376). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Linden, L., Rockoff, J. E. (2008). Estimates of the impact of crime risk on property values from Megan's laws. American Economic Review, 98(3), 1103-27. Lin, S. J. (2004). The marginal willingness-to-pay of star public elementary and junior high school districts in Taipei City. Journal of Housing Studies, 13(1), 15-34. Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of political economy, 74(2), 132-157. Muehlenbachs, L., Spiller, E., Timmins, C. (2015). The housing market impacts of shale gas development. American Economic Review, 105(12), 3633-59. Midgley, P. (2011). Bicycle-sharing schemes: enhancing sustainable mobility in urban areas. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 8, 1-12. Pucher, J., Buehler, R. (2017). Cycling towards a more sustainable transport future. Transport reviews, 37(6), 689-694. Pelechrinis, K., Zacharias, C., Kokkodis, M., Lappas, T. (2017). Economic impact and policy implications from urban shared transportation: The case of Pittsburgh’s shared bike system. PloS one, 12(8), e0184092. Palmquist, R. B. (2005). Property value models. Handbook of environmental economics, 2, 763-819. Pope, J. C. (2008). Do seller disclosures affect property values? Buyer information and the hedonic model. Land Economics, 84(4), 551-572. Palmquist, R. B. (2005). Property value models. Handbook of environmental economics, 2, 763-819. Pope Iii, C. A., Burnett, R. T., Thun, M. J., Calle, E. E., Krewski, D., Ito, K., Thurston, G. D. (2002). Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. Jama, 287(9), 1132-1141. Qiao, S., Yeh, A. G. O., Zhang, M. (2021). Capitalisation of accessibility to dockless bike sharing in housing rentals: Evidence from Beijing. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 90, 102640. Rosser, E. (2017). Laying the Foundation: The Private Rental Market and Affordable Housing. Fordham Urb. LJ, 44, 499. Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of political economy, 82(1), 34-55. Soriguera, F., Jiménez-Meroño, E. (2020). A continuous approximation model for the optimal design of public bike-sharing systems. Sustainable Cities and Society, 52, 101826. Shaheen, S. A., Guzman, S., Zhang, H. (2010). Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia: past, present, and future. Transportation research record, 2143(1), 159-167. Taylor, L. O. (2003). The hedonic method. In A primer on nonmarket valuation (pp. 331-393). Springer, Dordrecht. Woodcock, J., Tainio, M., Cheshire, J., O’Brien, O., Goodman, A. (2014). Health effects of the London bicycle sharing system: health impact modelling study. Bmj, 348. Voicu, I., Been, V. (2008). The effect of community gardens on neighboring property values. Real Estate Economics, 36(2), 241-283. Waugh, F. V. (1929). Quality as a determinant of vegetable prices: A statistical study of quality factors influencing vegetable prices in the Boston wholesale market. Columbia University Press. Yuan, J., Zheng, X., You, J., Skibniewski, M. J. (2017). Identifying critical factors influencing the rents of public rental housing delivery by PPPs: the case of Nanjing. Sustainability, 9(3), 345. Yiu, C. Y., Wong, S. K. (2005). The effects of expected transport improvements on housing prices. Urban studies, 42(1), 113-125. Zhou, Z., Li, H., Zhang, A. (2019). Does Bike Sharing Increase House Prices? Evidence From Micro-Level Data. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/81199 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 公共自行車作為銜接大眾運輸系統中第一哩與最後一哩路的最有效方式之一，近年來在臺灣與世界各地受到高度重視。然而，至今仍罕有文獻探討公共自行車對於相關社會經濟變數的因果關係。本研究利用空間差異中之差異(Spatial Difference-in-Differences)方法與線上不動產租賃平台之12萬筆租屋資訊，藉由分析引入Youbike 2.0系統對高雄租屋市場之影響，量化公共自行車系統對於居民所帶來之經濟效益。本研究首先藉由圖形化分析，發現公共自行車系統營運後，對於自行車站點150公尺內之物件價格有顯著的正向影響。接續的迴歸分析結果顯示，相較於距離站點150至450公尺之物件，在150公尺內物件之房租價格在Youbike 2.0營運後，顯著上升1.91%。本文也進行多個距離組合的穩健性測試，考量了不同的實驗組及控制組的距離範圍，皆發現公共自行車系統確實有提升鄰近站點區域房租之效果。本研究的異質性影響分析也進一步發現，自行車系統對於房租的正向影響，僅存在於鄰近捷運站等人口較密集之地區。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2022-11-24T03:35:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0208202122074000.pdf: 2945683 bytes, checksum: 71eb206f639eb67cc3d52253592427ea (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 i 謝辭 ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv 目錄 v 圖目錄 vii 表目錄 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與內容 5 第二章 高雄市公共自行車與實證方法相關文獻回顧 7 第一節 高雄市公共自行車背景 7 第二節 特徵價格與差異中之差異法相關文獻 9 第三章 研究方法與實證模型 13 第一節 特徵價格法 13 第二節 空間固定效果 14 第三節 差異中之差異法 15 第四節 變數選取 17 第四章 資料來源與處理 22 第一節 租屋交易資料來源 22 第二節 Youbike 2.0站點資料來源 23 第三節 其他設施資料來源 23 第四節 資料處理 24 第五章 實證分析與結果 33 第一節 圖形化分析 33 第二節 敘述統計 37 第三節 實證結果 43 第六章 結論與限制 54 第一節 結論 54 第二節 研究限制 56 參考來源 58 附錄 65 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 開放台灣民間租屋資料 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 公共自行車 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 特徵價格法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 差異中之差異法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Rental housing market | en |
| dc.subject | Public bike | en |
| dc.subject | Hedonic pricing method | en |
| dc.subject | Spatial Difference-in-Differences | en |
| dc.title | Youbike 2.0對於高雄市租屋市場之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Economic Benefits of Public Bicycle-sharing System: Evidence from the Rental Market in Kaohsiung | en |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 109-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 楊豐安(Hsin-Tsai Liu),蔡佳妤(Chih-Yang Tseng) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 差異中之差異法,特徵價格法,公共自行車,開放台灣民間租屋資料, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Spatial Difference-in-Differences,Hedonic pricing method,Public bike,Rental housing market, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 78 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202102008 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2021-08-05 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 農業經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0208202122074000.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用（校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務） | 2.88 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。