Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/81036Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 荷世平(Shih-Ping Ho) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kuan-Cheng Hu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 胡寬程 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-24T03:27:21Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-09-02 | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-11-24T03:27:21Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2021-09-02 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-08-25 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Amel-Zadeh, A., Serafeim, G. (2018). Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey. Financial Analysts Journal, 74(3), 87-103. Berg, F., Koelbel, J. F., Rigobon, R. (2019). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. MIT Sloan School of Management. Caradonna, J. L. (2014). Sustainability: A history. Oxford University Press. Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., Leuz, C. (2019). Mandatory CSR and Sustainability Reporting: Economic Analysis and Literature Review. Cort, T., Esty, D. (2020). ESG standards: Looming challenges and pathways forward. Organization Environment, 33(4), 491-510. Diesendorf, M. (2000). Sustainability and sustainable development. Sustainability: The corporate challenge of the 21st century, 2, 19-37. Dill, W. R. (1958). Environment as an influence on managerial autonomy. Administrative science quarterly, 409-443. Donaldson, T., Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of management Review, 20(1), 65-91. Escrig-Olmedo, E., Fernández-Izquierdo, M. Á., Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Rivera-Lirio, J. M., Muñoz-Torres, M. J. (2019). Rating the raters: Evaluating how ESG rating agencies integrate sustainability principles. Sustainability, 11(3), 915. Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45-64. Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization science, 15(3), 364-369. Friede, G., Busch, T., Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance Investment, 5(4), 210-233. Hill R. C. and Bowen P. A. (1997) Sustainable construction: Principles and a framework for attainment, Constr. Manage. Econ., 15(3), pp. 223-239 Hohnen, P., Potts, J. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility. An implementation guide for business. Kolk A. (2004). A decade of sustainability reporting: developments and significance, International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, pp. 51-54 KPMG, The KPMG Survey of Sustainability Reporting 2020: The time has come Mervelskemper, L., Streit, D. (2017). Enhancing market valuation of ESG performance: Is integrated reporting keeping its promise?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 536-549. O’Connor, J. T., Torres, N., Woo, J. (2016). Sustainability actions during the construction phase. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(7), 04016016. Scoones, I. (2007). Sustainability. Development in practice, 17(4-5), 589-596. SustainAbility an ERM Group company《Rate the Rater 2020: Invertor Survey and Interview Results》, March 2020 Thompson, C. F. (1967). Notes on the birds of the northeast cape of St. Lawrence Island and of the Punuk Islands, Alaska. The Condor, 69(4), 411-419. Wang, Z., Hsieh, T. S., Sarkis, J. (2018). CSR performance and the readability of CSR reports: too good to be true?. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(1), 66-79. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), 1987, Our common future, Oxford University Press, UK. Zrnić, A., Starčević, D. P., Crnković, B. (2020). Recent trends in sustainability reporting: Literature review and implications for future research. Ekonomski Vjesnik, 33(1), 271-283. 微盛投資-技術支援-相關資料https://www.wstock.net/wstock/big5/wsinfo.htm | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/81036 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 近年來永續意識逐漸抬頭,2020年新冠肺炎的肆虐致全球無一倖免,迫使人們更深刻感受地球村的緊密及看重地球永續發展;再者,如今的社會與企業是不可分離的,企業必須一起參與永續發展才能達到全球永續的目標。我們希望可以藉由公司發布永續性報告,作為永續發展的一聲號角,讓利害關係人們可以更簡便的監管公司,往永續的目標邁進。 為了了解企業永續表現與企業永續性報告之間的關係,本研究搜集了現今全球前三大證券交易所,納茲達克證券交易所、紐約證券交易所和香港證券交易所之所有上市公司,探討這些公司發佈之企業佈永續性報告及採用國際準則與否,是否會影響永續評分機構對他們的評分,並且我們相信得到較高分數的公司有較好的ESG表現也更積極的看待公司永續性的發展。本研究使用Python、R語言搭配上Google搜尋,收集了三大證交所上市公司所有於2019年發佈的企業永續性報告,以及這些企業的永續性評分,透過計量回歸統計分析他們之間的關聯性。 本研究的最終結論如下,在美國使用國際準則撰寫企業永續性報告的公司,在ESG評分上可以得到較高的分數,進而代表他們較注重永續經營。香港則是只要有發布任何的永續性報告,就會對其ESG評分有正面的影響。人們可以透過這樣的關係,去分辨了解一家公司在永續性的表現,本論文也透過結論給予企業在發佈永續性報告策略之建議,為地球永續盡一份心力。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2022-11-24T03:27:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2408202123504100.pdf: 3635728 bytes, checksum: 42751a565c83a1cba2962afe5206d6c8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | "口試委員會審定書 i 誌謝 ii 摘要 iii ABSTRACT iv 目錄 v 圖目錄 viii 表目錄 ix 第1章 緒論 1 1.1 研究動機 1 1.2 研究目的 2 1.3 研究流程 4 第2章 文獻回顧 6 2.1 永續性 6 2.1.1 永續性(Sustainability) 6 2.1.2 企業社會責任(CSR, Corporate Social Responsibility) 6 2.1.3 ESG (Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance) 7 2.2 利害關係人理論(Stakeholder theory) 8 2.3 企業永續性報告 9 2.3.1 發布企業永續性報告的現況與趨勢 9 2.3.2 發布企業永續性報告之利益與成本 11 2.3.3 Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) 12 2.3.4 Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) 15 2.3.5 GRI與SASB比較案例 18 2.4 企業永續性評分 20 2.4.1 Sustainalytics 21 2.4.2 MSCI ESG Ratings 23 2.4.3 DJSI Score 26 第3章 實證研究設計 28 3.1 假說 28 3.2 實證策略 29 3.3 實證模型 31 3.4 實證資料收集 34 3.4.1 交易所公司列表查詢 34 3.4.2 公司基本資訊搜集 34 3.4.3 企業永續性評分搜集 35 3.4.4 企業永續性報告搜集與處理 35 3.5 實證資料統計分析 38 第4章 實證結果與討論 42 4.1 Sustainalytics回歸結果與討論 43 4.2 DJSI回歸結果與討論 49 4.3 MSCI回歸結果與討論 51 第5章 企業發布永續性報告之策略 52 第6章 結論與建議 59 6.1 結論 59 6.2 建議 60 REFERENCE 61 " | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | SASB | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 企業永續性責任 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 企業永續性報告 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | GRI | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | CSR | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 永續發展 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | CSR | en |
| dc.subject | SASB | en |
| dc.subject | Sustainable development | en |
| dc.subject | GRI | en |
| dc.subject | Sustainability Report | en |
| dc.title | 企業永續性報告是否反應企業之永續表現?針對美國與香港之實證研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Do Corporate Sustainability Reports Reflect the Corporations’ Sustainability Performances? An Empirical Study of United States and Hong Kong | en |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 109-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 許耀文(Hsin-Tsai Liu),王裕仁(Chih-Yang Tseng),蔡宛珊 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 企業永續性責任,企業永續性報告,GRI,CSR,永續發展,SASB, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | CSR,Sustainability Report,GRI,Sustainable development,SASB, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 63 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202102699 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2021-08-25 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| Appears in Collections: | 土木工程學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-2408202123504100.pdf Access limited in NTU ip range | 3.55 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
