請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/81026完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 劉康慧(Helen K Liu) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jing-Hua Lo | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 羅靖華 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-24T03:26:46Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-09-02 | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-11-24T03:26:46Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2021-09-02 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-08-30 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王永慈，2005，〈台灣的貧窮問題：相關研究的檢視〉，《台大社會工作學刊》，10：1-54。 王淑楨，2012，〈街友社會工作之現況、困境與因應策略之探討：以臺北是為例〉，聯合勸募論壇，25-58。 王淑楨、黃志成，2012，〈臺北市社區遊民福利需求與福利服務之探討〉，《社區發展季刊》，138：226-238。 江佩芸，2016，〈中區環境教育區域中心運作機制及其推動成效之評估研究〉，臺中：國立臺中教育大學科學教育與應用學系環境教育及管理碩士班碩士論文。 吳瑾嫣，2000，〈女性遊民研究：家的另類意涵〉，《應用心理研究》，8：83-120。 李美華譯，1998，《社會科學研究方法》，臺北：時英。譯自Earl Babbie. The Practice of Social Research。 李淑容，2016，〈「台北市遊民生活狀況調查」報告〉，臺北市政府社會局105年度委託辦理，1-303。 杜承嶸、官有垣，2019，〈從非營利組織與政府的互動觀點審視臺灣社會福利民營化發展〉，《社區發展季刊》，166：28-41。 林秀雲，2016，《社會科學研究方法》，臺北：新加坡商聖智學習。譯自Earl Babbie. The Practice of Social Research. 張獻忠，2014，〈臺灣遊民收容安置探討─以臺北市遊民輔導為例〉，2014年兩岸社會福利學術研討會—劇變時代的社會福利政策，1-15。 陳祖輝、卓雅苹，2013，〈新聞報導街友論述建構下的社會治理初探〉，《社區發展季刊》，144：337-358。 陳燕禎，2011，〈遊民問題與管理之探討分析〉，《社區發展季刊》，134：441-457。 黃克先，2006，〈不該被看見，但該被治理的赤裸生命-政府對遊民問題的建構與治理技藝之初探〉，2006台灣社會學學會年會，1-16。 詹芳珣，2017，〈安置還是限制？台北市男性遊民收容安置經驗之探討〉，台北：國立政治大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。 劉淑雲，2010，〈從警政到社政：臺北市遊民收容政策之變遷〉，台北：世新大學社會發展研究所碩士論文。 潘淑滿 ，2005，〈飄浪人生：遊民、家與公共政策〉，《臺灣社會工作學刊》，4：172-189。 潘淑滿，2009，〈遊民政策與服務的意識形態〉，《臺灣社會工作學刊》，62：49-83。 鄭麗珍、張宏哲，2004，〈 遊民問題調查、分析與對策研究 〉，1-112。 臺北市就業服務處，2020，〈為民服務白皮書〉，1-45。 衛生福利部110年度公益彩券回饋金申請主軸項目及基準，1-14。 臺北市政府暨各機關落實性別主流化暨推展性別平等工作總計劃（109-112年），1-12。 衛生福利部，2014，《從遊民定義、就業輔導措施、居 住安排協助及防止不當驅趕等四 面向，檢視我國遊民現況、服務 措施及法規限制》專案報告。 Austin, J. E., Seitanidi, M. M. (2012). Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses: Part I. Value creation spectrum and collaboration stages. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 41(5), 726-758. Bateman, M. (2014). The rise and fall of Muhammad Yunus and the microcredit model. Cooley, L., Kohl, R. (2006). Scaling up—from vision to large-scale change: a management framework for practitioners. Washington, DC: Management Systems International. Cooley, L., Kohl, R. (2012). Scaling up—from vision to large-scale change: tools and techniques for practitioners. Washington DC: Management System International. Charif, A. B., Zomahoun, H. T. V., LeBlanc, A., Langlois, L., Wolfenden, L., Yoong, S. L., ... Légaré, F. (2017). Effective strategies for scaling up evidence-based practices in primary care: a systematic review. Implementation Science, 12(1), 1-13. Charif, A. B., Zomahoun, H. T. V., Massougbodji, J., Khadhraoui, L., Pilon, M. D., Boulanger, E., ... Légaré, F. (2020). Assessing the scalability of innovations in primary care: a cross-sectional study. CMAJ open, 8(4), E613. Davies, A., Simon, J. (2013, September). How to grow social innovation: A review and critique of scaling and diffusion for understanding the growth of social innovation. In 5th International Social Innovation Research Conference (Vol. 2, No. 4). Drucker, P. (2014). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge.European Commission. (2013). Guide to social innovation. In E. Commission(Ed.), Regional and Urban policy. Brussels: DG Regional and Urban Policy and DG Employment, Social affairs and Inclusion. Graham, J. R., Barter, K. (1999). Collaboration: A social work practice method. Families in society, 80(1), 6-13. Greenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Papoutsi, C., Lynch, J., Hughes, G., Hinder, S., Procter, R., Shaw, S. (2018). Analysing the role of complexity in explaining the fortunes of technology programmes: empirical application of the NASSS framework. BMC medicine, 16(1), 1-15. Hartmann, A., Linn, J. F. (2007). Scaling up: A path to effective development. Twenty twenty (2020) focus brief on the world's poor and hungry people/International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Innovation eXchange, S. (2010). Study on social innovation. Young Foundation. available at: http://youngfoundation. org. Longoria, R. A. (2005). Is inter-organizational collaboration always a good thing. J. Soc. Soc. Welfare, 32, 123. Lee, K., Milat, A., Grunseit, A., Conte, K., Wolfenden, L., Bauman, A. (2020). The Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool: a pilot study assessing five interventions for scalability. Public Health Research Practice, 30(2). Main, T. (1998). How to think about homelessness: Balancing structural and individual causes. Journal of social distress and the homeless, 7(1), 41-54. Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations: technology, governance, globalization, 1(2), 145-162. Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation (2010). Tercer Sector, 233. Milat, A. J., King, L., Bauman, A. E., Redman, S. (2013). The concept of scalability: increasing the scale and potential adoption of health promotion interventions into policy and practice. Health promotion international, 28(3), 285-298. Moore, M. L., Riddell, D., Vocisano, D. (2015). Scaling out, scaling up, scaling deep: strategies of non-profits in advancing systemic social innovation. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, (58), 67-84. Milat, A. J., Newson, R., King, L., Rissel, C., Wolfenden, L., Bauman, A., ... Giffin, M. (2016). A guide to scaling up population health interventions. Public Health Res Pract, 26(1), e2611604. Milat, A., Lee, K., Conte, K., Grunseit, A., Wolfenden, L., Van Nassau, F., ... Bauman, A. (2020). Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool: A decision support tool for health policy makers and implementers. Health research policy and systems, 18(1), 1-17. McLean, R., Gargani, J. (2019). Scaling impact: innovation for the public good. Routledge. Nikolic, S. J., Koontz, T. M. (2008). Nonprofit organizations in environmental management: A comparative analysis of government impacts. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(3), 441-463. Oliver, C. (1990). Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 241-265. Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34-43. Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (1983). Rabin, B. A., Brownson, R. C., Haire-Joshu, D., Kreuter, M. W., Weaver, N. L. (2008). A glossary for dissemination and implementation research in health. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 14(2), 117-123. Simmons, R., Fajans, P., Ghiron, L. (Eds.). (2007). Scaling up health service delivery: from pilot innovations to policies and programmes. World Health Organization. Uvin, P., Miller, D. (1994). Scaling up: thinking through the issues. The World Hunger Program. Uvin, P. (1995). Scaling up the grass roots and scaling down the summit: the relations between Third World nongovernmental organisations and the United Nations. Third World Quarterly, 16(3), 495-512. Uvin, P., Miller, D. (1996). Paths to scaling-up: alternative strategies for local nongovernmental organizations. Human Organization, 55(3), 344-354. Uvin, P., Jain, P. S., Brown, L. D. (2000). Think large and act small: Toward a new paradigm for NGO scaling up. World Development, 28(8), 1409-1419. Van Slyke, D. M. (2007). Agents or stewards: Using theory to understand the government-nonprofit social service contracting relationship. Journal of public administration research and theory, 17(2), 157-187. Verschuere, B., De Corte, J. (2014). The impact of public resource dependence on the autonomy of NPOs in their strategic decision making. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(2), 293-313. Van der Have, R. P., Rubalcaba, L. (2016). Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies?. Research Policy, 45(9), 1923-1935. Vaughan-Lee, H., Moriniere, L. C., Bremaud, I., Turnbull, M. (2018). Understanding and measuring scalability in disaster risk reduction. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal. World Health Organization. (2010). Nine steps for developing a scaling-up strategy. World Health Organization. Westley, F., Antadze, N. (2010). Making a difference: Strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact. Innovation Journal, 15(2). Xu, C., Kim, M. (2021). Loss or Gain? Unpacking Nonprofit Autonomy-Interdependence Paradox in Collaborations. The American Review of Public Administration, 51(4), 308-324. Yunus, M. (1999). The Grameen Bank. Scientific American, 281(5), 114-119. Zamboni, K., Schellenberg, J., Hanson, C., Betran, A. P., Dumont, A. (2019). Assessing scalability of an intervention: why, how and who?. Health policy and planning, 34(7), 544-552. Zainol, N., Zainol, F., Ibrahim, Y., Afthanorhan, A. (2019). Scaling up social innovation for sustainability: The roles of social enterprise capabilities. Management Science Letters, 9(3), 457-466. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/81026 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 台灣不乏具有良好社會創新方案的非營利組織，其中遊民福利領域於近十年陸續出現從事倡議及創新行動的小型非營利組織，然而，此類方案通常由於規模小且集中特定地區，致使方案影響力受限，故如何運用管理工具協助組織檢視方案規模化的可行性為本文著重之處。透過文獻檢索並比較分析不同可規模化評估工具，最終選擇運用干預措施規模化評估工具Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool (ISAT)。 本研究透過深度訪談和參與觀察法，針對人生百味的三項方案進行評估，並以ISAT涵蓋的十項可規模化特質，包含問題、干預措施、策略和政治環境、有效性的證據、方案成本和效益、保真度與適應性、觸及率和可接受性、輸送地點和人力、實施基礎設備以及可持續性，分別對三項方案進行逐點討論與分析。 最後研究發現，一雖然ISAT是一項新興工具，但本文證實ISAT工具在評估我國遊民社會福利創新方案上的有效性；二是透過不同方案利害關係人對於規模化的著重觀點，得出干預措施、觸及率和可接受性、策略和政治環境以及保真度與適應性此四項可規模化特質為關鍵；三是理論和實際的規模化特性（realized scalability）存有差異，人生百味其中一項方案非制度性和開放探索式的規模化發展模式，相比理論欠缺多方面的考量如政策背景，反之，理論則在部分指標上無法有效反映實際情形，故本文綜合實務和理論上的優劣勢，最終針對ISAT工具提出具體改善建議。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2022-11-24T03:26:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-3008202111520100.pdf: 3122521 bytes, checksum: be402ddde5e7d1a328c0514df492e4b7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭......................................................................................................................i 中文摘要..............................................................................................................ii ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................iii 目錄.....................................................................................................................v 表目錄................................................................................................................vii 圖目錄..................................................................................................................x 第一章 緒論..........................................................................................................1 第一節 研究背景...................................................................................................1 第二節 研究動機.................................................................................................13 第三節 研究目的.................................................................................................15 第四節 研究問題.................................................................................................17 第二章 文獻探討.................................................................................................18 第一節 社會創新概念與發展................................................................................18 第二節 規模化.....................................................................................................27 第三節 規模化優勢與困境....................................................................................62 第三章 研究方法..................................................................................................69 第一節 個案組織..................................................................................................69 第二節 選擇方案..................................................................................................70 第三節 可規模化性評估工具.................................................................................75 第四節 研究流程..................................................................................................82 第五節 資料蒐集和分析方法.................................................................................84 第四章 方案規模化特性........................................................................................88 第一節 人生萬事屋...............................................................................................88 第二節 重修舊好..................................................................................................115 第三節 石頭湯.....................................................................................................136 第五章 方案規模化特性比較與分析......................................................................164 第六章 結論.........................................................................................................193 第一節 實際可規模化特性的重要..........................................................................194 第二節 可規模化評估工具適用範疇.......................................................................196 參考文獻..............................................................................................................198 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 方案評估 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 規模化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 可規模化特性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 非營利組織 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社會創新 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Social innovation | en |
| dc.subject | Program evaluation | en |
| dc.subject | Scaling up | en |
| dc.subject | Scalability | en |
| dc.subject | Nonprofit Organization | en |
| dc.title | 非營利組織方案可規模化性評估—以人生百味為個案研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Scalability Evaluation of Nonprofit Organization Programs—A Case Study on Do You A Flavor | en |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 109-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王宏文(Hsin-Tsai Liu),沈建文(Chih-Yang Tseng) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 規模化,可規模化特性,非營利組織,社會創新,方案評估, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Scaling up,Scalability,Nonprofit Organization,Social innovation,Program evaluation, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 204 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202102841 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2021-08-31 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共事務研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 公共事務研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-3008202111520100.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用（校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務） | 3.05 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。