Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 會計學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/80971
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor吳琮璠(Chung-Fern Wu)
dc.contributor.authorTing-Yen Huangen
dc.contributor.author黃亭硯zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-24T03:24:14Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-08
dc.date.available2022-11-24T03:24:14Z-
dc.date.copyright2021-11-08
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.submitted2021-09-10
dc.identifier.citation一、英文部分 Abbott, L. J., S. Parker, and G. F. Peters. 2004. Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing-a Journal of Practice Theory 23 (1):69-87. Abbott, L. J., S. Parker, G. F. Peters, and K. Raghunandan. 2003. The association between audit committee characteristics and audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice Theory 22 (2):17-32. Ahmad, N., J. Mohd-Nor, and N. Mohd-Saleh. 2008. Fraudulent Financial Reporting and Companies' Characteristics: Evidence from Tax Audit. Available at SSRN 1158167. Altman, E. I., and T. P. McGough. 1974. Evaluation of a company as a going concern. Journal of Accountancy 138 (6):50-57. Arshad, R., and H. Othman. 2011. Ownership Structure, Capital Structure and Fraudulent Financial Reporting. International Conference On Financial Criminology (ICFC). Beasley, M. S. 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. Accounting review:443-465. Beasley, M. S., J. V. Carcello, and D. R. Hermanson. 1999. Fraudulent financial reporting: 1987-1997. An analysis of US public companies. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Beaver, W. H. 1966. Financial ratios as predictors of failure. Journal of accounting research:71-111. Carcello, J. V., D. R. Hermanson, T. L. Neal, and R. A. Riley Jr. 2002. Board characteristics and audit fees. Contemporary accounting research 19 (3):365-384. Carcello, J. V., C. W. Hollingsworth, and T. L. Neal. 2006. Audit committee financial experts: A closer examination using firm designations. Accounting Horizons 20 (4):351-373. Carcello, J. V., and A. L. Nagy. 2004. Audit firm tenure and fraudulent financial reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice Theory 23 (2):55-69. Chen, K. C., and B. K. Church. 1992. Default on debt obligations and the issuance of going-concern opinions. Auditing 11 (2):30. Collier, P., and A. Gregory. 1996. Audit committee effectiveness and the audit fee. European Accounting Review 5 (2):177-198. Deakin, E. B. 1972. A discriminant analysis of predictors of business failure. Journal of accounting research:167-179. Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary accounting research 13 (1):1-36. DeFond, M. L., R. N. Hann, and X. Hu. 2005. Does the market value financial expertise on audit committees of boards of directors? Journal of accounting research 43 (2):153-193. Erickson, M., M. Hanlon, and E. L. Maydew. 2006. Is there a link between executive equity incentives and accounting fraud? Journal of accounting research 44 (1):113-143. Fama, E. F., and M. C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. The journal of law and Economics 26 (2):301-325. Firth, M. 1985. An analysis of audit fees and their determinants in New-Zealand. Auditing-a Journal of Practice Theory (2):23-37. Gertner, R., and D. Scharfstein. 1991. A theory of workouts and the effects of reorganization law. the Journal of Finance 46 (4):1189-1222. Green, B. P., and J. H. Choi. 1997. Assessing the risk of management fraud through neural network technology. Auditing 16:14-28. Hay, D. C., W. R. Knechel, and N. Wong. 2006. Audit fees: A meta‐analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary accounting research 23 (1):141-191. Hegazy, M., and R. Kassem. 2010. Fraudulent financial reporting: Do red flags really help. Journal of Economics and Engineering 4:69-70. Jaffar, N. 2009. Fraud detection: The moderating role of fraud risk level. Journal of business and public affairs 3 (1):1-15. Jensen, M. C. 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. the Journal of Finance 48 (3):831-880. Knechel, W. R., and M. Willekens. 2006. The role of risk management and governance in determining audit demand. Journal of Business Finance Accounting 33 (9‐10):1344-1367. Lau, A. H.-L. 1987. A five-state financial distress prediction model. Journal of accounting research:127-138. Lee, T.-S., Y.-H. Yeh, and R.-T. Liu. 2003. Can corporate governance variables enhance the prediction power of accounting-based financial distress prediction models? Loebbecke, J. K., M. M. Eining, and J. J. Willingham. 1989. Auditors experience with material irregularities-frequency, nature, and detectability. Auditing-a Journal of Practice Theory 9 (1):1-28. McMullen, D. A. 1996. Audit committee performance: An investigation of the consequences associated with audit committees. Auditing 15 (1):87. Moyes, G. D., H. F. M. Din, and N. H. Omar. 2009. The effectiveness of the auditing standards to detect fraudulent financial reporting activities in financial statement audits in Malaysia. International Business Economics Research Journal (IBER) 8 (9). Ohlson, J. A. 1980. Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy. Journal of accounting research:109-131. Paino, H., W. M. M. W. Tahir, and F. Abd Jabar. 2013. Risk, Audit Fees and Fraud. Pastena, V., and W. Ruland. 1986. The merger/bankruptcy alternative. Accounting review:288-301. Schultz Jr, J. J., J. L. Bierstaker, and E. O’Donnell. 2010. Integrating business risk into auditor judgment about the risk of material misstatement: The influence of a strategic-systems-audit approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society 35 (2):238-251. Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny. 1986. Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of political economy 94 (3, Part 1):461-488. Vlad, M., M. Tulvinschi, and I. Chiriţă. 2011. The consequences of fraudulent financial reporting. The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration 11 (1):264-268. Wruck, K. H. 1990. Financial distress, reorganization, and organizational efficiency. Journal of financial economics 27 (2):419-444. Zhu, J., and S. S. Gao. 2011. Fraudulent financial reporting: corporate behavior of Chinese listed companies. Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies 11:61-82. Zmijewski, M. E. 1984. Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of accounting research:59-82. 二、中文部分 陳肇榮 (1983). 運用財務比率預測企業財務危機之實證研究. 碩士,政治大學. 潘玉葉 (1990). 臺灣股票上市公司財務危機預警分析. 博士,私立淡江大學. 黃文隆 (1993). 財務危機預警模式建立與驗證. 碩士,私立東吳大學. 徐銘傑 (1997). 資產流動性與企業財務危機之理論硏究. 碩士,國立台灣大學. 鄭瑞楠 (1999). 財務分析在銀行授信決策上的應用之研究. 碩士,國立東華大學.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/80971-
dc.description.abstract民國一零九年八月,康友-KY爆發財務危機,震驚國內股票市場及主管機關;董事長、財務長、簽證會計師亦相繼辭職與終止委任。康友-KY長年以來利用虛假財務操作粉飾財務狀況,使投資人未發覺財務報表舞弊之情況,進而蒙受鉅額財務損失。本文探討幾項相關議題,研究康友案對公司危機預警模式的影響,除了採用過去研究的財務變數外,更加入現金流量變數與非財務變數之獨立董事比例、持有5%股票之股東人數及會計師審計公費以提升模型解釋能力。本文使用Logistic回歸模型進行公司危機預測。 本文以民國102年至109年間發生危機的18間KY公司,搭配18間健全KY公司為樣本,建立兩個Logistic模型以探討獨立董事比例、持有5%股票之股東人數及會計師審計公費之解釋能力。 實證結果顯示,獨立董事比例、持有5%股票之股東人數、會計師審計公費具顯著解釋能力;財務變數之LTDEBT、SALES、NITA、CFCL具顯著解釋能力。zh_TW
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2022-11-24T03:24:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-0709202100365500.pdf: 1495167 bytes, checksum: 068fb7ee503627c8ad848567e7ac7b16 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2021
en
dc.description.tableofcontents壹、緒論………………………………………………………………………………………1  一、研究背景…………………………………………………………………………1 二、研究動機及目的……………………………………………………………5 三、研究架構…………………………………………………………………………5 貳、文獻回顧及假說建立………………………………………………………7 一、海外來台第一上市公司特性……………………………………7 二、財務危機…………………………………………………………………… 12 三、公司治理相關文獻………………………………………………… 15 四、會計師公費相關文獻…………………………………………… 17 五、研究假說…………………………………………………………………… 18 參、研究設計……………………………………………………………………………19 一、樣本選取與資料來源………………………………………………19 二、研究方法…………………………………………………………………… 21 三、變數定義與模型建立………………………………………………22 肆、實證結果……………………………………………………………………………26 一、產業分布探討………………………………………………………………26 二、敘述統計及相關係數分析……………………………………29 三、迴歸模型之結果…………………………………………………………30 伍、研究結論與建議……………………………………………………………34 一、研究結論……………………………………………………………………34 二、研究限制與建議………………………………………………………34 陸、參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………35
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject公司治理zh_TW
dc.subject財務危機預警zh_TW
dc.subject海外來台第一上市公司zh_TW
dc.subjectFinancial distress warningen
dc.subjectCorporate governmenten
dc.subjectForeign Listings on TWSEen
dc.title海外來台第一上市櫃公司財務危機預警研究zh_TW
dc.titleFinancial Crisis Precaution of Foreign Listings on TWSEen
dc.date.schoolyear109-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee許文馨(Hsin-Tsai Liu),吳青松(Chih-Yang Tseng)
dc.subject.keyword海外來台第一上市公司,財務危機預警,公司治理,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordForeign Listings on TWSE,Financial distress warning,Corporate government,en
dc.relation.page38
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202103022
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)
dc.date.accepted2021-09-11
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept會計學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:會計學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
U0001-0709202100365500.pdf
授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務)
1.46 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved