請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/80810完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 朱瑞玲(Ruey-Ling Chu) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Feng-Chun Hsiung | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 熊逢峻 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-24T03:17:24Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-11-05 | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-11-24T03:17:24Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2021-11-05 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-10-05 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 主計總處（2020）：〈108 年國人赴海外工作人數統計結果〉。台北市：行政院。民110年6月10日，取自https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Attachment/01217147167RLW6M7Z.pdf。 徐寒羽（2016）：〈「操之在我」或「交給政府」？──文化和大我認同對兩岸民眾政治參與傾向的影響〉。《本土心理學研究》，45，3-56。 黃囇莉（2007）：〈M型政黨 vs. 鐘型意識－台灣國族認同之意識型態及其心理基礎〉。《中華心理學刊》，49(4)，451-470。 Abramson, P. R., Aldrich, J. H. (1982). The decline of electoral participation in america. American Political Science Review, 76, 502-521. Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(1), 80-114. Balch, G. I. (1974). Multiple indicators in survey research: The concept 'sense of political efficacy'. Political Methodology, 1(2), 1-43. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman. Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75-78. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (Vol. 5, pp. 307-337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. Batson, C. D. (2011). Altruism in humans. New York: Oxford University Press. Campbell, A., Gurin, G., Miller, W. E. (1954). The voter decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Company. Caprara, G. V., Alessandri, G., Eisenberg, N. (2012). Prosociality: The contribution of traits, values, and self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1289-1303. Caprara, G. V., Alessandri, G., Giunta, L. D., Panerai, L., Eisenberg, N. (2010). The contribution of agreeableness and self-efficacy beliefs to prosociality. European Journal of Personality, 24(1), 36-55. Caprara, G. V., Steca, P. (2007). Prosocial agency: The contribution of values and self-efficacy beliefs to prosocial behavior across ages. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26(2), 218-239. Caricati, L., Panari, C., Melleri, M. (2020).Group identification and self-efficacy associated with quality of life in emergency medical services volunteers: A cross-sectional investigation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 50(8), 476-488. Cohen-Chen, S., Van Zomeren, M. (2018). Yes we can? Group efficacy beliefs predict collective action, but only when hope is high. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 77, 50-59. Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R. D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A. A., Haugen, J., Miene, P. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1516–1530. Corcoran, K. E., Pettinicchio, D., Young, J. T. N. (2011). The context of control: A cross-national investigation of the link between political institutions, efficacy, and collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(4), 575-605. Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R. (1992). The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6(4), 343-359. Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A., Penner, L. A. (2006). The social psychology of prosocial behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., Jr., W. B. S. (2003). A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528. Harp, E. R., Scherer, L. L., Allen, J. A. (2016). Volunteer engagement and retention: Their relationship to community service self-efficacy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(2), 442-458. Hodges, L., Carron, A. V. (1992). Collective efficacy and group performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 23(1), 48-59. Honicke, T., Broadbent, J. (2016). The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 17, 63-84. Judge, T., Erez, A., Bono, J. (1998). The power of being positive: The relation between positive self-concept and job performance. Human Performance, 11(2), 167-187. Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., Thoresen, C. J. (2002). Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 693-710. Judge, T. A., Jackson, C. L., Shaw, J. C., Scott, B. A., Rich, B. L. (2007). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: The integral role of individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 107-127. Jugert, P., Greenaway, K. H., Barth, M., Büchner, R., Eisentraut, S., Fritsche, I. (2016). Collective efficacy increases pro-environmental intentions through increasing self-efficacy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 12-23. Levenson, H. (1981). Differentiating between internality, powerful others, and chance. In H. M. Lefcourt (Ed.), Research with the locus of control construct (Vol. 1, pp. 15-63). New York: Academic Press. Macaulay, J. R., Berkowitz, L. (Eds.). (1970). Altruism and helping behavior. New York: Academic Press. Mael, F., Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123. McGuire, A. M. (1994). Helping behaviors in the natural environment: Dimensions and correlates of helping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 45–56. Myers, N. D., Feltz, D. L., Short, S. E. (2004). Collective efficacy and team performance: A longitudinal study of collegiate football teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 8(2), 126-138. Oliver, P. (1984). 'If you don't do it, nobody else will': Active and token contributors to local collective action. American Sociological Review, 49(5), 601-610. Pearce, P. L., Amato, P. R. (1980). A taxonomy of helping: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 363–371. Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365-392. Pollock, P. H. (1983). The participatory consequences of internal and external political efficacy: A research note. Western Political Quarterly, 36, 400-409. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Schroeder, D. A., Graziano, W. G. (Eds.). (2015). The field of prosocial behavior: An introduction and overview. In D. A. Schroeder W. G. Graziano (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior (p. 3–34). New York: Oxford University Press. Seijts, G. H., Latham, G. P., Whyte, G. (2000). Effect of self- and group efficacy on group performance in a mixed-motive situation. Human Performance, 13(3), 279-298. Stajkovic, A. D., Lee, D., Nyberg, A. J. (2009). Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: Meta-analyses of their relationships, and test of a mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 814-828. Stajkovic, A. D., Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240-261. Tidwell, M. V. (2005). A social identity model of prosocial behaviors within nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership., 15(4), 449-467. Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504-535. Watson, C. B., Chemers, M. M., Preiser, N. (2001). Collective efficacy: A multilevel analysis . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(8), 1057-1068. Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663-676. Zimmerman, M. A. (1989). The relationship between political efficacy and citizen participation: Construct validation studies. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53(3), 554-566. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/80810 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 利社會行為涵蓋的層面很廣，包含助人、利他行為、志願服務及合作等，其中合作指的是群體中的成員付出自己的力量為群體貢獻，幫助群體達成目標或克服困難以增進群體福祉。在合作的脈絡下，本論文試圖從效能感的角度切入，探究利台灣社會之個人與集體效能感對利台灣社會行為傾向的影響。研究一自編利台灣社會之個人效能感、集體效能感量表與利台灣社會行為傾向（包含三個因素：社會協助、留守台灣及監督政府）量表，並以網路樣本分析個人與集體效能感對利社會行為傾向三個因素的影響。研究二採用縱貫式調查，於2020總統大選前後各施測一次，募集較大的民眾樣本，以量表、捐款、投票及實際行動參與經驗作為利社會行為的指標進行驗證，追蹤研究變項於前、後測的改變，並控制性別、年齡、教育程度、性格特質及社會認同等混淆變項，以獲得更清晰穩定之實徵證據。研究三針對利社會行為中的留守台灣，招募即將畢業的大學生及研究生為參與者，以學生們的切身選擇（未來傾向離開或留在台灣）作為指標，探討利台灣社會效能感的影響。綜合三個研究結果，發現利台灣社會之個人與集體效能感有助於民眾的利台灣社會行為，最後討論研究限制與未來研究方向。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2022-11-24T03:17:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0510202110495500.pdf: 1168480 bytes, checksum: 9218ef2b2ded9743435744072031dd79 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論.........................................................1 第一節 研究背景與目的.............................................1 第二節 利社會行為.................................................2 第三節 效能感.....................................................5 第四節 集體效能感.................................................8 第二章 研究一：效能感與利社會行為傾向..............................10 第一節 研究目的..................................................10 第二節 研究方法..................................................10 第三節 研究結果..................................................12 第三章 研究二：以大樣本檢驗效能感的影響效果........................17 第一節 研究目的..................................................17 第二節 研究方法..................................................18 第三節 研究結果..................................................21 第四章 研究三：效能感對即將畢業之學生規劃離台的影響................38 第一節 研究目的..................................................38 第二節 研究方法..................................................38 第三節 研究結果..................................................39 第五章 綜合討論....................................................42 第一節 研究成果與貢獻............................................42 第二節 研究限制與未來研究方向....................................47 參考文獻...........................................................49 附錄...............................................................55 附錄一：研究一量表...............................................55 附錄二：研究二量表...............................................57 附錄三：研究三量表...............................................60 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 個人效能感 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 集體效能感 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 利社會行為 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | collective efficacy | en |
| dc.subject | prosocial behavior | en |
| dc.subject | individual efficacy | en |
| dc.title | 個人與集體效能感對利社會行為的影響：以台灣社會為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Impact of Individual and Collective Efficacy on Prosocial Behavior: A Study of Taiwan Society | en |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 109-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 鄭伯壎(Bor-Shiuan Cheng) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王叢桂(Hsin-Tsai Liu),張仁和(Chih-Yang Tseng) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 個人效能感,集體效能感,利社會行為, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | individual efficacy,collective efficacy,prosocial behavior, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 61 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202103551 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2021-10-06 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0510202110495500.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用（校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務） | 1.14 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。