請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/80124完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 吳嘉苓(Chia-Ling Wu) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sam Robbins | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 羅維 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-23T09:27:26Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-07-20 | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-11-23T09:27:26Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2021-07-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-07-07 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Alba. R. (2005) Bright vs. blurred boundaries: Second-generation assimilation and exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 2:1, 20-49, DOI: 10.1080/0141987042000280003 Anderson. B. (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. NY: Verso. Baack, S. (2015). Datafication and empowerment: How the open data movement re-articulates notions of democracy, participation, and journalism. Big Data Society, 2(2), 205395171559463. doi: 10.1177/2053951715594634 Baack, S. (2018a) “Practically Engaged”. Digital Journalism, 6(6):673- 692, DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2017.1375382 Baack, S. (2018b) “Civic Tech at mySociety: How the Imagined Affordances of Data Shape Data Activism”. Krisis (1). 44-54 Barbrook, R. Cameron, A. (1996). The Californian Ideology. Science As Culture. 6. 44-72. 10.1080/09505439609526455. Beraldo, D., Milan, S. (2019). From data politics to the contentious politics of data. Big Data Society, 6(2), 205395171988596. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719885967 Bigo, D., Isin, E., Ruppert, E. (2019). Data Politics: Worlds, Subjects, Rights (Routledge Studies in International Political Sociology) (1st ed.). Routledge. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Braman S (2009) Change of State: Information, Policy, and Power. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Castells, M. (1996) The Rise of the Network Society. New York: NY, Wiley-Backwell Chen, C-H (2015). The Revolution of Hackers. Retrived From http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=P20150327001-201512-201601080007-201601080007-49-60 Cheng, T-Y (2017). Keyboard Participation: A Case Study of 'g0v.tw' on Open-source Collaborative Citizen Engagement in Hacking Community. Retrived from http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?docid=U0001-1402201814112000 Chenou, J.-M., Cepeda-Másmela, C. (2019). #NiUnaMenos: Data Activism From the Global South. Television New Media, 20(4), 396–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419828995 Cheruiyot, D, Baack, S. Ferrer-Conill R. (2019) “Data Journalism Beyond Legacy Media: The case of African and European Civic Technology Organizations.” Digital Journalism, 7:9, 1215-1229, DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2019.1591166 Cinnamon J (2020) Attack the Data: Agency, Power, and Technopolitics in South African Data Activism, Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110:3, 623-639, DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2019.1644991 Deflanti, A., Laconesi, S. (2016). “Open Source Cancer Brain Scans and the Rituality of Biodigital Data Sharing” (pp. 123–144). In G. Coleman, J. Sterne, T. Tembeck, C. Ross, D. Barney (Eds.). The Participatory Condition in the Digital Age (Volume 51) (Electronic Mediations). In Univ Of Minnesota Press. Ermoshina, K. (2018). Civic Hacking Redefining Hackers and Civic Participation. Italian Journal of Science Technology Studies, 9(1):79–101. Fan, F.T., Chen S.L., Kao C.L, M. Murphy., Price M. Barry L, (2019) “Citizens, Politics, and Civic Technology: A Conversation with g0v and EDGI”, East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal, 13:2, 279-297, DOI: 10.1215/18752160-7542932 Fell, D. (2017). 'Social Movements in Taiwan After 2008: From the Strawberries to the Sunflower and Beyond” in Fell, D. eds Taiwan Social Movements Under Ma Ying-Jeou. p1-17. Fligstein, N. and McAdam, D. (2011), Toward a General Theory of Strategic Action Fields*. Sociological Theory, 29: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01385.x Fligstein, N. McAdam, D. (2012) A Theory of Fields. New York: Oxford University Press, Futrell, R. and Simi, P. (2004). Free spaces, collective identity, and the persistence of US white power activism. Social Problems 51(1):16-42. Gieryn, T. (1983). Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6): 781-795. doi:10.2307/2095325 Goldstone, Jack A. (2004). “More Social Movements or Fewer? Beyond Political Opportunity Structures to Relational Fields.” Theory and Society. 33:333–65. Goldstone, J. A., Useem, B. (2012). Putting Values and Institutions Back into the Theory of Strategic Action Fields. Sociological Theory, 30(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112437161 Gordon, E., Lopez, R. A. (2019). The Practice of Civic Tech: Tensions in the Adoption and Use of New Technologies in Community Based Organizations. Media and Communication, 7(3): 57. doi: 10.17645/mac.v7i3.2180 Iliadis, A., Russo, F. (2016). Critical data studies: An introduction. Big Data Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716674238 Irani, L. (2015). Hackathons and the Making of Entrepreneurial Citizenship. Science, Technology, Human Values, 40(5), 799–824. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915578486 Jasanoff, S., Kim, S.-H. (2015). Dreamscapes of modernity: sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Jasanoff, S. (2014) “Ordering Knowledge, Ordering Society,” in Jasanoff, S. ed., States of Knowledge, (pp. 89–105). Routledge. Justice, J. B., McNutt, J. G., Melitski, J., Ahn, M., David, N., McNutt, J. G. (2018). The Civic Technology movement: Implications for Nonprofit Theory and Practice. In Technology, Activism, and Social Justice in a Digital Age (pp. 89–105). Oxford University Press. Keck, M. Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell. Kelty, C. M. (2008). Two bits: the cultural significance of free software. Duke University Press. Lee, M.C. (2020a). Free the Data from the Birdcage: Opening Up Data and Crowdsourcing Activism in Taiwan. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 43(2), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12371 Lee, M.C (2020b) The “Nobody” Movement: Digital Activism and the Uprising of Civic Hackers in Taiwan. University of California, Davis. Lehtiniemi, T., Ruckenstein, M. (2019). The social imaginaries of data activism. Big Data Society, 6(1), 205395171882114. doi: 10.1177/2053951718821146 Levy, S. (1984) Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution. New York: Del Lewis, S.C Usher, N. (2014) Code, Collaboration, And The Future Of Journalism, Digital Journalism, 2:3, 383-393, DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2014.895504 Lichterman, P. (2005). Elusive togetherness: Church groups trying to bridge America’s divisions. NJ: Princeton University Press. Lichterman, P. (2021). How Civic Action Works: Fighting for Housing in Los Angeles. NJ: Princeton University Press. Lo, MCM, and Yun Fan. (2020.) “Brightening the Dark Side of Linking Social Capital? Negotiating Conflicting Visions in Post-Morakot Reconstruction in Taiwan.” Theory and Society 49: 23-48. Lune, H. (2015). Transnational Nationalism: Strategic Action Fields and the Organization of the Fenian Movement', Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change (Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change), 38: 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0163-786X20150000038001 McVeigh-Schultz, J., Baym, N.K. (2015). “Thinking of You: Vernacular Affordance in the Context of the Microsocial Relationship App, Couple.” Social Media + Society 1(2) doi:10.1177/2056305115604649. Mennicken, A., Espeland, W. N. (2019). What’s New with Numbers? Sociological Approaches to the Study of Quantification. Annual Review of Sociology, 45(1): 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041343x Milan, S. (2013). Social movements and their technologies: wiring social change. Palgrave Macmillan. Milan, S., Gutiérrez, M. (2015). Citizens’ media meets big data: the emergence of data activism. MEDIACIONES, 11(14): 120–133 https://doi.org/10.26620/uniminuto.mediaciones.11.14.2015.120-133 Milan, S., Velden, L. V. D. (2016). The Alternative Epistemologies of Data Activism. Digital Culture Society, 2(2) doi: 10.14361/dcs-2016-0205 Milan, S., Treré, E. (2019). Big Data from the South(s): Beyond Data Universalism. Television New Media, 20(4): 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419837739 Nagy, P. and Neff. G. (2015). “Imagined Affordance: Reconstructing a Keyword for Communication Theory.” Social Media + Society 1 (2). doi:10.1177/2056305115603385. Özen, H., Özen, Ş. (2011). Interactions in and between Strategic Action Fields: A Comparative Analysis of Two Environmental Conflicts in Gold-Mining Fields in Turkey. Organization Environment, 24(4): 343–363. Peixoto, T. and Sifry, M.L.( 2017). Civic Tech in the Global South: Assessing Technology for the Public Good. Washington, DC: World Bank and Personal Democracy Press. © World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/27947 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.” Peter, M.K., Kraft, C. Linedque, J. (2020). Strategic action fields of digital transformation: An exploration of the strategic action fields of Swiss SMEs and large enterprises. Journal of Strategy and Manegement. 13(1), 160-180. DOI 10.1108/JSMA-05-2019-0070 Pettinichio, D. (2013). Strategic Action Fields and the Context of Political Entrepreneurship: How Disability Rights Became Part of the Policy Agenda. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts Change, 36: 79-106. DOI:10.1108/S0163-786X(2013)0000036006 Perng S.Y., Kitchin R. Donncha D.M (2018) “Hackathons, entrepreneurial life and the making of smart cities”. Geoforum, 97: 189-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.08.024 Polletta, F. (1999). 'Free Spaces' in Collective Action. Theory and Society, 28(1): 1-38. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3108504 Reece, S.D. (2015). Globalization of Mediated Spaces: The Case of Transnational Environmentalism in China. International Journal of Communication, 9: 2263–2281 Richard. A, (2005) Bright vs. blurred boundaries: Second-generation assimilation and exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(1): 20-49, DOI: 10.1080/0141987042000280003 Robbert, F. Simi, P. (2004). Free Spaces, Collective Identity, and the Persistence of U.S. White Power Activism. Social Problems, 51(1): 16-42. Scott, B. (2015). The Hacker Hacked. https://aeon.co/essays/how-yuppies-hacked-the-original-hacker-ethos Schrock, A. R. (2016). Civic hacking as data activism and advocacy: A history from publicity to open government data. New Media Society, 18(4): 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816629469 Schrock, A., Shaffer, G. (2017). Data ideologies of an interested public: A study of grassroots open government data intermediaries. Big Data Society, 4(1), 205395171769075. doi: 10.1177/2053951717690750 Turegano, M. (2016). Banking Industry Regulation and Strategic Action Fields: a research agenda for Economic Sociology. Revista Internacional de Organizaciones, 15: 29-48. Tang, A. (2019) A Strong Democracy is a Digital Democracy. New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/15/opinion/taiwan-digital-democracy.html Vaisey. S And Lizardo. O (2010). “Can Cultural Worldviews Influence Network Composition?” Social Forces 88(4): 1595-1618. Söderberg, J., Delfanti, A. (2015). Hacking Hacked! The Life Cycles of Digital Innovation. Science, Technology, Human Values, 40(5): 793–798. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915595091 Skaržauskienė, A., Mačiulienė, M. (2020). Mapping International Civic Technologies Platforms. Informatics, 7(4): 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics7040046 Spence C, Carter C, Husillos J, Archel P. (2017). Taste matters: Cultural capital and elites in proximate Strategic Action Fields. Human Relations. 70(2): 211-236. doi:10.1177/0018726716649247 Stempbeck, M. (2019) 'How Civic Tech Has Evolved Over the Last 25 Years”. Civic Hall https://civichall.org/civicist/how-civic-tech-has-evolved-over-the-last-25-years/ Sun, Y Yan, W. (2020). The Power of Data From the Global South: Environmental Civic Tech and Data Activism in China. International Journal of Communication. 14: 2144-2162. Tilly. C (1995). Popular Contention in Great Britain 1758-1834. London: Paradigm publishers. Vedel, T. (2006) “The Idea of Electronic Democracy: Origins, Visions and Questions: Origins, Visions and Questions”. Parliamentary Affairs, 59(2), .226 - 235. hal-01475858v2 Wimmer, A. and Glick Schiller, N. (2002), Methodological nationalism and beyond: nation–state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks, 2: 301-334. doi:10.1111/1471-0374.00043 Wissenbach, K. R. (2019). Accounting for power in transnational civic tech activism: A communication-based analytical framework for media practice. International Communication Gazette, 82(6), 545–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048519832779 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/80124 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 科技行動主義者如何跨越國界相互聯繫？我以10個月的參與者觀察，與16位g0v參與者的訪談以及相關文件的分析為資料基礎，探討g0v社群與跨國公民科技行動主義圈子互動中不斷變化的策略。 g0v已從專注於提高g0v在國際上的知名度和建立國際網絡的重點，轉變為著重於建立鄰近國家行動主義的社群。這種轉變的直接原因是社區治理結構的變化，但本文將這種轉變置於跨國公民科技網絡的擴張以及 g0v 社群生態的變化。跨國公民科技一直是多元化的，包含了因各種原因而參與的異質參與者。跨國公民科技場域鬆散的制度化，加上g0v 的地位逐漸提高，使得g0v社群能夠創造出不同交流的模式。因為劃界工作以及對 g0v 社群治理的重新討論，引起了創造不同形式連結的期望。本研究以策略行動場域理論和數據行動主義文獻分析這些變化，筆者討論了場域鑲嵌性的型態如何於鬆散的新興領域中發生變化，並試圖將具價值者和意識形態主義者帶到策略行動場域理論中。本文認為國際交流是數據行動主義的一部分，並展示了對數據本身的理解是如何通過國際交流實務而形成，並如何形成國際交流模式。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2022-11-23T09:27:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0507202116350500.pdf: 3010748 bytes, checksum: 720659d84a9dffe7bfea2c137ae2573a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | "I. Introduction 1 II. Literature Review 5 2.1 Data Activism 5 2.2 Strategic Action Field 8 III. Research Methods 12 3.1 Casing g0v 12 3.2 Data Collection and Research Ethics 13 IV. From Global Networks to Regional Community: Two Phases of International Exchange 18 “ 4.1 International” exchange: Engaging with Whom 20 4.2 International “Exchange”: How to Engage 23 4.3 Broadening Participation 25 V. The Expansion of Transnational Civic tech and g0v’s Ascendance 29 5.1 The Transnational Civic Tech Field 29 Goals and forms of connection 31 Power and its distribution 35 5.2 g0v's Position in the Field 37 VI. Community Boundaries, Community Cultures 43 6.1 Internal Dynamics 43 6.2 Data Activist Cultures 49 VII. Conclusion 57 References 59 Appendix I: Ethics Review Form 64 Appendix II: Interview Template 65" | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 跨國行動主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 數據行動主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 公民科技 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | g0v | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 策略行動場域理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | data activism | en |
| dc.subject | transnational activism | en |
| dc.subject | strategic action fields | en |
| dc.subject | civic tech | en |
| dc.subject | g0v | en |
| dc.title | 從「全球公民科技」到「東亞社群」:台灣 g0v 社群的國際交流與數據行動主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | From “Global Civic Tech” to “East Asian Community”: Taiwan's g0v Community’s International Exchange and Data Activism | en |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 109-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 何明修(Hsin-Tsai Liu),彭松嶽 (Chih-Yang Tseng) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | g0v,公民科技,數據行動主義,策略行動場域理論,跨國行動主義, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | g0v,civic tech,data activism,strategic action fields,transnational activism, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 66 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202101277 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2021-07-07 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 社會學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0507202116350500.pdf | 2.94 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。