請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/80085完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 葉疏(Shu Yeh) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Min-Ting Zhou | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 周敏婷 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-23T09:25:17Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-08-13 | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-11-23T09:25:17Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2021-08-13 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-07-19 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 李明輝 沈真真.(2016).異常收費與審計質量:來自中國資本市場的經驗證據. 管理工程學報(02),166-174. 劉斌，葉建中 廖瑩毅(2003) . 我國上市公司審計公費影響因數實證研究——深沪市2001年報的經驗數據. 審計研究, 1, 44-47. 宋衍蘅,殷德全.(2005).會計師事務所變更、審計公費與審計質量——來自變更會計師事務所的上市公司的證據. 審計研究(02),72-77. 王兵 辛清泉.(2010).分所審計是否影響審計質量和審計公費?. 審計研究(02),70-76. 於富生,張敏,姜付秀 任夢傑.(2008).公司治理影響公司財務風險嗎?. 會計研究(10),52-59+97. Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The journal of finance, 23(4), 589-609. Altman, E. I., Brenner, M. (1981). Information effects and stock market response to signs of firm deterioration. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35-51. Asthana, S. C., Boone, J. P. (2012). Abnormal audit Fee and audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice Theory, 31(3), 1-22. Aziz, A., Emanuel, D. C., Lawson, G. H. (1988). Bankruptcy prediction‐an investigation of cash flow based models [1]. Journal of Management Studies, 25(5), 419-437. Beaver, W. H. (1966). Financial ratios as predictors of failure. Journal of accounting research, 71-111. Bell, T. B., Landsman, W. R., Shackelford, D. A. (2001). Auditors' perceived business risk and audit fees: Analysis and evidence. Journal of Accounting research, 39(1), 35-43. Blankley, A. I., Hurtt, D. N., MacGregor, J. E. (2012). Abnormal audit Fees and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice Theory, 31(1), 79-96. Chen, J., Hong, H., Stein, J. C. (2001). Forecasting crashes: Trading volume, past returns, and conditional skewness in stock prices. Journal of financial Economics, 61(3), 345-381. Choi, J. H., Kim, J. B., Zang, Y. (2006). The association between audit quality and abnormal audit fees. Available at SSRN 848067. Clark, T. A., Weinstein, M. I. (1983). The behavior of the common stock of bankrupt firms. The Journal of Finance, 38(2), 489-504. Cohen, D. A., Zarowin, P. (2010). Accrual-based and real earnings management activities around seasoned equity offerings. Journal of accounting and Economics, 50(1), 2-19. Cohen, D. A., Dey, A., Lys, T. Z. (2008). Real and accrual‐based earnings management in the pre‐and post‐Sarbanes‐Oxley periods. The accounting review, 83(3), 757-787. DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor independence, “low balling”, and disclosure regulation. Journal of accounting and Economics, 3(2), 113-127. DeFond, M. L., Raghunandan, K., Subramanyam, K. R. (2002). Do non–audit service FEEs impair auditor Independence? Evidence from going concern audit OPINIONs. Journal of accounting research, 40(4), 1247-1274. Dimson, E. (1979). Risk measurement when shares are subject to infrequent trading. Journal of Financial Economics, 7(2), 197-226. Eichenseher, J. W., Shields, D. (1983). The correlates of CPA-firm Change for publicly-held corporations. Auditing: A journal of practice and theory, 2(2), 23-37. Frankel, R. M., Johnson, M. F., Nelson, K. K. (2002). The relation between auditors' fees for non-audit services and earnings management. The accounting review, 77(s-1), 71-105. Fung, H. G., Leung, W. K., Zhu, J. (2008). Rights issues in the Chinese stock market: evidence of earnings management. Journal of International Financial Management Accounting, 19(2), 133-160. Griffin, P. A., Lont, D. H., Sun, Y. (2008). Corporate governance and audit fees: Evidence of countervailing relations. Journal of Contemporary Accounting Economics, 4(1), 18-49. HAW, I. M., Qi, D., Wu, D., Wu, W. (2005). Market consequences of earnings management in response to security regulations in China. Contemporary accounting research, 22(1), 95-140. Higgs, J. L., Skantz, T. R. (2006). Audit and non-audit fees and the market's reaction to earnings announcements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice Theory, 25(1), 1-26. Hope, O. K., Langli, J. C. (2010). Auditor Independence in a private firm and low litigation risk setting. The Accounting Review, 85(2), 573-605. Houston, R. W., Peters, M. F., Pratt, J. H. (2005). Nonlitigation risk and pricing audit services. Auditing: A Journal of Practice Theory, 24(1), 37-53. Hutton, A. P., Marcus, A. J., Tehranian, H. (2009). Opaque financial reports, R2, and crash risk. Journal of financial Economics, 94(1), 67-86. Kinney Jr, W. R., McDaniel, L. S. (1989). Characteristics of firms correcting previously reported quarterly earnings. Journal of accounting and economics, 11(1), 71-93. Kothari, S. P., Shu, S., Wysocki, P. D. (2009). Do managers withhold bad news?. Journal of Accounting research, 47(1), 241-276. Krishnan, J., Sami, H., Zhang, Y. (2005). Does the provision of non-audit services affect investor perceptions of auditor Independence?. Auditing: A Journal of Practice Theory, 24(2), 111-135. Larcker, D. F., Richardson, S. A. (2004). Fees paid to audit firms, accrual choices, and corporate governance. Journal of accounting research, 42(3), 625-658. Magee, R. P., Tseng, M. C. (1990). Audit pricing and Independence. Accounting Review, 315-336. Morck, R., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. W. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of financial economics, 20, 293-315. Roychowdhury, S. 2006. Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 42(3), 335-370. Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of political economy, 94(3, Part 1), 461-488. Simon, D. T., Francis, J. R. (1988). The effects of auditor change on audit fees: Tests of price cutting and price recovery. Accounting Review, 255-269. Simunic, D. A. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of accounting research, 161-190. Watkins, A. L., Hillison, W., Morecroft, S. E. (2004). Audit quality: A synthesis of theory and empirical evidence. Journal of accounting literature, 23, 153. Zang, A. Y. (2012). Evidence on the trade-off between real activities manipulation and accrual-based earnings management. The accounting review, 87(2), 675-703. Zmijewski, M. E. (1984). Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of Accounting research, 59-82. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/80085 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 企業風險、審計公費與審計品質一直是產官學界重點關注的議題，與過去文獻不同的是，本文檢視基於深圳證券交易所主板和創業板下上市公司的企業風險是否會對審計公費產生不一致的影響。同時使用Jones模型檢驗異常審計公費與審計品質之間的關係。本文以2006-2019年中國深圳證券交易所主板和創業板上市企業為研究對象，探討企業風險對審計公費的影響，異常審計公費對審計品質的影響。實證研究發現:(1)財務風險越高，審計公費越低，未符合預期方向;(2)企業經營風險越高，審計公費越高，創業板上市企業經營風險對審計費用的影響程度更大;(3)股權集中度發揮「監督效應」，降低公司治理風險，顯著降低審計公費，深圳證券交易所主板上市企業相較於創業板上市企業該效應更為顯著; (4)異常的審計公費會顯著降低審計品質，深圳證券交易所主板上市企業傾向進行應計項目盈餘管理，創業板上市企業傾向於採用實質盈餘管理手段。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2022-11-23T09:25:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1107202116562500.pdf: 1830933 bytes, checksum: 8ee64cce5f473d282cfb0df34d975afa (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭................................................................. I 摘要................................................................ II ABSTRACT ........................................................ III 第 1 章 緒論.......................................................... 1 第 2 章 背景與文獻探討................................................ 3 2.1 主板與創業板之發展...........................................3 2.2 企業風險與審計公費之相關文獻.................................5 第 3 章 假說建立與研究設計............................................ 8 3.1 假說建立...................................................... 8 3.2 研究設計..................................................... 12 3.2.1 企業風險與審計公費 .................................... 12 3.2.2 異常審計公費與審計品質 ................................ 16 第 4 章 樣本組成與實證結果........................................... 20 4.1 資料來源及樣本組成........................................... 20 4.2 敘述性統計與相關係數矩陣..................................... 20 4.3 假說檢驗與實證結果........................................... 22 第 5 章 結論......................................................... 38 參考文獻............................................................ 40 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 審計公費 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 企業風險 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 審計品質 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Audit Fees | en |
| dc.subject | Audit Quality | en |
| dc.subject | Corporate Risk | en |
| dc.title | 企業風險、審計公費與審計品質之關聯性：以深圳證券交易所為對象之實證研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | "The Association between Firm Risks, Audit Fees and Audit Quality ：An Empirical Examination of Shenzhen Stock Exchange" | en |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 109-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王全三(Hsin-Tsai Liu),王瑄(Chih-Yang Tseng) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 企業風險,審計公費,審計品質, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Corporate Risk,Audit Fees,Audit Quality, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 40 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202101386 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2021-07-19 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 會計學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-1107202116562500.pdf | 1.79 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。