請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/79952完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 唐欣偉(Hsin-Wei Tang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | CHANGKUN HOU | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 侯長坤 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-23T09:18:13Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-08-06 | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-11-23T09:18:13Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2021-08-06 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-08-03 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 尹繼武，2008，<聯盟信任的生成機制>，《國際政治科學》，4：35-78。 王日華，2015，《歷史主義與國際關係理論》，廣州：廣東人民出版社。 任曉，2013，<論東亞'共生體系'原理——對外關係思想和制度研究之一>，《世界經濟與政治》，7：4-22。 何芳川，1998，<“華夷秩序”論>，《北京大學學報（哲學社會科學版）》，6：30-45。 余瀟楓, 章雅荻，2019，<和合主義:國際關係理論的中國範式>，《世界經濟與政治》，7：49-76。 吳雁飛，2019，<國際關係研究中的自動文本分析>，《國際關係研究》，6：3-25。 宋偉、宋卓如，2014，<聯盟的維持與瓦解:理論分析與案例檢驗>，《世界經濟與政治》，12：137-153。 周亦奇、唐世平，2018，<“半負面案例比較法”與機制辨別>，《世界經濟與政治》，12：32-59。 金景芳，1983，《中國奴隸社會史》，上海：上海人民出版社。 韋紅、顔欣，2017，<東盟地區安全治理模式變遷——從抗禦力到安全共同體>，《當代世界與社會主義》，5：159-168。 唐世平，2012，<和解與無政府狀態的再造>，《國際政治科學》，1：79-103。 秦亞青，2012，《關係與過程：中國國際關係理論的文化建構》，上海：上海人民出版社。 高峰論壇，2016，<天下體系與未來世界秩序>，《探索與爭鳴》，5：52-75。 張鋒，2010，<解構朝貢體系>，《國際政治科學》，2：37-66。 張錫鎮，2007，<中國參與大湄公河次區域合作的進展, 障礙與出路>，《南洋問題研究》，3：1-10。 淩勝利，2016，<戰略能力、共同利益與安全合作——基於印度與美國亞太盟友安全合作的分析>，《南亞研究》，1：1-28。 郭樹勇，2002，<建構主義國際關係理論的興起悲劇、主要內容及其理論影響>，包霞琴、蘇長和（編），《國際關係研究：理論、視角與方法》，上海：文匯出版社。 陳小鼎、王亞琪，2015，<戰後歐洲安全公共産品的供給模式>，《世界經濟與政治》，6：102-122。 裴默農，1994，《春秋戰國外交群星》，重慶：重慶出版社。 黃枝連，1992，《天朝禮治體系研究: 中國與亞洲國家關係形態論. 亞洲的華夏秩序. 上卷》，北京：中國人民大學出版社。 黃枝連，1994，《天朝禮治體系研究: 中國封建王朝與朝鮮半島關係形態論. 東亞的禮義世界.中卷》，北京：中國人民大學社。 黃枝連，1995，《天朝禮治體系研究: 朝鮮的儒化情境構造--朝鮮王朝與滿清王朝的關係形態論. 下卷》，北京：中國人民大學出版社。 漆海霞，2020，<崛起信號,戰略信譽與遏制戰爭>，《國際政治科學》, 5(4)。 熊李力，2015，<參與還是回避——TPP 機制的發展與中國的區域戰略應對>，《當代世界與社會主義》1：131-136。 趙汀陽，2016，《天下的當代性》，北京：中信出版社。 趙鼎新，夏江旗譯，2006，《東周戰爭與儒法國家的誕生》，上海：華東師範大學出版社。 趙懷普、趙健哲，2017，<“特朗普衝擊波”對美歐關係的影響>，《歐洲演進》，1：1-17。 鄭先武，2016，<“亞洲安全觀”制度建構與“中國經驗”>，《當代亞太》，2：4-27。 鄭春榮、范一楊，2018，<重塑歐美安全關係? ——對歐盟“永久結構性合作”機制的解析>，《歐洲研究》，36(6)：1-24。 閻學通,、徐進主編，2009，《王霸天下思想及啓迪》，北京：世界知識出版社。 閻學通，2015，《世界權力的轉移》，北京：北京大學出版社。 閻學通、孫學峰，2007，《國際關係研究實用方法-第2版》，北京：人民出版社。 閻學通、徐進主編，2008，《中國先秦國家間政治思想選讀》，上海：復旦大學出版社。 蘇長和，2013，《共生型國際體系的可能——在一個多極世界中如何構建新型大國關係》，《世界經濟與政治》，9：4-22 鐘振明，2002，<公共産品與聯盟經濟理論>，《世界經濟與政治》，10：28-33。 《史記》 《左傳》 《竹書紀年》 《呂氏春秋》 《赤壁賦》 《孟子》 《尚書》 《春秋公羊傳》 《荀子》 《過秦論》 《道德經》 《管子》 《管子》 《墨子》 《論語》 《禮記》 Acharya, Amitav. 2001. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order, London: Routledge. Acharya, Amitav. 2005. “Do norms and identity matter? Community and power in Southeast Asia’s regional order.” The Pacific Review 18(1): 95-118. Acharya, Amitav. 2011. Whose ideas matter?: agency and power in Asian regionalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Adler, Emanuel, and Vincent Pouliot, eds. 2011b. International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Adler, Emanuel, and Vincent Pouliot. 2011a. “International practices.” International Theory 3(1): 1-36. Altfeld, Michael F. 1984. 'The decision to ally: A theory and test.' Western Political Quarterly 37(4): 523-544. Altfeld, Michael F. 1984. 'The decision to ally: A theory and test.' Western Political Quarterly 37(4): 523-544. Ayoob, Mohammed. 2002. 'Inequality and theorizing in international relations: the case for subaltern realism.' International Studies Review 4(3): 27-48. Bau, Tzong-ho. 1986. The Stability of International Systems: A Study of the Warring States System of Ancient China. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin. Beckley, Michael. 2015. 'The myth of entangling alliances: Reassessing the security risks of US defense pacts.' International Security 39(4): 7-48. Bentham, Jeremy. 1996. The collected works of Jeremy Bentham: An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Béraud-Sudreau, Lucie and Nick Childs. 2018. The US and its NATO allies: costs and value. International Institute for Strategic Studies. In https://www.iiss.org/blogs/military-balance/2018/07/us-and-nato-allies-costs-and-value. Bergsten, C. Fred, and William R. Cline. 1976. 'Increasing International Economic Interdependence: The Implications for Research.' The American Economic Review 66(2): 155-161. Bound to Relate. Chih-yu Shih.2020. 'Friendship in Chinese International Relations: The Confucian Theme of Distance in Practice.' Communist and Post-Communist Studies 53(4)177-199. Bukovansky, Mlada, Ian Clark, Robyn Eckersley, Richard Price, Christian Reus-Smit, and Nicholas J. Wheeler. 2012. Special Responsibilities: Global Problems and American Power, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bull, Hedley. 1995. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Basingstoke: Macmillan. Buzan, Barry, and Richard Little. 2000. International systems in world history: remaking the study of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cantir, Cristian, and Juliet Kaarbo, eds. 2016. Domestic Role Contestation, Foreign Policy, and International Relations, Abingdon: Routledge. Cha, Victor D . 2009. “Powerplay: Origins of the U.S. Alliance System in Asia.” International Security, 34(3): 158-196. Chan, Gerald. 1999. The Origin of the Interstate System: The Warring States in Ancient China. Issues and Studies 35 (1): 147–166. Chang, Kwang-chih. 1983. Art, myth, and ritual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Charles A. Kupchan. 2012. How enemies become friends: The sources of stable peace. Princeton; Princeton University Press. Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2004. “Social constructivisms in global and European politics: a review essay.” Review of International Studies 30: 229-44. Chen, Shih-tsai. 1941. The Equality of States in Ancient China. The American Journal of International Law 35 (4): 641–650. Churchill, Winston. 2012. Churchill: The Power of Words. New York: Random House. CNN. 2019. Trump administration to cut its financial contribution to NATO. https://edition.cnn.com/2019/11/27/politics/trump-nato-contribution-nato/index.html. Latest update 27 November 2019. Davies, Mathew. 2013. “ASEAN and human rights norms: constructivism, rational choice, and the action-identity gap.” International Relations of the Asia Pacific 13(2): 207-31. Davies, Mathew. 2016. 'A community of practice: explaining change and continuity in ASEAN's diplomatic environment.' The pacific review 29(2): 211-233. Denis Mercier. 2018. NATO's Adaptation in an Age of Complexity. PRISM. 7(4): 2-11. Dougherty, James E., and Robert L. Pfaltzgraff, Jr. 2001. Contending Theories of International Relations. A Comprehensive Survey. New York: Addison Wesley Longman. Dunne, Tim, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. 2013. International relations theories. Oxford University Press. Easley, David, and Jon Kleinberg. 2010. Networks, crowds, and markets. Cambridge: Cambridge university press. Emmers, Ralf. 2003. Cooperative Security and the Balance of Power in ASEAN and the ARF. London: Routledge. European Community. 1990.“Transatlantic Declaration,” http://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/124320/trans_declaration_90_en.pdf. Latest update 22 Novemver 1990. Fairbank, John K., and Ssu-yu Teng. 1941. 'On the Ch'ing tributary system.' Cambridge, MA: Harvard journal of Asiatic studies 6(2): 135-246. Fairbank, John King, eds. 1968. The Chinese World Order: Traditional China's Foreign Relations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968. Feng, Huiyun, and Kai He. 2020. China’s Challenges and International Order Transition: Beyond “Thucydides's Trap”. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. “International norm dynamics and political change.” International Organization 52(4): 887-917. Geir Lundestad. 1986. “Empire by Invitation? The United States and Western Europe, 1945-1952.” Journal of peace research. 23(3): 263-277. Gerring, John. 2006. Case study research: Principles and practices. Cambridge: Cambridge university press. Gilpin, Robert. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Glenn H. Snyder. 1984. “The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics.” World Politics 36(4): 471–475. Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Miles Kahler, and Alexander H. Montgomery. 2009. 'Network analysis for international relations.' International organization 63(3): 559-592. Hans J. Morgenthau. 1993. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, Brief Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill. Hobbes, Thomas. 1946. Leviathan. Oxford: Blackwell. Holsti, Kalevi J. 1995. International Politics: A Framework for Analysis, 7th ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Holsti, Kalevi J. 1999. The Coming Chaos? Armed Conflict in the World’s Periphery. In International Order and the Future of World Politics, edited by T. V. Paul and John A. Hall, 283–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Holsti, Kalevi Jaakko, and Kalevi Jaakko Holsti. 1972. International politics: a framework for analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Hsieh, C. S., Kovářík, J., Logan, T. 2014. “How central are clients in sexual networks created by commercial sex?” Scientific reports, 4(1), 1-8. Hsieh, Chih-Sheng, Jaromír Kovářík, and Trevon Logan.2014. 'How central are clients in sexual networks created by commercial sex?.' Scientific reports 4(1): 1-8. Hui, Victoria Tin-bor. 2005. War and state formation in ancient China and early modern Europe. N ew York: Cambridge University Press. Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus, and Daniel H. Nexon. 1999. 'Relations before states: Substance, process and the study of world politics.' European journal of international relations 5(3): 291-332. Jackson, Richard, Georg Sørensen, and Jørgen Møller. 2019. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Jackson, Robert, and Georg Sorensen. 2013. Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press. James D. Morrow. 1991. “An Alternative to the Capabilities Aggregation Model of Alliances,” American Journal of Political Science, 35-4: 904-933. Jervis, Robert. 1998. System effects: Complexity in political and social life. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Jetschke, Anja. 2009. “Institutionalizing ASEAN: celebrating Europe through network governance.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22(3): 407-26. Johnston, Alastair I. 2008. Social States, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Johnston, Alastaire Iain. 1995. Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Kaplan, Lawrence S., and Lawrence Kaplan. 2004. NATO divided, NATO united: the evolution of an alliance. Santa Barbara: Greenwood Publishing Group. Katsumata, Hiro. 2009. “ASEAN and human rights: resisting western pressure or emulating the west?” The Pacific Review 22(5): 619-37. Katsumata, Hiro. 2011. “Mimetic adoption and norm diffusion; ‘western’ security cooperation in Southeast Asia?” Review of International Studies 37(2): 557~76. Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye. 2012. Power and interdependence 4th.ed. New York: Longman. Keohane, Robert Owen. 1989. International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Kindleberger, Charles Poor. 1973. The World in Depression, 1929–1939. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Kissinger, Henry. 2011. On China. New York: Penguin Press. Klotz, Audie. 1995. “Norms reconstituting interests: global racial equality and U.S. sanctions against South Africa.” International Organization 49(3): 451-78. Lansford, Tom. 2018. All for One: Terrorism, NATO and the United States. London: Routledge. Lawrence S. Kaplan. 1994. NATO and the United States: the enduring alliance. Boston: Twayne Pub. Leifer, Michael. 1989. ASEAN and the security of South-East Asia. London: Routledge. Leifer, Michael. 1996. The ASEAN Regional Forum: extending ASEAN's model of regional security. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Machiavelli, Niccolò. 1961. The Prince. Harmondsworth: Penguin Olson, Mancur and Richard Zeckhauser. 1966. 'An economic theory of alliances.' The Review of Economics and Statistics. 48(3): 266-279. Fryc, Mariusz. 2016. “From Wales to Warsaw and Beyond: NATO's Strategic Adaptation to the Russian Resurgence on Europe's Eastern Flank.” Connections 15(4): 45-65. Mark W. Zacher and Richard A. Matthew. 1995. “Liberal international theory: common threads, divergent strands.” In Ch. W. Kegley Jr, eds. 1995. Controversies in international relations theory: Realism and the neoliberal challenge, New York: St Martin’s Press. Karnitschnig, Matthew. 2017.”What Angela Merkel Meant at the Munich Beer Hall.” In https://www.politico.eu/article/what-angela-merkel-meant-at-the-munich-beer-hall/. Latest update 28 May 2017. McAdam, Doug, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The tragedy of great power politics. New York: WW Norton Company. Morgenthau, Hans Joachim, Kenneth W. Thompson, and W. David Clinton. 1985. Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf Inc. NATO. 2020. The Secretary General’s Annual Report 2019. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_174399.htm#:~:text=On%2019%20March%202020%2C%20Secretary,to%20keep%20its%20people%20safe. Latest update 21 April 2020. Williams, Nicholas. 2018. “NATO－EU Cooperation: Don’t Forget Berlin Plus!” In https://www.europeanleadershipnetwork.org/commentary/nato-eu-cooperation-dont-forget-berlin-plus/．Latest update 26 March 2018 NPR. 2018. FACT CHECK: Trump's Claims On NATO Spending. In https://www.npr.org/2018/07/11/628137185/fact-check-trumps-claims-on-nato-spending. Latest update 11 July 2018. Nye Jr, Joseph S, Jr. 1990. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic. Park, Hwee-rhak. 2019. 'The South Korea–US Alliance under the North Korean Nuclear Threat: A Reluctant Return to the “Autonomy–Security Trade‐Off”.' Pacific Focus 34(3): 447-472. Peking Review. 18 August 1967. 10(34). Quisumbing, Purification V. and Benjamin B. Domino, eds. 1983. EEC and ASEAN: Two Regional Community Perspective. Manila: The Foreign Service Institute and University of the Phillipines Law Center. Van Wagenen, Richard. 1952. Research in the international organization field. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Rosenau, James. 1990. Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Schelling, Thomas C. 1980. The Strategy of Conflict: With a New Preface by The Author. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university press. Schelling, Thomas C. 1980. The Strategy of Conflict: With a New Preface by The Author. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university press. Shiping, Tang. 2013. The social evolution of international politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Smith, Adam. 2010. The theory of moral sentiments. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Stephan Frühling. 2016. “Managing Escalation: Missile Defense, Strategy and U.S. Alliances.” The Royal Institute of International Affairs, 92(1): 81-95. Stephen M. Walt. 1985. “Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power.” International Security. 9(4): 3-43. Tadelis, Steven. 2013. Game theory: an introduction. Princeton university press. Tan, See Seng. 2015. Multilateral Asian security architecture: non-ASEAN stakeholders. London: Routledge. Thielemann, Eriko R. 2006. “Burden-Sharing: The International Politics of Refugee Protection.” San Diego: The Center of Comparative Immigration Studies. Thomas J. Christensen and Jack Snyder. 1990. “Chain gangs and passed bucks: Predicting alliance patterns in multipolarity.” International organization 44(2): 137-168. Tilly, Charles. 1992. Coercion, Capital, and European States. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell. USA TODAY. 2019. Donald Trump, NATO leader meet amid tensions over military spending by US allies. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/04/02/donald-trump-nato-leader-jens-stoltenberg-meet-70th-anniversary/3330366002/. Latest update 2nd April 2019. Walker, Richard. 1953. The Multi-State System of Ancient China. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. Walker, Richard. 1953. The Multi-State System of Ancient China. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. Walt, Stephen M. 1990. The origins of alliance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of international politics. Boston: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Waltz, Kenneth N. 1986. 'Reflections on theory of international politics: A response to my critics.' Neorealism and its Critics (1986): 322-345. Washington Post. 2016. Trump questions need for NATO, outlines noninterventionist foreign policy. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/03/21/donald-trump-reveals-foreign-policy-team-in-meeting-with-the-washington-post/. Latest update 21 May 2016. Washington Post. 2019. Trump’s NATO parade of falsehoods and misstatements. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/12/10/trumps-nato-parade-false-facts-misstatements/. Latest update 10 December 2019. Wendt, Alexander. 1992. 'Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics.' International organization 46(2): 391-425. Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Wong, R. Bin. 1999. The Political Economy of Agrarian Empire and Its Modern Legacy. In China and Historical Capitalism: Genealogies of Sinological Knowledge, edited by Gregory Blue and Timothy Brook. 210-245. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Yang, Lien-sheng. 1968. The Chinese World Order. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Yang, Zhao, René Algesheimer, and Claudio J. Tessone. 2016. 'A comparative analysis of community detection algorithms on artificial networks.' Scientific reports 6(1): 1-18. Yates, Robert. 2017. 'ASEAN as the ‘regional conductor’: understanding ASEAN's role in Asia-Pacific order.' The Pacific Review 30.4: 443-461. Studzinska, Zofia. 2015. “How Russia, Step by Step, Wants to Regain an Imperial Role in the Global and European Security System.” Connections 14(4):21-42. Zyla, Benjamin. 2016. 'Nato burden sharing: a new research agenda.' Journal of International Organizations Studies 7(2): 5-22. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/79952 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 爲了研究聯盟在公共産品提供、自主權轉讓、社會化過程中，矛盾的産生與消解，本文從天下體系理論宏觀哲學層面出發，追溯先秦孔子、老子、墨子哲學思想，構建出天下爲公、天下有序、天下無外三種天下主義視角，分別對話主流國際關係理論三大主義，即自由主義、現實主義、建構主義。在使用了演化博弈論、社會網絡分析、大數據文本分析的研究方法，對春秋戰國時期的齊國、晋國、楚國，以及當代美國、蘇聯、中國在聯盟政治中的案例比較，本研究將天下體系理論拓展到中觀實證研究層面，得出了是否具有天下觀，是聯盟矛盾消解與産生的關鍵，對于國際關係理論、科學研究方法、聯盟政治實踐具有重要意義。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2022-11-23T09:18:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2607202114193700.pdf: 5273068 bytes, checksum: f6ee8f7fae89ff0ae9234ae6b820afa3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 I 謝辭 III 中文摘要 V 英文摘要 VI 表圖目次 XI 第一章 天下體系理論 1 第一節 案例 2 第二節 研究方法 7 第三節 世界政治的天下理論的基本框架 9 第四節 國際政治的天下觀 13 壹、國際政治中的矛盾産生邏輯——個體邏輯 13 貳、國際政治中的矛盾消解邏輯——整體主義 15 叁、國際政治的天下觀：春秋中國與當代三大聯盟 24 第五節 聯盟矛盾的天下觀 25 壹、聯盟政治的個體邏輯 26 貳、聯盟政治的整體邏輯 29 叁、聯盟政治的天下觀：春秋中國與當代三大聯盟 30 第六節 天下爲公、天下有序、天下無外對三大主義 32 第七節 替代性解釋 32 第二章 春秋戰國與當代的國際政治與聯盟政治天下體系 37 第一節 天下體系理論的整體邏輯歷史 38 第二節 主流國際關係理論的替代性解釋 44 第三節 天下爲公：演化博弈視角下聯盟公共産品提供 46 壹、博弈情況介紹 47 貳、演化模型構建 50 叁、演化博弈結果 55 肆、案例檢驗：齊國與美國 58 伍、小結 62 第四節 天下有序：社會網絡視角下聯盟自主權轉讓 64 壹、資料處理方法 64 貳、概念界定 65 叁、社會網絡靜態分析 66 肆、社會網絡仿真 67 伍、齊桓晉文社會網絡比較 70 陸、案例檢驗：齊國、晉國與美國、蘇聯 72 柒、小結 75 第五節 天下無外：文本分析視角下聯盟社會化過程 77 壹、具體研究步驟 77 貳、詞頻統計及文字雲處理 79 叁、情緒-詞頻分析 81 肆、詞袋模型 85 伍、詞嵌入模型-情緒分析 87 陸、案例檢驗：楚國與中國 92 柒、小結 96 第六節 小結：天下體系影響 97 第三章 主流國際關係學理論對當代聯盟的替代性解釋 99 第一節 美國、北約公共産品提供的替代性解釋 99 壹、身份定位說 99 貳、安全戰略說 101 叁、自由主義合作-國際公共產品理論 103 肆、小結 104 第二節 蘇聯、華約自主權轉讓的替代性解釋 105 壹、聯盟結構穩定論 105 貳、安全共同體理論 107 叁、和解機制說 109 肆、小結 110 第三節 中國、東盟社會化的替代性解釋 110 壹、合作依賴說 111 貳、權力依賴說 112 叁、文化依賴說 113 肆、小結 114 第四章 結論、意義及展望 115 第一節 天下體系理論的中層實證研究 115 第二節 天下體系理論與主流國際關係理論的對話 117 第三節 展望天下 120 參考文獻 122 壹、中文部分 122 贰、西文部分 125 附錄一 春秋戰國時期國家間聯盟數據庫 135 附錄二 春秋戰國時期國家間戰爭數據庫 142 附錄三 《左傳》文本分析結果 161 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 天下 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 春秋戰國 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 聯盟 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 大數據文本分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 國際關係理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 演化博弈論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社會網絡分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Spring and Autumn and Warring States Period | en |
| dc.subject | Alliance | en |
| dc.subject | Tianxia | en |
| dc.subject | International Relations Theory | en |
| dc.subject | Evolutionary Game Theory | en |
| dc.subject | Social Network Analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Text Analysis | en |
| dc.title | 天下的實證研究：春秋戰國與當代聯盟公共産品、自主權、社會化矛盾 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | "Tianxia’s Empirical Research in Ancient China and Modern Alliances Disputes about Public Goods, Autonomy, and Socialization" | en |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 109-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 童涵浦(Hsin-Tsai Liu),許智偉(Chih-Yang Tseng) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 天下,國際關係理論,演化博弈論,社會網絡分析,大數據文本分析,春秋戰國,聯盟, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Tianxia,International Relations Theory,Evolutionary Game Theory,Social Network Analysis,Text Analysis,Spring and Autumn and Warring States Period,Alliance, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 170 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202101749 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2021-08-03 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-2607202114193700.pdf | 5.15 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。