請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/79927完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張俊彥(Chun-Yen Chang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chin-Wen Yeh | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 葉晴文 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-23T09:17:04Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-02-21 | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-11-23T09:17:04Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-02-21 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-01-27 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 陳長益。Goff, K., Torrance, E. P. (2006)。陶倫斯創造力測驗成人適用精簡版 –指導手冊。台北市:心理。 Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative science quarterly, 50(3), 367-403. Atchley, R. A., Strayer, D. L., Atchley, P. (2012). Creativity in the wild: Improving creative reasoning through immersion in natural settings. PloS one, 7(12), e51474. Benyus, J. M. (1997). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature (p. 320). New York: Morrow. Berman, M. G., Hout, M. C., Kardan, O., Hunter, M. R., Yourganov, G., Henderson, J. M., ... Jonides, J. (2014). The perception of naturalness correlates with low-level visual features of environmental scenes. PloS one, 9(12), e114572. Berto, R. (2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of environmental psychology, 25(3), 249-259. Browne, B. A., Cruse, D. F. (1988). The incubation effect: Illusion or illumination?. Human Performance, 1(3), 177-185. Carrus, G., Lafortezza, R., Colangelo, G., Dentamaro, I., Scopelliti, M., Sanesi, G. (2013). Relations between naturalness and perceived restorativeness of different urban green spaces. Psyecology, 4(3), 227-244. Chulvi, V., Agost, M. J., Felip, F., Gual, J. (2020). Natural elements in the designer's work environment influence the creativity of their results. Journal of Building Engineering, 28, 101033. Cramond, B., Matthews-Morgan, J., Bandalos, D., Zuo, L. (2005). A report on the 40-year follow-up of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Alive and well in the new millennium. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(4), 283-291. Cristofori, I., Salvi, C., Beeman, M., Grafman, J. (2018). The effects of expected reward on creative problem solving. Cognitive, Affective, Behavioral Neuroscience, 18(5), 925-931. Diehl, M., Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of personality and social psychology, 53(3), 497. Feldhusen, J. F., Goh, B. E. (1995). Assessing and accessing creativity: An integrative review of theory, research, and development. Creativity research journal, 8(3), 231-247. Ferraro III, F. M. (2015). Enhancement of convergent creativity following a multiday wilderness experience. Ecopsychology, 7(1), 7-11. Finke, R. A. (1996). Imagery, creativity, and emergent structure. Consciousness and cognition, 5(3), 381-393. Goldschmidt, G. (2015). Ubiquitous serendipity: Potential visual design stimuli are everywhere. In Studying visual and spatial reasoning for design creativity (pp. 205-214). Springer, Dordrecht. Goldschmidt, G., Smolkov, M. (2006). Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance. Design Studies, 27(5), 549-569. Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological bulletin, 53(4), 267. Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1(1), 3-14. Hass, R. W. (2015). Feasibility of online divergent thinking assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 85-93. Herzog, T. R., Kropscott, L. S. (2004). Legibility, mystery, and visual access as predictors of preference and perceived danger in forest settings without pathways. Environment and behavior, 36(5), 659-677. Hunter, M. R., Askarinejad, A. (2015). Designer's approach for scene selection in tests of preference and restoration along a continuum of natural to manmade environments. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 1228. Hyam, R. (2017). Automated image sampling and classification can be used to explore perceived naturalness of urban spaces. PloS one, 12(1), e0169357. Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge university press. Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., Ryan, R. (1998). With people in mind: Design and management of everyday nature. Island press. Keller, A. I., Pasman, G. J., Stappers, P. J. (2006). Collections designers keep: Collecting visual material for inspiration and reference. CoDesign, 2(01), 17-33. Kellert, S. R. (1995). The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press. Korpela, K., Hartig, T. (1996). Restorative qualities of favorite places. Journal of environmental psychology, 16(3), 221-233. Kowaltowski, D. C., Bianchi, G., De Paiva, V. T. (2010). Methods that may stimulate creativity and their use in architectural design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(4), 453-476. Kudrowitz, B., Dippo, C. (2013). When does a paper clip become a sundial? Exploring the progression of originality in the alternative uses test. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 17(4), 3-18. Lamb, R. J., Purcell, A. T. (1990). Perception of naturalness in landscape and its relationship to vegetation structure. Landscape and Urban Planning, 19(4), 333-352. MacKinnon, D. W. (1962). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American psychologist, 17(7), 484. McCoy, J. M., Evans, G. W. (2002). The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 14(3-4), 409-426. Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological review, 69(3), 220. Ode, Å., Fry, G., Tveit, M. S., Messager, P., Miller, D. (2009). Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference. Journal of environmental management, 90(1), 375-383. Ode, Å., Tveit, M. S., Fry, G. (2008). Capturing landscape visual character using indicators: touching base with landscape aesthetic theory. Landscape research, 33(1), 89-117. Oleynick, V. C., Thrash, T. M., LeFew, M. C., Moldovan, E. G., Kieffaber, P. D. (2014). The scientific study of inspiration in the creative process: challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 8, 436. Palanica, A., Lyons, A., Cooper, M., Lee, A., Fossat, Y. (2019). A comparison of nature and urban environments on creative thinking across different levels of reality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 44-51. Plambech, T., Van Den Bosch, C. C. K. (2015). The impact of nature on creativity–A study among Danish creative professionals. Urban Forestry Urban Greening, 14(2), 255-263 Posner, M. I. (1973). Cognition: An introduction.. Purcell, A. T., Lamb, R. J. (1998). Preference and naturalness: An ecological approach. Landscape and urban planning, 42(1), 57-66. Reinig, B. A., Briggs, R. O., Nunamaker, J. F. (2007). On the measurement of ideation quality. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(4), 143-161. Runco, M. A., Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity research journal, 24(1), 66-75. Runco, M. A., Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational psychology review, 7(3), 243-267. Runco, M. A., Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity research journal, 24(1), 92-96. Seifert, C. M., Meyer, D. E., Davidson, N., Patalano, A. L., Yaniv, I. (1994). Demystification of cognitive insight: Opportunistic assimilation and the prepared-mind hypothesis. Shibata, S., Suzuki, N. (2004). Effects of an indoor plant on creative task performance and mood. Scandinavian journal of psychology, 45(5), 373-381. Silvia, P. J. (2011). Subjective scoring of divergent thinking: Examining the reliability of unusual uses, instances, and consequences tasks. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(1), 24-30. Sio, U. N., Ormerod, T. C. (2009). Does incubation enhance problem solving? A meta-analytic review. Psychological bulletin, 135(1), 94. Sio, U. N., Ormerod, T. C. (2015). Incubation and cueing effects in problem-solving: Set aside the difficult problems but focus on the easy ones. Thinking Reasoning, 21(1), 113-129. Studente, S., Seppala, N., Sadowska, N. (2016). Facilitating creative thinking in the classroom: Investigating the effects of plants and the colour green on visual and verbal creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 1-8. Thrash, T. M., Elliot, A. J. (2003). Inspiration as a psychological construct. Journal of personality and social psychology, 84(4), 871. Thrash, T. M., Elliot, A. J. (2004). Inspiration: core characteristics, component processes, antecedents, and function. Journal of personality and social psychology, 87(6), 957. Torrance, E. P. (1972). Predictive validity of the torrance tests of creative thinking. The Journal of creative behavior. Torrance, E. P., Goff, K. (1990). Fostering academic creativity in gifted students. ERIC Clearinghouse. Tyrväinen, L., Ojala, A., Korpela, K., Lanki, T., Tsunetsugu, Y., Kagawa, T. (2014). The influence of urban green environments on stress relief measures: A field experiment. Journal of environmental psychology, 38, 1-9. Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 85-125). Springer, Boston, MA. Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. science, 224(4647), 420-421. van Rompay, T. J., Jol, T. (2016). Wild and free: Unpredictability and spaciousness as predictors of creative performance. Journal of environmental psychology, 48, 140-148. Velarde, M. D., Fry, G., Tveit, M. (2007). Health effects of viewing landscapes–Landscape types in environmental psychology. Urban Forestry Urban Greening, 6(4), 199-212. Williams, K. J., Lee, K. E., Hartig, T., Sargent, L. D., Williams, N. S., Johnson, K. A. (2018). Conceptualising creativity benefits of nature experience: Attention restoration and mind wandering as complementary processes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 59, 36-45. Wilson, J. O., Rosen, D., Nelson, B. A., Yen, J. (2010). The effects of biological examples in idea generation. Design Studies, 31(2), 169-186. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/79927 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 環境心理領域的研究中我們了解自然環境具有注意力恢復等生心理健康效益，然而我們尚不清楚環境如何影響創造力表現，此外我們好奇是否因為自然環境具有注意力恢復效益促進更好的創造力表現。本研究目的為探討觀看不同自然度景觀環境下的注意力恢復對創造力的影響。為了有效比較不同環境的恢復效益，我們將環境類型以自然度分為三個等級，驗證不同環境下的創造力表現。 本研究操作方法首先以台大校園為研究範圍，藉由專家照片評估法挑選符合研究目的之實驗照片，包括高自然度、中自然度、低自然度等三組環境照片作為實驗刺激物。實驗邀請100位受測者在隨機觀看其中一組景觀環境照片組的同時進行陶倫斯創造力測驗成人適用精簡版(ATTA)，並填寫心理問卷包括感知注意力恢復量表(PRS)和靈感量表(IS)。實驗結果發現高自然度及中自然度在創造力表現上優於低自然度，其中從創造力各構面來看，不同自然度間精密性、變通性的表現達到顯著差異。在所有觀看不同自然度樣本中感知注意力恢復總級分與創造力表現總級分達到顯著相關，表明高自然度與中自然度環境所獲得更高的注意力恢復效益有助於提升更好的創造力表現。研究結論為當遇到工作困難時，觀看具有自然元素的景觀環境組成更能刺激好奇心產生靈活的想像力。此外，自然度高的景觀環境讓我們的心靈短暫遠離工作狀態所獲得注意力疲勞恢復效益有助於提出相比他人更獨特、多樣化的創意點子。本研究有助於提升對景觀環境健康效益的了解，並提供未來創造力需求之環境設計參考建議。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2022-11-23T09:17:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2701202203025100.pdf: 6987347 bytes, checksum: 052f4c4e5177943fb32b94988bab33e2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 i 誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iv 英文摘要 v 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究範圍與限制 3 第二章 文獻回顧 4 第一節 創造力相關理論 4 一、創造力定義 4 二、創造力歷程：孵化期 5 四、創造力與靈感啟發 7 五、創造力的量測方式 8 第二節 自然度、注意力恢復與創造力的關係 10 一、自然度與創造力的關係 10 二、注意力恢復與創造力的關係 12 第三節 小結 15 第三章 研究方法 16 第一節 研究架構與假設 16 第二節 研究方法 17 一、研究流程 17 二、操作變項：環境照片篩選與評估 17 三、測量變項：數據收集工具 20 第三節 實驗設計 23 一、實驗參與者選擇標準 23 二、實驗流程 23 第四節 數據分析方法 26 一、創造力測驗結果評分操作 26 二、實驗數據整理 29 第四章 研究結果 30 第一節 樣本特性分析 30 第二節 研究假設驗證 32 一、不同自然度景觀環境下的注意力恢復對創造力有差異 32 二、不同自然度景觀環境對創造力表現的影響有差異 34 三、觀看不同自然度景觀環境時注意力恢復與創造力表現有相關關係 41 第三節 結果討論 46 第五章 結論與建議 50 第一節 結論 50 一、不同自然度景觀環境對創造力表現的影響 50 二、自然度景觀環境下注意力恢復與創造力表現的關係 50 三、日常校園環境中自然度環境對大專生的創造力表現 51 第二節 後續研究建議 52 一、實務建議 52 二、研究建議 52 參考資料 54 附錄一 英文文獻摘錄 61 附錄二 實驗照片 65 附錄三 心理出版社創造力測驗使用同意書 68 附錄四 研究倫理審查核可證明書 69 附錄五 研究參與者知情同意書 70 附錄六 實驗問卷 74 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 靈感啟發 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 景觀環境 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自然度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 注意力恢復 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 創造力 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Attention Restoration | en |
| dc.subject | Landscape | en |
| dc.subject | Inspiration | en |
| dc.subject | Creativity Thinking | en |
| dc.subject | Naturalness | en |
| dc.title | 景觀環境的自然度對創造力的影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The influence of Naturalness in Landscape Environment on Creativity | en |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林晏州(Sheng-Hsien Chiu),歐聖榮(Wei-Ssu Liao),何立智,張伯茹 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 景觀環境,自然度,注意力恢復,創造力,靈感啟發, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Landscape,Naturalness,Attention Restoration,Creativity Thinking,Inspiration, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 75 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202200225 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-01-29 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝暨景觀學系 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 園藝暨景觀學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-2701202203025100.pdf | 6.82 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。