請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/79688完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 蕭高彥(Carl K.Y. Shaw) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Liang-Chung Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王亮中 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-23T09:07:36Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-09-02 | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-11-23T09:07:36Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2021-09-02 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-08-25 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分 傅柯（Michel Foucault），2018，《安全、領土與人口》，錢翰、陳曉徑譯。上海：上海人民出版社。 洛克（Locke, John），1996，《利維坦》，葉啟芳、瞿菊農譯。北京：商務印書館。 霍布斯（Hobbes, Thomas），1985，《利維坦》，黎思復、黎廷弼譯。北京：商務印書館。 霍布斯（Hobbes, Thomas），2006，《一位哲學家與英格蘭普通法學者的對話》，毛曉秋譯。上海：上海人民出版社。 蕭高彥，2020，《探索政治現代性：從馬基維利到嚴復》。台北：聯經出版公司。 英文部分 Abizadeh, Arash. 2011. “Hobbes on the Causes of War: A Disagreement Theory.” American Political Science Review 105(2): 298-315. Abizadeh, Arash. 2013. “The Representation of Hobbesian Sovereignty: Leviathan as Mythology” in Hobbes Today: Insights for the 21st Century, ed. S. A. Lloyd. New York: Cambridge University Press, 113-152. Abizadeh, Arash. 2017. “Hobbes on Mind: Practical Deliberation, Reasoning, and Language.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55(1): 1-34. Abizadeh, Arash. 2018. Hobbes and the Two Faces of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Aristotle. 2000. Nichomachean Ethics., translated and edited by Roger Crisp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Aubrey, John. 2016(1949). “Thomas Hobbes” in Aubrey’s Brief Lives. London: Vintage, 147-159. Baumgold, Deborah. 1988. Hobbes’s political theory. New York: Cambridge University Press. Baumgold, Deborah. 2013. “Trust in Hobbes’s Political Thought.” Political Theory 41(6): 838-855. Baumgold, Deborah. 1988. Contract Theory in Historical Context: essays on Grotius, Hobbes, and Locke. Leiden: Brill. Bobbio, Norberto. 1993(1989). Thomas Hobbes and the Natural Law Tradition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Bodin, Jean. 1962 (1606). The Six Bookes of a Commonweale: A Facsimile reprint of the English translation of 1606, Corrected and Supplemented in the light of a new comparison with the French and Latin texts., trans. R. Knolles, ed. Kenneth D. McRAE. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Branstetter, John. 2017. “The Leviathan’s Conscience: Hobbesian Human Nature and Moral Judgment.” Political Research Quarterly 70(4): 778-789. Brett, Annabel. 2011. Changes of State: Nature and the Limits of the City in Early Modern Natural Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Burgess, Gleen. 1990. “Contexts for the Writing and Publication of Hobbes’s Leviathan.” History of Political Thought 11(4): 675-702. Campbell, Enid. 1958. “Thomas Hobbes and the Common Law.” Tasmanian University Law Review 1(1): 20-45. Ciceronis, M. Tulli. 2006. De Re Publica; De Legibus; Cato Maior De Senectute; Laelius De Amicitia. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Creppell, Ingrid. 2003. “The Democratic Element in Hobbes’s Behemoth.” Filozofski vestnik 24(2): 7-35. D'Entrèves, A. P. 1951. Natural Law: An Introduction to Legal Philosophy. London: Hutchinson University Library. Dyzenhaus, David. 2012. “Hobbes on the authority of law.” in Hobbes and the Law, ed. David Dyzenhaus and Thomas Poole. New York: Cambridge University Press, 186-209. Focault, Michel et al. 2007. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-78. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Gaus, Gerald. 2013. “Hobbes’s Challenge to Public Reason Liberalism: Public Reason and Religious Convictions in Leviathan” in Hobbes Today: Insights for the 21st Century, ed. S. A. Lloyd. New York: Cambridge University Press, 155-177. Gauthier, David. 1969. The Logic of Leviathan. Oxford: Clarendon. Gert, Bernard. 1996. “Hobbes’s Psychology.” in The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes, ed. Tom Sorell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 157-174. Gert, Bernard. 2001. “Hobbes on Reason.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 82: 243-257. Goldsmith, Maurice M. 1966. Hobbes’s Science of Politics. New York: Columbia University Press. Goldsmith, Maurice M. 1996. “Hobbes on Law.” in The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes, ed. Tom Sorell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 274-304. Gray, John. 2000. Two Faces of Liberalism. New York: The New Press. Grotius, Hugo. 2005. The Rights of War and Peace, 3vols, ed. R. Tuck, from the edition by Jean Barbeyrac. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. “The Horrors of Autonomy: Carl Schmitt in English.” in The New Conservatism. Cambridge: Polity Press. Halldenius, Lena. 2012. “Liberty, Law and Leviathan: Of Being Free from Impediments by Artifice.” Theoria 59(131): 1-20. Hamilton, James. 2013. “The Origins of Hobbes’s State of Nature.” Hobbes Studies 26: 152-170. Hampton, Jean. 1986. Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Harrington, James. 1992. The Commonwealth of Oceana, ed. J. G. A. Pocock. New York: Cambridge University Press. Harrison, Ross. 2012. “The Equal Extent of Natural and Civil Law.” in Hobbes and the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hobbes, Thomas. 1845. Six Lessons to the Professors of the Mathematics in The English Works 7vol, ed. Sir William Molesworth, 181-356. London: Richards. Hobbes, Thomas et al. 1978. Man and Citizen: Thomas Hobbes’s De Homine translated by Charles T. Wood, T. S. K. Scott-Craig, and Bernard Gert, and De Cive, translated by Thomas Hobbes, also known as Philosophical Rudiments Concerning Government and Society, ed. Bernard Gert. Gloucester: Peter Smith. Hobbes, Thomas. 1984(1889). The Elements of Law, ed. Ferdinand Tönnies. New Impression, London: Frank Cass Co. Ltd. Hobbes, Thomas. 1994. Leviathan, with Selected Variants from the Latin Edition of 1668, ed. Edwin Curley. Indianapolis: Hackett. Hobbes, Thomas. 1998. On the Citizen, ed. And trans. Richard Tuck and Michael Silverthorne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hobbes, Thomas. 1990. Behemoth, ed. Ferdinand Tönnies. London: The University of Chicago Press, Ltd. Hobbes, Thomas. 2005. “A Dialogue Between a Philosopher and a Student, of the Common Laws of England: Questions Relative to Hereditary Right.” in Thomas Hobbes: Writings on Common Law and Hereditary Right, ed. Alan Cromartie and Quentin Skinner. New York: Oxford University Press, 1-152. Hobbes, Thomas. 2012. Leviathan: The English and Latin Texts, ed. Noel Malcolm. Oxford: Clarendon. Hoekstra, Kinch. 2004. “The de facto Turn in Hobbes’s Political Philosophy.” in Leviathan After 350 Years, ed. Tom Sorell and Luc Foisneau. Oxford: Clarendon, 33-74. Hoekstra, Kinch. 2007. “Hobbes on the Natural Condition of Mankind.” in The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan, ed. Patricia Springborg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 109-127. Hoekstra, Kinch. 2013. “Early Modern Absolutism and Constitutionalism.” Cardozo Law Review 34: 1079-98. Jesseph, Douglas. 1996. “Hobbes and the Method of Natural Science.” in The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes, ed. Tom Sorell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 86-107. Jones, Peter. 2017. “The Political Theory of Modus Vivendi.” Philosophia 45: 443-461. Kapust, Daniel. 2019. “Hobbes, Lucretius and the Political Psychology of Peace.” History of Political Thought 40(2): 247-269. Kavka, Gregory. 1986. Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Koebner, Richard. 1951. “Despot and Despotism: Vicissitudes of a Political Term.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 14(3): 275-302. Kraynak, Robert. 1983. “Hobbes on Barbarism and Civilization.” The Journal of Politics 45(1): 86-109. Lobban, Michael. “Thomas Hobbes and the Common Law.” in Hobbes and the Law, ed. David Dyzenhaus and Thomas Poole. New York: Cambridge University Press, 39-67. Locke, John. 1965(1960). Two treaties of Government, ed. Peter Laslett. New York: Mentor. Luban, Daniel. 2018. “Hobbesian Slavery.” Political Theory 46(5): 726-748. Lucretius. 2001(1969). On the Nature of Things, trans. By Martin Ferguson Smith. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. Loughlin, Martin. 2012. “The Political Jurisprudence of Thomas Hobbes.” in Hobbes and the Law, ed. David Dyzenhaus and Thomas Poole. New York: Cambridge University Press, 39-67. Nyquist, Mary. 2009. “Hobbes, Slavery, and Despotical Rule.” University of Chicago Press 106(1): 1-33. Malcolm, Noel. 2002. “Hobbes and the European Republic of Letters.” in Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford: Clarendon. Oakeshott, Michael. 1975(1937). Hobbes on Civil Association. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, Inc. Parker, Henry. 1640. The Case of Shipmony Briefly Discoursed, According to the Grounds of Law, Policie, and Conscience and Most Humbly Presented to the Censure and Correction of the High Court of Parliament, Nov.3. 1640. London: Printed by Elizabeth Purslowe, ann. Dom. 1640. In https://ap01-a.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do;jsessionid=B8DAAE02F0CF6C0E319BC705FDB40EE5.app09.ap01.prod.alma.dc05.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com:1801?operation=resolveService package_service_id=38667843990001731 institutionId=1731 customerId=1720. Pitkin, Hanna. 1964. “Hobbes’s Concept of Representation.” The American Political Science Review, 58(2): 328-340. Rahe, Paul A. 2007. “In the Shadow of Lucretius: the Epicurean Foundations of Machiavelli’s Political Thought.” History of Political Thought 28(1): 30-55. Rapaczynski, Andrzej. 1989. Nature and Politics: Liberalism in the Philosophies of Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Rogers, G. A. J. 1988. “Hobbes’s Hidden Influence.” in Perspective on Thomas Hobbes, ed. G. A. J. Rogers and Alan Ryan. Oxford: Clarendon, 189-205. Runciman, David. 2000. “What Kind of Person is Hobbes’s State? A Reply to Skinner.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 8(2): 268-278. Ryan, Alan. 1996. “Hobbes’s Political Philosophy.” in The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes, ed. Tom Sorell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 208-245. Sabine, George. 1961(1937). A History of Political Theory, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Schmitt, Carl. 2008. The Concept of the Political. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Skinner, Quentin. 1996. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Skinner, Quentin. 1998. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Skinner, Quentin. 2004a. “Hobbes and the purely artificial person of the state.” in Vision of Politics, 3vol. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 177-208. Skinner, Quentin. 2004b. “Hobbes on the proper signification of liberty.” in Vision of Politics, 3vol. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 209-237. Skinner, Quentin. 2004c. “History and ideology in the English revolution.” in Vision of Politics, 3vol. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 238-263. Skinner, Quentin. 2004d. “The context of Hobbes’s theory of political obligation.” in Vision of Politics, 3vol. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 264-286. Skinner, Quentin. 2004e. “Conquest and consent: Hobbes and the engagement controversy.” in Vision of Politics, 3vol. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 287-307. Skinner, Quentin. 2008. Hobbes and Republican Liberty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Skinner, Quentin. 2009. “A Genealogy of the Modern State.” British Academy 162: 325-370. Smith, Steven. 2012. Political Philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press. Sommerville, Johann. 1992. Thomas Hobbes: Political Ideas in Historical Context. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd. Sorell, Tom. 1988. “The Science in Hobbes’s Politics.” in Perspective on Thomas Hobbes, ed. G. A. J. Rogers and Alan Ryan. Oxford: Clarendon, 67-80. Springborg, Patricia. 2013. “Hobbes’s Epicurean Civil Religion.” Published in translation as “Hobbes’s theorie der Zivilreligion.” In Philosophie, Politik und Religion: Klassische Modelle von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, eds. Dirk Bantl, Rolf Geiger, Stephan Herzberg. The Hague: de Gruyter, 117-132. Springborg, Patricia. 2016. “Hobbes’s materialism and Epicurean mechanism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24(5): 814-835. Sreedhar, Susanne. 2010. Hobbes on Resistance: Defying the Leviathan. New York: Cambridge University Press. Strauss, Leo 1963(1936). The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Its Genesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Strong, Tracy B. 2015. “Glory and the Law in Hobbes.” European Journal of Political Theory 0(0): 1-16. Thomsen, Jacob Als. 1997. “Carl Schmitt – The Hobbsian of the 20TH Century?” Social Thought Research 20(1): 5-28. Tricaud, François. 1988. “Hobbes’s Concerption of the State of Nature from 1640 to 1651: Evolution and Ambiguities.” in Perspective on Thomas Hobbes, ed. G. A. J. Rogers and Alan Ryan. Oxford: Clarendon, 107-24. Tuck, Richard. 1988. “Hobbes and Descartes.” in Perspective on Thomas Hobbes, ed. G. A. J. Rogers and Alan Ryan. Oxford: Clarendon, 11-42. Tuck, Richard. 1993. Philosophy and Government 1572-1651. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tuck, Richard. 1996. “Hobbes’s Moral Philosophy.” in The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes, ed. Tom Sorell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 175-207. Tuck, Richard. 1999. The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant. New York: Oxford University Press Inc. Tuck, Richard. 2006. “Hobbes and Democracy.” in Annabel Brett et. al. eds., Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 171-190. Tuck, Richard. 2016. The Sleeping Sovereign: The Invention of Modern Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Waldmann, Felix. 2021. “John Locke as a Reader of Thomas Hobbes’s Leviathan: A New Manuscript.” The Journal of Modern History 93: 245-282. Warrender, Howard. 1957. The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: His Theory of Obligation. Oxford: Clarendon. Wilson, Catherine. 2008. Epicureanism at the Origins of Modernity. Oxford: Clarendon. Zagorin, Perez. 2000. “Hobbes Without Grotius.” History of Political Thought 21(1): 16-40. Zagorin, Perez. 2009. Hobbes and the Law of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/79688 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本文旨在分析湯瑪士‧霍布斯在著作《利維坦》發展的絕對主義理論，並據此評判歷來兩支詮釋霍布斯式絕對主義的對立觀點。筆者主張，霍布斯為其政治理論的構成預設了筆者稱為「自然性」與「創發性」的兩個人觀面向，而二者之間的張力關係貫穿了政治共同體的理論架構。基此，本文依循著此一線索，檢視了霍布斯式絕對主義論證從早期的《法律的元素》、《論公民》直至《利維坦》的演進;筆者並聚焦於四個問題意識作為論證的核心，這分別是：人類本質和人際互動的真實樣貌為何、政治生活如何成立、以及成立後的政治生活何以維繫。 在本文的第一章中，筆者首先回顧了兩種對於霍布斯式絕對主義的既存詮釋，這分別是以約翰‧洛克為代表的批判途徑，以及由Quentin Skinner基於脈絡主義方法論提出的辯護途徑。在第二章的部分，筆者則處理了人類的本質在霍布斯的唯物主義認識論體系中如何獲得闡釋，並指出他在這樣的基礎上，架構起了「激情」（自然性）和「理性」（創發性）兩種人類心智官能的對立關係。接續著在第三章中，筆者指出霍布斯將此二種對於人類本質的設想擴展到了人際互動的層次，分別派生出了反映自然性、呈現為人際互動衝突本質的「人的自然境況」與「戰爭狀態」，以及由創發性指示的、脫離衝突的有效途徑：自然權利與自然法。第四章探討了霍布斯如何在自然徑引致的衝突困境之基礎上，鋪陳象徵創發性實踐的政治共同體之建構邏輯;其中，筆者概述了「取得的共同體」、「建制的共同體」之組建，並宣稱兩者在《利維坦》虛擬人格理論之框架下獲得了收束。而霍布斯由此將共同體的存廢與成員的效忠緊密相連，進而否決了恣意統治合乎共同體的組成目的。最後在第五章的討論中，筆者主張霍布斯對於統治方式的描述，體現了創發性的實現必須應對自然性的挑戰之顧慮。筆者指出，霍布斯賦予了主權者「公共理性」的角色、意謂著共同體賴以運作的實證法應當以自然法為本，主權者有義務施行合乎道德的統治;而鑑於臣民有充分的自由背棄臣屬關係，霍布斯強調主權者必須基於「審慎」的能力、因時度勢的制定統治方略，如此才能確保共同體和平的維繫。 基於上述的觀察，本文的最後重新檢視了霍布斯式絕對主義的兩支詮釋途徑，筆者並主張由Skinner所代表的詮釋觀點更加符合《利維坦》呈現的理論樣貌。換言之，霍布斯並非如洛克等論者宣稱的，建構了一個自我矛盾的論證系統;反而，霍布斯的絕對主義理論應該被理解為一套修辭術，應允他在護持主權者絕對統治權利的同時，亦充分地提示了統治手段的箇中風險。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2022-11-23T09:07:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2508202109511800.pdf: 2958966 bytes, checksum: ce1f1db81987fd5f971cc3c7506df314 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論：兩種絕對主義詮釋………………………… 1 第二章 唯物主義哲學與兩種人觀 第一節 引言………………………… 12 第二節 唯物主義的認識論………………………… 14 第三節 激情與理性………………………… 23 第四節 自然性/創發性的人觀面向………………………… 34 第五節 小結………………………… 41 第三章 人的自然境況、自然權利與自然法 第一節 引言………………………… 42 第二節 自然狀態、戰爭狀態、人的自然境況………………………… 44 第三節 自然權利與自然法………………………… 53 第四節 小結………………………… 63 第四章 兩種型態的共同體與授權理論 第一節 引言………………………… 65 第二節 權宜共存狀態與取得的共同體………………………… 68 第三節 建制的共同體與基源民主………………………… 79 第四節 授權理論與共同體的虛擬人格………………………… 86 第五節 小結………………………… 98 第五章 共同體的統治 第一節 引言…………………………… 99 第二節 自由與臣民自由…………………………… 102 第三節 公共理性與法律…………………………… 111 第四節 審慎的統治術…………………………… 122 第五節 小結………………………… 134 第六章 結論：絕對主義的修辭術…………………………… 135 參考文獻……………………………… 142 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 主權者與公共理性：《利維坦》絕對主義新解 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Sovereign and Public Reason: Reinterpreting Hobbesian Absolutism in Leviathan | en |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 109-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳禹仲(Hsin-Tsai Liu),陳嘉銘(Chih-Yang Tseng) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 霍布斯式絕對主義,約翰‧洛克,脈絡主義,唯物主義認識論,激情與理性,自然法與公共理性,審慎的統治術, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Hobbesian Absolutism,John Locke,Contextualism,Materialistic Epistemology,Passion and Reason,Natural Law and Public Reason,Prudential Statecraft, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 152 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202102708 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2021-08-26 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-2508202109511800.pdf | 2.89 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。