Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/79489Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 王宏文(Hong-Wung Wang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ching-Yi Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳靜儀 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-23T09:01:44Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-11-06 | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-11-23T09:01:44Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2021-11-06 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-10-07 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 吳乃德，2002，〈認同衝突和政治信任：現階段台灣族群政治的核心難題〉，《台灣社會學》，4：75-118。 沈有忠，2012，〈半總統制「權力總統化」之比較研究〉，《臺灣民主季刊》，9(4)：1-36。 沈有忠，2016，〈政黨菁英或官僚菁英？台灣半總統制下的行政院院長類型與立法影響〉，《政治科學論叢》，69：75-102。 林正義，1999。〈「特殊的國與國關係」之後美國對台海兩岸的政策〉，《政治科學論叢》，1999年12月號：105-126。 林佳龍，2000，〈台灣民主化與政黨體系的變遷：菁英與群眾的選舉連結〉，《台灣政治學刊》，4：3-55。 林能山，2011，〈李登輝的兩國論：認知與政策轉變〉，《東吳政治學報》，29(4)：177-249。 林萬億，2012，《臺灣的社會福利: 歷史經驗與制度分析》，台北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。 林聰吉，2011，〈台灣政黨體系的制度化─ 大眾政治態度面向的探討〉，《臺灣民主季刊》，8(4)：135-160。 邱訪義、李誌偉，2016，〈影響行政部門提案三讀通過之制度性因素－總統、官僚、與政黨〉，《臺灣民主季刊》，13(1)：39-84。 姜皇池，1999，〈「特殊兩國論」與台灣國家屬性〉，《全國律師》，3(12)：15-35。 張峻豪，2016，〈從閣揆角色談台灣半總統制的行政權運作 (1997-2016)〉，《國家發展研究》，16(1)：1-42。 張傳賢、黃紀，2011，〈政黨競爭與台灣族群認同與國家認同間的聯結〉，《台灣政治學刊》，15(1)：3-71。 盛杏湲，2003，〈立法機關與行政機關在立法過程中的影響力：一致政府與分立政府的比較〉，《台灣政治學刊》，7(2)：51-105。 盛杏湲，2014，〈選制變革前後立委提案的持續與變遷：一個探索性的研究〉，《台灣政治學刊》，18(1)：73-127。 盛杏湲、陳義彥，2003，〈政治分歧與政黨競爭：二○○一年立法委員選舉的分析〉，《選舉研究》，10(1)：7-40。 劉從葦，2006，〈台灣政黨的政策位置：非介入式與介入式測量的比較研究〉，《台灣政治學刊》，10(2)：3-62。 蕭怡靖、鄭夙芬，2014，〈台灣民眾對左右意識型態的認知：以統獨議題取代左右意識型態檢測台灣的政黨極化〉，《台灣政治學刊》，18(2)：79-138。 羅清俊、廖健良，2009，〈選制改變前選區規模對立委分配政策提案行為的影響〉，《台灣政治學刊》，13(1)：3-53。 Alexandrova, P., M. Carammia, and A. Timmermans. 2012. “Policy Punctuations and Issue Diversity on the European Council Agenda. Policy Studies Journal 40(1): 69-88. Baumgartner, F. R. and B. D. Jones. 1991. “Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems.” Journal of Politics 53(4): 1044-1074. Bachrach, P., and M. S. Baratz. 1962. “Two Faces of Power.” American Political Science Review 56(4): 947-952. Baumgartner, F. R. and B. D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Baumgartner, F. R. and B. D. Jones. 2014. The Politics of Information. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Baumgartner, F. R., C. Breunig, C. Green‐Pedersen, B.D. Jones, P.B. Mortensen, M. Nuytemans, and S. Walgrave. 2009. “Punctuated Equilibrium in Comparative Perspective.” American Journal of Political Science 53(3): 603-620. Baumgartner, F. R., M. Carammia, D. A. Epp, B. Noble, B. Rey, and T.M. Yildirim. 2017.“Budgetary Change in Authoritarian and Democratic Regimes.” Journal of European Public Policy 24(6): 792-808. Birkland, T. A. 2007. “Agenda Setting in Public Policy.” In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis, eds F. Fischer, G. J. Miller and M. S. Sidney. London, UK: Taylor Francis, 63-78. Blais, A., D. Blake, and S. Dion. 1993. “Do Parties Make a Difference? Parties and the Size of Government in Liberal Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 37: 40-62. Borghetto, E., F. Visconti, and M. Michieli. 2017. “Government Agenda-Setting in Italian Coalitions. Testing the «Partisan Hypothesis» Using Italian Investiture Speeches 1979-2014.”Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche 12(2): 193-220. Breeman, G., D. Lowery, C. Poppelaars, S. L. Resodihardjo, A. Timmermans, and J. De Vries. 2009. “Political Attention in a Coalition System: Analysing Queen's Speeches in the Netherlands 1945–2007.”Acta Politica 44(1): 1-27. Bulut, A. T. 2017. “Measuring Political Agenda Setting and Representation in Turkey: Introducing a New Approach and Data set.” Party Politics 23(6): 717-730. Chan, K. N., and S. Zhao. 2016. “Punctuated Equilibrium and the Information Disadvantage of Authoritarianism: Evidence from the People's Republic of China.”Policy Studies Journal 44(2): 134-155. Cobb, R. W. and C. D. Elder. 1983. Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Dowding, K., A. Hindmoor, R. Iles, and P. John. 2010. “Policy Agendas in Australian Politics: The Governor-General's Speeches, 1945–2008.”Australian Journal of Political Science 45(4): 533-557. Froio, C., S. Bevan, and W. Jennings. 2017. “Party Mandates and the Politics of Attention: Party Platforms, Public Priorities and the Policy Agenda in Britain.”Party Politics 23(6): 692-703. Gordon, T. P. 1990. Incrementalism in Public Budgeting. Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press, t990. Green-Pedersen , C. and S. Walgrave. 2014. “Political Agenda Setting: An Approach to Studying Political Systems.” In Agenda Setting, Policies, and Political Systems: A Comparative Approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Green‐Pedersen, C. 2006. “Long‐term Changes in Danish Party Politics: The Rise and Importance of Issue Competition.”Scandinavian Political Studies 29(3): 219-235. Hager, A. and H. Hilbig. 2020. “Does Public Opinion Affect Political Speech?”American Journal of Political Science 64(4): 921-937. Howes, M., L. Wortley, R. Potts, A. Dedekorkut-Howes, S. Serrao-Neumann, J. Davidson, T. Smith and P. Nunn. 2017.“Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”Sustainability 9(2) 165:1-17. Jennings, W. and P. John. 2009. “The Dynamics of Political Attention: Public Opinion and the Queen's Speech in the United Kingdom.” American Journal of Political Science 53(4): 838-854. Jennings, W., S. Bevan, and P. John. 2011. “The Agenda of British Government: The Speech from the Throne, 1911-2008.” Political Studies 59(1): 74-98. John, P., and W. Jennings. 2010. “Punctuations and Turning Points in British Politics: The Policy Agenda of the Queen's Speech, 1940-2005.”British Journal of Political Science 40(3): 561-586. John, P., H. P. Larsen, and H. Liu. 2006. “Comparing Executive-led Policy Agendas in the USA and UK.” In annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL. Jones, B. D. and Baumgartner, F. R. 2005. The Politics of attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Jones, B. D., and F. R. Baumgartner. 2004. “Representation and Agenda Setting.” Policy Studies Journal 32(1): 1-24. Jones, B. D., D. A. Epp, and F.R. Baumgartner. 2019. “Democracy, Authoritarianism, and Policy Punctuations.” International Review of Public Policy 1(1): 7-26. Jones, B. D., F. R. Baumgartner, and J. C. Talbert. 1993. “The Destruction of Issue Monopolies in Congress.” American Political Science Review 87(3): 657-671. Jones, B. D., F. R. Baumgartner, C. Breunig, C. Wlezien, S. Soroka, M. Foucault, A. Franc¸ ois, C. Green-Pedersen, C. Koski, P. John, P. B. Mortensen, F. Varone, and S. Walgrave. 2009. “A General Empirical Law of Public Budgets: A Comparative Analysis.”American Journal of Political Science 53(4): 855-873. Jones, B. D., T. Sulkin, and H.A. Larsen. 2003. “Policy Punctuations in American Political Institutions.”American Political Science Review 90(1): 151-169. Jordan, M. M. 2002.“Punctuated Equilibrium: An Agenda-based Theory of Budgeting.” In Budget Theory in the Public Sector, eds Khan, A. and W.B. Hildreth. CT: Greenwood Publishing Group, 202-215. Kingdon, J. W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins. Klingemann, H.-D., R. I. Hofferbert and I. Budge. 1994. Parties, Policies and Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview. Lam, W. F. and K. N. Chan. 2015. “How Authoritarianism Intensifies Punctuated Equilibrium: The Dynamics of Policy Attention in Hong Kong.” Governance 28(4): 549-570. McCombs, M. E., D. L. Shaw and D. H. Weaver. 2013. Communication and Democracy: Exploring the Intellectual Frontiers in Agenda-Setting Theory. NY: Routledge. McCombs, M. E., D. L. Shaw, and D. H. Weaver. 2014. “New Directions in Agenda-setting Theory and Research.” Mass Communication and Society 17(6): 781-802. McCombs, M., and S. Valenzuela. 2020. Setting the Agenda: Mass Media and Public Opinion. NJ: John Wiley Sons. Mortensen, P. B. 2010. “Political Attention and Public Policy: A Study of How Agenda Setting Matters.”Scandinavian Political Studies 33(4): 356-380. Mortensen, P. B., C. Green-Pedersen, G. Breeman, L. Chaqués-Bonafont, W. Jennings, P. John, A. M. Palau, and A. Timmermans. 2011. “Comparing Government Agendas: Executive Speeches in the Netherlands, United Kingdom, and Denmark.”Comparative Political Studies 44(8): 973-1000. Powell Jr, G. B. 2004.“The Quality of Democracy: The Chain of Responsiveness.”Journal of Democracy 15(4): 91-105. Pralle, S. B. 2009. “Agenda-setting and Climate Change.” Environmental Politics 18(5): 781-799. Rey, B., D. A. Epp, and F. R. Baumgartner. 2015.“Punctuated Equilibrium in Public Budgeting in Authoritarian and Democratic Brazil.”In Annual Meetings of the Midwest Political Science Association (Vol. 1, pp. 1-25). Salonen, A. O. and M. Åhlberg. 2013. “Towards Sustainable Society: from Materialism to Post-Materialism.”International Journal of Sustainable Society 5(4): 374-393. Schattschneider, E.E. 1960/1975. The Semisovereign People. Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden Press. Schwartz, S. H. 1994.“Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values?”Journal of Social Issues 50 (4): 19-45. Sebők, M. and T. Berki, T. 2018. “Punctuated Equilibrium in Democracy and Autocracy: An Analysis of Hungarian Budgeting Between 1868 and 2013.”European Political Science Review 10(4): 589-611. Sen, A. K. 1999.“Democracy as a Universal Value.”Journal of Democracy 10(3): 3-17. Valenzuela, S. 2011.“Materialism, Postmaterialism and Agenda-Setting Effects: The Values–Issues Consistency Hypothesis.”International Journal of Public Opinion Research 23(4): 437-463. Walgrave, S. and F. Varone. 2008. “Punctuated Equilibrium and Agenda‐setting: Bringing Parties Back In: Policy Change after the Dutroux Crisis in Belgium.”Governance 21(3): 365-395. Walgrave, S., S. Soroka, and M. Nuytemans. 2008.“The Mass Media's Political Agenda-Setting Power: A Longitudinal Aanalysis of Media, Parliament, and Government in Belgium (1993 to 2000).”Comparative Political Studies 41(6): 814-836. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/79489 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | "本文根據廣受各國議程研究學者所使用的CAP原則，將1972年至2015年期間共94次行政院長口頭施政報告加以分類，希望能了解這段期間行政議程的趨勢。本文認為政府對不同議題類別的注意力應會反映在行政院長施政報告中，不同政策議題類別所分配到的字數，因此本文分析每位行政院長在施政報告中，每個政策類別所被分配到的字數，並透過敘述統計檢視口頭施政報告所涉及的政策議題與比重。研究結果顯示，平均每次的行政院長報告字數為8,918字，且幾乎每一位行政院長上任後的第一次口頭施政報告即是任內字數最少的報告。在這段研究期間中，行政院長口頭施政報告的總字數愈來愈少，但提及的議題類別則愈來愈多元。其中，外交及兩岸關係、政府運作，以及總體經濟的字數和占比明顯較其他議題多，而外國貿易、國內商業、社會福利、環境、健康、勞工、公有地及自然資源、公民權、能源、民主轉型，以及移民等議題的字數上升趨勢特別明顯，這顯示政府愈來愈重視這些政策領域。在所有議題之中，只有外交及兩岸關係、文化，以及國防等議題在字數與占比上有明顯的下降趨勢，其它議題無非是穩定地出現或愈來愈容易出現在施政報告中。本文透過施政報告描繪我國行政議程的輪廓，期能充實我國政策議程研究，提供未來相關研究些許提示。 " | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2022-11-23T09:01:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0610202109473300.pdf: 8394669 bytes, checksum: 42f27a2ce9fcbdbd6eae1bff7ba708cd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i 誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iv Abstract v 目錄 vii 圖目錄 x 表目錄 xiv 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 4 第三節 研究問題 6 第二章 文獻回顧 7 第一節 行政議程 7 壹、行政議程的意涵 7 貳、行政議程與演說 10 第二節 施政報告 14 壹、施政報告的意義 14 一、形式意義 14 二、實質意義 15 貳、影響報告的因素 16 一、外部環境的改變 16 二、政黨的意識型態 17 三、威權或民主國家 20 第三章 研究方法 26 第四章 研究成果 30 第一節 整體趨勢 30 第二節 議題字數與占比 40 第三節 字數與占比最多 43 壹、外交及兩岸關係 43 一、兩蔣時代 44 二、李登輝時代 53 三、陳水扁時代 60 四、馬英九時代 63 貳、政府運作 67 參、總體經濟 73 第四節 字數與占比居中 79 壹、早期的字數與占比較高 79 一、文化 79 二、國防 89 貳、早期與近期無明顯差異 94 一、法律與犯罪 94 二、教育 96 三、住房 99 四、農業 102 五、科技 105 六、運輸 107 參、近期的字數與占比提升 111 一、外國貿易 111 二、國內商業 115 三、社會福利 118 四、環境 122 五、健康 126 六、勞工 129 第五節 字數與占比最少 134 壹、公有地及自然資源 134 貳、公民權 137 參、能源 141 肆、民主轉型 144 伍、移民 147 第五章 研究結論 150 第一節 綜合討論與分析 150 第二節 研究限制與建議 156 參考文獻 158 壹、中文部分 158 貳、西文部分 159 附錄 165 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 我國行政議程長期分析：1972-2015行政院長口頭施政報告 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | "A Study of the Executive Policy Agendas in Taiwan: The Premier's Speeches, 1972-2015" | en |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 109-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 羅清俊(Hsin-Tsai Liu),俞振華(Chih-Yang Tseng) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 議程設定,行政議程,行政院長,施政報告,比較議程計畫(CAP), | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | agenda-setting,executive agenda,premier,political speech,Comparative Agendas Project(CAP), | en |
| dc.relation.page | 167 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202103572 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2021-10-08 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共事務研究所 | zh_TW |
| Appears in Collections: | 公共事務研究所 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0610202109473300.pdf | 8.2 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.