請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/79428完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林子倫(Tze-Luen Lin) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yi-Ting Lu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 呂依庭 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-23T09:00:16Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-11-04 | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-11-23T09:00:16Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2021-11-04 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-10-21 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 林子倫、李宜卿（2017）。〈再生能源政策在地實踐之探討：以高雄市推動屋頂型太陽光電為例〉。《公共行政學報》，52：39-80。 林子倫（2009）。〈後京都氣候談判的五大難題〉。《看守台灣》，11(3)：5-12。 周桂田 （2016）。〈氣候變遷驅動下台灣能源轉型挑戰〉。載於周桂田、林子倫（編），臺灣能源轉型十四講。臺北：巨流。頁3-26。 陳惠萍（2021）。〈環境vs.能源？陳惠萍：談能源轉型，別忘以人為本〉。https://ubrand.udn.com/ubrand/story/12117/5310525 陳惠萍（2020a）。〈幫學校裝冷氣能消除能源貧窮？ 陳惠萍：有三個正義可以解決能源不平等〉。https://csr.cw.com.tw/article/41542 陳惠萍（2020b）。〈【專欄】陳惠萍：當綠能遇上公益，一場再生能源與永續發展的美好之戀〉。https://csr.cw.com.tw/article/41347 陳惠萍（2015）。綠能科技與在地使用：台灣太陽光電的社會技術網絡分析。國立臺灣大學社會學研究所博士論文。 許志義（2006）。〈水電瓦斯公用事業解除管制政策芻議〉。《台灣銀行季刊》，第57卷第2期，頁 79-111，台北。 許志義、陳澤義（1993）。《能源經濟學》，全書356頁，台北：華泰書局。 趙家緯（2016）。〈邁向轉型時代──破除「以煤易核」、「犧牲生態」與「成本昂貴」的三重迷思〉。載於周桂田、張國暉（編），轉給你看：開啟臺灣能源轉型。臺北：秀威。頁93-112。 Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global environmental change, 16(3), 268-281. Agora Energiewende Sandbag (2020). The European Power Sector in 2019: Up-to-Date Analysis on the Electricity Transition. https://static.agora-energiewende.de/fileadmin2/Projekte/2019/Jahresauswertung_EU_2019/172_A-EW_EU-Annual-Report-2019_Web.pdf Al-Sunaidy, A., Green, R. (2006). Electricity deregulation in OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) countries. Energy, 31(6-7), 769-787. Andreasen, A. R., Manning, J. (1990). The dissatisfaction and complaining behavior of vulnerable consumers. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 3(1), 12-20. Baffert, C., Brajković, J., Grgurev, I., De Miglio, R., Deane, P. (2015). Energy poverty and vulnerable consumers in the energy sector across the EU: analysis of policies and measures. INSIGHT_E. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/INSIGHT_E_Energy%20Poverty%20-%20Main%20Report_FINAL.pdf Baker, S. M., Gentry, J. W., Rittenburg, T. L. (2005). Building understanding of the domain of consumer vulnerability. Journal of Macromarketing, 25(2), 128-139. Banerjee, A., Prehoda, E., Sidortsov, R., Schelly, C. (2017). Renewable, ethical? Assessing the energy justice potential of renewable electricity. AIMS Energy, 5(5), 768. BEIS (2021). Energy retail market strategy for the 2020s: Helping consumers on their net zero journey. BEIS (2020a). UK energy in brief 2020. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/904503/UK_Energy_in_Brief_2020.pdf BEIS (2020b). The energy white paper: powering our net zero future. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/energy-white-paper-powering-our-net-zero-future/energy-white-paper-powering-our-net-zero-future-accessible-html-version Bouzarovski, S. (2014). Energy poverty in the European Union: Landscapes of vulnerability. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 3(3), 276-289. Brenner, N., Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of “actually existing neoliberalism”. Antipode, 34(3), 349-379. Carrington, D. (2016). UK solar eclipses coal power over month for first time. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/jun/07/solar-sets-british-record-for-may-producing-more-electricity-than-coal Carley, S., Konisky, D. M. (2020). The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition. Nature Energy, 5(8), 569-577. Castree, N. (2008). Neoliberalising nature: The logics of deregulation and reregulation. Environment and planning A, 40(1), 131-152. Cherp, A., Jewell, J. (2014). The concept of energy security: Beyond the four As. Energy policy, 75, 415-421. CMA (2016). Energy Market Investigation: Final Report. Deloitte (2020). Unlocking growth in energy retail: Building revenue by giving customers what they want. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Energy-and-Resources/gx-eri-unlocking-growth-in-energy-retail-web-final.pdf Dyner, I., Larsen, E. R. (2001). From planning to strategy in the electricity industry. Energy policy, 29(13), 1145-1154. European Commission (2021). European Green Deal: Commission proposes transformation of EU economy and society to meet climate ambitions. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_3541 European Commission (2015). Delivering a New Deal for Energy Consumers. COM (2015) 339 Final. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/1_EN_ACT_part1_v8.pdf Evans, S. (2019). Analysis: UK renewables generate more electricity than fossil fuels for first time. Carbon Brief. Retrieved from https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-uk-renewables-generate-more-electricity-than-fossil-fuels-for-first-time Evensen, D., Demski, C., Becker, S., Pidgeon, N. (2018). The relationship between justice and acceptance of energy transition costs in the UK. Applied energy, 222, 451-459. Fouquet, R. (2016). Historical energy transitions: Speed, prices and system transformation. Energy Research Social Science, 22, 7-12. Foxon, T. J. (2013). Transition pathways for a UK low carbon electricity future. Energy Policy, 52, 10-24. Foxon, T. J. (2011). A coevolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low carbon economy. Ecological Economics, 70(12), 2258-2267. Foxon, T. J., Hammond, G. P., Pearson, P. J. (2010). Developing transition pathways for a low carbon electricity system in the UK. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(8), 1203-1213. Geels, F. W., Sovacool, B. K., Schwanen, T., Sorrell, S. (2017). Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization. Science, 357(6357), 1242-1244. Geels, F. W. et al. (2016). The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014). Research Policy, 45(4), 896-913. Geels, F. W., Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research policy, 36(3), 399-417. Gillard, R., Snell, C., Bevan, M. (2017). Advancing an energy justice perspective of fuel poverty: Household vulnerability and domestic retrofit policy in the United Kingdom. Energy Research Social Science, 29, 53-61. Grand, J. L. (2011). Quasi-market versus state Provision of public services: Some ethical considerations. Public Reason, 3(2). Hall, S. M. (2013). Energy justice and ethical consumption: comparison, synthesis and lesson drawing. Local Environment, 18(4), 422-437. Hanke, F., Lowitzsch, J. (2020). Empowering vulnerable consumers to join renewable energy communities—towards an inclusive design of the clean energy package. Energies, 13(7), 1615. Hinkel, J. (2011). “Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity”: Towards a clarification of the science–policy interface. Global environmental change, 21(1), 198-208. IEA (2021). Net zero by 2050: a roadmap for the global energy sector. IEA (2020a). Global energy review 2020 – December 2020. IEA (2020b). Electricity market report. IEA (2019a). Electricity information 2018. IEA (2019b). Status of power system transformation 2019: Power system flexibility. IEA (2019c). Energy policies of IEA countries: United Kingdom 2019 Review. IEA (2017). Getting wind and sun onto the grid: A manual for policy makers. IEA (2016). Re-powering markets: Market design and regulation during the transition to low carbon power systems. IEA (2007). Energy security and climate policy: assessing interactions. IEA 21CPP (2018). Status of power system transformation 2018 – advanced power plant flexibility. Ioannidou, M. (2018). Effective paths for consumer empowerment and protection in retail energy markets. Journal of Consumer Policy, 41(2), 135-157. IPCC (2018). Summary for policymakers. In: Global warming of 1.5°C. Ipsos MORI (2019). Concern about climate change reaches record levels with half now 'very concerned'. Retrieved from https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/concern-about-climate-change-reaches-record-levels-half-now-very-concerned IRENA (2021). World energy transitions outlook: 1.5°C pathway (preview). https://www.irena.org/publications/2021/March/World-Energy-Transitions-Outlook IRENA (2020). Renewable power generation costs in 2019. https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2020/Jun/IRENA_Costs_2019_EN.pdf?la=en hash=BFAAB4DD2A14EDA7329946F9C3BDA9CD806C1A8A IRENA (2019). Electrification with renewables. https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2019/Jan/IRENA_RE-Electrification_SGCC_2019_preview.pdf Jenkins, K., McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Stephan, H., Rehner, R. (2016). Energy justice: A conceptual review. Energy Research Social Science, 11, 174-182. Jenkins, K., Sovacool, B. K., McCauley, D. (2018). Humanizing sociotechnical transitions through energy justice: An ethical framework for global transformative change. Energy Policy, 117, 66-74. Jessop, B. (2002). Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance: A state–theoretical perspective. Antipode, 34(3), 452-472. Krause, F., Bossel, H., Müller-Reißmann, K. F. (1980). Energiewende–Wachstum und Wohlstand ohne Erdöl und Uran. [Energy Transition. Growth and Prosperity without Oil and Uranium] Frankfurt. Germany: Fischer. Knudsen, J. K., Wold, L. C., Aas, Ø., Haug, J. J. K., Batel, S., Devine-Wright, P., ... Jacobsen, G. B. (2015). Local perceptions of opportunities for engagement and procedural justice in electricity transmission grid projects in Norway and the UK. Land use policy, 48, 299-308. Le Grand, J., Bartlett, W. (1993). Quasi-markets and social policy: the way forward?. In Quasi-markets and social policy (pp. 202-220). Palgrave Macmillan, London. Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., Avelino, F. (2017). Sustainability transitions research: Transforming science and practice for societal change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42. McCauley, D., Ramasar, V., Heffron, R. J., Sovacool, B. K., Mebratu, D., Mundaca, L. (2019). Energy justice in the transition to low carbon energy systems: Exploring key themes in interdisciplinary research. Applied Energy, 233, 916-921. McCauley, D. A., Heffron, R. J., Stephan, H., Jenkins, K. (2013). Advancing energy justice: The triumvirate of tenets. International Energy Law Review, 32(3), 107-110. McMeekin, A., Geels, F. W., Hodson, M. (2019). Mapping the winds of whole system reconfiguration: Analysing low-carbon transformations across production, distribution and consumption in the UK electricity system (1990-2016). Research Policy, 48(5), 1216-1231. Meadowcroft, J. (2009). What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy sciences, 42(4), 323. Meadowcroft, J. (2007). Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world. Journal of Environmental Policy Planning, 9(3-4), 299-314. Middlemiss, L., Gillard, R. (2015). Fuel poverty from the bottom-up: Characterising household energy vulnerability through the lived experience of the fuel poor. Energy Research Social Science, 6, 146-154. Mundaca, L., Busch, H., Schwer, S. (2018). ‘Successful’low-carbon energy transitions at the community level? An energy justice perspective. Applied Energy, 218, 292-303. National Grid ESO (2020). Future Energy Scenarios. https://www.nationalgrideso.com/document/173821/download Newbery, D. M. (2002). Problems of liberalising the electricity industry. European Economic Review, 46(4-5), 919-927. Newell, P., Mulvaney, D. (2013). The political economy of the ‘just transition’. The Geographical Journal, 179(2), 132-140. Nilsson, M., Lucas, P., Yoshida, T. (2013). Towards an integrated framework for SDGs: Ultimate and enabling goals for the case of energy. Sustainability, 5(10), 4124-4151. Ofgem (2021). Ofgem Consumer Survey 2020: Update on Consumer Engagement with Energy. Ofgem (2020). Ofgem decarbonisation programme action plan. Ofgem (2019a). State of the energy market 2019 report. Ofgem (2019b). Ofgem consumer survey 2019. Ofgem (2019c). Consumer vulnerability strategy 2025. Ofgem (2019d). Vulnerable consumers in the energy market 2019. Ofgem (2014a). State of the market: assessment. Ofgem (2014b). Protecting domestic consumers in the green and renewable tariffs market – final proposals. Ofgem (2011). What can behavioural economics say about GB energy consumers? https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2011/03/behavioural_economics_gbenergy_1.pdf Pollitt, M., Dale, L. (2018). Restructuring the Chinese electricity supply sector - How industrial electricity prices are determined in a liberalized power market: lessons from Great Britain. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics: 1871. Roberts, C., Geels, F. W., Lockwood, M., Newell, P., Schmitz, H., Turnheim, B., Jordan, A. (2018). The politics of accelerating low-carbon transitions: Towards a new research agenda. Energy Research Social Science, 44, 304-311. Roberts, J. T., Parks, B. C. (2009). Ecologically unequal exchange, ecological debt, and climate justice: The history and implications of three related ideas for a new social movement. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 50(3-4), 385-409. Schot, J., Kanger, L., Verbong, G. (2016). The roles of users in shaping transitions to new energy systems. Nature energy, 1(5), 1-7. Shirani, F., Groves, C., Henwood, K., Pidgeon, N., Roberts, E. (2020). ‘I'm the smart meter’: Perceptions of smart technology amongst vulnerable consumers. Energy Policy, 144, 111637. Sovacool, B. K., Martiskainen, M., Hook, A., Baker, L. (2019a). Decarbonization and its discontents: a critical energy justice perspective on four low-carbon transitions. Climatic Change, 155(4), 581-619. Sovacool, B. K., Hook, A., Martiskainen, M., Baker, L. (2019b). The whole systems energy injustice of four European low-carbon transitions. Global Environmental Change, 58, 101958. Sovacool, B. K., Dworkin, M. H. (2015). Energy justice: Conceptual insights and practical applications. Applied Energy, 142, 435-444. Sovacool, B. K., Kivimaa, P., Hielscher, S., Jenkins, K. (2017). Vulnerability and resistance in the United Kingdom's smart meter transition. Energy Policy, 109, 767-781. Sovacool, B. K. (2014). What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda. Energy Research Social Science, 1, 1-29. Szulecki, K. (2018). Conceptualizing energy democracy. Environmental Politics, 27(1), 21-41. Thornton, P. K., Ericksen, P. J., Herrero, M., Challinor, A. J. (2014). Climate variability and vulnerability to climate change: a review. Global change biology, 20(11), 3313-3328. UNDP (2018). What does it mean to leave no one behind? A UNDP discussion paper and framework for implementation. https://olc.worldbank.org/system/files/1-5%20Pages%20from%20Discussion_Paper_LNOB_EN_lres-2.pdf UNDP (2016). Towards accessibility, availability, affordability and accountability: Sustainable Energy for All in India. https://in.one.un.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/undp-SE4ALL.pdf Upham, P., Oltra, C., Boso, À. (2015). Towards a cross-paradigmatic framework of the social acceptance of energy systems. Energy Research Social Science, 8, 100-112. Van Veelen, B., Van Der Horst, D. (2018). What is energy democracy? Connecting social science energy research and political theory. Energy Research Social Science, 46, 19-28. Vaughan, A. (2018). UK renewable energy capacity surpasses fossil fuels for first time. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/nov/06/uk-renewable-energy-capacity-surpasses-fossil-fuels-for-first-time Verbong, G. P., Geels, F. W. (2010). Exploring sustainability transitions in the electricity sector with socio-technical pathways. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(8), 1214-1221. Walker, G. (2009). Beyond distribution and proximity: Exploring the multiple spatialities of environmental justice. Antipode, 41(4), 614-636. Walker, G. (2012). Environmental justice: Concepts, evidence and politics. Routledge. Walker, G., Day, R. (2012). Fuel poverty as injustice: Integrating distribution, recognition and procedure in the struggle for affordable warmth. Energy policy, 49, 69-75. World Development Movement (2014). Towards a just energy system: The struggle to end energy injustice. https://www.globaljustice.org.uk/sites/default/files/files/resources/wdm_energy_justice_briefing.pdf Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., Bürer, M. J. (2007). Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy policy, 35(5), 2683-2691. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/79428 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 隨著氣候變遷議題持續發酵，世界各國積極關注減緩及調適措施、並採取減碳行動。許多國家開展低碳能源轉型下，電力部門的綠能發電占比亦逐年攀升，逐漸走向電力市場去碳化。20世紀末起，電業自由化促成電力零售競爭市場的出現；而近期的去碳化、去中心化與數位化趨勢，更將電力市場帶向新的形態。然而，自市場開放競爭以降，電力的「脆弱消費者」在轉型浪潮下受到損害，甚至是為其帶來新的風險。因此，如何辨別且保護處於脆弱情境的消費者，並協助其減少因電力系統轉變而帶來的衝擊，成為低碳能源轉型進程中更需關注之處。 本研究將以英國為例，透過文獻分析方法進行英國電力零售市場的消費者脆弱度案例研究。分析架構則將從能源的「分配正義」、「程序正義」和「肯認正義」三面向，闡述英國電力市場在開展轉型下之消費者脆弱度型態與相關挑戰，而其中是如何兼顧消費者利益，同時推進低碳能源轉型。近年臺灣政府積極推動低碳能源轉型暨電業改革，本研究期許透過能源轉型下的英國電力零售市場經驗，作為臺灣未來發展之參考借鑒。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2022-11-23T09:00:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1710202114111700.pdf: 3733486 bytes, checksum: d3b9b3f037b4be033cd6bb3c0c5c1d73 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 I 摘要 II ABSTRACT III 目次 V 圖目次 VII 表目次 VIII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 7 第三節 研究設計 9 壹、研究問題 9 貳、研究方法 9 第二章 文獻評述 11 第一節 氣候變遷觸動低碳能源與電力系統轉型 11 第二節 能源與電力系統轉型下的不平等 21 壹、分配正義 24 貳、程序正義 26 參、肯認正義 27 第三節 能源的消費者脆弱度議題 31 第四節 小結：低碳脈絡下的能源與電力系統轉型如何「不遺落任何人」 35 第三章 英國低碳轉型下的電力零售市場與用戶分析 37 第一節 英國能源暨電力概況 37 第二節 英國電業架構與電力市場 45 第三節 英國電力零售市場暨售電業概況 50 第四節 英國電力市場中的脆弱用戶 60 第五節 政府如何因應消費者脆弱度議題 69 第四章 英國脆弱消費者策略分析：正義觀點 74 第一節 分配正義 75 壹、可負擔程度：「支持繳費困難的用戶」 75 貳、可取得性與可及性：「鼓勵正面且具包容性的創新」 83 第二節 程序正義 89 壹、能源暨電力資訊之可及性：「智慧利用數據」 89 貳、用戶參與決策與立法過程之正當性：「建立跨部門夥伴關係」 91 第三節 肯認正義 100 壹、增進對脆弱族群之辨識 100 貳、投入資源強化針對脆弱族群之用戶服務 105 第四節 小結：英國消費者脆弱度策略促進能源正義 109 第五章 結論 113 第一節 研究發現 113 壹、能源正義理論的延展與深化 113 貳、納入脆弱消費者觀點，促進以人為本的電力市場轉型 114 參、邁向包容性電力轉型的多元利害關係人協作與治理 116 第二節 研究貢獻與政策建議 119 第三節 研究限制 121 參考文獻 122 壹、中文部分 122 貳、西文部分 123 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 能源轉型下的能源正義策略：以英國電力零售市場的脆弱消費者為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Energy Justice Strategy in Energy Transitions: A Case Study of the UK Vulnerable Consumers in the Retail Electricity Market | en |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 109-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 陳惠萍(Hui-Ping Chen) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 謝宜桓(Hsin-Tsai Liu),趙家緯(Chih-Yang Tseng) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 能源轉型,公正轉型,能源正義,消費者脆弱度,電力零售市場, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | energy transition,just transition,energy justice,consumer vulnerability,retail electricity market, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 134 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202103793 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2021-10-22 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 氣候變遷與永續發展國際學位學程 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 氣候變遷與永續發展國際學位學程(含碩士班、博士班) | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-1710202114111700.pdf | 3.65 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。