請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/79315完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林楨家(Jen-Jia Lin) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yun-Tuan Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 張芸端 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-23T08:57:59Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-03-07 | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-11-23T08:57:59Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-03-07 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-08-17 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 李宜家、林慧淳和江東亮（2003）。地區剝奪程度、個人社經地位與臺灣男性成人的吸菸行為。臺灣公共衛生雜誌，22(1)，10-16。 林慧淳（2001）。地區剝奪與死亡率之相關 : 以臺灣為例。國立臺灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所碩士論文。 李婉菁 （2007）。 台北市捷運對於沿線土地使用供給與需求之影響分析。政治大學地政研究所學位論文，1-138。 李宗儒 （2019）。 臺灣地區大腸癌空間分析。國立國立中正大學社會福利研究所碩士論文。 馮正民、 曾平毅和王冠斐。 (1994)。 捷運系統對車站地區房價之影響。都市與計劃，21(1)， 25-45。 洪得洋、林祖嘉 （1999）。 臺北市捷運系統與道路寬度對房屋價格影響之研究。 住宅學報(8)， 47-67。 林楨家和黃至豪 （2003）。 台北捷運營運前後沿線房地屬性特徵價格之變化。 運輸計劃季刊， 32(4)， 777-800。 彭建文、 楊宗憲和楊詩韻 （2009）。 捷運系統對不同區位房價影響分析-以營運階段為例。 運輸計劃季刊，38(3)，275-296。 李春長、梁志民和林豐文（2017）。 捷運系統對鄰近住宅價格之影響—以差異中之差異法估計。 Journal of Taiwan Land Research， 20(2)，31-58。 張學聖、林孟瑤 （2011）。 捷運場站周邊土地使用變遷之初探-以臺北木柵線為例。Journal of architecture， 12(3)， 199-214。 邱皓政（2006）。 量化研究與統計分析。 五南圖書出版股份有限公司。 林楨家、謝宗育 （2010）。 工作可及性對都市原住民就業之影響: 臺北縣之實證分析。 運輸計劃季刊 ，39(2)，165-190。 郭怡汾（2001）。 社經地位、地區剝奪與老人存活狀況， Doctoral dissertation， National Taiwan University Department of Health Policy and Management。 行政院（2018）。我國薪資現況、低薪研究及其對策。 https://www.ey.gov.tw/File/A19B6A3D000C3E42?A=C 交通部統計處 (2018) 。機車使用狀況調查報告。 勞動部統計處（2018）。我國女性勞動參與狀況調查。 https://www.mol.gov.tw/media/5759046/%E8%BF%91%E5%B9%B4%E5%A5%B3%E6%80%A7%E5%8B%9E%E5%8B%95%E5%8F%83%E8%88%87%E7%8E%87%E7%8B%80%E6%B3%81.pdf Ahern, A., Vega, A., Caulfield, B. (2016). Deprivation and access to work in Dublin City: The impact of transport disadvantage. Research in Transportation Economics, 57, 44-52. Alonso, W. (1964). Location and land use. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Alonso, W. (1964). Location and land use. toward a general theory of land rent. Location and land use. Toward a general theory of land rent. Andrews, F. M., Withey, S. B. (2012). Social indicators of well-being: Americans' perceptions of life quality. Springer Science Business Media. Aslund, O., Östh, J., Zenou, Y. (2006). How Important is Access to Jobs. Old Question–Improved. Atkinson, A. B., Hills, J. (1998). Exclusion, employment and opportunity. LSE STICERD research paper no. CASE004. Atkinson, R. (2000). The hidden costs of gentrification: Displacement in central London. Journal of housing and the built environment, 15(4), 307-326. Bania, N., Leete, L., Coulton, C. (2008). Job access, employment and earnings: Outcomes for welfare leavers in a US urban labour market. Urban Studies, 45(11), 2179-2202. Barton, M. S., Gibbons, J. (2017). A stop too far: How does public transportation concentration influence neighbourhood median household income?. Urban Studies, 54(2), 538-554. Benach, J., Yasui, Y. (1999). Geographical patterns of excess mortality in Spain explained by two indices of deprivation. Journal of Epidemiology Community Health, 53(7), 423-431. Beyazit, E. (2015). Are wider economic impacts of transport infrastructures always beneficial? Impacts of the Istanbul Metro on the generation of spatio-economic inequalities. Journal of Transport Geography, 45, 12-23. Blumenberg, E., Manville, M. (2004). Beyond the spatial mismatch: Welfare recipients and transportation policy. Journal of planning literature, 19(2), 182-205. Blumenberg, E., Ong, P. (1998). Job accessibility and welfare usage: Evidence from Los Angeles. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: The Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, 17(4), 639-657. Boarnet, M. G. (2007). Conducting impact evaluations in urban transport. World Bank, Poverty Reduction and Economic Management, Thematic Group on Poverty Analysis, Monitoring and Impact Evaluation. Boisjoly, G., Moreno-Monroy, A. I., El-Geneidy, A. (2017). Informality and accessibility to jobs by public transit: Evidence from the São Paulo Metropolitan Region. Journal of Transport Geography, 64, 89-96. Boschmann, E. E. (2011). Job access, location decision, and the working poor: A qualitative study in the Columbus, Ohio metropolitan area. Geoforum, 42(6), 671-682. Browning, C. J., Sims, J. (2007). Ageing without driving: Keeping older people connected. In No way to go: Transport and social disadvantage in Australian communities (pp. 06-1). Monash University Publishing. Bruekner, J. K., Thisse, J. F., Zenou, Y. (1999). Why is central Paris rich and downtown Detroit poor. An amenity-based. Buck, N. (2001). Identifying neighbourhood effects on social exclusion. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2251-2275. Calthorpe, P. (1993). The next American metropolis: Ecology, community, and the American dream. Princeton architectural press. Carstairs, V., Morris, R. (1990). Deprivation and health in Scotland. Health Bulletin, 48(4), 162-175. Cervero, R. (1996). Traditional neighborhoods and commuting in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation, 23(4), 373-394. Cervero, R., Sandoval, O., Landis, J. (2002). Transportation as a stimulus of welfare-to-work: Private versus public mobility. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(1), 50-63. Chapman, S., Weir, D. (2008). Accessibility planning methods (No. 363). Chatman, D. G., Noland, R. B. (2011). Do public transport improvements increase agglomeration economies? A review of literature and an agenda for research. Transport Reviews, 31(6), 725-742. Church, A., Frost, M., Sullivan, K. (2000). Transport and social exclusion in London. Transport Policy, 7(3), 195-205. Clapp, J. M. (1993). Dynamics of office markets: empirical findings and research issues. The Urban Insitute. Clark, A. (2005). What makes a good job? Evidence from OECD countries. In Job quality and employer behaviour (pp. 11-30). Palgrave Macmillan, London. Cuthbert, A. L., Anderson, W. P. (2002). Using spatial statistics to examine the pattern of urban land development in Halifax–Dartmouth. The Professional Geographer, 54(4), 521-532. Dalvi, M. Q., Martin, K. M. (1976). The measurement of accessibility: some preliminary results. Transportation, 5(1), 17-42. Department of Environment Transport and the Regions. (2000). Social Exclusion and the Provision of Public Transport. London: Department of Environment Transport and the Regions Department of the Environment. (2000). T. at R., Regeneration Research Summary. Indices of Deprivation 2000. Eibner, C., Sturm, R. (2006). US-based indices of area-level deprivation: results from HealthCare for Communities. Social Science Medicine, 62(2), 348-359. Foth, N., Manaugh, K., El-Geneidy, A. M. (2013). Towards equitable transit: examining transit accessibility and social need in Toronto, Canada, 1996–2006. Journal of transport geography, 29, 1-10. Fujita, M. (1989). Urban economic theory: land use and city size. Cambridge university press. Fujita, M., Ogawa, H. (1982). Multiple equilibria and structural transition of non-monocentric urban configurations. Regional science and urban economics, 12(2), 161-196. Fukuda, Y., Nakamura, K., Takano, T. (2007). Higher mortality in areas of lower socioeconomic position measured by a single index of deprivation in Japan. Public Health, 121(3), 163-173 Gao, S., Mokhtarian, P. L., Johnston, R. A. (2007). Exploring Causal Connections Among Job Accessibility, Employment, Income, and Automobile Ownership Using Structural Equations Modeling, TRB 86th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers CD-ROM (No. 07-1027). Gao, S., Mokhtarian, P. L., Johnston, R. A. (2008). Exploring the connections among job accessibility, employment, income, and auto ownership using structural equation modeling. The Annals of Regional Science, 42(2), 341-356. Getis, A., Ord, J. K. (2010). The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. In Perspectives on spatial data analysis (pp. 127-145). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Geurs, K. T., Van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of Transport geography, 12(2), 127-140. Glaeser EL, Kahn ME and Rappaport J (2008) Why do the poor live in cities? The role of public transportation. Journal of Urban Economics 63: 1–24. Goldberg, M. A. (1970). Transportation, urban land values, and rents: A synthesis. Land Economics, 46(2), 153-162. Gordon, D. (2002, May). Measuring poverty and social exclusion in Britain. In Conference on “The Dynamics of Poverty”, Budapest (pp. 24-25). Grengs, J. (2001). Does public transit counteract the segregation of carless households? Measuring spatial patterns of accessibility. Transportation Research Record, 1753(1), 3-10. Grengs, J. (2010). Job accessibility and the modal mismatch in Detroit. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1), 42-54. Grieco, M. (1994). The Impact of Transport Investment Projects upon the Inner City: A Literature Review, Avebury, Aldershot. Hansen, W. G. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of planners, 25(2), 73-76. Havard, S., Deguen, S., Bodin, J., Louis, K., Laurent, O., Bard, D. (2008). A small-area index of socioeconomic deprivation to capture health inequalities in France. Social Science Medicine, 67(12), 2007-2016. Helling, A. (1998). Changing intra-metropolitan accessibility in the US: Evidence from Atlanta. Progress in planning, 49(2), iii-107. Hess, D. B. (2005). Access to employment for adults in poverty in the Buffalo-Niagara region. Urban Studies, 42(7), 1177-1200. Higgins, C., Ferguson, M., Kanaroglou, P. (2014). Light rail and land use change: Rail transit’s role in reshaping and revitalizing cities. Journal of Public Transportation, 17(2), 5. Hsiao, C. (1986). Analysis of panel data, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York. Imrie, R. F., Imrie, R. I. R. (1996). Disability and the city: International perspectives. Sage. Ingram, D. R. (1971). The concept of accessibility: a search for an operational form. Regional studies, 5(2), 101-107. Iseki, H., Eom, H. (2019). Impacts of Rail Transit Accessibility on Firm Spatial Distribution: Case Study in the Metropolitan Area of Washington, DC. Transportation Research Record, 2673(11), 220-232. Iseki, H., Jones, R. P. (2018). Analysis of firm location and relocation in relation to Maryland and Washington, DC metro rail stations. Research in Transportation Economics, 67, 29-43. Jarman, B. (1983). Identification of underprivileged areas. British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.), 287(6385), 130. Jones, P., Lucas, K. (2012). The social consequences of transport decision-making: clarifying concepts, synthesising knowledge and assessing implications. Journal of Transport Geography, 21, 4-16. Kain, J. F. (1968). Housing segregation, negro employment, and metropolitan decentralization. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82(2), 175-197. Kasu, B. B., Chi, G. (2018). The Evolving and Complementary Impacts of Transportation Infrastructures on Population and Employment Change in the United States, 1970–2010. Population Research and Policy Review, 37(6), 1003-1029. Kawabata, M. (2003). Job access and employment among low-skilled autoless workers in US metropolitan areas. Environment and Planning A, 35(9), 1651-1668. Kenyon, S. (2003, June). Understanding social exclusion and social inclusion. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Municipal Engineer (Vol. 156, No. 2, pp. 97-104). Thomas Telford Ltd. Kenyon, S., Rafferty, J., Lyons, G. (2003). Social exclusion and transport in the UK: a role for virtual accessibility in the alleviation of mobility-related social exclusion?. Journal of Social Policy, 32(3), 317-338. Korsu, E., Wenglenski, S. (2010). Job accessibility, residential segregation and risk of long-term unemployment in the Paris region. Urban Studies, 47(11), 2279-2324. Krieger, N., Chen, J. T., Waterman, P. D., Soobader, M. J., Subramanian, S. V., Carson, R. (2002). Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter? the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. American Journal of Epidemiology, 156(5), 471-482. Kwan, M. P., Murray, A. T., O'Kelly, M. E., Tiefelsdorf, M. (2003). Recent advances in accessibility research: Representation, methodology and applications. Journal of Geographical Systems, 5(1), 129-138. Lau, J. C., Chiu, C. C. (2003). Accessibility of low-income workers in Hong Kong. Cities, 20(3), 197-204. Leinberger, C. B. (1986). How business is reshaping America. The Atlantic Monthly, 43-52. Levinson, D. M. (1998). Accessibility and the journey to work. Journal of Transport Geography, 6(1), 11-21. Lin, J. J., Chen, C. H. (2020). Survival analysis of metro-induced household displacement in Taipei (2001–2016). Travel Behaviour and Society, 20, 237-247. Lin, J. J., Chung, J. C. (2017). Metro-induced gentrification: A 17-year experience in Taipei. Cities, 67, 53-62. Lin, J. J., Yang, S. H. (2019). Proximity to metro stations and commercial gentrification. Transport Policy, 77, 79-89. Lin, J. J., Chen, C. H., Hsieh, T. Y. (2016). Job accessibility and ethnic minority employment in urban and rural areas in Taiwan. Papers in Regional Science, 95(2), 363-382. Lin, J. J., Feng, C. M., Hu, Y. Y. (2006). Shifts in activity centers along the corridor of the blue subway line in Taipei. Journal of urban planning and development, 132(1), 22-28. Lucas, K. (2006). Providing transport for social inclusion within a framework for environmental justice in the UK. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40(10), 801-809. Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20, 105-113. Lucas, K., Grosvenor, T., Simpson, R. (2001). Transport, the environment and social exclusion. YPS for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Marmot, M. (1999). The solid facts: the social determinants of health. Health Promotion Journal of Australia: Official Journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 9(2), 133. Matas, A., Raymond, J. L., Roig, J. L. (2009). Car ownership and access to jobs in Spain. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43(6), 607-617. Mejia-Dorantes, L., Paez, A., Vassallo, J. M. (2012). Transportation infrastructure impacts on firm location: the effect of a new metro line in the suburbs of Madrid. Journal of Transport Geography, 22, 236-250. Mejia-Dorantes, L., Paez, A., Vassallo, J. M. (2012). Transportation infrastructure impacts on firm location: the effect of a new metro line in the suburbs of Madrid. Journal of Transport Geography, 22, 236-250. Messer, L. C., Laraia, B. A., Kaufman, J. S., Eyster, J., Holzman, C., Culhane, J. O’campo, P. (2006). The development of a standardized neighborhood deprivation index. Journal of Urban Health, 83(6), 1041-1062. Michalos, A. C., Zumbo, B. D. (1999). Public services and the quality of life. Social indicators research, 48(2), 125-157. Miller, H. J. (1999). Measuring space‐time accessibility benefits within transportation networks: Basic theory and computational procedures. Geographical analysis, 31(1), 187-212. Mills, E. S. (1972). Studies in the Structure of the Urban Economy. The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, Maryland 21218. Morris, R., Carstairs, V. (1991). Which deprivation? A comparison of selected deprivation indexes. Journal of Public Health, 13(4), 318-326. Noble, M., Wilkinson, M. E., Barnes, M. H. (2008). The English indices of deprivation 2007. Ong, P., Blumenberg, E. (1998). Job access, commute and travel burden among welfare recipients. Urban Studies, 35(1), 77-93. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.(2012). Compact city policies: A comparative assessment. OECD. Paez, A., Ruben, M., Faber, S. (2009). Mobility and Social Exclusion in Canadian Communities: An Empirical Investigation of Opportunity Access and Deprivation from the Perspective of Vulnerable Groups.Policy Research Directorate Strategic Policy and Research, Toronto, Canada Páez, A., Scott, D. M., Morency, C. (2012). Measuring accessibility: positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators. Journal of Transport Geography, 25, 141-153. Pagliara, F. Papa, E. (2011). Urban rail systems investments: an analysis of the impacts on property values and residents’location. Journal of Transport Geography. 19(2), 200-211. Papageorgiou, G. J., Casetti, E. (1971). Spatial equilibrium residential land values in a multicenter setting. Journal of regional science, 11(3), 385-389. Papageorgiou, G. J., Casetti, E. (1971). Spatial equilibrium residential land values in a multicenter setting. Journal of regional science, 11(3), 385-389. Pollack S, Bluestone B and Billingham C (2010) Maintaining diversity in America’s transit-rich neighborhoods: Tools for equitable neighborhood change. Vol. Paper 3. Dukakis Center Publications. Boston, MA: Kitty Michael Dukakis Center for Urban and Regional Policy. Salmond, C., Crampton, P. (2002). NZDep2001 Index of Deprivation Users Manual: Department of Public Health. Wellington School of Medicine. Sanchez, T. W. (1999). The connection between public transit and employment: The cases of Portland and Atlanta. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(3), 284-296. Sanchez, T. W., Shen, Q., Peng, Z. R. (2004). Transit mobility, jobs access and low-income labour participation in US metropolitan areas. Urban Studies, 41(7), 1313-1331. Saunders, P. (2003). Can social exclusion provide a new framework for measuring poverty?. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales. Schmidt, A. F., Finan, C. (2018). Linear regression and the normality assumption. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 98, 146-151. Scott, L. M. (2000). Evaluating intra-metropolitan accessibility in the information age: operational issues, objectives, and implementation. In Information, place, and cyberspace (pp. 21-45). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Sen, A. (2000). Social Exclusion: Concept. Application, and Scrutiny (Asian Development Bank). Shen, Q. (1998). Location characteristics of inner-city neighborhoods and employment accessibility of low-wage workers. Environment and planning B: Planning and Design, 25(3), 345-365. Shen, Q., Sanchez, T. W. (2005). Residential location, transportation, and welfare‐to‐work in the United States: A case study of Milwaukee. Housing Policy Debate, 16(3-4), 393-431. Silver, H. Miller, S.M. (2003) Social exclusion: the European approach to social disadvantage. Indicators, 2, 1–17 Singh, G. K. (2003). Area deprivation and widening inequalities in US mortality, 1969–1998. American journal of public health, 93(7), 1137-1143. Slovic, A. D., Tomasiello, D. B., Giannotti, M., de Fatima Andrade, M., Nardocci, A. C. (2019). The long road to achieving equity: Job accessibility restrictions and overlapping inequalities in the city of São Paulo. Journal of Transport Geography, 78, 181-193. Social Disadvantage Research Centre. (2003). Scottish indices of deprivation 2003. Report of the Scottish Executive, Edlnburgh. Social Exclusion Unit (1997) Social Exclusion Unit: Purpose, work priorities and working methods, London: SEU. Social Exclusion Unit (2003). Making the connections: final report on transport and social exclusion, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/media/cabinetoffice/social_exclusion_task_force/assets/publications_1997_to_2006/making_transport_2003. pdf, 67. Social Exclusion Unit Britain, G. (2001). Preventing social exclusion. London: Cabinet Office. Townsend, P. (1987). Deprivation. Journal of social policy, 16(2), 125-146. Townsend, P., Phillimore, P., Beattie, A. (1988). Health and deprivation: inequality and the North. Routledge. Trewin, D. (2003). Socio-economic indexes for areas: Australia 2001. Information paper 2039.0. Tsou, K. W., Cheng, H. T. (2013). The effect of multiple urban network structures on retail patterns–A case study in Taipei, Taiwan. Cities, 32, 13-23. Turner, J., Grieco, M. (2000). Gender and time poverty: the neglected social policy implications of gendered time, transport and travel. Time Society, 9(1), 129-136. Vickerman, R. (2008). Recent Evolution of Research into the Wider Economic Benefit of Transport Infrastructure Investments. In Round Table on Macro-, Meso and Micro Infrastructure Planning and Assessment ToolsEuropean Conference of Ministers of Transport. Wachs, M., Kumagai, T. G. (1973). Physical accessibility as a social indicator. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 7(5), 437-456. Wang, C. H., Chen, N. A. (2015). A GIS-based spatial statistical approach to modeling job accessibility by transportation mode: case study of Columbus, Ohio. Journal of transport geography, 45, 1-11. Weisbrod, G., Duncan, C., Moses, S. J. (2014). Evolving connection of transit, agglomeration, and growth of high-technology business clusters. Transportation Research Record, 2452(1), 11-18. White, S. B., Binkley, L. S., Osterman, J. D. (1993). The sources of suburban employment growth. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59(2), 193-204. Wilkinson, R. G., Marmot, M. (Eds.). (2003). Social determinants of health: the solid facts. World Health Organization. Williams, D., Salathiel, D., O'Shea, C., Noble, B., Mottau, C., McDonnell, P., Broadley, S. (2005). Focus on Personal Travel, 2005 Edition, Including the Report of the National Travel Survey 2002/2003. Yu, H., Jiao, J., Houston, E., Peng, Z. R. (2018). Evaluating the relationship between rail transit and industrial agglomeration: An observation from the Dallas-fort worth region, TX. Journal of Transport Geography, 67, 33-52. Yu, N., De Jong, M., Storm, S., Mi, J. (2012). Transport infrastructure, spatial clusters and regional economic growth in China. Transport Reviews, 32(1), 3-28. Zheng, S., Kahn, M. E. (2013). Does government investment in local public goods spur gentrification? Evidence from Beijing. Real Estate Economics, 41(1), 1-28. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/79315 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 捷運作為全球各大城市重要的大眾運輸工具，除改善地區運輸條件，具有永續運輸的重要功能，更被認為具有避免汽車導向城市及促進運輸公平之作用。在臺灣，臺北地區更是仰賴捷運作為每日通勤的重要大眾運輸工具。然而過往卻鮮少評估捷運建設後活動重分布對公平性的影響。過往運輸公平研究經常與工作可及性（job accessibility）聯繫在一起討論，個人若處於工作可及性弱勢之狀態，因而無法參與有償勞動，被認為對經濟安全、生活質量以及社會總體福利水平產生嚴重影響。Lucas（2012）指出，如果一個人同時處於運輸弱勢（transport disadvantage）及社會弱勢，將導致運輸貧困、難以取得所需服務、就業機會不足及社會排除（social exclusion）。 為探究捷運建設後對公平性影響，本研究以臺北地區（包含臺北市與新北市）為研究範圍，以里為單位探討捷運建設後對於排除性的長期影響，採用捷運1996年開始營運後，每五年工作可及性數據和收入中位數建構之剝奪指標，以兩者差距建構排除性指標，衡量地區排除程度。最後透過追蹤資料迴歸分析(panel data analysis)及普通最小平分法釐清捷運系統與排除性之關係。 研究結果證實，捷運建設對排除性具顯著影響，捷運站距離跟排除性間呈現正向關係。此外，捷運擴張及短期影響會改善排除性，然而在長時間之間接影響下，24公里至44公里處距離區間之排除性卻相對明顯，尤其以公共運輸工作可及性建構之排除性較他種運具顯著，顯示居住在此範圍的居民更容易到受排除而無法受益於捷運建設。研究結果也證實某些距離區間下，捷運對排除性無影響，且隨著營運時間拉長不顯著區域越明顯，然本研究尚無法釐清捷運對排除性無影響之確切範圍。 本研究在學術上彌補捷運影響研究中缺乏對排除性長期影響的考量；實務上有助於都市規劃者與政府在制定運輸政策時，評估長期性的社會影響，俾憑採取適當配合政策，促進城市發展的包容性。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2022-11-23T08:57:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0407202121461000.pdf: 9088610 bytes, checksum: 885b55afd247bcf8e2b5fa6d4c92919c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 i 謝誌 ii 摘要 iii Abstract v 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 5 第三節 研究範疇 6 第四節 研究流程 12 第五節 研究方法 15 第二章 文獻回顧 17 第一節 工作可及性 17 第二節 捷運影響研究 23 第三節 綜合評析 28 第三章 研究設計 33 第一節 研究課題 33 第二節 假說研提 51 第三節 驗證方法 65 第四章 資料蒐集與分析 77 第一節 樣本資料蒐集 77 第二節 敘述統計 82 第三節 相關分析 87 第四節 空間特徵 90 第五章 實證分析 102 第一節 模式估計 103 第二節 假說驗證 124 第三節 討論與分析 134 第六章 結論與建議 147 第一節 結論 147 第二節 後續研究建議 152 附錄一 文獻回顧整理 154 附錄二 文獻回顧中剝奪指標採用變項整理 162 附錄三 自變數與應變數空間特徵圖 163 附錄四 延伸模式（一）距離虛擬變數係數與距離關係圖 171 附錄五 延伸模式（二）估計結果 173 附錄六 延伸模式（二）捷運站距離與排除性關係圖 181 參考文獻 184 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 捷運、經濟弱勢與工作可及性－排除性的長期分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | "Metro, economically disadvantaged groups and job accessibility: A long-term analysis of exclusiveness" | en |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 石豐宇(Hsin-Tsai Liu),許心萍(Chih-Yang Tseng) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 捷運,社會排除,工作可及性,經濟弱勢,追蹤資料迴歸, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | metro,social exclusion,job accessibility,economically disadvantaged group,panel data regression, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 192 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202101266 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2021-08-17 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 建築與城鄉研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 建築與城鄉研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0407202121461000.pdf | 8.88 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。