請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/78831
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 沈偉強 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Wei-Chiang Shen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 渡部彩香 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Sayaka Watanabe | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-11T15:22:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-01-31 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-02-19 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2002-01-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Aime MC, Matheny PB, Henk DA, Frieders, EM, Nilsson RH, Piepenbring P, McLaughlin DJ, Szabo LJ, Begerow, D, Sampaio JP, Bauer R, Weiß M, Oberwinkler F, Hibbett D, 2006. An overview of the higher level classification of Pucciniomycotina based on combined analyses of nuclear large and small subunit rDNA sequences. Mycologia 98 (6): 896-905
2. Akita M, Lehtonen MT, Koponen H, Marttinen EM, Valkonen JPT, 2011. Infection of the Sunagoke moss panels with fungal pathogens hampers sustainable greening in urban environments. Science of the Total Environment 409: 3166-3173 3. Akiyama H, 2014. コケに寄生する菌類 (In Japanese). コケに誘われコケ入門-生き物好きの自然ガイド「このは」7, Bun-ichi So-go Shuppan, Tokyo, Japan, pp 73 4. Atkinson GF, 1902. Preliminary note on two new genera of basidiomycetes. The Journal of Mycology 8 (3): 106-107 5. Bauer R, Begerow D, Sampaio JP, Weiβ M, Oberwinkler F, 2006. The simple-septate basidiomycetes: a synopsis. Mycological Progress 5: 41-66 6. Begerow D, Bauer R, Oberwinkler F, 1997. Phylogenetic studies on nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences of smut fungi and related taxa. Canadian Journal of Botany 75: 2045-2056 7. Berres ME, Szabo LJ, McLaughlin DJ, 1995. Phylogenetic Relationships in Auriculariaceous Basidiomycetes Based on 25S Ribosomal DNA Sequences. Mycologia 87 (6): 821-840 8. Boehm EWA, McLaughlin DJ, 1988. Eocronartium muscicola: a basidiomycetous moss parasite exploiting. Canadian Journal of Botany 66 (4): 762-770 9. Boehm EWA, McLaughlin DJ, 1989. Phylogeny and ultrastructure in Eocronartium muscicola: meiosis and basidial development. Mycologia 81: 98-114 10. Chiang H, Mou S, Hsu T, Chen C, 2001. Moss of Taiwan. Council of Agriculture Executive Yuan, Taiwan (in Chinese), http://subject.forest.gov.tw/species/mosses/mosses/index.htm (Jan. 9, 2019) 11. Cox CJ, Goffinet B, Norman JW, Boles SB, Shaw AJ, 2010. Moss diversity: A molecular phylogenetic analysis of genera. Phytotaxa 9: 175-195 12. Davey ML, Currah RS, 2006. Interactions between mosses (Bryophyta) and fungi. Canadian Journal of Botany 84: 1509-1519 13. Donk MA, 1966. Check list of European Hymenomycetous Heterobasidiae. Persoonia 4 (2): 155 14. Fitzpatrick HM, 1918a. The life history and parasitism of Eocronartium muscicola. Phytopathology 13: 197-219 15. Fitzpatrick HM, 1918b. The cytology of Eocronartium muscicola. American Journal of Botany 5: 397-419 16. Frieders EM, McLaughlin DJ, 2001. The heterobasidiomycete moss parasites Jola and Eocronartium in culture: cytology, ultrastructure, and anamorph. Mycological Research 105 (6): 734-744 17. Fries EM, 1821. Systema Mycologicum 1: 498 18. Fries EM, 1838. Epicrisis Systematis Mycologici: 585 19. Glime JM, Bisang I, 2017. Chapter 3-1 Sexuality: Sexual Strategies. Bryophyte Ecology Vol.1, Physiological Ecology Ebook, Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists, Michigan, USA 20. Higuchi M, Lin S, 2004. Correlations between the Moss Floras of Japan and Taiwan. National Science Museum Monographs 24: 227-240 21. Izumitsu K, Hatoh K, Sumita T, Kitade Y, Morita A, Gafur A, Ohta A, Kawai M, Yamanaka T, Neda H, Ota Y, Tanaka C, 2012. Rapid and simple preparation of mushroom DNA directly from colonies and fruiting bodies for PCR. Mycoscience 53: 396-401 22. Iwatsuki Z, 2001. Mosses and Liverworts of Japan (in Japanese). Heibonsha, Tokyo, Japan, pp 10-230 23. Iwatsuki Z, 2010. A list of Japanese names of mosses. Part I. Hattoria 1: 71-125 24. Iwatsuki Z, 2011. A list of Japanese names of mosses. Part 2. Hattoria 2: 47-115 25. Iwatsuki Z, 2012. A list of Japanese names of mosses. Part 3. Hattoria 3: 73-133 26. Jülich W, 1982. Notes on some basidiomycetes (Aphyllophorales and heterobasidiomycetes). Persoonia 11 (4) 421-428 27. Karsten PA, 1868. Notiser ur Sällskapets pro Fauna et Flora Fennica förhandlingar 9: 373 28. Karsten PA, 1838. Epicrisis Systematis Mycologici: 585 29. Kasuya T, Ono Y, 2018. Herpobasidium filicinum (Eocronartiaceae, Platygloeales) occurs on Dennstaedtia wilfordii (Dennstaedtiaceae) in Japan. Mycoscience 59 (6) 10-23 30. Khan SR, Kimbrough JW, 1980. Ultrastructure and the taxonomy of Eocronartium. Canadian Journal of Botany 58: 642-647 31. Kitagawa N, 2017. Biology of Bryophytes. Kenseisha (in Japanese), Tokyo, Japan, pp 9-223 32. Kumar TKA, Celio GJ, Matheny PB, McLaughlin DJ, Hibbett DS, Manimohan P, 2007. Phylogenetic relationships of Auriculoscypha based on ultrastructural and molecular studies. Mycological Research 111: 268-274 33. Lowy B, 1971. Tremellales. Flora Neotropica. 6: 29 34. McLaughlin DJ, McLaughlin EG, 1972. Pure culture studies of fruiting and sporulation in a clavarioid fungus, Pterula sp. Mycologia 54: 599-608 35. Martin GW, 1952. Revision of the north central Tremellales. State University of Iowa Studies in Natural History 19: 86-87 36. Møller A, 1895. Botanische Mittheilungen aus den Tropen 8: 22-29 37. Moore RT, 1990. Order Platygloeales. Mycotaxon: 245-248 38. Newton AE, Cox CJ, Duckett JG, Wheeler JA, Goffinet B, Hedderson TA, Mishler BD, 2000. Evolution of the Major Moss Lineages: Phylogenetic Analyses Based on Multiple Gene Sequences and Morphology. The Bryologist 103 (2): 187-211 39. Oberwinkler F, 1982. The significance of the morphology of the basidium in the phylogeny of Basidiomycetes. In Basidium and Basidiocarp: Evolution, Cytology, Function and Development (ed. Wells, K & Wells, E. K.), Springer New York, New York, USA, pp. 9-35 40. Oberwinkler F, Bandoni R, 1984. Herpobasidium and allied genera Transactions of the British. Mycological Society 83: 639-658 41. Ohgue T, 2012. コケとキノコとインカ帝国 (in Japanese). The Japanese Society for Plant Systematics News letter 47: 16 42. Padamesee M, McKenzie EHC, 2014. A new species of rust fungus on the New Zealand endemic plant, Myosotidium, from the isolated Chatham Islands. Phytotaxa 174 (3): 223-230 43. Patouillard MN, 1920. Bulletin de la Société Mycologique de France 36: 176 44. Persoon CH, 1799. Observationes mycologicae: 60 45. Pilát A, 1959. Eocronartium muscicola (Pers ex Fr) Fitzp. Mechovice mechová v Čechách. Cēska Mykologie 13: 25-26 46. Reid DA, 1990. New or interesting records of British Heterobasidiomycetes. Mycological Research 94 (1): 94-108 47. Rensing SA, Lang D, Zimmer AD, Terry A, Salamov A, Harris Shapiro H, Nishiyama T, Perroud PF, Lindquist EA, Kamisugi Y, Tanahashi T, Sakakibara K, Fujita T, Oishi K, Shin-I T, Kuroki Y, Toyoda A, Suzuki Y, Hashimoto S, Yamaguchi K, Sugano S, Kohara Y, Fujiyama A , Anterola A, Aoki S, Ashton N, Barbazuk WB, Barker E, Bennetzen JL, Blankenship R, Cho SH, Dutcher SK, Estelle M, Fawcett JA, Gundlach H, Hanada K , Heyl A, Hicks KA , Hughes J, Lohr M, Maye K, Melkozernov A, Murata T , Nelson DR, Pils B, Prigge M, Reiss B, Renner T, Rombauts S, Rushton PJ, Sanderfoot A, Schween G, Shiu S, Stueber K, Theodoulou FL, Tu H, Van de Peer Y, Verrier PJ, Waters E, Wood A, Yang L, Cove D, Cuming AC, Hasebe M, Lucas S, Mishler BD, Reski R, Grigoriev IV, Quatrano RS, Boore JL 2008. The Physcomitrella Genome Reveals Evolutionary Insights into the Conquest of Land by Plants. Science 319: 64-69 48. Rick J, 1933. Monographia dos Protobasidiomicetos Rio-Grandenses. Egatea 18: 209-215 49. Sabri NSA, Zakaria Z, Mohamad SE, Jaafar AB, Hara H, 2018. Importance of Soil Temperature for the Growth of Temperate Crops under a Tropical Climate and Functional Role of Soil Microbial Diversity. Microbes Environ 33 (2): 144-150 50. Saccardo PA, 1888. Sylloge Hymenomycetum, Vol II Polyporeae, Hydneae, Thelephoreae, Clavarieae, Tremellineae. Sylloge Fungorum 6: 730-731 51. Sandoval P, Henrïquez JL, Faündez L, Larraïn J, 2012. First records of Eocronartium muscicola (Basidiomycota, Eocronartiaceae) in Chile on two new hosts. Gayana Botanica 69 (1): 100-104 52. Seifert KA, 2009. Progress towards DNA barcoding of fungi. Molecular Ecology Resources 9 (s1): 83-89 53. Spegazzini C, 1910. Mycetes Argentinenses Anales del Museo Nacional de Buenos Aires 3 (13): 447-448 54. Trotter A, 1925. Sylloge Fungorum 23: 497 55. Tsubota H, 2008. A short review of molecular phylogenetic studies on bryophytes and my personal side view (in Japanese). Bunrui 8 (1): 15-27 56. Van der Merwe M, Ericson L, Walker J, Thrall PH, Burdon JJ, 2007. Evolutionary relationships among species of Puccinia and Uromyces (Pucciniaceae, Uredinales) inferred from partial protein coding gene phylogenies. Mycological Research 3: 163-175 57. Zhang T, Zhang Y, Liu H, Wei Y, Li H, Su J, Zhao L, Yu L, 2013. Diversity and cold adaptation of culturable endophytic fungi from bryophytes in the Fildes Region, King George Island maritime Antarctica. Microbiology Letters 341: 52-61 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/78831 | - |
dc.description.abstract | zh_TW | |
dc.description.abstract | Eocronartium muscicola (Pers.) Fitzp. (Eocronartiaceae, Platygloeales, Pucciniomycotina) is a moss parasitic fungus that can be found in the temperate zone. Its host, mosses, are non-vascular plants, that are sometimes utilized as roof greening plants and/or used as model plants in plant science research. Eocronartium has been known to be a monotypic genus including only E. muscicola with over 15 synonyms. However, the morphology of fruiting bodies is diverse, and the host range of this fungus is wide. Owing to that reason, the interpretation of the previous taxonomical assignment of “E. muscicola (E. muscicola-like fungi)” is ambiguous, and may require a molecular phylogenetic approach.
The objective of this study was to clarify the taxonomic treatment of “E. muscicola” based on molecular phylogenetic analyses, morphological observations and biological study of host mosses. One hundred-fifty fruiting bodies of E. muscicola were examined for morphological analysis, and 121 sequences of these fruiting body specimens and living culture specimens were utilized for molecular phylogenetic studies. Fruiting bodies on various mosses were collected from mainly Japan and Taiwan. In addition, the authentic specimens of E. muscicola examined by Fitzpatrick were used in this study to identify the most reliable E. muscicola (Pers.) Fitzp. Results of the molecular phylogenetic analyses reveal that the fungal specimens which were morphologically identified as “E. muscicola” consisted of four genetically different groups (Em1, Em2, Em3 and Em4). These phylogenetic groupscorrelated with morphological features of fungal fruiting bodies and the classification and/or sexuality of host mosses. As a result, Em1 was recognized to be E. muscicola (Pers.) Fitzp., whereas the other three groups were regarded as different species from E. muscicola (Pers.) Fitzp. based on phylogenetic studies, morphological studies, and the biological characteristics of their host mosses. Consequently, these three groups were concluded to be new species of the genus Eocronartium. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-07-11T15:22:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R05633022-1.pdf: 3763827 bytes, checksum: ae2a593829acbf5870902a3299e8d553 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 #
Acknowledgement I Abstract III Contents V Figures VIII Tables X Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Objective 3 Chapter 2: Previous studies in the taxonomy of Eocronartium 4 2-1 Taxonomical history of Eocronartium muscicola based on Fitzpatrick (1918a) 8 2-2 Untreated species in Fitzpatrick (1918a) and updates after Fitzpatrick (1918a) 12 2-3 Taxonomic treatment of Eocronartium muscicola in higher level classification 14 Chapter 3: Molecular phylogenetic analyses 17 3-1 Materials and methods 18 3-2 Results and discussion 27 Chapter 4: Morphological research 45 4-1 Materials and methods 46 4-2 Results and discussion 47 4-2-1 Fruiting bodies 47 4-2-2 Hyphae 61 4-2-3 Basidia and basidiospores 65 Chapter 5: Study of host mosses 70 5-1 Materials and methods 71 5-2 Results and discussion 71 5-2-1 Classification of host mosses 72 5-2-2 Distribution 77 5-2-3 Sexuality of mosses 80 Chapter 6: General discussion 84 6-1 Phylogenetic groups of “Eocronartium muscicola” 84 6-1-1 Phylogenetic groups of “Eocronartium muscicola” with classification of host mosses 84 6-1-2 Phylogenetic groups of “Eocronartium muscicola” with sexuality of host mosses 89 6-1-3 Phylogenetic groups of “Eocronartium muscicola” with morphological characters 92 6-2 Host mosses of “Eocronartium muscicola” 94 6-2-1 New host mosses in this study 94 6-2-2 “Eocronartium muscicola” in Taiwan 95 6-2-3 Original host moss species 96 6-3 Taxonomic treatment of “Eocronartium muscicola” 98 6-4 Conclusion107 References 109 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.title | 蘚類寄生真菌 Eocronartium muscicola 分類學的再探 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Taxonomic Reexamination of a Moss Parasitic Fungus, Eocronartium muscicola | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-1 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 岡根泉 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | Izumi Okane | en |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉瑞芬;山岡裕一;阿部淳一Peter | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Ruey-Fen Liou;Yuichi Yamaoka;Junichi Peter Abe | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 苔蘚,蘚類寄生真菌,真菌分類,分子生物技術分析,新種真菌, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Eocronartium muscicola,phylogenetic analyses,mosses,new species,taxonomy, | en |
dc.relation.page | 116 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201900369 | - |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-02-12 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 植物病理與微生物學系 | - |
dc.date.embargo-lift | 2029-02-01 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 植物病理與微生物學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.68 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。