請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/78707完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 李財坤(Tsai-Kun Li) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tsung-Lu Yang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 楊宗儒 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-11T15:13:37Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-28 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2019-08-28 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2019-08-01 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Azarova, A. M., Y. L. Lyu, C.-P. Lin, Y.-C. Tsai, J. Y.-N. Lau, J. C. Wang and L. F. Liu (2007). 'Roles of DNA topoisomerase II isozymes in chemotherapy and secondary malignancies.' Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(26): 11014.
Burgess, D. J., J. Doles, L. Zender, W. Xue, B. Ma, W. R. McCombie, G. J. Hannon, S. W. Lowe and M. T. Hemann (2008). 'Topoisomerase levels determine chemotherapy response <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em>.' Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(26): 9053. Calderwood, S. K. (2016). 'A critical role for topoisomerase IIb and DNA double strand breaks in transcription.' Transcription 7(3): 75-83. Chen, S.-F., N.-L. Huang, J.-H. Lin, C.-C. Wu, Y.-R. Wang, Y.-J. Yu, M. K. Gilson and N.-L. Chan (2018). 'Structural insights into the gating of DNA passage by the topoisomerase II DNA-gate.' Nature Communications 9(1): 3085. Dickey, J. S. and N. Osheroff (2005). 'Impact of the C-terminal domain of topoisomerase IIalpha on the DNA cleavage activity of the human enzyme.' Biochemistry 44(34): 11546-11554. Dingemans, A.-M. C., M. A. Witlox, R. A. L. M. Stallaert, P. van der Valk, P. E. Postmus and G. Giaccone (1999). 'Expression of DNA Topoisomerase IIα and Topoisomerase IIβ Genes Predicts Survival and Response to Chemotherapy in Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer.' Clinical Cancer Research 5(8): 2048. Ezoe, S. (2012). 'Secondary leukemia associated with the anti-cancer agent, etoposide, a topoisomerase II inhibitor.' International journal of environmental research and public health 9(7): 2444-2453. Huang, W.-C., C.-Y. Lee and T.-S. Hsieh (2017). 'Single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) analysis discloses the dynamics of the DNA-topoisomerase II (Top2) interaction in the presence of TOP2-targeting agents.' The Journal of biological chemistry 292(30): 12589-12598. Larsen, A. K., A. E. Escargueil and A. Skladanowski (2003). 'Catalytic topoisomerase II inhibitors in cancer therapy.' Pharmacology & Therapeutics 99(2): 167-181. Lee, C.-H., M.-Y. Hsieh, L.-W. Hsin, H.-C. Chen, S.-C. Lo, J.-R. Fan, W.-R. Chen, H.-W. Chen, N.-L. Chan and T.-K. Li (2012). Anthracenedione-methionine conjugates are novel topoisomerase II-targeting anticancer agents with favorable drug resistance profiles. Li, T.-K. and L. F. Liu (2001). 'Tumor Cell Death Induced by Topoisomerase-Targeting Drugs.' Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 41(1): 53-77. Lin, Y.-S., W.-C. Huang, M.-S. Chen and T.-S. Hsieh (2014). 'Toward discovering new anti-cancer agents targeting topoisomerase IIα: a facile screening strategy adaptable to high throughput platform.' PloS one 9(5): e97008-e97008. Liu, L. F. (1989). 'DNA TOPOISOMERASE POISONS AS ANTITUMOR DRUGS.' Annual Review of Biochemistry 58(1): 351-375. Lyu, Y. L., J. E. Kerrigan, C.-P. Lin, A. M. Azarova, Y.-C. Tsai, Y. Ban and L. F. Liu (2007). 'Topoisomerase IIβ–Mediated DNA Double-Strand Breaks: Implications in Doxorubicin Cardiotoxicity and Prevention by Dexrazoxane.' Cancer Research 67(18): 8839. Madabhushi, R. (2018). 'The Roles of DNA Topoisomerase IIβ in Transcription.' International journal of molecular sciences 19(7): 1917. McClendon, A. K. and N. Osheroff (2007). 'DNA topoisomerase II, genotoxicity, and cancer.' Mutation research 623(1-2): 83-97. Nitiss, J. L. (2009). 'Targeting DNA topoisomerase II in cancer chemotherapy.' Nature Reviews Cancer 9: 338. Pommier, Y., E. Leo, H. Zhang and C. Marchand (2010). 'DNA Topoisomerases and Their Poisoning by Anticancer and Antibacterial Drugs.' Chemistry & Biology 17(5): 421-433. Roca, J. (1995). 'The mechanisms of DNA topoisomerases.' Trends in Biochemical Sciences 20(4): 156-160. Tewey, K. M., G. L. Chen, E. M. Nelson and L. F. Liu (1984). 'Intercalative antitumor drugs interfere with the breakage-reunion reaction of mammalian DNA topoisomerase II.' J Biol Chem 259(14): 9182-9187. Villman, K., E. Ståhl, G. Liljegren, U. Tidefelt and M. G. Karlsson (2002). 'Topoisomerase II-α Expression in Different Cell Cycle Phases in Fresh Human Breast Carcinomas.' Modern Pathology 15(5): 486-491. Wang, J. C. (1996). 'DNA TOPOISOMERASES.' Annual Review of Biochemistry 65(1): 635-692. Wu, C.-C., T.-K. Li, L. Farh, L.-Y. Lin, T.-S. Lin, Y.-J. Yu, T.-J. Yen, C.-W. Chiang and N.-L. Chan (2011). 'Structural Basis of Type II Topoisomerase Inhibition by the Anticancer Drug Etoposide.' Science 333(6041): 459. Wu, C.-C., Y.-C. Li, Y.-R. Wang, T.-K. Li and N.-L. Chan (2013). 'On the structural basis and design guidelines for type II topoisomerase-targeting anticancer drugs.' Nucleic acids research 41(22): 10630-10640. Zhang, S., X. Liu, T. Bawa-Khalfe, L.-S. Lu, Y. L. Lyu, L. F. Liu and E. T. H. Yeh (2012). 'Identification of the molecular basis of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity.' Nature Medicine 18: 1639. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/78707 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 人類第二型拓樸異構酶(hTop2)是目前臨床化療藥物主要針對的蛋白質,這類的化療藥在臨床上很有效,而且廣泛被使用在許多癌症上,像是血癌、乳癌、攝護腺癌… …等等。雖然這些藥物很有效,但是嚴重的副作用像是心毒性、藥物引起的癌症等等,都大大的降低這些藥物在臨床上的使用。而人類第二型拓樸異構酶分成兩種亞型: hTop2α 和hTop2β。這兩種亞型負責調控不同的細胞功能,hTop2α 主要負責細胞複製和分裂而且在癌細胞會大量表現;hTop2β 則負責細胞基因表現的調控而且在所有細胞中表現量都差不多。目前許多研究指出,藥物針對hTop2α與化療療效有關,而針對hTop2β則與副作用息息相關。但不幸的是,目前現行的臨床藥物並沒有辦法區分hTop2α 和hTop2β,因此開發能夠區分這兩種亞型的藥物是很急迫地而且是目前臨床上需要的。我們實驗室目前有兩線藥物開發,一個是Mitoxantrone 的衍生物另一個是Etoposide 的衍生物。透過細胞外的實驗,Mitoxantrone 衍生物871和Etoposide 衍生物7882, 78871, 78769R, 78769S,可以區分兩種亞型,而其中7882、78871可以主要藉由hTop2α 造成DNA的斷裂。除了藥物開發外,我們也建立可以區分這兩種亞型的篩選系統,7882, 78871在這個篩選系統中也呈現他們比較會形成hTop2α cleavable complex。因此我們認為Etoposide 的衍生物可以比較針對hTop2α而且可能具有較低的副作用,有成為新一代化療藥物的潛力。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Human typeⅡ topoisomerase has been proved to be an excellent target of chemotherapy. Current clinical drugs like Doxorubicin (DOX), Etoposide (VP-16) are hTop2-targeting drugs. They are very effective and has been widely used in many kinds of cancer for many years. Although they are effective, the severe side effects like cardiotoxicity and secondary malignancy have also been reported and have been studied well. Human typeⅡ topoisomerase has two isozyme, hTop2α and hTop2β respectively. Because of their regulating different cellular functions, the results of targeting hTop2α and hTop2β are very different. Targeting hTop2α, which up regulated in cancer, is responsible for the efficacy of treatment and targeting hTop2β, which expression level remains a constant level in all kinds of cell, takes charge of side effects. Unfortunately, current clinical drugs do not have good isozyme selectivity. Therefore discovering potential isozyme selectivity agents is urgent and un-met need. In addition to discovering new agents, establishing a screening system for those potential chemotherapy agents is also important. Our lab is developing two lines of new chemotherapy agents, one comes from Mitoxantrone and the other comes from Etoposide. Through conducting in-vitro relaxation assay, using purified recombinant hTop2α and hTop2β, Compound 871, a derivative from Mitoxantrone, and compound 7882, 78871, 78769R, 78769S, derivatives from Etoposide, have good isozyme selectivity, which can target hTop2α more than hTop2β. In cleavage assay, we demonstrate that compound 7882, 78871 can cause DNA damage mainly through hTop2α. Besides, those compounds do not have strong ability of DNA intercalating, which indicates that those agents could have lower unwanted side effects cause from direct DNA damage. We also establish a screening system for those agents by biophysical measurement. We find Etoposide derivatives, 7882, 78871 and 78769R could form hTop2αcc more than hTop2βcc and are better than Etoposide and Teniposide, which are current clinical drugs. Taking all together, our Etoposide derivatives might be excellent new chemotherapy agents, which can preferentially target hTop2α and might have lower side effects. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-07-11T15:13:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R06445132-1.pdf: 6125684 bytes, checksum: 125220456c601f429a93edaad143231e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………..………….……….………….…….........I
中文摘要……………………………………………………….................…………………….…….…..….. II ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………………………………….…... Ⅲ CONTENTS……………………………………………………………………..…………………....………Ⅴ INTRODUCTIONS……………………………………………..……..……………………..……………..1 1. Human Topoisomerases………………………………………………………..……..................................1 1.1 Human typeⅡTopoisomerase…………………………………………………………….................……….2 1.2 The mechanism of human TypeⅡ Topoisomerases…………………………..………..……….………….3 2. Human TypeⅡ Topoisomerase as an chemo-therapeutic target…………………………….….…….…4 2.1 The classification of hTop2 targeting drugs……………………………………………………….….….….5 3. The biological function of hTop2 isozymes in cancer therapy and their side effects…….…….……….6 3.1 The mechanism of adverse side effects caused by hTop2β mediated DNA double strand break…………………………………………………………………………………….............………….….6 4. The establishment of drugs screening system by measuring the tumbling rate of DNA……..……….…...8 SPECIFIC AIM………………………………………………………….…………………….………………9 MATERIALS AND METHODS...............................................................................................10 Chemical compounds and plasmid…………………………………...……………………..…………...10 Recombinant of human TopoisomeraseⅡ isozyme purification……….……...…………………….10 TopoisomeraseⅡ relaxation assay……………………………………..………………………………12 TopoisomeraseⅡ cleavage assay……………………………………….……...………………………13 DNA binding assay…………………………………………………………….…….……………………14 In-vitro complex of Enzyme measurement………………………………..……………….…………….14 RESULTS………………………………………………….………………………….………………………..15 1. Successfully purified hTop2 isozymes and had higher enzyme activity……….….……..……………..15 2. Mitoxantrone derivatives did not have strong DNA binding activity………………….…..…..……….15 3. Mitoxantrone derivatives had strong hTop2 inhibition……………………………..……….…………..16 4. Compound 716 inhibited both hTop2 isozymes, whereas; compound 871 preferentially inhibited hTop2α than hTop2β…………………………………………………………………….…………………..17 5. Compound 871 and 716 could not cause DNA damage and might be an hTop2 inhibitor…...…….18 6. Etoposide derivatives did not have strong DNA binding activity……………………………….………19 7. Etoposide derivatives had better hTop2 inhibition than Etoposide and could preferentially target hTop2α…………………………………………………………………………………………….………….19 8. Etoposide derivatives could cause DNA double strand break mainly through hTop2α………………20 9. Teniposide (VM-26) and Etoposide (VP-16) could form hTop2α cleavable complex and hTop2β cleavable complex with Drosophila Top2 preferentially cutting site…………………………………..21 10. Etoposide derivatives could interfere with fluorophore at high dose…………….…….……………..23 11. The Etoposide derivatives could form hTop2αcc more than hTop2βcc…………..…………….……..23 12. NaClO4 could not extensively trigger hTop2 cleavage reaction, comparing with SDS……………..24 DISCUSSIONS……………………….……………………...………………………………………...…….26 FIGURES AND TABLES…………………………………………………….………...…………..…...32 Table 1. The cytotoxicity of Mitoxantrone derivatives in PC-3………………………………….……………32 Figure 1. The induction of the yeast containing hTop2α or hTop2β expression plasmid…………….…….33 Figure 2. Full-length hTop2 isozyme were purified from yeast expressing system……………..……..……35 Figure 3. The specific activity of hTop2α and hTop2β………………………………………………..……….37 Figure4. Mitoxantrone derivatives, except compound 365 and compound 820, were weaker DNA binding agents compare with Mitoxantrone…………………………….…..…………………..38 Figure 5. Mitoxantrone derivatives could inhibit both hTop2 relaxation activities………………..………39 Figure 6. Mitoxantrone derivatives 871 and 716 could not cause DNA double strand break through hTop2….……………………………………………………………………………………………..41 Figure 7. Etoposide derivatives did not have strong DNA binding activity…………….………..………….42 Figure 8. Etoposide derivatives could preferentially inhibit hTop2α relaxation activity…………...……..43 Figure 9. Etoposide derivatives could cause DNA damage mainly through hTop2α…………...………….44 Figure 10. The optimal hTop2 isozyme to DNA ratio and the optimal amount of NaClO4…………..…….46 Figure 11. The dynamic effects of NaClO4 on hTop2 isozymes…………………………………….…………47 Figure 12. The response of Teniposide (VM-26) and Etoposide (VP-16)……………………….................49 Figure 13. The effect of interfering fluorophore at high dose and optimize drug concentration………….51 Figure 14. Etoposide derivatives could form hTop2αcc more than hTop2βcc……………………..….……52 Figure 15. The effects of NaClO4 on the reaction of hTop2 cleavage…………………………….………….53 Figure 16. The effects of NaClO4 on the reaction of hTop2 cleavage………………………………..………54 REFERENCE………………………………………………………………………..…………...…………..55 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 拓樸異構? | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | topoisomerase | en |
| dc.title | 建立專一性第二型拓樸異構酶亞型藥物篩選系統 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Establish a screen system for typeⅡtopoisomerase isozymes specific drugs | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 詹迺立(Nei-Li Chan),陳文彬(Wen-Pin Chen) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 拓樸異構?, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | topoisomerase, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 57 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201902302 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2019-08-01 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 微生物學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2024-08-28 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 微生物學科所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-108-R06445132-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 5.98 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
