請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/78443完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張重昭 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kuo-How Huang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃國皓 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-11T14:57:17Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-02-17 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020-02-17 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-02-07 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. 行政院衛生署全民健保爭議審議委員會:體外電震波碎石術之爭議。臺灣醫學,2005,9(6):, 785-787。.
2. 行政院衛生署101年度委託科技研究計畫研究報告. 建構民眾對全民健康保險就醫利用影響之評估模式 3. Trinchieri A. Epidemiology of urolithiasis: an update. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2008;5(2):101-6. Epub 2008/05/01. PubMed PMID: 22460989; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2781200. 4. Scales CD, Jr., Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. European urology. 2012;62(1):160-5. Epub 2012/04/14. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.052. PubMed PMID: 22498635; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3362665. 5. Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA, Nyberg LM, Curhan GC. Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976-1994. Kidney Int. 2003;63(5):1817-23. Epub 2003/04/05. doi: kid917 [pii] 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00917.x. PubMed PMID: 12675858. 6. Goldfarb DS. Increasing prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Kidney international. 2003;63(5):1951-2. Epub 2003/04/05. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00942.x. PubMed PMID: 12675877. 7. Lee YH, Huang WC, Tsai JY, Lu CM, Chen WC, Lee MH, et al. Epidemiological studies on the prevalence of upper urinary calculi in Taiwan. Urol Int. 2002;68(3):172-7. Epub 2002/03/29. doi: 10.1159/000048445. PubMed PMID: 11919463. 8. Huang WY, Chen YF, Carter S, Chang HC, Lan CF, Huang KH. Epidemiology of upper urinary tract stone disease in a Taiwanese population: a nationwide, population based study. J Urol. 2013;189(6):2158-63. Epub 2013/01/15. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.105. PubMed PMID: 23313204. 9. Litwin MS, Saigal CS, Yano EM, Avila C, Geschwind SA, Hanley JM, et al. Urologic diseases in America Project: analytical methods and principal findings. The Journal of urology. 2005;173(3):933-7. Epub 2005/02/16. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000152365.43125.3b. PubMed PMID: 15711342. 10. 龔佩珍. 影響高科技醫療利用相關因素─以體外震波碎石術(ESWL) 為例. 行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫 成果報告 2006. 11. Saigal CS, Joyce G, Timilsina AR. Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: opportunity for disease management? Kidney international. 2005;68(4):1808-14. Epub 2005/09/17. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00599.x. PubMed PMID: 16164658. 12. Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51(4):899-906; discussion Epub 2006/11/11. doi: S0302-2838(06)01310-8 [pii] 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.020. PubMed PMID: 17095141. 13. de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, Gutierrez J, Lingeman J, Scarpa R, et al. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol. 2011;25(1):11-7. Epub 2011/01/21. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0424. PubMed PMID: 21247286. 14. Desai M, Jain P, Ganpule A, Sabnis R, Patel S, Shrivastav P. Developments in technique and technology: the effect on the results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi. BJU Int. 2009;104(4):542-8; discussion 8. Epub 2009/03/21. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08472.x. PubMed PMID: 19298409. 15. Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionalized? the empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. The New England journal of medicine. 1979;301(25):1364-9. 16. Arndt M, Bradbury RC, Golec JH. Surgeon volume and hospital resource utilization. Inquiry. 1995:407-17. 17. Huang WY, Wu SC, Chen YF, Lan CF, Hsieh JT, Huang KH. Surgeon volume for percutaneous nephrolithotomy is associated with medical costs and length of hospital stay: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan. J Endourol. 2014;28(8):915-21. Epub 2014/04/09. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0003. PubMed PMID: 24707828. 18. https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/lp-2156-113.html. 19. https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/lp-1977-113.html. 20. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(6):613-9. Epub 1992/06/01. doi: 0895-4356(92)90133-8 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 1607900. 21. Clark JY, Thompson IM, Optenberg SA. Economic impact of urolithiasis in the United States. J Urol. 1995;154(6):2020-4. Epub 1995/12/01. PubMed PMID: 7500448. 22. Lotan Y. Economics and cost of care of stone disease. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2009;16(1):5-10. Epub 2008/12/20. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2008.10.002. PubMed PMID: 19095200. 23. Pearle MS, Calhoun EA, Curhan GC, Urologic Diseases of America P. Urologic diseases in America project: urolithiasis. J Urol. 2005;173(3):848-57. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000152082.14384.d7. PubMed PMID: 15711292. 24. Hannan EL, Kilburn H, Jr., Bernard H, O'Donnell JF, Lukacik G, Shields EP. Coronary artery bypass surgery: the relationship between inhospital mortality rate and surgical volume after controlling for clinical risk factors. Med Care. 1991;29(11):1094-107. Epub 1991/11/11. PubMed PMID: 1943270. 25. Hillner BE, Smith TJ, Desch CE. Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(11):2327-40. Epub 2000/06/01. PubMed PMID: 10829054. 26. Killeen SD, O'Sullivan MJ, Coffey JC, Kirwan WO, Redmond HP. Provider volume and outcomes for oncological procedures. Br J Surg. 2005;92(4):389-402. Epub 2005/03/24. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4954. PubMed PMID: 15786424. 27. Lin HC, Lin CC. Surgeon volume is predictive of 5-year survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: a population-based study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(12):2284-91. Epub 2009/09/05. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-0990-8. PubMed PMID: 19730957. 28. Weitz J, Koch M, Friess H, Buchler MW. Impact of volume and specialization for cancer surgery. Dig Surg. 2004;21(4):253-61. Epub 2004/08/17. doi: 10.1159/000080198 80198 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 15308864. 29. Wilt TJ, Shamliyan TA, Taylor BC, MacDonald R, Kane RL. Association between hospital and surgeon radical prostatectomy volume and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Urol. 2008;180(3):820-8; discussion 8-9. Epub 2008/07/19. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.010 S0022-5347(08)01230-5 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 18635233. 30. Opondo D, Tefekli A, Esen T, Labate G, Sangam K, De Lisa A, et al. Impact of case volumes on the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(6):1181-7. Epub 2012/03/24. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.010. PubMed PMID: 22440402. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/78443 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 全民健保實施後,醫療支出年年增加,而高科技醫療的使用成為醫療費用上漲的主要原因。尿路結石在台灣,是高盛行率的疾病,但其疾病的就醫情況與醫療支出,卻少有研究。而體外震波碎石術是結石治療中,醫療支付點值最高的,健保署也在1999年針對體外震波碎石術加以專案審查及設限,希望能減少體外震波碎石術的浮濫使用,但其對於能否控制醫療支出的成效仍有待評估。此外,經皮腎造廔碎石術常用以治療大型或困難的腎結石,是一需麻醉及住院的侵入性治療,會有出血及感染等併發症,甚至死亡的風險。在考慮結石治療的成本時,除了醫療上的支出及花費,也會有因休養及無法工作造成的損失等無形的成本。此類侵入性治療的醫療照護品質特別需要減少併發症,減短住院天數,以降低醫療支出。
本研究利用全民健康保險醫療統計及全民健康保險資料庫2005年百萬抽樣歸人檔,探討泌尿道結石就醫情形與醫療花費。並研究體外震波碎石術1997 至 2004的醫療利用情況,探討體外震波碎石術專案審查政策實施,對體外震波碎石術合理利用及降低其使用次數與花費的成效。本研究也探討採用經皮腎造廔取石術的病患,在出院後3日內到急診或14天內再次入院的相關因子。 研究結果有三項發現: 第一部分:1997-2010年台灣尿路結石每10萬人口就醫率及醫療支出趨勢。 每10萬人的尿路結石醫療就診率從1998年的1,532人增加到2010年的1,627人,增長了6.2%。同樣,尿路結石的醫療費用從1998年的29億5千7百萬元增加到2010年的42億4千8百萬元,增長了43.7%,兩者均呈逐年增加的結果。 第二部分:健保對於體外震波碎石術的管控措施,是否能降低結石治療 的醫療費? 在1997 年至 2004 年間,體外震波碎石術醫療利用 除了在 1998 年至 2000 年間,體外震波碎石的使用次數從1998的 77847下降到2000 年55381次,有下降之外,自2000年起,從55381上升至 2004 年71415次,使用次數有逐年上升的趨勢。 第三部分:研究接受經皮腎造廔取石術的病患,分析影響其術後3天內到急診,14天內再入院的相關因素。 1997年至2010年期間,有995例腎結石患者接受了經皮造廔取石術。在38例(3.8%)受試者中觀察到經皮腎造廔取石術後3天內急診就診,68例(6.8%)受試者14天內再次入院率。出院後3 天內到急診與住院中血尿需進一步醫療處置,共病疾病嚴重度及醫師年平均手術量顯著相關。而出院後14天內再入院與病人年齡住院中敗血症、泌尿道感染、手術部位感染、血尿需進一步醫療處置及出院內三天內到急診及地區醫院接受手術顯著相關。 台灣的健保署須考慮醫療資源的合理分配、政策的成本與效果,及改善醫療品質以降低醫療費用。本研究的結果對此提供了重要的資訊,我們期望經由本土的研究以提供健康保險主管機關、醫院管理者及病患能據此做出最好的醫療決策的參考。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Following the implementation of National Health Insurance (NHI), the medical expenditure rose rapidly, Urolithiasis is a prevalent disease in Taiwan. However, studies on the prevalence and medical expenditure of urolithiasis in Taiwan is scarce. Additionally, high-tech medical devices have become one of the main factors causing an increase in health care expenditure. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) served as the most commonly adopted and the highest payment unit in medical equipment usage for treatment of urolithiasis. The utilities of ESWL in Taiwan increased rapidly after the implementation of Taiwan’s NHI. The authorities issued NHI payment guideline and utilization review policy on ESWL in 1999. The effectiveness of the regulation policy on the reasonable usage of ESWL should be evaluated. Moreover, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been commonly used for treatment of complicated and large renal stone. PCNL is an invasive procedure with potential risks of complications and mortalities Weeks of convalescence period and loss of work absence in inevitable for patients receiving PCNL. To identify factors associated with medical care quality to improve patient safety and lower medical cost is an important issue.
This study used a subset of the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) known as Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2005 (LHID2005), which contains the data of all medical benefit claims 1998-2010 for a subset of 1,000,000 enrollees randomly drawn from the population of 22.72 million individuals who were enrolled in 2005. The results of the study are divided into three parts as follows: Part I. We analyzed medical utilities and costs for management of urolithiasis in Taiwan, 1998-2010. Our results showed tract there were significantly rising trends in the annual medical visits and costs for stone disease. The rate of medical care visits increased by 6.2%, from 1,532 in 1998 to 1,627 in 2010 per 100,000 subjects (r2=0.25; p=0.050). Similarly, the medical cost increased by 43.7%, from $101.9 million dollars in 2000 to $133.8 million dollars in 2010 (r2=0.63; p=0.001). There were rising trends in both medical utilization and costs for stone disease during the period. Part II. We investigated the efficacy of the regulation policy on the reasonable usage of ESWL. The growing rate of average utilization of ESWL per thousand people from 1997 to 2004 is 6.588%. The average utilization of ESWL is 1.466 times per person. The regulation and utilization review policy elicited short-term and transient effect on decreasing ESWL utilization. Part III. We examined factors associated with two quality indices of medical care and medical expense, including emergency room visit within 3 days after discharge and rehospitalization within 14 days after discharge. A total of 995 cases receiving PCNL. Among them, 38(3.8%)experienced emergency room visit within three days after discharge and 68(6.8%)needed re-hospitalization within 14 days after discharge. Factors associated with emergency room visit included hematuria needed additional therapeutic procedures and higher Charlson comorbidity index and surgeon caseload volume. Factors associated with rehospitalization included sepsis, urinary tract infection, surgical site infection, hematuria needed other therapeutic procedures and emergency room visit within three days and treatment at district hospital. In conclusion, our study indicated the increasing trends in medical utilization and costs of urolithiasis in Taiwan. The utilization review policy provided short-term and transient effect on decreasing the utilization of ESWL. To decrease emergency room visit or rehospitalization after discharge, care-provider should consider to transfer high-risk patients with severe comorbidities to high-volume surgeon and hospital of higher level. Our study provides important information for policy making and clinical practice to reduce medical expenses and improve quality of care. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-07-11T14:57:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-109-P04748042-1.pdf: 2828294 bytes, checksum: 9bde941055268e1d3b90f9ab15fc2fd1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
口試委員審定書II 誌謝III 中文摘要IV THESIS ABSTRACT VI 目錄VIII 圖目錄IX 表目錄X 第一章 研究動機與研究目的1 第二章 研究資料收集及研究方法10 第三章 研究結果12 第四章 討論14 第五章 研究結論與應用17 第六章 圖表附錄18 參考文獻29 圖目錄 圖1A 1998到2010年台灣尿路結石就醫率(男性vs.女性18 圖1B 1998到2010年台灣尿路結石就醫率(上vs.下泌尿道結石18 圖2A 1998到2010年台灣尿路結石醫療費用(男性 vs. 女性19 圖2B 1998到2010年台灣尿路結石醫療費用(上vs.下泌尿道結石)19 圖3 1998年到2004年台灣體外震波碎石總使用次數20 圖4 1998年到2004年台灣體外震波碎石每千人使用次數20 圖5 1998年到2004年台灣每百萬人體外震波碎石機儀器數及平均使用次數21 表目錄 表1 接受經皮腎造廔碎石術病患,出院後3天內到急診及 14天內再入院 與病患特徵,醫院特徵及手術醫師特徵的關係。22 表2 多變數分析經皮腎造廔取石術出院後3天內到急診與14天內再入院 之影響因素25 附錄一 各種尿路結石治療方式的併發症,使用比例,及住院天數的比較26 附錄二 台灣全民健保尿路結石手術的給付點數27 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 尿路結石 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 經皮腎造廔取石術 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 體外震波碎石 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 醫療費用 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Medical utilization | en |
| dc.subject | Urolithiasis | en |
| dc.subject | Percuatneous Nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) | en |
| dc.subject | Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) | en |
| dc.subject | Medical cost | en |
| dc.title | 影響台灣尿路結石治療品質與醫療支出相關因素之探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Factors Associated with Quality of Care and Medical Expense for Treatment of Urolithiasis in Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 108-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 黃俊堯 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 郭佳瑋 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 醫療費用,尿路結石,體外震波碎石,經皮腎造廔取石術, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Urolithiasis,Medical cost,Medical utilization,Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL),Percuatneous Nephrolithotripsy (PCNL), | en |
| dc.relation.page | 32 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202000332 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-02-10 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學組 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 商學組 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-109-P04748042-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.76 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
