請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/78432完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃俊豪(Jiun-Hau Huang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tung-Hua Wu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 吳東華 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-11T14:56:42Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2030-02-01 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020-03-13 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-02-17 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ajzen, H., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211. Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of experimental social psychology, 22(5), 453-474. Aparici, M., Fernandez Gonzalez, A. L., & Alegria, E. (1993). [Aerobic capacity. Differences between smokers and non-smokers. Effects of withdrawal]. Rev Clin Esp, 193(8), 424-427. Awaisu, A., Khalifa, S., Mottram, D., Ahmed, A., & Stuart, M. (2018). Instructional design and assessment of an elective course on the use of drugs in sport. Curr Pharm Teach Learn, 10(8), 1124-1131. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.05.020 Barkoukis, V., & Brooke, L. (2019). The role of the athletes' entourage on attitudes to doping. 37(21), 2483-2491. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1643648 Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of research in personality, 25(3), 285-301. Bloodworth, A., & McNamee, M. (2010). Clean Olympians? Doping and anti-doping: The views of talented young British athletes. International journal of drug policy, 21(4), 276-282. Boardley, I. D., Smith, A. L., Mills, J. P., Grix, J., & Wynne, C. (2017). Empathic and self-regulatory processes governing doping behavior. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1495. Chan, D. K., Dimmock, J. A., Donovan, R. J., Hardcastle, S., Lentillon-Kaestner, V., & Hagger, M. S. (2015). Self-determined motivation in sport predicts anti-doping motivation and intention: a perspective from the trans-contextual model. J Sci Med Sport, 18(3), 315-322. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.04.001 Cronson, H., & Mitchell, G. (1987). Athletes and their families: Adapting to the stresses of professional sports. The Physician and sportsmedicine, 15(5), 121-127. De Hon, O., Kuipers, H., & van Bottenburg, M. (2015). Prevalence of doping use in elite sports: a review of numbers and methods. Sports Medicine, 45(1), 57-69. Diehl, K., Thiel, A., Zipfel, S., Mayer, J., Litaker, D. G., & Schneider, S. (2012). How healthy is the behavior of young athletes? A systematic literature review and meta-analyses. Journal of sports science & medicine, 11(2), 201. Dimeo, P., McNamee, M. J., & Møller, V. (2009). Elite sport, doping and public health: University Press of Southern Denmark. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Fitch, K. D. (2013). Therapeutic use exemptions (TUEs) at the Olympic Games 1992-2012. Br J Sports Med, 47(13), 815-818. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092460 Graupensperger, S. A., Benson, A. J., & Evans, M. B. (2018). Everyone Else Is Doing It: The Association Between Social Identity and Susceptibility to Peer Influence in NCAA Athletes. J Sport Exerc Psychol, 40(3), 117-127. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2017-0339 Grossbard, J. R., Lee, C. M., Neighbors, C., Hendershot, C. S., & Larimer, M. E. (2007). Alcohol and risky sex in athletes and nonathletes: what roles do sex motives play? J Stud Alcohol Drugs, 68(4), 566-574. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2007.68.566 Hartgens, F. (2008). Medication, athletes and doping regulations. Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde, 152(33), 1844-1848. Hausmann, R., Hammer, S., & Betz, P. (1998). Performance enhancing drugs (doping agents) and sudden death–a case report and review of the literature. International journal of legal medicine, 111(5), 261-264. Horcajo, J., & Santos, D. (2019). Changing attitudes and intentions related to doping: An analysis of individual differences in need for cognition. 37(24), 2835-2843. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1665876 Huang, J.-H., Jacobs, D. F., & Derevensky, J. L. (2010). Sexual risk-taking behaviors, gambling, and heavy drinking among US college athletes. Archives of sexual behavior, 39(3), 706-713. Iso-Ahola, S. E. (1995). Intrapersonal and interpersonal factors in athletic performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 5(4), 191-199. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.1995.tb00035.x Jayanthi, N. A., Holt, D. B., Jr., LaBella, C. R., & Dugas, L. R. (2018). Socioeconomic Factors for Sports Specialization and Injury in Youth Athletes. Sports health, 10(4), 303-310. doi: 10.1177/1941738118778510 Kavussanu, M., & Ring, C. (2017). Moral identity predicts doping likelihood via moral disengagement and anticipated guilt. Journal of sport & exercise psychology, 39(4), 293-301. Kinahan, A., Budgett, R., & Mazzoni, I. (2017). Structure and development of the list of prohibited substances and methods Acute Topics in Anti-Doping (Vol. 62, pp. 39-54): Karger Publishers. Kumar, P. R., & Kumar, N. V. (1998). Effect of cigarette smoking on muscle strength of flexibility of athletes. Indian J Exp Biol, 36(11), 1144-1146. Lentillon‐Kaestner, V., & Carstairs, C. (2010). Doping use among young elite cyclists: a qualitative psychosociological approach. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 20(2), 336-345. Lippi, G., & Guidi, G. (1999). [Doping and sports]. Minerva Med, 90(9), 345-357. Ljungqvist, A. (2017). Brief History of Anti-Doping. Med Sport Sci, 62, 1-10. doi: 10.1159/000460680 Magdalinski, T., & Nauright, J. (2012). Chapter 9-Commercialisation of the Modern Olympics: Chapter taken from The Commercialisation of Sport ISBN: 978-0-7146-5021-0. Routledge Online Studies on the Olympic and Paralympic Games, 1(17), 185-204. Mazanov, J., Huybers, T., & Connor, J. (2011). Qualitative evidence of a primary intervention point for elite athlete doping. J Sci Med Sport, 14(2), 106-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.06.003 McDuff, D., Stull, T., Castaldelli-Maia, J. M., Hitchcock, M. E., Hainline, B., & Reardon, C. L. (2019). Recreational and ergogenic substance use and substance use disorders in elite athletes: a narrative review. British journal of sports medicine, 53(12), 754-760. McNamee, M. J., & Tarasti, L. (2010). Juridical and ethical peculiarities in doping policy. Journal of Medical Ethics, 36(3), 165-169. Mestre, A. (2008). The legal basis of the Olympic Charter. The international sports law journal(1-2), 100-102. Miller, M. T., & Kissinger, D. B. (2009). College StudentAthletes: Challenges, Opportunities, and Policy Implications: IAP. Minutillo, A., Pacifici, R., Scaravelli, G., De Luca, R., Palmi, I., Mortali, C., . . . Berretta, P. (2016). Gender disparity in addiction: an Italian epidemiological sketch. Ann Ist Super Sanita, 52(2), 176-183. doi: 10.4415/ann_16_02_08 Morente-Sanchez, J., & Zabala, M. (2013). Doping in sport: a review of elite athletes' attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge. Sports Med, 43(6), 395-411. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0037-x Nattiv, A., Puffer, J. C., & Green, G. A. (1997). Lifestyles and health risks of collegiate athletes: a multi-center study. Clin J Sport Med, 7(4), 262-272. doi: 10.1097/00042752-199710000-00004 Ntoumanis, N., Ng, J. Y., Barkoukis, V., & Backhouse, S. (2014). Personal and psychosocial predictors of doping use in physical activity settings: a meta-analysis. Sports Med, 44(11), 1603-1624. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0240-4 Ntoumanis, N., Ng, J. Y., Barkoukis, V., & Backhouse, S. (2014). Personal and psychosocial predictors of doping use in physical activity settings: a meta-analysis. Sports Med, 44(11), 1603-1624. Ring, C., & Kavussanu, M. (2018). The role of self-regulatory efficacy, moral disengagement and guilt on doping likelihood: A social cognitive theory perspective. Journal of sports sciences, 36(5), 578-584. Rolandsson, M., Wagnsson, S., & Hugoson, A. (2014). Tobacco use habits among Swedish female youth athletes and the influence of the social environment. International journal of dental hygiene, 12(3), 219-225. Romano Spica, V., Di Rosa, E., Savino, G., Pasquarella, C., Liguori, G., Fallace, P., . . . Giammanco, G. (2019). Erice 2018 Charter on the role of the National Health Service in the prevention of doping. Ann Ig, 31(6), 523-532. doi: 10.7416/ai.2019.2313 Schanzer, W., & Thevis, M. (2007). [Doping in sport]. Med Klin (Munich), 102(8), 631-646. doi: 10.1007/s00063-007-1079-3 Striegel, H., Vollkommer, G., & Dickhuth, H. (2002). Comnbating drug use in competitive sports. Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness, 42(3), 354. Striegel, H., Vollkommer, G., & Dickhuth, H. H. (2002). Combating drug use in competitive sports. An analysis from the athletes' perspective. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 42(3), 354-359. Tandon, S., Bowers, L. D., & Fedoruk, M. N. (2015). Treating the elite athlete: anti-doping information for the health professional. Mo Med, 112(2), 122-128. Tentori, L., & Graziani, G. (2007). Doping with growth hormone/IGF-1, anabolic steroids or erythropoietin: is there a cancer risk? Pharmacological research, 55(5), 359-369. Tricker, R., & Connolly, D. (1997). Drugs and the college athlete: An analysis of the attitudes of student athletes at risk. Journal of Drug Education, 27(2), 105-119. Tricker, R., & Connolly, D. (1997). Drugs and the college athlete: an analysis of the attitudes of student athletes at risk. J Drug Educ, 27(2), 105-119. doi: 10.2190/e8u0-42um-pblk-96rh Vlad, R. A., & Hancu, G. (2018). Doping in Sports, a Never-Ending Story? , 8(4), 529-534. doi: 10.15171/apb.2018.062 Wippert, P. M., & Fliesser, M. (2016). National doping prevention guidelines: Intent, efficacy and lessons learned - A 4-year evaluation. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy, 11(1), 35. doi: 10.1186/s13011-016-0079-9 Zubak, Z., Terzic, A., & Zenic, N. (2018). Are Sports-Related Factors Correlated to the Prevalence and Initiation of Illicit Drug Misuse in Adolescence? Prospective Study in Older Adolescents. 2018, 1236284. doi: 10.1155/2018/1236284 王翠敏, & 許美智. (1998). 臺灣區運動會 83—86 年選手用藥之調查研究. 中華體育季刊, 12(2), 120-128. 張珉嫻. (2010). 2008 年北京奧運中華台北選手禁藥認知調查. 臺灣師範大學運動與休閒管理研究所在職碩士班學位論文, 1-98. 許美智, 曹立妍, 錢桂玉, & 林淑芬. (2011). 1968-2008 年奧運運動禁藥陽性率分析. 運動研究, 20. 許美智, & 黃志綉. (2000). 常見含運動禁藥之市售感冒藥. 大專體育(49), 199-203. 羅嵐. (2016). 禁賽事件後大學生運動員生活之民族誌-以某大學籃球隊為例. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/78432 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 背景:國際間競技運動日趨激烈,加上全球運動商業化所帶來的龐大商機與利益,部分運動員受到金錢、榮譽與想要超越自我潛能等因素之影響,可能產生運動禁藥使用之問題。根據國際奧委會統計,於奧運比賽期間,選手被檢測出有使用運動禁藥之比例,每屆均介於1–4%,另,過往研究指出,有14–39%的頂尖運動員刻意使用運動禁藥,此顯示運動競技之公平性,正面臨極大之挑戰,然而,過往文獻中較缺乏以行為科學理論為基礎,針對大學生運動員之運動禁藥使用及其相關因素,所進行之系統性探討,以提供未來發展預防策略之實證依據。
目標:運用計劃行為理論 (Theory of Planned Behavior, TPB) 之三大構念探討大學生校隊運動員使用運動禁藥 (doping) 之行為意圖,運用其三大構念 (行為態度、主觀規範及自覺行為控制) 之直接及間接測量,檢視其與運動禁藥使用意圖之關聯。 方法:本研究於2019年3月,針對北部某大學之校隊運動員,使用以TPB為依據自編而成之匿名紙本問卷進行調查,於該校校隊專長練習時間進行招募,共發放問卷1,250份 (回覆率91.6%)。 結果:本研究最終納入樣本1,145份,並使用探索性因素分析,針對運動禁藥使用相關之TPB題組進行檢視,共萃取出五個潛在因素,分別為:行為態度之正面與負面行為結果評價、主觀規範、有利及阻礙情境下之自覺行為控制。進一步使用多變項羅吉斯迴歸進行資料分析後,發現其中三個因素與運動禁藥使用意圖具統計顯著關聯,分別為:負面行為結果評價相對中立 (AOR=2.41) 與相對正向 (AOR=3.08);有利情境下具相對中度 (AOR=1.98) 與相對高度 (AOR=2.10) 自覺行為控制;阻礙情境下具相對中度 (AOR=2.59) 與相對高度 (AOR=3.99) 自覺行為控制;而正面行為結果評價與主觀規範則不顯著。此外,學業成績、吸菸頻率、喝酒頻率及平均月收入亦為重要之相關因子。 結論:本研究發現特定之TPB構念,與大學校隊運動員之運動禁藥使用意圖具統計顯著關聯,因此,未來若欲降低其運動禁藥之使用意圖,可嘗試澄清其對於運動禁藥使用負面結果之迷思,增強環境中阻礙情境及降低運動禁藥使用之有利因素。本研究結果可作為未來相關單位,進行運動禁藥政策擬定與衛教策略規劃時之實證參考依據。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: With the increasing intensity of international competitive sports and the great business opportunities and benefits brought by the commercialization of global sports, some athletes may be affected by money, honor, and the desire to surpass their potential, which may lead to the problem of doping in sports. According to the statistics of the International Olympic Committee (IOC), the percentage of athletes tested positive for doping during the Olympic Games is between 1–4% in each Game. Additionally, earlier studies have pointed out that 14–39% of top athletes deliberately engaged in doping, which shows that the fairness in sports is facing great challenges. However, there is a lack of literature on the basis of behavioral science to systematically discuss doping and associated factors among college varsity athletes, and to provide empirical evidence for the development of preventive strategies in the future.
Objectives: This study aimed to explore the behavioral intention of doping among college varsity athletes in relation to the three constructs of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)—namely, attitude toward the behavior (ATB), subjective norm (SN), and perceived behavioral control (PBC)—using the direct and indirect measures of TPB. Methods: I In March 2019, an anonymous questionnaire based on TPB was used to investigate the college varsity athletes of a university in northern Taiwan. A total of 1,250 responses were sent out during the time of team practice, with a response rate of 91.6%. Results: Data from 1,145 participants were included in this study. Exploratory factor analysis was used to examine the TPB indirect measures related to doping and extracted five latent factors: ATB about positive and negative doping outcomes, SN, and PBC under facilitating and constraining conditions. Further analysis using multiple logistic regression revealed that the following three factors had statistically significant associations with high doping intention: relatively neutral (AOR = 2.41) and relatively positive (AOR = 3.08) ATB about negative doping outcomes; relatively intermediate (AOR = 1.98) and relatively high (AOR = 2.10) PBC under facilitating conditions; and relatively intermediate (AOR = 2.59) and relatively high (AOR = 3.99) PBC under constraining conditions. However, ATB about positive doping outcomes and SN were not significant factors. In addition, academic performance, smoking frequency, drinking frequency, and average monthly income were also important associated factors. Conclusion: This study found that specific TPB constructs were significantly associated with high doping intention among college varsity athletes. Therefore, to decrease doping intention in the future, efforts could be made to clarify the myths about negative doping outcomes, enhance the constraining conditions in the environment, and reduce the facilitating conditions for doping. The results of this study can be used as an empirical reference for the formulation of anti-doping policy and the strategic planning of health education in the future. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-07-11T14:56:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-109-R02847041-1.pdf: 962693 bytes, checksum: 1cb03b01741282f0a7454e34b5286537 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 Ⅰ
中文摘要 V Abstract VII Contents IX List of Tables XI List of Figures XII Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Research background 1 1.2 Objectives 3 Chapter 2 The Current Study 4 2.1 Doping 4 2.2 Important factors and variables associated with doping 7 2.3 Theory of Planned Behavior 10 2.4 TPB-related variables in the doping literature 12 Chapter 3 Methods 15 3.1 Framework and participants 15 3.2 Research tool 16 3.3 Measures 16 3.4 Procedure and analysis 19 Chapter 4 Results 22 4.1 Background characteristics and their relationships with doping intention 22 4.2 Five TPB factors and their relationships with doping intention 23 4.3 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of five TPB factors in relation to high doping intention 23 4.4 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of individual TPB items in relation to high doping intention 25 Chapter 5 Discussion 28 5.1 Attitudinal evaluations had an important impact on doping intention in college varsity athletes 28 5.2 More supportive subjective norms were linked to greater doping intention 31 5.3 Perceived behavioral control under facilitating and constraining conditions was both associated with doping intention 33 5.4 Some background characteristics were associated with high doping intention 34 5.5 Study limitations and future directions 36 5.6 Conclusions 37 References 39 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 計畫行為理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 運動禁藥使用 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 臺灣 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 大學校隊運動員 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Doping | en |
| dc.subject | Theory of planned behavior | en |
| dc.subject | Taiwan | en |
| dc.subject | College varsity athletes | en |
| dc.title | 探討以計劃行為理論檢視大學校隊運動員
運動禁藥使用意圖的可行性之形成性研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Formative Study to Explore the Feasibility of Using the
Theory of Planned Behavior to Examine Doping Intention among College Varsity Athletes | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 108-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 莊?智,張齡尹 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 計畫行為理論,運動禁藥使用,大學校隊運動員,臺灣, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Theory of planned behavior,Doping,College varsity athletes,Taiwan, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 48 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202000497 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-02-17 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共衛生碩士學位學程 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2030-02-01 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 公共衛生碩士學位學程 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-109-R02847041-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 940.13 kB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
