請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/77366
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陸洛 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | 黃煜為 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Wei Huang | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-10T21:58:26Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-01 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-07-23 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2002-01-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
1. 台灣大學智慧生活科技整合與創新研究中心(譯,原作者:Nicholas LaRusso, Barbara Spurrier, Gianrico Farrugia, 2014)(2017)。《微破壞:梅約設計思考法的轉型式創新》。美商麥格羅‧希爾。 2. 石曜堂(2010)。「我們要往哪裡走?-健康照護再造的前瞻思維-」,《醫療爭 議審議報導 系列 45》,4-17。 3. 江淑美、吳伊勻、翁士勛、劉育雯 (2000)。個案研究(Case study)。國立台灣師範大學教育研究法專題研究報告。 4. 行政院主計總處(2019)。國民所得統計摘要(108年5月更新)。 5. 林兆明(2008)。「創造服務品質的企業文化」,《品質月刊》,44 卷第 3 期, 33-35。 6. 林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花 (2005)。質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析,身心障礙研究,3(2),122-136。 7. 范麗娟(1994)。深度訪談簡介,戶外遊憩研究,7(1),25-36。 8. 袁方編(2002)。 《社會研究方法》. 臺北:五南圖書公司。 9. 財團法人永齡健康基金會(2015)。《智慧醫院設計》。財團法人永齡健康基金會。 10. 財團法人永齡健康基金會(2018)。《自己的醫院自己設計》。財團法人永齡健康基金會。 11. 財團法人永齡健康基金會(2018)。《醫院設計方程式》。財團法人永齡健康基金會。 12. 高翠霜(譯,原作者Peter F. Drucker) (2000)。《哈佛商業評論績效評估:經理人真正需要的資訊》,台北:天下文化。 13. 國家發展委員會(2019)。人口推估。 14. 許嘉霖(2009)。「提升服務品質的思維與作法」,《品質月刊》,第 45 卷第 2 期,29-37。 15. 陳家聲(2010)。「政府機關創新服務樣態之探討」,《研考雙月刊》,第 34 卷第 5 期,30-38。 16. 陳萬淇(1992)。《個案研究法》. 台北:華泰書局。 17. 黃光玉、 劉念夏、陳清文譯(2004)。《媒介與傳播研究方法:質化與量化研究途徑》。臺北:風雲論壇。 18. 趙碧華、朱美珍編譯(1995)。《研究方法-社會工作暨人文科學領域的運用》。臺北:雙葉書廊。 19. 劉嘉韻、鄧桂芬、簡浩正(2018)。避免浪費!重複CT、MRI 健保明年不埋單,聯合報。 20. 劉璁翰(2002)。企業導入ERP 系統階段性關鍵成功因素之研究。國立台灣科技大學生產系統工程與管理研究所碩士論文。 21. 衛生福利部(2019)。國民醫療保健支出(NHE)。 22. 鍾倫納(1993)。《應用社會科學研究法》。台北:台灣商務印書館公司。 英文部分 1. Aday, L. A., Begley, C. E., Lairson, D. R., & Balkrishnan, R. (2004), “Evaluating the Healthcare System: Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Equiity,” Chicago, Illinois, Academy Health, Washington, D. C.: Health Administration Press. 2. Beckers Hospital Review. (2016, January 29). 40 hospitals with innovation centers. Beckers Hospital Review. Retrieved from https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/lists/66-hospitals-and-health-systems-with-innovation-programs-2018.html 3. Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception Theory, Advance in Experimental Social Psychology. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 1-62. 4. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. and Mead M. (1987). The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information System. MIS Quarterly, 11, 3, 369-386. 5. Den Hertog, P. (2000). “Knowledge-Intensive Business Services as Co-Producers of Innovation,” International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol.4(4),491-528. 6. Donabedian, A. (1998), “The Definition of Quality and Approaches to its Assessment,"Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring, Vo1.Ι Ann Arbor, Michigam:Health Administration Press. 7. Dyrda, L. (2018). 66 hospitals and health systems with innovation programs, 2018. Beckers Hospital Review. Retrieved from https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/lists/66-hospitals-and-health-systems-with-innovation-programs-2018.html 8. Herzlinger, R.E. (2006). “Why Innovation in Health Care Is So Hard,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 84(5), 58-66. 9. McDonald, R. E. & Srinivasan, N. (2004), “Technological innovations in hospitals: what kind of competitive advantage does adoption lead to?” Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 28, 103-117. 10. Neuwirth, Z. (2019). Interview with Dr. Scott Weingarten. Docwire News. Retrieved from https://www.docwirenews.com/docwire-pick/home-page-picks/interview-with-dr-scott-weingarten/. 11. Prahalad, C. K. & Ramaswamy, V. (2002), “The co-creation connection,” Strategy and Business, 27 pp.50-61. 12. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004a). “Co-creating unique value with customers,” Strategy & Leadership, 32(3) pp.4-9. 13. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004b). “Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3) pp.5-14. 14. Ramaswamy, V. (2011). “It's about human experiences and beyond, to co-creation,” Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2) pp.195-196. 15. Regan, W. J. (1963). “The Service Revolution,"Journal of Marketing, Vol .27,32-36. 16. Smith, M. (1998). “The development of an innovation culture,” Financial Management, Vol.76, 22-24. 17. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd edition). Sage Publications: London. 18. U.S. News & World Report. (2018). Best Hospitals Honor Roll. U.S. News & World Report. 19. Van Ark, B. L. Broersma & P.D. Hertog (2003). “Services Innovation, Performance and Policy: a Review. Synthesis Report in the Framework of the Project Structurele Informatievoorziening in Diensten (SIID) (Structural Information Provision on Innovation in Services),” Hague: Ministry of Economic Affairs. 20. Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. A. (2008). “On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective,” European Management Journal, 26(3) pp. 145-152. 21. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/77366 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 「醫療創新」是近幾年非常熱門的名詞,但在全民健康保險制度及醫療評鑑制度底下,現行台灣醫院對「醫療創新」仍在摸索階段,甚至大規模的醫療創新中心並沒有像美國一樣如雨後春筍般出現,這並不代表台灣的醫療環境沒有急迫的創新需求,從政治、經濟及社會環境來看,「醫療服務使用量增加」及「醫療人員負擔增加」是台灣醫療正在面臨的重要議題,而這正需要透過「醫療創新」尋求解答。
面對這些議題,科技的導入並不能有效且根本地解決問題,而是必須從整個醫療體系的文化、流程開始思考醫療的本質,滿足所有利害關係人的需求及最大利益。W醫院急診室的改建案便是在這樣的環境下,所產生的一場關經由溝通說服,引導使用者參與的創新變革,此改建案的負責人藉由尋求外部顧問共同執行前期研究,這不同於以往改建的方式,必須藉由溝通與說服才能夠讓底下的急診同仁認同及參與,在規劃急診空間的過程中,他們從根本開始思考醫療的本質與核心,藉此重塑急診室的願景、文化。 本研究以此個案為核心,藉由撰寫個案重現創新變革發生的現場,接著讓理論與實務相互對話,從研究個案內容中學習理行並進的精神。其中萃取出的管理意涵,外部顧問與使用者間,經由「價值共創」的模式,透過DART架構,即對話(Dialogue)、資訊入口(Access to information)、資訊透明(Transparency of information)及利害分析(Risk-benefit analysis),成功完成了醫院內部的創新變革,同時也形塑了單位內的創新文化。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | “Medical innovation” has become a highly popular term in recent years, but “medical innovation” at Taiwanese hospitals are still in the developmental stages under our current NHI and medical evaluation policies. Unlike in the US, few large-scale medical innovation centers have been established, but this does not mean that Taiwan’s medical environment does not have urgent need for innovation. In terms of political, economic, and social environments, the important issues we are currently facing in Taiwan include “increase in usage of medical services” and “increased responsibilities for medical personnel”, both issues that can be resolved through “medical innovation”.
Technology cannot effectively resolve these issues at the source; what we need is a complete rethinking of core medical values present in the cultures and processes of medical institutions to fulfill the needs of stakeholders and maximize benefits. The re-design of the emergency room at W Hospital was a communication process and organizational transformation conducted under the current environment; users were invited to participate in the transformation process and the person in charge also sought help from external consultants in implementing research activities during the early stages. Unlike previous re-design processes, this case had to communicate and convince emergency personnel to agree with and participate in the process. During the re-design process, the people in charge considered the heart and core of medical services and then recreated the vision and culture of the emergency room. This study was built around this case. During the writing of this case study, we revisited on-site innovation transformations and created a dialogue between theory and practice, thus facilitating a learning-through-doing process. Management implications extracted from external consultants and users were structured using the DART framework (Dialogue, Access to information, Risk-benefit analysis, and Transparency of information) for “co-creation of value”. This case successfully completed internal innovation transformations at the hospital and also shaped a culture of innovation within relevant units. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-07-10T21:58:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-P05748011-1.pdf: 2410825 bytes, checksum: 0fbe8040e6221aec1d6e6db445215e69 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 ii
THESIS ABSTRACT iii 目 錄 v 圖目錄 vi 表目錄 vii 第一節、緒論 1 第一節、研究動機與背景 1 第二節、研究目的 3 第三節、研究架構 3 第二章、文獻探討 5 第一節、醫療產業分析 5 第二節、醫療服務創新 9 第三節、價值共創 12 第三章、研究方法 14 第一節、研究方法 14 第二節、資料蒐集 14 第三節、訪談對象與研究工具 16 第四章、研究結果—企業案例 17 第一節、急診室簡介 17 第二節、台灣急診室概況 18 第三節、W醫院急診室改建個案 20 第五章、結論與建議 39 第一節、研究結論 39 第二節、研究建議 44 參考文獻 46 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 醫療創新中的價值共創—以急診空間設計為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Value Co-creation in medical innovation: The Case of re-designing the emergency room | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 高旭繁;樊學良 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | ;; | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 醫療創新,組織變革,價值共創, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Medical innovation,organizational transformation,co-creation of value, | en |
dc.relation.page | 49 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201901538 | - |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-07-17 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 碩士在職專班商學組 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 商學組 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-2.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.35 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。