Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 會計與管理決策組
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/77356
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor林世銘zh_TW
dc.contributor.author李逢暉zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorFeng-Hui Leeen
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-10T21:57:57Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-31-
dc.date.copyright2019-08-12-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.date.submitted2002-01-01-
dc.identifier.citation一、中文資料
1. 中華民國精算學會(2017),106年保險負債貼現利率曲線建構,2019年7月1日取自http://www.airc.org.tw/re/seminar/17121117125900.pdf
2. 付丹丹(2015),國際財務報告準則的普適性研究,第11期,金融監管研究。
3. 李紀珠(2003),台灣金融監理體系之改革與建制—我國金融監理機構一元化,臺灣銀行季刊,第54卷第4期,2003/12/1。
4. 金融監督管理委員會保險局(2013),國際保險業清償能力監理制度之研究,金融監督管理委員會保險局。
5. 財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會/臺灣財務報導準則委員會(2019),國際財務報導準則第17號保險合約(2018年版),財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會/臺灣財務報導準則委員會。
6. 詹芳書、黃雅文(2015),美國保險監理官協會(NAIC)之清償能力現代化倡議(SMI)最新發展研究報告,財團法人保險事業發展中心。

二、英文資料
1. Actuarial Standards Board (2010). Final Standards – Practice-Specific Standards for Insurers, Section 2300 – Valuation of Policy Liabilities: Life and Health (Accident and Sickness) Insurance, Actuarial Standards Board.
2. American Academy of Actuaries Life Principle-Based Approach Practice Note Work Group (2014). Life Principle-Based Reserves Under VM-20, American Academy of Actuaries Life Principle-Based Approach Practice Note Work Group.
3. Aon Benfield (2011). Asia Pacific Solvency Regulation Non-Life Solvency Calculations for Selected Asia Pacific Countries/Regions, Aon Benfield
4. Asia Insurance Review (2017). Aon Benfield: Actuarial software to ease shift to IFRS 17 compliance, Asia Insurance Review, retrieved July 1, 2019, from http://www3.asiainsurancereview.com/Magazine/ReadMagazineArticle/aid/39556/Aon-Benfield-Actuarial-software-to-ease-shift-to-IFRS-17-compliance
5. BaFin (2017). BaFin’s 2017 Annual Report-Accounting, BaFin.
6. Black, J. (2008). Forms and Paradoxes of Principles Based Regulation, LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers, 12.
7. Canadian Institute of Actuaries (CIA) (2010). Canadian Methods for the Valuation of Insurance Contracts (Life and P&C) to Satisfy the Requirements of IFRS 4.14, Canadian Institute of Actuaries (CIA).
8. Canadian Institute of Actuaries (CIA) (2017). Calibration of Stochastic Risk-Free Interest Rate Models for Use in CALM Valuation, Canadian Institute of Actuaries (CIA).
9. Chan, K. C. (2010). The Canadian Valuation Practice and Profit Pattern, Sun Life Financial, retrieved July 1, 2019, from https://www.soa.org/uploadedFiles/Files/Pd/crc-chan-presentation.pdf
10. differencebetween.net (2019). Difference between GAAP and Statutory Accounting, retrieved July 1, 2019, from http://www.differencebetween.net/business/difference-between-gaap-and-statutory-accounting/#ixzz4cePXeXtT
11. Eder, A., Keiler, S. & Pichi, H. (2013), Interest rate risk and the swiss solvency test, Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper.
12. European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) (2018). Summary of US GAAP requirements for insurance (including proposed changes to the Accounting for Long-Duration Insurance Contracts) and comparison with IFRS 17 Issues Paper, European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG).
13. EY (2011). Solvency II implications for Asian life insurers, EY, retrieved July 1, 2019, from https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Solvency_II_implications_for_Asian_Life_Insurers/$FILE/Solvency_II_implications_for_Asian_Life_Insurers.pdf
14. EY (2015). Risk-based capital and governance in Asia-Pacific: emerging regulations, EY.
15. EY (2017). IFRS 17 accounting and capital changes agenda for Asia-Pacific insurers, EY.
16. EY (2017). Technical Line NAIC — final guidance How principle-based reserving will affect life insurers, EY Accounting Link.
17. Financial Services Agency (2015). IFRS Adoption Report, Financial Services Agency.
18. FRC (2017). FRC defers decision on updating FRS 102 for major changes in IFRS, FRC, retrieved July 1, 2019, from https://www.frc.org.uk/news/june-2017/frc-defers-decision-on-updating-frs-102-for-major,
19. Hines, W. & Yadatore, K. (2018). U.S. GAAP targeted improvements for long-duration insurance contracts: Update II, Milliman.
20. Hoshino, T., Lambrechts, K., Brethouwer, S., Hines, W. (2018). IFRS 17 coverage units for CSM amortization, retrieved July 1, 2019, from http://www.milliman.com/insight/2018/IFRS 17-coverage-units-for-CSM-amortization/
21. ICAEW (2019). FRS 103 Insurance Contracts, The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, retrieved July 1, 2019, from https://www.icaew.com/technical/financial-reporting/new-uk-gaap/frs-103-insurance-contracts
22. IFRS (2016). IFRS Application Around the World Jurisdictional Profile: United Kingdom, IFRS, retrieved July 1, 2019, from https://www.ifrs.org/-/media/feature/around-the-world/jurisdiction-profiles/united-kingdom-ifrs-profile.pdf
23. IFRS (2018). IFRS Application Around the World Jurisdictional Profile: Japan, IFRS, retrieved July 1, 2019, from https://www.ifrs.org/-/media/feature/around-the-world/jurisdiction-profiles/japan-ifrs-profile.pdf
24. IFRS Foundation (2017). IFRS Standards Effects Analysis-IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts, IFRS Foundation
25. IFRS Foundation (2018). IFRS Application Around The World Jurisdictional Profile: Switzerland, IFRS Foundation
26. Institute of Singapore Chartered Accountants (ISCA) (2017). IFRS Convergence 2018 Implementation Roadmap, Institute of Singapore Chartered Accountants (ISCA)
27. Insurance Information Institute (2014). Background on: Insurance accounting, Insurance Information Institute, retrieved July 1, 2019, from https://www.iii.org/article/background-on-insurance-accounting
28. Lucas, P. (2017). UK insurers hit by IFRS 17 shake-up, Insurance business UK, retrieved July 1, 2019, from https://www.insurancebusinessmag.com/uk/news/breaking-news/uk-insurers-hit-by-ifrs-17-shakeup-67922.aspx
29. Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) (2016). RBC 2 Review – Third Consultation, Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS).
30. NAIC (2017). Principle-Based Reserving (PBR) Implementation Plan, National Association of Insurance Commissioners, retrieved July 1, 2019, from https://www.naic.org/documents/committees_ex_pbr_implementation_tf_150323_pbr_implementation_plan.pdf
31. NAIC (2018). National Association of Insurance Commissioners Valuation Manual Jan. 1, 2018 Edition, National Association of Insurance Commissioners, retrieved July 1, 2019, from https://www.naic.org/documents/prod_serv_2018_valuation_manual.pdf
32. Nobes, C. & Zeff, S. (2016), Have Canada, Japan and Switzerland Adopted IFRS?, Australian Accounting Review.
33. Nobes, C. (2011), International Variations in IFRS Adoption and Practice, ACCA.
34. Norton Rose Fulbright (2018). 2018: Insurance regulation in Asia Pacific, Norton Rose Fulbright guide.
35. Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) (2018). Life Insurance Capital Adequacy Test Guideline, Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI).
36. Oliver Wyman (2017). #BreakingtheMould: LICAT Overview, Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Commentary, retrieved July 1, 2019, from https://www.caa.com.bb/Attachments/2017/28_-_Jacques_Tremblay_-_LICAT_Overview.pdf
37. PwC (2011). International comparison of insurance taxation, PwC.
38. PwC (2011). PwC International Comparison of Insurance Taxation 2011, PwC, retrieved July 1, 2019, from https://www.pwc.at/de/publikationen/financial-services/international-comparison-of-insurance-taxation-2011.pdf
39. PwC (2011). PwC International Comparison of Insurance Taxation 2011 (Japan), PwC, retrieved July 1, 2019, from https://www.pwc.com/sg/en/international-comparison-of-insurance-taxation-2011/assets/japan_comparisonofinstaxation_final.pdf
40. Seekings, C. (2018). IFRS 17 to be more costly than Solvency II, The Actuary, retrieved July 1, 2019, from http://www.theactuary.com/news/2018/05/ifrs-17-to-be-more-costly-than-solvency-ii/
41. Veney, D. Norman, J. and Gibrais, V. (2017), IFRS 17 Impact on Contracts Issued in Different Jurisdictions, Institute and Faculty of Actuaries.

三、網路資料
1. 金融服務管理局網站:http://www.fsa.gov.uk
2. The Japanese Institute of Certified Public Accountants: http://hp.jicpa.or.jp/english/accounting/standards/index.html
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/77356-
dc.description.abstract自國際會計準則理事會(International Accounting Standard Board, IASB)於 2017年5月18日發布了國際財務報導準則第17 號「保險合約」(IFRS 17)後,相關會計處理與現行保險會計差異甚大,故可以預期保險業主管機關及保險業者將面臨重大變革。從保險業者之角度來看,導入IFRS 17涉及之層面絕不僅限於財務會計,還包含了精算、投資及資訊等部門,必須加以整合才能符合IFRS 17公報規定,同時也滿足資產負債管理及最終創造保戶及投資人最高效益之目的;而對主管機關而言,除現行保險法令須配合修正外,於擬定配套措施協助保險業者順利接軌,以降低潛在衝擊之同時,尚須考量監理需求,實屬不易。
本論文係藉由分析並彙整IFRS 17規範,同時了解採用IFRS國家採行現況與因應措施,提出準則差異之影響分析、可行之因應準備作業及相關法規修正與配套機制之建議,供保險業者及主管機關參考。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIFRS 17 introduces a new measurement model for insurance contracts and a new basis of reporting. From the perspective of insurers, preparing for and implementing the new standard will present challenges. It will require substantial effort, and new or upgraded systems, processes and controls. Coordination between functions such as Finance, Actuarial and IT will be essential, and it will be important to educate business users and investors on what to expect. From the perspective of regulators, the responsibility lies in the area of modification of laws and regulations to accommodate IFRS 17 and formulation of supplementary measures to assist insurers to smoothly adopt IFRS 17, while at the same time achieving regulatory purpose.
This thesis analyzes and aggregates IFRS 17 standards and the current situations of the countries applying IFRS, and accordingly proposes the impact analysis, feasible preparations, and recommendations regarding regulation amendments and mechanisms for insurance companies, which could be provided to insurers and the competent authority for reference.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-07-10T21:57:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-108-P06744004-1.pdf: 2648451 bytes, checksum: 9fa0513b9989ec229b932d6a1445bec1 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2019
en
dc.description.tableofcontents中文摘要 ii
THESIS ABSTRACT iii
目 錄 iv
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
第一章、緒論 1
第一節、研究動機與目的 1
第二節、研究方法 3
第三節、研究步驟 4
第二章、IFRS 17之主要規範內容 5
第一節、保險合約會計之衡量模型 5
第二節、財務報表表達與揭露 41
第三節、具參與特性商品之會計處理 55
第四節、保險合約彙總層級 56
第五節、新、舊制度轉換之會計處理 59
第三章、IFRS 17與我國現行制度之差異比較及可能影響評估 68
第一節、與現行保險會計處理之差異及可能影響評估 68
第二節、與現行準備金制度之差異及可能影響評估 88
第四章、我國未來因應IFRS 17之建議 98
第一節、準備作業及時程規劃 98
第二節、過渡時期因應措施 100
第三節、因應IFRS 17之試算方式 101
第四節、其他配套措施及機制 103
第五章、結論與建議 108
第一節、結論 108
第二節、建議 108
參考文獻 112
附錄、專案計畫工作時程與工作分配 118
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject國際財務報導準則公報第17號zh_TW
dc.subject一般衡量模型zh_TW
dc.subject保費分攤法zh_TW
dc.subject變動收費法zh_TW
dc.subjectPremium Allocation method (PAA)en
dc.subjectIFRS 17en
dc.subjectGeneral measurement model (GMM)en
dc.subjectVariable Fee Approach (VFA)en
dc.titleIFRS 17對於我國保險會計制度影響及因應zh_TW
dc.titleImpacts and Response Measures of IFRS 17 on Insurance Accounting Systems in Taiwanen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear107-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee石百達;陳坤志zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee;;en
dc.subject.keyword國際財務報導準則公報第17號,一般衡量模型,保費分攤法,變動收費法,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordIFRS 17,General measurement model (GMM),Premium Allocation method (PAA),Variable Fee Approach (VFA),en
dc.relation.page122-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201901834-
dc.rights.note未授權-
dc.date.accepted2019-07-24-
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept碩士在職專班會計與管理決策組-
顯示於系所單位:會計與管理決策組

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-107-2.pdf
  未授權公開取用
2.59 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved