請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/77060完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 許文馨(Andrey Wen-Hsin Hsu) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ting-Yi Chiang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 江庭誼 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-10T21:45:05Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-07-10T21:45:05Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020-07-15 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-07-07 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部分 1. 司徒達賢(2000),《策略管理》,台北:遠流。 2. 吳思華(2000),《策略九說:策略思考的本質》,台北:臉譜。 3. 呂美玲(2001),《廠商資源能力發展與組織學習關聯性之研究-以發展新事業廠商為例》,銘傳大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。 4. 林晉寬(1995),《從資源基礎理論探討資源特性與成長策略之關係》,政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。 5. 胡幼圃(1999),「推動我國新藥臨床試驗之現況與展望」,《台北市醫師公會會刊》,43期10卷,頁4-9。 6. 陳振祥(1997),《ODM策略之理論架構與實證》,台灣大學商學研究所博士論文。 7. 陳錦輝(2001),《應用資源基礎論探討經營策略與競爭優勢:以高雄港為例》,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。 8. 曾寶玲(1999),《企業核心能力與人力資源策略關係之研究》,國立台灣師範大學工業科技教育學系碩士論文。 9. 謝佳宏(2002),《核心能力觀點下台灣工具機企業新事業發展類型之探討》,東海大學工業工程學系碩士論文。 二、英文文獻 1. Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993), “Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent,” Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), pp.33-46. 2. Ansoff, H. I., and McDonnel, E. (1990), Implanting Strategic Management, 2nd ed., NJ: Prentice Hall Inc., pp.52-54. 3. Barney, J. B. (1986), “Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy,” Management Science, Vol.42, pp.1231-1241. 4. Barney, J. B. (1991), “Firm Resource and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management, Vol.17, pp.99-120. 5. Chandler, A. D. Jr. (1962), Strategy and Structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 6. Chatterjee, S. and Wernerfelt, B. (1991), “The Link Between Resources and Type of Diversification: Theory and Evidence,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.12, pp.33-48. 7. Collis, D. J. (1991), “A Resource-Based Analysis of Global Competition: The Case of the Bearing Industry,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.12, pp.49-68. 8. Collis, D. J. and Montgomery, C. A. (1997), Corporate Strategy, Boston: IRWIN, Mcgraw-Hill Company. 9. Gallon, Mark R., Stillman, H. M. and Coates, D. (1995), “Putting Core Competency Thinking into Practice,” Technology Management, pp.20-28. 10. Grant, R. M. (1991), “The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation,” California Management Review, 33(3), pp.114-135. 11. Hafeez, K., Zhang, Y. B. and Malak, N. (2002), “Core Competence for Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Structured Methodology for Identifying Core Competence,” IEEE Transactions On Engineering Management, 49(1), pp.28-35. 12. Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C. K. (1993), “Strategy as Stretch and Leverage,” Harvard Business Review, 71(2), pp.75-84. 13. Hamel, G. and Heene, A. (1994), “The Concept of Core Competence,” Competence-based Competition, NY: John Wiley Sons, pp.11-34. 14. Hamel, G. (2000), Leading the Revolution, Harvard Business School Press, pp.61-113. 15. Leonard-Barton D. (1995), Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation, Harvard Business School Press, Boston Mass. 16. Long, C. and Vickers-koch, M. (1995), “Using Core Capabilities to Create Competitive Advantage,” Organizational Dynamics, 24(1), pp.6-22. 17. Penrose, E. T. (1959), The Growth of the Firm, M. E. Sharpe Inc., New York. 18. Peteraf, M. A. (1993), “The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View,” Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), pp.179-191. 19. Porter, M. E. (1980), Competitive Strategy, New York: Free Press. 20. Porter, M. E. (1985), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York: Free Press. 21. Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, G. (1990), “The Core Competence of the Corporation,” Harvard Business Review, May-Jane, pp.79-91. 22. Robbins, S. P. (1994), Management, 4th ed., New Jersey: Prentice Hall. 23. Rumet, R. P. (1984), “Toward a Strategic Theory of the Firm,” in R. B. Lamb(ed.) Competitive Strategy Management, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp.557-570. 24. Sanchez, R. (1991), “Strategic Flexibility, Real Options, and Product-Based Strategy,” Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA02139, U.S.A. 25. Sanchez, R. (1993), “Strategic Flexibility, Firm Organization, and Managerial Work in Dynamic Markets: A Strategic Options Perspective,” Advances in Strategic Management, Vol.9, pp.251-291. 26. Sanchez, R. (1995), “Strategic Flexibility in Product Competition,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.16, pp.135-159. 27. Sanchez, R. and Thomas, H. (1996), Dynamics of Competence-Based Competition: Theory and Practice in the New Strategic Management, London: Elsevier, pp.63-84. 28. Stalk, G., Evans, P. and Shulman, L. E. (1992), “Competing on Capabilities: The New Rules of Corporate Strategy,” Harvard Business Review, pp.57-69. 29. Teece, D. J. and Pisano, G. (1994), “The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), pp.537-556. 30. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997), “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management.” Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), pp.509-533. 31. Timmers, P. (1998), “Business Models for Electronic Markets,” Electronic Market, 8(2), pp.3-8. 32. Watkins, K.E., and Marsick, V. J. (1993), Sculpting the Learning Organization: Lessons in the Arts and Science of Systemic Change, San Francisco California: Jossey-Bass Publisher. 33. Wernerfelt, B. (1984), “A Resource-Based View of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), pp.171-180. 34. Weill, P. and Vitale, M. R. (2001), Place to Space: Migrating to eBusiness Models, Harvard Business School Press. 35. Yin, R. K. (1994), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd Edition, Stage Publication. 三、國內外醫藥機構及其他網站之參考網址 1. 美國食品藥品監督管理局(U.S. Food and Drug Administration,FDA)(https://www.fda.gov)。 2. 大陸國家藥品監督管理局(National Medical Products Administration,NMPA)(https://www.nmpa.gov.cn)。 3. 經濟部工業局(https://www.moeaidb.gov.tw)。 4. 行政院衛生福利部(http://www.mohw.gov.tw)。 5. 國家圖書館(http://lib.ncl.edu.tw)。 6. 國家圖書館遠距圖書服務系統(http://readopac.ncl.edu.tw)。 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/77060 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 新藥開發需要長周期及高資金的投入,是高風險,也是高獲利的產業,研發時程越短,專利的保護期就越長,獲利就愈大,因此,專業分工的委託研究機構(CRO)產業就應運而生,相對於全球委託研究機構產業發展進程,大陸委託研究機構產業仍處於萌芽階段。近幾年,大陸因為醫藥創新政策的催化、一致性評價的推進,以及全球委託研究機構市場的轉移等因素的影響下,使得大陸委託研究機構產業呈現爆發性的增長。 過去很少有對委託研究機構產業進行研究,而不同類型的委託研究機構產業想要能成功立足與成長,並不是簡單的一個因素就可以成功,尤其針對兩岸本土中小型的I期臨床試驗委託研究機構公司而言,更不是件容易的事,必須要發展出一種有效的經營模式(Business Model),才可以立足兩岸,放眼全球。 本研究係以台灣本土中小型的I期臨床試驗委託研究機構公司為個案研究對象,採用質性研究之描述性個案研究法(Descriptive Case Study),嘗試以Hamel(2000)之經營模式架構,從核心策略(Core Strategy)、策略性資源(Strategic Resources)、顧客介面(Customer Interface),以及價值網路(Value Network)四個構面,探討個案公司之經營模式。透過對個案公司經營模式的全面檢視,分別對兩岸本土中小型的I期臨床試驗委託研究機構產業及個案公司,提出經營上的建議。 經由本研究分析的結果,對兩岸本土中小型的I期臨床試驗委託研究機構產業而言,顯示出四個重要的結論: 1. 經營模式最重要的要素,首推策略性資源,同時結合核心策略與善用價值網路,以符合產業的關鍵性成功因素(key success factors)。 2. 有效的活動構造提升,能深化策略資源的能力,並支援核心策略的發展,才能區隔市場,提昇競爭力,建立競爭優勢。 3. 顧客利益的提供,有助於建立客戶滿意度與忠誠度,以及業務推廣,提升市場占有率。 4. 需透過持續的經驗及技術的累積,不斷的創新與善用資源配置,建立獨特性與差異性,以及動態管理的經營模式,才能建立企業長久的競爭優勢。 對個案公司提出之經營策略建議為: 1. 有效提升活動構造,以支援並深化核心策略及策略性資源的運用。 2. 善用國際化經驗能力的品牌與形象優勢,加強行銷業務活動。 3. 善用價值網路的支援與互補資源能力,共同開發業務與行銷,相互提升彼此的企業形象與聲譽。 4. 強化顧客介面與提供顧客利益的經營模式。 5. 強化經營模式各要素之效率與獨特性,以創造利潤,建立競爭優勢。 本研究對兩岸本土中小型的I期臨床試驗委託研究機構產業及個案公司,在其營運策略之擬定及調整上,具有一定的參考價值。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | New drug development requires a long period and high capital investment. It is a high-risk and high-profit industry. The shorter the R D period, the longer the patent protection period and the greater the profit. Therefore, the Contract Research Organization (CRO) industry of professional division of labor emerged at the historic moment. Compared with the global Contract Research Organization industry development level, the Contract Research Organization industry is still in the embryonic stage. In recent years, due to the influence of factors such as the catalysis of pharmaceutical innovation policies, the promotion of consistency evaluation, and the transfer of the global market for commissioned research institutions, the industry of mainland the Contract Research Organization has shown explosive growth. In the past, there have been few studies on the Contract Research Organization industry, and different types of Contract Research Organization industry want to be able to successfully establish and grow, it is not a single factor that can be created, especially for the cross-strait local small and medium-sized phase I clinical trial (including the BE trial) Contract Research Organization company is not an easy task. It must develop an effective business model before it can stand on both sides of the strait and look at the world. This research is based on the Taiwan local small and medium-sized phase I clinical trials Contract Research Organization company as case study objects. This research adopts Descriptive Case Study method and takes system integration vendors as the object. Through theoretical and practical verification, it tries to describe how business strategies were made based on the structure of Hamel Business Model (2000). According to business model of Hamel, refine the business model of the studied company via the Core Strategy, Strategic Resources, Customer Interface and Value Network. Through the overview of the studied company’s business model, we try to provide the cross-strait local small and medium-sized phase I clinical trials Contract Research Organization industry and case company recommendations to the company strategy. Based on the analysis of this study, for the cross-strait local small and medium-sized phase I clinical trials Contract Research Organization industry, it shows four important conclusions: 1. The most important element of the business model, the first push strategic resources, combined with the core strategy and the best use of value network, in order to meet the industry's key success factors. 2. Effective activity construction enhances, deepens the ability of strategic resources, and supports the development of core strategies, in order to market segments, enhance competitiveness, and build competitive advantage. 3. The provision of customer benefits helps to build customer satisfaction and loyalty, as well as business promotion, to enhance market share. 4. Only through continuous accumulation of experience and technology, constant innovation and good use of resource allocation, the establishment of uniqueness and difference, and a dynamic management business model can we establish a long-term competitive advantage. The business strategy recommendations for the case company are: 1. Effectively enhance activity structure to support and deepen the use of core strategies and strategic resources. 2. Making good use of the brand and image advantages of international experience and capabilities to strengthen marketing business activities. 3. Make good use of the support of the value network and complementary resources, jointly develop business and marketing, and mutually enhance each other's corporate image and reputation. 4. Strengthen the customer interface and provide customer benefits business model. 5. Strengthen the efficiency and uniqueness of all the factor in the business model to make profit and establish a competitive advantage. This thesis has reference value to draft and adjust business strategy of cross-strait the local small and medium-sized phase I clinical trials Contract Research Organization industry and case company. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-07-10T21:45:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0707202015094400.pdf: 3154724 bytes, checksum: bab0fda20a20c61d7f31e5535df732c0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i 中文摘要 ii 英文摘要 iv 目 錄 vii 圖目錄 ix 表目錄 xi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節、研究背景與動機 1 第二節、研究問題與目的 3 第三節、研究流程 5 第四節、研究論文之章節與結構 7 第二章 文獻探討 8 第一節、五力分析 8 第二節、資源基礎理論 13 第三節、核心競爭能力 22 第四節、經營模式 25 第三章 研究方法 30 第一節、研究架構 30 第二節、研究方法 31 第三節、研究變數之定義與說明 34 第四章 委託研究機構產業的現況分析 36 第一節、委託研究機構產業沿革、範疇及特性 36 第二節、全球委託研究機構產業概況 42 第三節、中國大陸委託研究機構產業概況 46 第四節、兩岸本土中小型委託研究機構產業面臨的問題 50 第五章 個案公司研究與分析 56 第一節、個案公司簡介 56 第二節、個案公司經營模式的構面因素分析 65 第三節、個案公司經營模式的構面連結分析 77 第四節、個案公司經營模式的整體策略評估 82 第五節、個案公司經營模式彙整 86 第六節、個案公司SWOT分析 90 第六章 結論與建議 94 第一節、研究結論 94 第二節、研究建議 96 第三節、研究限制 97 參考文獻 98 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 核心能力 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 經營模式 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 委託研究機構 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 五力分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 生體相等性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 資源基礎理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Bioequivalence | en |
| dc.subject | Five forces analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Business model | en |
| dc.subject | Contract research organization (CRO) | en |
| dc.subject | Resource-based view | en |
| dc.subject | Core competence | en |
| dc.title | 台灣臨床委託研究機構(CRO)進入中國市場的經營策略-以鈦翔公司為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Management Strategy of Taiwan Contract Research Organization (CRO) Entering Chinese Market - The Case of MedFly Company | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 劉心才(Hsin-Tsai Liu) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳家麟(Chialin Chen),陳俊忠(Chun-Chung Chen) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 委託研究機構,五力分析,資源基礎理論,核心能力,經營模式,生體相等性, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Contract research organization (CRO),Five forces analysis,Resource-based view,Core competence,Business model,Bioequivalence, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 100 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202001367 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-07-08 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計與管理決策組 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 會計與管理決策組 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0707202015094400.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 3.08 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
