請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/76493
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 季瑋珠(Wei-Chu Chie,) | |
dc.contributor.author | Rou-Xiang Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林柔香 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-09T15:53:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-29 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-08-29 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-08-20 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Bélanger, E., Ahmed, T., Vafaei, A., Curcio, C. L., Phillips, S. P., & Zunzunegui, M. V. (2016). Sources of social support associated with health and quality of life: A cross-sectional study among Canadian and Latin American older adults. BMJ Open,6(6). doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011503
Buys, L., & Miller, E. (2006). The meaning of' active ageing' to older Australians: Exploring the relative importance of health, participation and security Carstensen, L. L. (1992). Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and aging, 7(3), 331. Chambre, S. M. (1984). Is volunteering a substitute for role loss in old age? An empirical test of activity theory. The Gerontologist, 24(3), 292-298. Cohen, S. (1987). Social support and health. Orlando, FL: Acad. Press. Crandall, J. E., & Rasmussen, R. D. (1975). Purpose in life as related to specific values. Journal of Clinical Psychology,31(3), 483-485. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(197507)31:33.0.co;2-c Dahal, G. R., & Adhikari, K. P. (2008). Bridging, Linking, and Bonding Social Capital in Collective Action: The Case of Kalahan Forest Reserve in the Philippines. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. doi:10.2499/capriwp79 Deindl, C., Brandt, M., & Hank, K. (2015). Social Networks, Social Cohesion, and Later-Life Health. Social Indicators Research,126(3), 1175-1187. doi:10.1007/s11205-015-0926-5 Dijkers, M. P. (2004). Quality of life of individuals with spinal cord injury: A review of conceptualization, measurement, and research findings. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development,42(3sup1), 87. doi:10.1682/jrrd.2004.08.0100 Ebersole, P. (1998). Types and depth of written life meanings. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Erikson, E. H., & Erikson, J. M. (1998). The life cycle completed (extended version). WW Norton & Company. Erikson, E. H., Erikson, J. M., & Kivnick, H. Q. (1994). Vital involvement in old age. WW Norton & Company. Farquhar, M. (1995). Elderly peoples definitions of quality of life. Social Science & Medicine,41(10), 1439-1446. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00117-p Fougeyrollas, P., Boucher, N., Edwards, G., Grenier, Y., & Noreau, L. (2019). The Disability Creation Process Model: A Comprehensive Explanation of Disabling Situations as a Guide to Developing Policy and Service Programs. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 21(1). Fougeyrollas, P., Cloutier, R., Bergeron, H., Côté, J., & St Michel, G. (1998). The Quebec classification: Disability creation process. Quebec: International Network on the Disability Creation Process. Fougeyrollas, P., Noreau, L., & Boschen, K. (2002). Interaction of Environment with Individual Characteristics and Social Participation: Theoretical Perspectives and Applications in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation,7(3), 1-16. doi:10.1310/qdnn-8fn0-njmg-tvwb Friedman, D., Parikh, N. S., Giunta, N., Fahs, M. C., & Gallo, W. T. (2011). The influence of neighborhood factors on the quality of life of older adults attending New York City senior centers: Results from the Health Indicators Project. Quality of Life Research,21(1), 123-131. doi:10.1007/s11136-011-9923-6 Fung, H. H., Carstensen, L. L., & Lang, F. R. (2001). Age-Related Patterns in Social Networks among European Americans and African Americans: Implications for Socioemotional Selectivity across the Life Span. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development,52(3), 185-206. doi:10.2190/1abl-9be5-m0x2-lr9v George, L. K. (1978). The impact of personality and social status factors upon levels of activity and psychological well-being. Journal of Gerontology, 33(6), 840-847. Greve, W., & Staudinger, U. M. (2015). Resilience in later adulthood and old age: Resources and potentials for successful aging. Helgeson, V. S. (2003). Quality of Life Research,12(1suppl), 25-31. doi:10.1023/a:1023509117524 Henning-Smith, C. (2014). Quality of Life and Psychological Distress Among Older Adults. Journal of Applied Gerontology,35(1), 39-61. doi:10.1177/0733464814530805 Kaufman, S. R. (1994). The ageless self: Sources of meaning in late life. Univ of Wisconsin Press. Kawachi, I. (2004). Commentary: Reconciling the three accounts of social capital. International Journal of Epidemiology,33(4), 682-690. doi:10.1093/ije/dyh177 Kotter-Grühn, D., & Hess, T. M. (2012). The Impact of Age Stereotypes on Self-perceptions of Aging Across the Adult Lifespan. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B,67(5), 563-571. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbr153 Laslett, P. (1996). The Emergence of the Third Age. A Fresh Map of Life,99-122. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-24615-1_6 Levasseur, M., Tribble, D. S., & Desrosiers, J. (2009). Meaning of quality of life for older adults: Importance of human functioning components. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics,49(2). doi:10.1016/j.archger.2008.08.013 Litwin, H., & Stoeckel, K. J. (2013). Confidant Network Types and Well-Being Among Older Europeans. The Gerontologist,54(5), 762-772. doi:10.1093/geront/gnt056 Mulholland, F., & Jackson, J. (2018). The experience of older adults with anxiety and depression living in the community: Aging, occupation and mental wellbeing. British Journal of Occupational Therapy,81(11), 657-666. doi:10.1177/0308022618777200 Netuveli, G. (2006). Quality of life at older ages: Evidence from the English longitudinal study of aging (wave 1). Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health,60(4), 357-363. doi:10.1136/jech.2005.040071 Nilsson, J., Rana, A. K., & Kabir, Z. N. (2006). Social Capital and Quality of Life in Old Age. Journal of Aging and Health,18(3), 419-434. doi:10.1177/0898264306286198 Nosraty, L., Jylhä, M., Raittila, T., & Lumme-Sandt, K. (2015). Perceptions by the oldest old of successful aging, Vitality 90+ Study. Journal of Aging Studies, 32, 50-58 Paúl, C., Ribeiro, O., & Teixeira, L. (2012). Active ageing: an empirical approach to the WHO model. Current gerontology and geriatrics research, 2012. Reblin, M., & Uchino, B. N. (2008). Social and emotional support and its implication for health. Current Opinion in Psychiatry,21(2), 201-205. doi:10.1097/yco.0b013e3282f3ad89 Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (1998). The Contours of Positive Human Health. Psychological Inquiry,9(1), 1-28. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0901_1 Sampson, R. J. (1997). Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy. Science,277(5328), 918-924. doi:10.1126/science.277.5328.918 Sarvimaki, A., & Stenbock-Hult, B. (2000). Quality of life in old age described as a sense of well-being, meaning and value. Journal of Advanced Nursing,32(4), 1025-1033. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01568.x Sarvimaki, A., & Stenbock-Hult, B. (2000). Quality of life in old age described as a sense of well-being, meaning and value. Journal of Advanced Nursing,32(4), 1025-1033. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01568.x Shenkman, G., Ifrah, K., & Shmotkin, D. (2017). The association between negative attitudes toward aging and mental health among middle-aged and older gay and heterosexual men in Israel. Aging & Mental Health,22(4), 503-511. doi:10.1080/13607863.2016.1274374 Stephan, Y., Sutin, A. R., & Terracciano, A. (2015). How Old Do You Feel? The Role of Age Discrimination and Biological Aging in Subjective Age. Plos One,10(3). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119293 Subramanian, S. V. (2002). Social Trust and Self-Rated Health in US Communities: A Multilevel Analysis. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine,79(90001). doi:10.1093/jurban/79.suppl_1.s21 Sutin, A. R., Stephan, Y., Carretta, H., & Terracciano, A. (2015). Perceived Discrimination and Physical, Cognitive, and Emotional Health in Older Adulthood. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry,23(2), 171-179. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2014.03.007 Tornstam, L. (1992). The quo vadis of gerontology: On the scientific paradigm of gerontology. The Gerontologist, 32(3), 318-326. Tsai, S. Y., Chi, L. Y., Lee, L. S., & Chou, P. (2004). Health-related quality of life among urban, rural, and island community elderly in Taiwan. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association= Taiwan yi zhi, 103(3), 196-204. Twigg, J. (2004). The body, gender, and age: Feminist insights in social gerontology. Journal of Aging Studies,18(1), 59-73. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2003.09.001 Webb, E., Blane, D., Mcmunn, A., & Netuveli, G. (2010). Proximal predictors of change in quality of life at older ages. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health,65(6), 542-547. doi:10.1136/jech.2009.101758 Windle, G., & Woods, R. T. (2004). Variations in subjective wellbeing: The mediating role of a psychological resource. Wu, T., Chie, W., Liu, J., Liaw, C., Netuveli, G., & Blane, D. (2014). Association of quality of life with laboratory measurements and lifestyle factors in community dwelling older people in Taiwan. Aging & Mental Health,19(6), 548-559. doi:10.1080/13607863.2014.962000 Zaninotto, P., Falaschetti, E., & Sacker, A. (2009). Age trajectories of quality of life among older adults: Results from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Quality of Life Research,18(10), 1301-1309. doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9543-6 黃芳誼. (2015). 成功老化之實徵性研究: 以美國養老院老人生命歷程為例. 新社會政策, (40), 66-79. 陳向明. (2002). 社會科學質的硏究. 五南圖書出版股份有限公司. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/76493 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 台灣老年人口比例已在82年超過7%,達世界衛生組織高齡化社會定義,並在107年達14.5%,進入高齡社會。於國際間亦屬老化速度快速之國家。內政部統計處106年生命簡易表顯示台灣民眾平均壽命為80.4歲,男性77.3歲、女性83.7歲;生命歷程日趨延長,老年生活品質提升為當代重要課題。本研究共收集36位60歲以上長者。來源有社區、街頭、養老院。地點主要為北部區域,包含台北市、新北市、基隆市。前驅研究包含參與四個月的社區觀察,與非正式訪談。研究採深度訪談與觀察法。
本研究描繪不同性別、年齡層、職業、社經地位之老人進入60歲以上的身心經驗,最低60歲,最高101歲,採變異度最大抽樣法選取樣本。運用質性研究紮根理論,經沉浸(immersion)與萃取(crystallization)方式整理文字稿,抽取出來的主題主要為老化定義(心理、生理層面)、個性、適應、社交(含對象與目的)、靈性(含宗教、生命意義、生命目標、生活重心);良好老化重要認知:個體性、視老化為一階段、肯定;影響老年生活重要因素:經濟、年齡與性別、居住環境。訪綱與訪談衍生自老化理論、老年人生活品質等文獻與前驅研究構成的研究架構,佐以相關文獻。並以良好老化(aging well)做為橋樑與核心,盼本研究能提供當局、個人、照顧者對於老年生命的理解。 結論為一、不同長輩會有不同良好老化經驗,應了解與傾聽其性格、生長背景脈絡、現在背景(如經濟、年齡性別、居住環境)。二、不同長輩會有不同良好老化經驗,應了解與傾聽其性格、生長背景脈絡、現在背景(如經濟、年齡性別、居住環境)。三、需有足夠經濟基礎、居住環境,佐以適當社交與靈性需求。並注意資源可近性。四、協助其自主適應:視老化為一階段、個體性、肯定。五、身體與認知的健康依舊首當重要 關鍵詞:生活品質;老;高齡;老化;活躍老化;成功老化;良好老化;適應 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The proportion of people older than 65 years old in Taiwan has exceeded 7% in 1993, reaching the definition of the aging society of the World Health Organization, and reached 14.5% in 2018, entering the aged society, which is one of the fasted-aging societies in the world. The 2017 life table of the Statistics Department of the Ministry of the Interior shows that the average life of Taiwanese is 80.4 years old, 77.3 years for men and 83.7 years for women. The life course is prolonging and the quality of life of the elderly is really an important issue. A total of 36 older adults over 60 years were collected from communities, streets, and nursing homes in northern Taiwan, including Taipei City, New Taipei City, and Keelung City. The pilot study included four months of community observation and informal interview. We used in-depth interviews and observations in this qualitative study.
This study depicts physical and mental experiences of the older adults over 60 years with different genders, age groups, occupations, and socioeconomic status. The minimum age is 60 years and the highest is 101 years. With maximum variation sampling, we used grounded theories, immersion and crystallization to analyze contents. The themes are subjective aging (Including psychological and physical view), personality, adaptation, social (Including object and purpose), spirituality (Including religion, life meaning, life purpose, life focus); important concept distributing aging well: individuality, knowing aging is a stage, affirmation; important factors affecting the life of the older people: economic status, age and gender, living environment. The interviews were derived from the framework consisting of literatures about aging theory, quality of life of older adults and pilot study, and related literature. With ‘aging well’ as a bridge and core, I hope that this study can provide the authorities, individuals, and caregivers with an understanding of old age. The conclusion is that, first, the different elders will have different experiences of ‘aging well’. People should understand their personality, life course, and current background (such as economic status, age, gender, living environment). Second, it is necessary to ensure older adults have enough economic basis, living environment, and appropriate social and spiritual satisfaction. And pay attention to the availability of resources. Third, the concept to assist their autonomous adaptation: knowing aging is a new stage, individuality, and affirmation. Last, the health of the body and cognition is still the first important. Keywords: quality of life; aging; old age; active aging; successful aging; aging well; adaptation | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-07-09T15:53:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R06849038-1.pdf: 2047763 bytes, checksum: 36fbc4d477f59425333f3f8adc52955a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 i
英文摘要 iii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究目的 1 第三節 研究重要性 2 第二章 文獻探討 3 第一節 老化的定義 3 第二節 老年人生活品質 3 第三節 老化理論 4 第三章 研究方法 7 第一節 研究者的角色 7 第二節 研究倫理 8 第三節 資料來源與資料收集 8 第四節 資料分析 9 第四章 研究結果 10 第一節 訪談對象簡介 10 第二節 研究架構 11 第三節 研究結果架構 11 第四節 何時意識到老化的身體與心理面向 12 第五節 社交對每人的意義不同──依照對象與目的性區分 26 一、 對象 ...26 二、 目的 30 第六節 個性對老年生活與適應行動選擇的影響 36 一、 內在感受 36 二、 外顯行為 38 第七節 靈性對老人的影響──宗教、生命意義、人生目標、生活重心 40 一、 宗教 41 二、 人生意義、人生目標與生活重心 45 第八節 良好老化的重要認知──個體性、視年老為一階段、肯定 55 一、 個體性 55 二、 視年老為一階段 58 三、 肯定 60 第九節 影響老年生活的重要因素──經濟、年齡與性別、居住環境 61 一、 經濟 61 二、 年齡與性別 65 三、 居住環境 71 第五章 討論 80 第一節 老人主觀老化認為的心理與生理層面 80 第二節 社交對每個人意義不同──依對象與目的非互斥區分 82 第三節 個性對老年生活與適應行動的影響 87 第四節 靈性對老人的影響——宗教、生命意義、生命目標、生活重心 89 一、 宗教 89 二、生命意義、生命目標、生活重心 90 第五節 良好老年生活的重要認知──個體性、視年老為一階段、肯定 91 一、個體性 91 二、視年老為一階段 91 三、肯定 92 第六節 影響老年生活的重要因素──經濟、年齡與性別、居住環境 93 一、 經濟 93 二、 年齡與性別 95 三、 居住環境 98 第六章 結論 101 參考文獻 104 附錄 113 一、 國立台灣大學行為與社會科學研究倫理委員會審查核可證明 113 二、 受訪者同意書與訪綱 114 表目錄 第四章表 表一 訪談對象人口特徵 73 表二 訪談大綱 78 圖目錄 第四章圖 圖一 研究架構 77 圖二 結果架構 79 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 探索臺灣老人老化經驗與生活品質的不同面向 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Exploring different dimensions of older adults’ aging experiences and quality of life:A qualitative study | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 官晨怡(Chen-I Kuan),程蘊菁(Yen-Ching Chen) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 生活品質老,高齡,老化,活躍老化,成功老化,良好老化,適應, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | quality of life,aging,old age,active aging,successful aging,aging well,adaptation, | en |
dc.relation.page | 114 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201904053 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-08-20 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 流行病學與預防醫學研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.date.embargo-lift | 2024-08-29 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 流行病學與預防醫學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-R06849038-1.pdf | 2 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。