請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/76187完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Chih-Wen Chou | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 周志文 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-01T08:18:54Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-07-01T08:18:54Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 1996 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 朱盛侃、陳安國． 1993．小家鼠生態特性與預測．科學出版社．北京． 339頁
陳彥君． 1987．嘉義地區農地野鼠之族群動態研究．私立東海大學碩士論文． 71頁． Berry, R. J. 1981. Town mouse, country mouse: adaptation and adaptability in Mus domesticus (M. musculus domesticus). Mammal Review 11: 92-136. Berry R. J. 1969. History in the evolution of Apodemus Sylvaticus (Mammalia) at one edge of its range. Journal of Zoology, London 159: 311-328. Berry. R. J. and M. E. Jakobson. 1975. Adaptation and adaptability in wild-living house mice (Mus musculus). Journal of Zoology, London. 176:391-402. Bomford, M. and T. Redhead. 1987. A field experiment to examine the fffects of food quality and population density on reproduction of wild house mice. Oikos 48: 304-311. Bookstein. F. L., B. Chernoff, R. L. Elder, J. M. Humphries, G. R. Smith and R. E. Strauss. 1985. Morphometrics in evolutionary biology. Special Publication 15, The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. 275pp. Boursot, P., J.-C. Auffray, J. Britton-Davidian, and F. Bonhomme. 1993. The evolution of house mice. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 119-152. Breakey, D. R. 1963. The breeding season and age structure of feral house mouse populations near San Francisco Bay, California, Journal of Mammalogy 44: 153-168. Bronson, F. H. 1979.The reproductive ecology of the house mouse. The Quarterly Review of Biology 54: 265-299. Bronson, F. H. 1984.The adaptability of the house mouse. Scientific American 250: 90-97. Carleton, M. D. and G. G. Musser. 1995. Systematic studies of oryzomyine rodents (Muridae: Sigmodontinae): definition and distribution of Oligoryzomys vegetus (Bangs, 1902) Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 108: 338-369. Davis, S.J.M. 1983. Morphometric variation of populations of house mice Mus domesticus in Britain and Faroe. Journal of Zoology, London 199: 521-534. DeLong, K. T. 1967. Population ecology of feral house mice. Ecology 48: 611-634. Drickamer, L. C. 1990. Seasonal variation in fertility, fecundity and litter sex ratio in laboratory and wild stocks of house mice (Mus domesticus). Laboratory Animal Science 40: 284-288. Festing, M. 1972. Mouse strain identification. Nature 238: 351-352. Festing, M. 1973. A multivanate analysis of subline divergence in the shape of the mandible in C57BL/Gr mice. Genetics Research, Cambridge 21: 121-132. Hillis, D. M. 1987. Molecular versus morphological approaches to systematics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 23-42. Hseun, Y. K., C. W. Hague and T. Y. Ku. 1978. Observations on populations of five field rodents in cultivated land in central Taiwan. Plant Protection Bulletin 20: 302-312. Huggins, J. A. and M. L. Kennedy. 1989. Morphologic variation in the masked shrew (Sorex cinereus) and smoky shrew (S. fumeus). The American Midland Naturalist 122: 11-25. Jolicoeur, P. 1963. The multivariate generalization of the allometry equation. Biometrics 19: 497-499. Leamy, L. 1975. Component analysis of osteometric traits in randombred house mice. Systematic Zoology 24: 176-190. Leamy, L. 1977. Genetic and environmental correlations of morphometric traits in randombred house mice. Evolution 31:357-369. Leamy, L. 1983. Variance partionihg and effects of sex and age on morphometric traits in randombred house mice. Journal of Mammalogy 64(1): 55-61. Lidicker, W. Z. 1966. Ecological observations on a feral house mouse population declining to extinction. Ecological Monograph 36:27-50. Lidicker, W. Z. 1976. Social behavior and density regulation in house mice live in large enclosures. Journal of Animal Ecology 45:677-697. Lukyanov, O., W. Walkowa and K. Adamczyk. 1994. Analysis of mortality and emigration in a house mouse population. Polish Ecological Studies 20: 243-247. Marshall, J. T. 1981. Taxonomy. In The mouse in biomedical research. Volume 1 History, genetics, and wild mice, eds. H. L. Foster, J. D. Small, and J. G. Fox. pp. 17-27. Academic Press, New York. Morris, P. 1972. A review of mammalian age determination methods. Mammal Review 2: 69-104. Newsome, A. E. 1969. A population study of house-mice temporarily inhabiting a south Australian wheatfield. Journal of Animal Ecology 38: 341-359. Patton, J. L. and P. V. Brylski. 1987. Pocket gophers in alfalfa fields: causes and consequences of habitat related body size variation. America Naturalist 130: 493-506. Pelikan, J. 1981. Pattern of reproduction in the house mouse. Symp. zool. Soc. Lond. 47: 205-229. Petras, M. L. and J. C. Tooping. 1981. Studies of natural populations of Mus. Ⅵ. Sizes of populations inhabiting corn cribs in southwestern Ontario. Journal of Mammology 62: 146-153. Sage, R. D. 1981. Wild mice. In The mouse in biomedical research. Volume I History, genetics, and wild mice, eds. H. L. Foster, J. D. Small, and J. G. Fox. pp. 39-90. Academic Press, New York. Sage, R. D., D. Heyneman, K-C. Lim, and A. C. Wilson. 1986. Wormy mice in hybrid zone. Nature 324: 60-63. Silver, L. M. 1995. Mouse genetics. Oxford University Press, New York. 362pp. Strauss, R. E. and F. L. Bookstein. 1982. The truss: body from reconstructions in morphometrics. Systematic Zoology 31: 113-135. Thiessen, D. D. 1966. The relation of social position and wounding to exploratory behavior and organ weights in house mice. Journal of Mammalogy 47: 28-34. Vandenbergh, J. G. 1971. The influence of the social environment on sexual maturation in male mice. Journal of Reproductive and Fertility 24: 383-390. Van Zyll De John, C. G. 1980. Systematic relationships of woodland and prairie forms of the common shrew, Sorex cinereus cinereus Kerr and S. c. haydeni Baird, in the Canadian prairie province. Journal of Mammology 61: 66-75. Voss, R. S. 1988. Systematics and ecology of Ichthyomyine rodents (Muroidea): patterns of morphological evolution in a small adaptive radiation. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 188. Voss, R. S., L. F. Marcus, and P. Escalante P. 1990. Morphological evolution in muroid rodents 1. Conservative patterns of craniometric and their ontogenetic basis in the neotropical genus Zygodontomys. Evolution 44: 1568-1587. Wallace, J. T. and R. S. Bader. 1967. Factor analysis in morphometric traits of the house mouse. Systematic Zoology 16:144-148. Wright, S. L., C. B. Crawford, and J. L. Anderson. 1988. Allocation of reproductive effect in Mus domesticus: response of offspring sex ratio and quality to social density and food availability. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 23: 357-366. Yu, H. T. 1993. Natural history of small mammals of subtropical montane areas in central Taiwan. Journal of Zoology, London 231: 403-422. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/76187 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 為了瞭解台灣地區小家鼠的生殖生物學及地理變異，本研究自1995年6月至1996年2月，分別於台灣各地農會穀倉內採集小家鼠樣本。其中應用於第一章“小家鼠之年齡鑑定與生殖”之樣本共269隻，主要是在探討利用體重和利用牙齒磨損程度估算小家鼠相對年齡的適用性，並利用所得結果找出各地小家鼠的族群結構及生殖情形。第二章“小家鼠之地理變異”所用樣本共計408隻（含上述269隻），主要是利用主成分分析(PCA)來探討各地小家鼠的頭骨形值是否已有地理差異產生，此時，40隻月鼠為對照組。 初步結果發現，在分析生殖狀態時，利用體重粗分年齡群有其適用性，分析生長曲線時，則以牙齒磨損程度估算為佳。另由不同季節，個別地區族群具生殖潛力個體的比例來看，台灣地區小家鼠應無明顯生殖高峰期存在，而為全年生殖。至於地理變異方面，各地小家鼠在頭骨形值上並無明顯區隔，而月鼠則可和小家鼠清楚分開。雌雄小家鼠體型上的差異，是在生長初期產生，雌性個體超越雄性個體後，便一直持續下去。由牙齒磨損程度的資料亦顯示雌鼠有較長之壽命。 研究亦發現，台灣各地小家鼠普遍存在著高絛蟲寄生及高缺齒比例的現象，這是否與遺傳有關，則待進一步研究。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-07-01T08:18:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 1996 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要………………………………………………………………………………………………………………? 前言………………………………………………………………………………………………………………? 第一章 小家鼠之年齡鑑定與生殖 1．前言 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………1 2．材料與方法 2.1 鼠隻採集……………………………………………………………………………………………3 2.2 樣本處理……………………………………………………………………………………………4 2.3 年齡鑑定……………………………………………………………………………………………5 2.4 生殖狀態判定………………………………………………………………………………………7 2.5 資料分析……………………………………………………………………………………………7 3．結果 3.1 雌雄差異……………………………………………………………………………………………9 3.2 年齡判別……………………………………………………………………………………………9 3.3 族群結構……………………………………………………………………………………………11 3.4 性別比例……………………………………………………………………………………………12 3.5 生殖…………………………………………………………………………………………………13 3.6 缺齒狀況……………………………………………………………………………………………14 3.7 消化道絛蟲感染率…………………………………………………………………………………14 4．討論 4.1 雌雄差異……………………………………………………………………………………………15 4.2 年齡估算方法比較…………………………………………………………………………………16 4.3 族群結構……………………………………………………………………………………………19 4.4 生殖與季節的關係…………………………………………………………………………………20 4.5 性別比例……………………………………………………………………………………………20 4.6 生殖…………………………………………………………………………………………………21 4.7 缺齒狀況……………………………………………………………………………………………22 4.8 消化道絛蟲感染率…………………………………………………………………………………23 表……………………………………………………………………………………………………………24 圖……………………………………………………………………………………………………………32 第二章 小家鼠的地理變異 1．前言 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………43 2．材料與方法 2.1 族群採樣點…………………………………………………………………………………………45 2.2 測量部位……………………………………………………………………………………………45 2.3 資料分析……………………………………………………………………………………………47 3．結果 3.1 主成分分析…………………………………………………………………………………………48 3.2 成長曲線……………………………………………………………………………………………50 3.3 異速生長……………………………………………………………………………………………50 4．討論 4.1 傳統形態分類………………………………………………………………………………………51 4.2 主成分分析…………………………………………………………………………………………52 4.3 成長曲線……………………………………………………………………………………………53 4.4 異速生長……………………………………………………………………………………………55 表……………………………………………………………………………………………………………56 圖……………………………………………………………………………………………………………67 參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………………………………………71 附錄………………………………………………………………………………………………………………76. | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 台灣地區小家鼠族群生物學研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Population Biology of House Mouse (Mus musculus castaneus) in Taiwan | en |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 84-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.relation.page | 92 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生命科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 動物學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 動物學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
沒有與此文件相關的檔案。
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。