Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生命科學院
  3. 動物學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/75243
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.authorChung-Yi Linen
dc.contributor.author林中一zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-01T08:12:21Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-01T08:12:21Z-
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.citation杜銘章.1998.臺北縣雙溪川兩生爬行動物相之調查及規劃生態保護區之初步規劃.中國生物學會.
汪靜明.1991.河川魚類棲地生態調查之基本原則與技術.森林溪流淡水魚保育訓練班論文集.119?137.
張淑美.1989.白頷樹蛙生殖行為之研究.國立台灣大學動物學研究所碩士論文.67頁.
莊國碩.1988.艾氏樹蛙生殖生物學之研究.國立台灣師範大學生物研究所碩士論文.74頁.
莊鎮碩.2000.諸羅樹蛙生殖行為之研究.國立台灣師範大學生物研究所碩士論文.60頁
陳賜隆.1992.翡翠樹蛙生殖行為及生態學之研究.國立台灣師範大學生物研究所碩士論文.80頁.
楊懿如.1987.臺北樹蛙生殖行為之研究.國立台灣大學動物學研究所碩士論文.58頁
Berven K. A. 1981. Mate choice in the wood frog. Rana sylvatica. Evolution. 35:707?722.
Bevier C. R. 1997. Breeding activity and chorus tenure of two neotropical hylid frogs. Herpetologica. 53(3): 297-311.
Boulenger G. A. 1909. Descriptions of four new frogs and a new snake discovered by Mr. H. Sauter in Formosa. Ann. Mag. N. H. 8(4):492-496.
Bourne G. R. 1992. Lekking behavior in the neotropical frog Ololygon rebra. Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology. 31(3): 173-180.
Bourne G. R. 1993. Proximate cost and benefits of mate acquisition at leks of the frog Ololygon rebra. Animal Behaviour. 45(6): 1051-1059.
Bradbury J. W. 1977. Lek mating behavior in the hammer-headed bat. Z Tierpsychol. 45:225-255.
Burrowes P. A. 2000. Parental care and sexual selection in the Puerto Rican cave-dwelling frog, Eleutherodactylus cooki. Herpetologica. 56(3): 375-386.
Carey C. Cohen N. and Rollins-Smith L. 1999. Amphibian declines: An immunological perspective. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 23(6): 459-472.
Crump M. L and Pounds J. A. 1994. Amphibian declines and climate disturbance: The case of the golden toad and the harlequin frog. Conservation Biology. 8(1): 72-85.
Delgado M. J. Alonso-Gomez A. L. and Alonso-Bedate M. Role of environmental temperature and photoperiod in regulation of seasonal testicular activity in the frog, Rana perezi. Canadian Journal of Physiology & Pharmacology. 70(10): 1348-1352.
Drost C. A. and Fellers G. M. 1996. Collapse of a regional frog fauna in the Yosemite area of the California Sierra Nevada, USA. Conservation Biology. 10(2): 414-425.
Duellman W. E. and Trueb L. 1986. Biology of Amphibians. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company. New York. 670pp.
Dupuis L. and Steventon D. 1999. Raparian management and the tailed frog in northern coastal forests. Forest Ecology & Management. 124(1):35-43.
Dutta S. K. Mahapatra P. and Mohanty H. P. 1991. Size analysis and sex ratio of Jerdon’s bull frog Rana crassa Jerdon anura Ranidae. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society. 88(2): 234-241.
Elmberg J. 1991. Factors affecting male yearly mating success in the common frog Rana temporaria. Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology. 28(2): 125-132.
Emlen S. T. 1968. A technique for marking anuran amphibians for behavioral studies. Herpetologia. 24: 172-173.
Emlen S. T. and Oring L.T. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and evolution of mating system. Science. 197:215-223.
Fogden Michael P. L. Pound J. A. Savage J. M. and Gorman G. C. 1997. Test of null models for amphibian declines on a tropical mountain. Conservation Biology. 11(6): 1307-1322.
Fukuyama K. and Kusano T. 1989. Sexual size dimorphism in a Japanese stream-breeding frog, Buergeria buergeri(Rhacophoridae, Amphibia). The Herpetological Society of Japan. 1989:306-
313.
Fukuyama K. and Kusano T. 1992. Factors affecting breeding activity in a stream-breeding frog, Buergeria buergeri. Journal of Herpetology. 26(1): 88-91.
Fukuyama K. Kusano T. and Nakane M. 1988. A radio-tracking study of the behavior of females of the frog Buergeria buergeri(Rhacophoridae, Amphibia) in a breeding stream in Japan. Japanese Journal of Herpetology. 12(3):102-107.
Gascon C. and de Lima M. G. 1999. The conservation value of linear forest remnant in central Amazonia. Biological Conservation. 91(2-3):241-247.
Gilbert M. Leclair R. and Jr.Fortin R. 1994. Reproduction of the northern leopard frog (Rana pipiens)in floodplain habitat in the Richelieu River, P. Quebec, Canada. Journal of Herpetology. 28(4): 465-470.
Gillespie G. R. and Hollis G. J. 1996. Distribution and habitat of the spotted frog, Litoria spenceri Dubois(Anuran: Hylidae), and as assessment of potential causes of population declines. Wildlife Research. 23(1):49-75.
Grafe T. U. 1997. Cost and benefits of mate choice in the lek-breeding reed frog, Hyperolius marmoratus. Animal Behaviour. 53(5): 1103-1117.
Green D. M. and Tessier C. 1990. Distribution and abundance of Hochstetter’s frog Leiopelma hochstetteri. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 20(3): 261-268.
Hecnar Stephen Joseph. 1995. Acute and chronic toxicity of ammonium nitrate fertilizer to amphibians from Southern Ontario. Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry. 14(12): 2131-2137.
Hollis G. J. 1995 Reassessment of the distribution, abundance and habitat of the Baw Baw frog Philoria frosti Spencer: Preliminary finding. Victorian Naturalist(South Yarra). 112(5):190-201.
Hunter D. and Gillespie G. R. 1999. The distribution, abundance and conservation status of riverine frogs in Kosciuszko National Park. Australian Zoologist. 31(1): 198-209.
Jennions M. D. Backwell Patricia R. Y. and Passmore N. I. Breeding behaviour of the African frog, Chiromantis xerampelina: Multiple spawning and polyandry. Animal Behaviour. 44(6): 1091-1100.
Kyriakopoulou S. P. and Loumbourdis N. 1990. Annual ovarian cycle in the frog Rana ridibunda in northern Greece. Journal of Herpetology. 24(2): 185-191.
Laurance W. F. and McDonald K. R. 1996. Speare Richard Epidemic disease and the catastrophic decline of Australian rain forest frogs. Conservation Biology. 10(2): 406-413.
Lawler S. P. Dritz D. Strange T. and Holyoak M. 1999. Effects of introduced mosquitofish and bullfrogs on the threatened California red-legged frog. Conservation Biology. 13(3): 613-622.
Palis J. G. 1998. Breeding biology of the gopher frog, Rana capito, in Western Florida. Journal of Herpetology. 32(2):217-223.
Parris K. M. and McCarthy M. A. 1999. What influences the structure of frog assemblages at forest streams Australian Journal of Ecology. 24(5):495-502.
Perril S. A. 1983. Mutiple egg clutches in Hyla regilla, H. cinerea and H. gratiosa. Copeia. 1983(2): 513-516.
Pramoda S. and Saidapur S. K. 1984. Annual changes in the somatic weight hypophyseal gonadotrophs ovary oviduct and abdominal fat bodies in the Indian bull frog Rana tigrina. Proceeding of the Indian National Science Academy Part B Biology Sciences. 50(5): 490-499.
Robertson J. G. M. 1986. Female choice, male strategies and the role of vocalizations in the Australian frog Uperoleia rugosa. Animal Behaviour. 34(3): 773-784.
Shimoyama R. 1993. Female reproductive traits in a population of the pond frog, Rana nigromaculata, with prolonged breeding season. Japanese Journal of Herpetology. 15(1): 37-41.
Shine R. and Katsikaros K. 1997. Sexual dimorphism in the tusked frog, Adelotus brevis(Anura: Myobatrachidae): The roles of natural and sexual selection. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 60(1): 39-51.
Snedden W. A. 1996. Lifetime mating success in male sagebrush cricket: Sexual selection constrained by a virgin male mating advantage. Animal Behaviour. 51(5): 1119-1125.
Tucker J. K. 1997. Fecundity in the Illinois Chorus frog(Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis) from Madison Country, Illinois. Transaction of the Illinois State Academy of Science. 90(3-4): 167-170.
Weigoldt P. 1989. Changes in the composition of mountain stream frog communities in the Atlantic mountains of brazil frogs as indicators of environmental deteriorations. Studies on Neotropical Fauna & Environment. 24(4): 249-256.
Welsh H. H. and Jr. Ollivier L. M. 1998. Stream amphibians as indicator of ecosystem stress: A case study from California’s redwood. Ecological Application. 8(4):1118-1132.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/75243-
dc.description.abstract本研究分為兩大部分,第一部份為生殖生態研究,從1999年5月1日到9月30日,在枋腳溪中游固定樣區研究觀察,記錄其生殖生物學資料及棲地特徵。第二部份為族群分佈研究,從2000年6月23日至9月14日,每週於雙溪河流域的15個樣點中記錄褐樹蛙的性別、數量及環境因數。
1999年生殖生態的研究結果發現,褐樹蛙有明顯的雌雄二型性,雌蛙平均體長為雄蛙的1.48倍,平均體重為雄蛙的3.7倍。操作性比(operational sex ratio)為1:16.6(雌:雄),明顯偏向雄性。雄蛙競爭是靠停留之天數,配對成功的雄蛙中,有66.7%停留超過2天以上。雌蛙選擇屬於體型配對模式,選擇佔其體長68%的雄蛙配對。生殖季從5月17日到9月10日。生殖活動受到溫度升高的影響開始,偏好在晴天的夜晚進行生殖活動。雄蛙生殖活動時會偏好停棲在離水邊1m的範圍內、水淺、流速緩的4、5號石頭上鳴叫。
2000年的族群研究發現,褐樹蛙族群多分佈在雙溪河流域各支流的上游,有4條支流(66.7%)上游的雄蛙族群數量顯著大於中、下游。丁子蘭溪的褐樹蛙族群數量最豐富。底石大小與雄蛙的出現數量有顯著的正相關,有3條支流(50%)上游的底石級數顯著大於中、下游。
zh_TW
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-07-01T08:12:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0
Previous issue date: 2001
en
dc.description.tableofcontents摘要………………………………………………………………………………………?
前言………………………………………………………………………………………1
材料與方法………………………………………………………………………………3
一、生殖生態研究 …………………………………………………………………3
二、族群研究 ………………………………………………………………………6
結果………………………………………………………………………………………8
一、基礎生物學資料 ………………………………………………………………8
二、生殖行為、配對與產卵 ………………………………………………………9
三、生殖生態 ………………………………………………………………………11
四、族群分佈 ………………………………………………………………………14
討論………………………………………………………………………………………16
一、生殖生物學 ……………………………………………………………………16
配對系統(mating system)…………………………………………………16
性比差異 ……………………………………………………………………18
性擇 …………………………………………………………………………19
特殊的雌雄二型性 …………………………………………………………21
雌蛙之生產力(female fecundity) ………………………………………22
溫度、雨量對生殖季的影響 ………………………………………………24
二、族群分佈 ………………………………………………………………………25
影響褐樹蛙族群分佈之因素 ………………………………………………25
三、保育 ……………………………………………………………………………28
參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………………31
圖…………………………………………………………………………………………38
表…………………………………………………………………………………………43
附錄………………………………………………………………………………………47
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title臺北縣雙溪河流域褐樹蛙(Buergeria robusta)之生殖生態與族群分佈zh_TW
dc.titleReproductive Ecology and Population Distribution of Brown Treefrog(Buergeria robusta) in Shuang-Si River of Taipei Sianen
dc.date.schoolyear89-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.relation.page55
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.contributor.author-dept生命科學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept動物學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:動物學研究所

文件中的檔案:
沒有與此文件相關的檔案。
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved