Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生命科學院
  3. 動物學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/75065
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.author聶嘉慧zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-01T08:11:40Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-01T08:11:40Z-
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.citation丁宗蘇.1993.玉山地區成熟林之鳥類群聚生態.碩士論文.國立台灣大學.臺北.
王嘉雄、吳森雄、黃光瀛、楊秀英、蔡仲晃、蔡牧起、蕭慶亮.1991.臺灣野鳥圖鑑.亞舍圖書有限公司.臺北.
李春生.1989.大陸與台灣的地理淵源.第1-11頁.臺灣動物地理淵源研討會專輯.臺北市立動物園.臺北.
李培芬、呂光洋、李玉琪、謝佳君、潘彥宏、陳宣汶、潘天祺、丁宗蘇.1998.臺灣地區野生動物分佈資料庫之建立.行政院農業委員會.臺北.
李培芬、廖倩瑜、李玉琪、潘彥宏、傅維馨、陳宣汶.1997.台灣地區生態與環境因數地理資訊資料庫.行政院農業委員會.臺北.
林俊義、林良恭.1983.台灣陸生哺乳動物動物學研究史.省立博物館科學年刊26:37-51.
林曜松、楊平世、李玲玲、李培芬、李後晶、吳文哲、洪淑彬、莊鈴川、許洞慶、陳俊宏、劉小如.1996.台灣地區野生動物資料庫之建立.行政院農業委員會.臺北.
林曜松.1989.雪山、大霸尖山動物生態資源先期調查研究.內政部營建署.臺北.
柳榗.1989.台灣生物地理概說.第13-23頁.臺灣動物地理淵源研討會專輯.臺北市立動物園.臺北.
廖倩瑜.1997.台灣產畫眉亞科鳥種之空間分佈與預測模式.碩士論文.台灣大學.臺北.
翟鵬.1977.台灣鳥類生態隔離的研究.碩士論文.東海大學.台中.
顏重威.1984.臺灣的野生鳥類(一、繁殖鳥類).渡假出版社有限公司.臺北.
顏重威.1989.從臺灣生物地理探討鳥類相.第85-97頁.臺灣動物地理淵源研討會專輯.臺北市立動物園.臺北.
Abrams, P. A. 1995. Monotonic or unimodal diversity-productivity gradients: what does competition theory predict Ecology 76:2019-2027.
Begon, M., Harper, J. L. and Townsend, C. R. 1996. Ecology: individuals, populations and communities, 3rd ed. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
Blackburn, T. M., and K. J. Gaston. 1996. Spatial patterns in the body sizes of bird species in the New World. Oikos 77:436-446.
Blackburn, T. M., and K. J. Gaston. 1998. Some methodological issues in macroecology. The American Naturalist 151:68-83.
Bohning-Gaese, K. 1997. Determinants of avian species richness at different spatial scale. Journal of Biogeography 24:49-90.
Bojorquez-Tapia, L. A., I. Azuara, E. Ezcurra, and O. Flores-Villela. 1995. Identifying Conservation Priorities in Mexico Through Geographic Information Systems and Modelling. Ecological Applications 5:215-231.
Brown, J. H. 1995. Macroecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Brown, J. H., G. C. Stevens, and D. M. Kaufman. 1996. The geographic range: Size, shape, boundaries, and internal structure. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27:597-623.
Cleveland, W. S. 1979. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74:829-836.
Colwell, R. K. and G. C. Hurtt, 1994. Nonbiological gradients in species richness and a spurious Rapoport effect. The American Naturalist 144:570-595.
Colwell, R. K. and Hurtt, G. C. 1994. Nonbiological gradients in species richness and a spurious Rapoport effect. The American Naturalist 144:570-595.
Currie, D. J. 1991. Energy and large-scale patterns of animal- and plant-species richness. The American Naturalist 137:27-49.
Currie, D. J., and V. Paquin. 1987. Large-scale biogeographic patterns of species richness of trees. Nature 329:326-327.
Debinski, D., and P. F. Brussard. 1994. Using biodiversity data to assess species-habitat relationships in Glacier National Park, Montana. Ecological Applications 4:833-843.
Digby, P. G. N., and R. A. Kempton. 1987. Multivariate analysis of ecological communities. Chapman and Hall, London.
Dobson, A. P., J. P. Rodriguez, W. M. Roberts, and D. S. Wilcove. 1997. Geographic distribution of endangered species in the United States. Science 275:550-553.
Dunning, J. B., Jr. 1993. Body masses of birds of the world. Pages 1-313 in J. B. Dunning, editor. CRC handbook of avian body masses. CRC Press. Boca Raton.
ESRI. 1990. PC ARC/INFO. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. Redlands.
Flather, C. H., K. R. Wilson, D. J. Dean, and W. C. McComb. 1997. Identifying gaps in conservation networks: of indicators and uncertainty in geographic-based analyses. Ecological Applications 7:531-542.
Gardezi, T., and J. D. Silva. 1999. Diversity in relation to body size in mammals: a comparative study. The American Naturalist 153:110-123.
Gaston, K. J. 1996. Species-range-size distributions: patterns, mechanisms and implications. TREE 11(5):197-201.
Gaston, K. J., and T. M. Blackburn. 1996. Range size - body size relationships: evidence of scale dependence. Oikos 75:479-485.
Gaston, K. J., and T. M. Blackburn. 1999. A critique for macroecology. Oikos 84:353-368.
Gaston, K. J., R. M. Quinn, T. M. Blackburn, and B. C. Eversham. 1998. Species-range size distribution in Britain. Ecography 21:361-370.
Goward, S. N., B. Markham, D. G. Dye, W. Dulaney, and J. Yang. 1991. Normalized difference vegetation index measurements from the advanced very high resolution radiometer. Remote Sensing of Environment 35:257-277.
Gregory, R. D. 1998. Biodiversity and body size: patterns among British birds. Ecography 21:87-91.
Gregory, R. D., and T. M. Blackburn. 1998. Macroecological patterns in British breeding birds: covariation of species geographic range size at differing spatial scales. Ecography 21:527-534.
Heikkinen, R. K., and S. Neuvonen. 1997. Species richness of vascular plants in the subarctic landscape of northern Finland: modelling relationships to the environment. Biodiversity and Conservation 6:1181-1201.
Kano, T. 1940. Zoogeographical studies of the Tsugitaka Mountains of Formosa. Shibusawa Institute, Tokyo.
Kerr, J. T. 1997. Species richness, endemism, and the choice of areas for conservation. Conservation Biology 11:1094-1100.
Kindlmann, P., A. F. G. Dixon, and I. Dostalkova. 1999. Does body size optimization result in skewed body size distribution on a logarithmic scale. The American Naturalist 153:445-447.
Kozlowski, J., and J. Weiner. 1997. Interspecific allometries are byproducts of body size optimization. The American Naturalist 149:352-380.
Lawton, J. H. 1996. Pattern in ecology. Oikos 75:145-147.
Lawton, J. H. 1999. Are there general laws in ecology Oikos 84:177-192.
Lee, P. F., T. S. Ding, and H. J. Shiu. 1998. Relationship between body mass and body length of resident bird species in Taiwan. Acta Zoologica Taiwanica 9:69-79.
Levin, S. A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943-1967.
MacArthur, J. W. 1975. Environmental fluctuations and species diversity. Pages 74-80 in M. L. Cody and J. M. Diamond, editors. Ecology and Evolution of Communities. Belknap, Cambridge.
MacArthur, R. H. 1964. Environmental factors affecting bird species diversity. The American Naturalist 98:387-397.
Mayer, N. 1989. Threatened biotas: 'Hotspots' in tropical forests. Environmentalist 8:1-20.
Muriuki, J. N., H. M. D. Klerk, P. H. Williams, L. A. Bennun, T. M. Crowe, and E. V. Berge. 1997. Using patterns of distribution and diversity of Kenyan birds to select and prioritize areas for conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 6:191-210.
Prendergast, J. R., R. M. Quinn, J. H. Lawton, B. C. Eversham, and D. W. Gibbons. 1993. Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365:335-337.
Rahbek, C. 1995. The elevational gradient of species richness: a uniform pattern Ecography 18:200-205.
Rahbek, C. 1997. The relationship among area, elevation, and regional species richness in neotropical birds. The American Naturalist 149:875-902.
Rapoport, E. H. 1982. Areography: geographical strategies of species. Pergamon, New York.
Rasmussen, M. S. 1998. Developing simple, operational, consistent NDVI-vegetation models by applying environmental and climate information: Part I. Assessment of net primary production. International Journal of Remote Sensing 19:97-117.
Reid, W. V. 1998. Biodiversity hotspots. TREE 13:275-280.
Rosenzweig, M. L. 1995. Species diversity in space and time. University Press, Cambridge.
Rosenzweig, M. L. and Z. Abramsky. 1993. How are diversity and productivity related Pages 52-65 in R. Ricklefs and D. Schluter, editors. Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographical perspectives. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
SAS Institute Inc., 1989. SAS/STAT User Guide. SAS Institute Inc. Cary.
Schluter, D. and R. E. Ricklefs. 1993. Species diversity: an introduction to the problem. Pages 1-10 in R. Ricklefs and D. Schluter, editors. Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographical perspectives. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Scott J. M., T. H. Tear, and F. W. Davis. 1996. Gap analysis: a landscape approach to biodiversity planning. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Maryland.
Serveringhaus, L. L. 1994. The zoogeography and biodiversity of birds in Taiwan. Pages 245-258 in C. I. Peng and C. H. Chou, editors. Biodiversity and Terrestrial Ecosystems. Institude of Botany, Acdemia Sinica Monograph Series No. 14, Taipei.
Spellerberg, I. F. 1996. Conserving biological diversity. Pages 25-35 in I. F. Spellerberg, editor. Conservation Biology. Longman, Edingburgh Gate.
SPSS Inc. 1997. SYSTAT 7.0 for Windows. SPSS Inc, Chicago.
Stevens, G. C. 1989. The latitudinal gradient in geographical range: how so many species coexist in the tropics. The American Naturalist 133:240-256.
Stevens, G. C. 1992. The elevational gradient in altitudinal range: an extension of Rapoport's latitudinal rule to altitude. The American Naturalist 140:893-911.
Tilman, D. and S. Pacala. 1993. The maintenance of species richness in plant communities. Pages 13-25 in R. Ricklefs and D. Schluter. Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographical perspectives. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Tucker, C. J., and P. J. Sellers. 1989. Satellite remote sensing of primary production. International Journal of Remote Sensing 7:1395-1416.
Whittaker, R. H. 1975. Communities and ecosystems. 2nd ed. Macmillan, New York.
Williams, P., D. Gibbons, C. Margules, A. Rebelo, C. Humphries, and R. Pressey. 1996. A comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots, and complementary areas for conserving diversity of British birds. Conservation Biology 10:155-174.
Wohlgemuth, T. 1998. Modelling floristic species richness on a regional scale: a case study in Switzerland. Biodiversity and Conservation 7:159-177.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/75065-
dc.description.abstract種豐富度(species richness)的分佈是生態學和生物地理學的研究焦點,且在生物多樣性(biodiversity)快速消失的今日,更成為迫在眉睫的研究重心。近年來巨觀生態學(macroecology)之發展,突破了傳統性野外實驗的尺度限制,能從較大的尺度找出複雜系統之新興特質(emergent properties)。本研究以台灣的繁殖鳥類為對象,就現有文獻記錄之分佈資料進行分析,以瞭解台灣繁殖鳥類種豐富度的分佈模式及其與環境因數間之關係,並探討台灣鳥類種豐富度熱點(hotspots)之分佈。結果顯示台灣繁殖鳥類的體重、體長經對數轉換後亦呈偏右分佈,地理分佈範圍呈偏左分佈,皆與國外大尺度研究結果類似。繁殖鳥類、特有種、保育類之多樣性熱點非常相似,但稀有種差異較大。種豐富度較高的地區多集中於中海拔、中低度海拔變異、氣候環境溫和、中低度氣候變異、中度生產力、低度人為幹擾之地區。以逐步迴歸進行繁殖鳥類種豐富度之空間分佈預測,現有環境變數解釋變異的程度僅達36%,與海岸線距離解釋了大部分的變異。特有種之種豐富度之最佳預測模式可達71%,以年均溫之解釋程度最高。本研究結果所得到之巨觀生態學分佈型態可供物種保育之參考,成因與機制則仍待探討。鳥種豐富度高的地區環境特徵確有不同,但難以從相關性找出主要影響種豐富度之原因。鳥類多樣性熱點之選定可供保育政策擬定之參考。未來需加強生物資料品質及找尋其他環境變數,以提高鳥類分佈預測之準確度。zh_TW
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-07-01T08:11:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0
Previous issue date: 1999
en
dc.description.tableofcontents摘要………………………………………………………I
前言………………………………………………………1
研究地區…………………………………………………5
材料與方法………………………………………………6
結果………………………………………………………10
討論………………………………………………………16
引用文獻…………………………………………………27
圖…………………………………………………………34
表…………………………………………………………66
附錄 1……………………………………………………70
附錄 2……………………………………………………74
附錄 3……………………………………………………78
附錄 4……………………………………………………82
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title台灣繁殖鳥類之種豐富度分佈型態zh_TW
dc.titleSpecies Richness Pattern of Breeding Birds in Taiwanen
dc.date.schoolyear87-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.relation.page104
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.contributor.author-dept生命科學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept動物學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:動物學研究所

文件中的檔案:
沒有與此文件相關的檔案。
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved