請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74900
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林乃君 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chia-Han Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳佳翰 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T09:09:52Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-10-17 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-10-17 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-10-05 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 劉依昌、黃瑞彰、蔡孟旅、黃秀雯。2016。小果番茄設施栽培及健康管理技術。台南區農業改良場技術專刊 164: 1-48。
劉依昌、韓錦絲、謝明憲、王仕賢、王仁晃、陳正次。2009。番茄台南亞蔬 19 號之育成。臺南區農業改良場研究彙報 53: 12-23。 劉依昌、傅成美、陳正次、陳農哲。1997。小果番茄台南亞蔬六號之育成。臺南區農業改良場研究彙報 34: 1-13。 吳雅芳、鄭安秀、林志鴻。2017。番茄青枯病防治實務。臺南區農業專訊 100: 19-23。 寧方俞。2012。鑑定及檢測茄科植物細菌性斑點病菌 Xanthomonas perforans 之聚合酵素連鎖反應技術及台灣 X. perforans 菌株之多型性分析。中興大學植物病理學系所學位論文。臺中。臺灣。 曾國欽。2016。台灣重要病原細菌之診斷與管理。台灣重要植物病原細菌與菌質體研討會專刊 (二)。 呂昀陞。2003。鑑定及偵測茄科植物細菌性斑點病菌 Xanthomonas vesicatoria 之聚合酵素連鎖反應技術。國立中興大學植物病理學研究所碩士論文。臺中。臺灣。 周浩平、陳昱初、黃德昌。2014。應用液化澱粉芽孢桿菌防治土壤傳播性病害之成效評估。高雄區農業專訊 88: 16-18。 楊秀珠、余思葳、黃裕銘。2012。番茄之病蟲害發生與管理。行政院農業委員會農業藥物毒物試驗所。台中。台灣。 黃玉梅。2015。種苗披衣技術 研發。種苗產業發展新趨勢研討會專刊。台南區農業改良場。台南。台灣。 Ahmed, S., E. Nawata and T. Sakuratani, 2006. Changes of endogenous aba and acc, and their correlations to photosynthesis and water relations in mungbean (Vigna radiata (l.) Wilczak cv. Kps1) during waterlogging. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 57: 278-284. Alexander, D.B. and D.A. Zuberer, 1991. Use of chrome azurol s reagents to evaluate siderophore production by rhizosphere bacteria. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 12: 39-45. Andrews, J.H., 1992. Biological control in the phyllosphere. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 30: 603-635. Arnold, A.E. and F. Lutzoni, 2007. Diversity and host range of foliar fungal endophytes: Are tropical leaves biodiversity hotspots? Ecology, 88: 541-549. Ashraf, M., 2004. Some important physiological selection criteria for salt tolerance in plants. Flora - Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, 199: 361-376. Ashraf, M.A., 2012. Waterlogging stress in plants: A review. 7: 1976-1981. Azevedo, J.L., W.L. Araújo and P.T. Lacava, 2016. The diversity of citrus endophytic bacteria and their interactions with Xylella fastidiosa and host plants. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 39: 476-491. Balogh, B., J.B. Jones, M.T. Momol, S.M. Olson, A. Obradovic, P. King and L.E. Jackson, 2003. Improved efficacy of newly formulated bacteriophages for management of bacterial spot on tomato. Plant Disease, 87: 949-954. Barrs, H.D. and P.E. Weatherley, 1962. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences, 15: 413-428. Bates, L.S., R.P. Waldren and I.D. Teare, 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil, 39: 205-207. Beneduzi, A., A. Ambrosini and L.M.P. Passaglia, 2012. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (pgpr): Their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 35: 1044-1051. Bertani, G., 1951. Studies on lysogenesis. I. The mode of phage liberation by lysogenic Escherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology, 62: 293-300. Bita, C. and T. Gerats, 2013. Plant tolerance to high temperature in a changing environment: scientific fundamentals and production of heat stress-tolerant crops. Frontiers in Plant Science, 4: 273. Bochner, B.R. and M.A. Savageau, 1977. Generalized indicator plate for genetic, metabolic, and taxonomic studies with microorganisms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 33: 434-444. Buddenhagen, I. and A. Kelman, 1964. Biological and physiological aspects of bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Phytopathology, 2: 203-230. Cardinale, M., S. Ratering, C. Suarez, A.M. Zapata Montoya, R. Geissler-Plaum and S. Schnell, 2015. Paradox of plant growth promotion potential of rhizobacteria and their actual promotion effect on growth of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under salt stress. Microbiological Research, 181: 22-32. Chen, Y., F. Yan, Y. Chai, H. Liu, R. Kolter, R. Losick and J.h. Guo, 2013. Biocontrol of tomato wilt disease by bacillus subtilis isolates from natural environments depends on conserved genes mediating biofilm formation. Environmental Microbiology, 15: 848-864. Clay, K., 1988. Fungal endophytes of grasses: a defensive mutualism between plants and fungi. Ecology, 69: 10-16. Colburn-Clifford, J.M., J.M. Scherf and C. Allen, 2010. Ralstonia solanacearum Dps contributes to oxidative stress tolerance and to colonization of and virulence on tomato plants. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 76: 7392. Daryanto, S., L. Wang and P.-A. Jacinthe, 2016. Global synthesis of drought effects on maize and wheat production. PLoS One, 11: e0156362. Denny, T., 2007. Plant pathogenic ralstonia species. In: Plant-associated bacteria. Springer: pp: 573-644. Dworkin, M. and J.W. Foster, 1958. Experiments with some microorganisms which utilize ethane and hydrogen. Journal of Bacteriology, 75: 592-603. Ehmann, A., 1977. The van urk-salkowski reagent — a sensitive and specific chromogenic reagent for silica gel thin-layer chromatographic detection and identification of indole derivatives. Journal of Chromatography A, 132: 267-276. Elphinstone, J.G., J. Hennessy, J.K. Wilson and D.E. Stead, 1996. Sensitivity of different methods for the detection of Ralstonia solanacearum in potato tuber extracts. EPPO Bulletin, 26: 663-678. Farooq, M., N. Gogoi, S. Barthakur, B. Baroowa, N. Bharadwaj, S.S. Alghamdi and K.H.M. Siddique, 2017. Drought stress in grain legumes during reproduction and grain filling. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 203: 81-102. Fegan, M. and P. Prior, 2005. How complex is the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. J Bacterial Wilt Disease, 1: 449-461. Feng, H., Y. Li and Q. Liu, 2013. Endophytic bacterial communities in tomato plants with differential resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 7: 1311-1318. Fujiwara, A., M. Fujisawa, R. Hamasaki, T. Kawasaki, M. Fujie and T. Yamada, 2011. Biocontrol of Ralstonia solanacearum by treatment with lytic bacteriophages. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 77: 4155. Genin, S., 2010. Molecular traits controlling host range and adaptation to plants in Ralstonia solanacearum. New Phytologist, 187: 920-928. Genin, S. and C. Boucher, 2002. Ralstonia solanacearum: Secrets of a major pathogen unveiled by analysis of its genome. Molecular Plant Pathology, 3: 111-118. Genin, S. and T.P. Denny, 2011. Pathogenomics of the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 50: 67-89. Glick, B.R., 1995. The enhancement of plant growth by free-living bacteria. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 41: 109-117. Goode, M.J. and M. Sasser, 1980. Prevention - the key to controlling bacterial spot and bacterial speck of tomato. Plant Disease, 64: 831-834. Gray, S.B., O. Dermody, S.P. Klein, A.M. Locke, J.M. McGrath, R.E. Paul, D.M. Rosenthal, U.M. Ruiz-Vera, M.H. Siebers, R. Strellner, E.A. Ainsworth, C.J. Bernacchi, S.P. Long, D.R. Ort and A.D.B. Leakey, 2016. Intensifying drought eliminates the expected benefits of elevated carbon dioxide for soybean. Nature Plants, 2: 16132. Hayward, A., 1964. Characteristics of Pseudomonas solanacearum. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 27: 265-277. Hayward, A., 1991. Biology and epidemiology of bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 29: 65-87. Heath, R.L. and L. Packer, 1968. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 125: 189-198. Hsu, S.T., 1991. Ecology and control of Pseudomonas solanacearum in Taiwan. Plant Prot. Bull. Taiwan., 33: 72-79. IPCC, 2014. Climate change 2014 – impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: Part a: Global and sectoral aspects: Working group ii contribution to the IPCC fifth assessment report: Volume 1: Global and sectoral aspects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Islam, F., T. Yasmeen, S. Ali, B. Ali, M.A. Farooq and R.A.J.A.P.P. Gill, 2015. Priming-induced antioxidative responses in two wheat cultivars under saline stress. Acta PHysiologiae Plantarum, 37: 153. Janvier, C., F. Villeneuve, C. Alabouvette, V. Edel-Hermann, T. Mateille and C. Steinberg, 2007. Soil health through soil disease suppression: Which strategy from descriptors to indicators? Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 39: 1-23. Jones, J.B., G.H. Lacy, H. Bouzar, R.E. Stall and N.W. Schaad, 2004. Reclassification of the Xanthomonads associated with bacterial spot disease of tomato and pepper. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 27: 755-762. Jones, J.B., R.E. Stall and H. Bouzar, 1998. Diversity among Xanthomonads pathogenic on pepper and tomato. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 36: 41-58. Kado, C.I., 2016. Chapter 3: Classification of plant-pathogenic bacteria. In: Plant bacteriology. The American Phytopathological Society: pp: 21-62. Kato, M. and S. Shimizu, 1987. Chlorophyll metabolism in higher plants. VII. Chlorophyll degradation in senescing tobacco leaves; phenolic-dependent peroxidative degradation. Canadian Journal of Botany, 65: 729-735. Kelman, A., 1954. The relationship of pathogenicity of pseudomonas solanacearum to colony appearance in a tetrazolium medium. J Phytopathology, 44. Khan, A.L., J. Hussain, A. Al-Harrasi, A. Al-Rawahi and I.-J. Lee, 2015. Endophytic fungi: Resource for gibberellins and crop abiotic stress resistance. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 35: 62-74. Lichtenthaler, H.K., 1998. The stress concept in plants: An introduction. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 851: 187-198. Lin, C.H., S.T. Hsu, K.C. Tzeng and J.F. Wang, 2009. Detection of race 1 strains of Ralstonia solanacearum in field samples in Taiwan using a bio-PCR method. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 124: 75-85. MacAdam, J.W., C.J. Nelson and R.E. Sharp, 1992. Peroxidase activity in the leaf elongation zone of tall fescue. Plant Physiology, 99: 872. Mansfield, J., S. Genin, S. Magori, V. Citovsky, M. Sriariyanum, P. Ronald, M. Dow, V. Verdier, S.V. Beer and M.A. Machado, 2012. Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology. Molecular Plant Pathology, 13: 614-629. McGarvey, J.A., T.P. Denny and M.A. Schell, 1999. Spatial-temporal and quantitative analysis of growth and eps i production by Ralstonia solanacearum in resistant and susceptible tomato cultivars. Phytopathology, 89: 1233-1239. McGuire, R., 1986. Tween media for semi-selective isolation of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria from soil and plant metarial. Plant Disease, 70: 887-889. Munns, R. and H.M. Rawson, 1999. Effect of salinity on salt accumulation and reproductive development in the apical meristem of wheat and barley. Functional Plant Biology, 26: 459-464. Nautiyal, C.S., 1999. An efficient microbiological growth medium for screening phosphate solubilizing microorganisms. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 170: 265-270. Netondo, G.W., J.C. Onyango and E. Beck, 2004. Sorghum and salinity. 44: 797-805. Pastrana, A.M., M.J. Basallote-Ureba, A. Aguado, K. Akdi and N. Capote, 2016. Biological control of strawberry soil-borne pathogens Macrophomina phaseolina and Fusarium solani , using Trichoderma asperellum and Bacillus spp. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 55: 109-120. Peeters, N., A. Guidot, F. Vailleau and M. Valls, 2013. Ralstonia solanacearum, a widespread bacterial plant pathogen in the post-genomic era. Molecular Plant Pathology, 14: 651-662. Penrose, D.M. and B.R. Glick, 2003. Methods for isolating and characterizing acc deaminase-containing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Physiologia Plantarum, 118: 10-15. Saikkonen, K., P. Wäli, M. Helander and S.H. Faeth, 2004. Evolution of endophyte–plant symbioses. Trends in Plant Science, 9: 275-280. Saile, E., J.A. McGarvey, M.A. Schell and T.P. Denny, 1997. Role of extracellular polysaccharide and endoglucanase in root invasion and colonization of tomato plants by Ralstonia solanacearum. Phytopathology, 87: 1264-1271. Sairam, R.K., D. Kumutha, K. Ezhilmathi, V. Chinnusamy and R.C. Meena, 2009. Waterlogging induced oxidative stress and antioxidant enzyme activities in pigeon pea. Biologia Plantarum, 53: 493-504. Seckin, B., A.H. Sekmen and İ.J.J.o.P.G.R. Türkan, 2008. An enhancing effect of exogenous mannitol on the antioxidant enzyme activities in roots of wheat under salt stress. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 28: 12. Shahzad, R., A.L. Khan, S. Bilal, S. Asaf and I.-J. Lee, 2017. Plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria versus pathogenic infections: An example of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens RWL-1 and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici in tomato. PeerJ, 5: e3107. Sijam, K., C. Chang and R. Gitaitis, 1991. An agar medium for the isolation and identification of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria from seed. Phytopathology, 81: 831-834. Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, L.V. Alexander, S.K. Allen, N.L. Bindoff, F.-M. Bréon, J.A. Church, U. Cubasch, S. Emori, P. Forster, P. Friedlingstein, N. Gillett, J.M. Gregory, D.L. Hartmann, E. Jansen, B. Kirtman, R. Knutti, K. Krishna Kumar, P. Lemke, J. Marotzke, V. Masson-Delmotte, G.A. Meehl, I.I. Mokhov, S. Piao, V. Ramaswamy, D. Randall, M. Rhein, M. Rojas, C. Sabine, D. Shindell, L.D. Talley, D.G. Vaughan and S.-P. Xie, 2013. Technical summary. In: Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group i to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: pp: 33–115. Tans-Kersten, J., Y. Guan, and C. Allen. 1998. Ralstonia solanacearum pectin methylesterase is required for growth on methylated pectin but not for bacterial wilt virulence. Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 64:4918-4923 Upreti, R. and P. Thomas, 2015. Root-associated bacterial endophytes from Ralstonia solanacearum resistant and susceptible tomato cultivars and their pathogen antagonistic effects. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6: 255-255. Vallad, G., K. Pernezny and T. Momol, 2004. A series on disease in the Florida vegetable garden: Tomato. University of Florida, IFAS Extension, Gainesville, FL. Vinocur, B. and A. Altman, 2005. Recent advances in engineering plant tolerance to abiotic stress: Achievements and limitations. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 16: 123-132. Wahid, A., S. Gelani, M. Ashraf and M.R. Foolad, 2007. Heat tolerance in plants: An overview. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 61: 199-223. Weller, S.A., J.G. Elphinstone, N.C. Smith, N. Boonham and D.E. Stead, 2000. Detection of Ralstonia solanacearum strains with a quantitative, multiplex, real-time, fluorogenic PCR (Taqman) assay. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66: 2853-2858. Weller, D. M. 2007. Pseudomonas biocontrol agents of soilborne pathogens: looking back over 30 years. Phytopathology 97: 250-256. Zhu, J.-K., 2003. Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 6: 441-445. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74900 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 番茄 (Solanum lycopersicum) 為台灣重要蔬果之一,於台灣栽培面積大約有 4, 400 公頃,種植區域主要分布在中南部,年產量約 11 萬公噸。由於台灣地處亞熱帶地區,夏季高溫多濕,且屢有颱風或豪雨侵襲,往往造成病蟲害盛行與植株生理性障礙,包括青枯病、細菌性斑點病、高溫、乾旱、鹽害和淹水等,因此研發出新的策略以克服這些逆境為科學家重要的課題。近年來的研究顯示,利用有益微生物增加逆境下植物活性極具應用潛力,因此,本研究即以篩選出能應用於提高番茄抗逆境能力的內生菌株為目標。首先,將從番茄根系分離出的內生細菌,接種於植株後,測試其在不同逆境下的生長指標,並利用培養基測試其溶磷、螯鐵和脫氨酶 (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylase, ACC) 等與可促進植物生長及抗逆境有關之活性,及其對番茄青枯病菌和細菌性斑點病菌的拮抗情形。篩選的 100 支內生細菌中,分別有 12、17、11 和 19 支菌株能增強番茄對高溫、乾旱、鹽害及淹水逆境的耐受性,且有 19 支菌株同時具有兩種以上的功能。進一步分析後發現,在潛力菌株中,Pseudomonas protegens XH1-2a 與 P. kribbensis XP1-6 有相對較佳的表現,且又以 P. kribbensis XP1-6 展現最佳的逆境耐受性。在高溫逆境下,接種 P. protegens XH1-2a 及 P. kribbensis XP1-6 後的植株,其脯胺酸含量有顯著性提昇,而Malondialdehyde (MDA) 含量及過氧化酶 (peroxidase) 活性則與對照組無差異。利用表現有 green fluorescence protein (GFP) 的菌株,可觀察此二菌株均會內生於番茄根系中。未來期望將這些內生菌導入番茄害物整合管理策略中,以減少番茄生產過程中因逆境所造成的損失。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) is one of the most important fruits in Taiwan. Approximately 4, 400 ha, mainly in the middle and south parts of Taiwan, were used for tomato production, and the annual yield is about 110 thousand tons. Located in the subtropical region, hot and humid weather in summer accompanied with occasionally occurred typhoons and thunderstorm has put plants at risk of prevailing pest infestation and physiological disorder in Taiwan. Tomato plants are often threatened by different stresses, such as bacterial wilt, bacterial spot disease, heat, drought, salt and flooding. Therefore, development of strategies for farmers to counteract the outcome of such stresses becomes an important issue for scientists. Successful cases using beneficial microorganisms to increase plant vitality under stresses have been reported in recent years. In this study, endophytic bacteria isolated from tomato roots were used to investigate their in vitro plant growth-promoting (PGP) and resistance enhancing activities, including phosphate solubilization, siderophore production, and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylase (ACC) deaminase production as well as the antagonistic effects against different tomato pathogens. Afterwards, in vivo growth indices under different abiotic and biotic stresses were obtained. In total, 100 endophytic bacteria were screened for abovementioned activities, and 12, 17, 11 and 19 strains showed potentials to enhance tomato tolerance to heat, drought, salt and flooding, respectively. Moreover, 19 isolates have more than two activities. Further analysis indicates that among those candidates, XH1-2a and XP1-6, identified as Pseudomonas protegens and P. kribbensis, by 16S rDNA sequencing, exhibited better performance, and XP1-6 showed the highest tolerance under abiotic stress and biotic stress. Under heat stress, the amount of proline detected in XH1-2a or XP1-6-inoculated plants increased dominantly, but the amount of malondialdehyde and the peroxidase activity were similar to the control plants. Using green fluorescence protein-expressing derivative strains of XH1-2a and XP1-6, their colonization in the tomato roots was confirmed. In the future, these bacteria will be introduced into the integrated pest management strategies for increasing tomato adaptability to different stresses in the field. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T09:09:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R06645002-1.pdf: 2291126 bytes, checksum: a9883cd7a53c8da1af7d331f515cc190 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 i
Abstract ii 目錄 iv 表目錄 viii 圖目錄 ix 壹、前言 1 一、 番茄簡介 1 1. 栽培歷史 1 2. 營養與經濟價值 2 3. 栽培條件 2 二、 非生物性逆境 3 1. 高溫逆境 3 2. 乾旱逆境 3 3. 鹽害逆境 4 4. 淹水逆境 5 三、 番茄生物性逆境 6 1. 青枯病 (Bacteria wilt) 6 2. 細菌性斑點病 (Bacterial spot disease) 8 四、 促進植物生長根棲細菌與內生菌 9 1. 定義 9 2. PGPR 對作物的影響 10 3. PGPR 可增加植物抵抗生物與非生物逆境能力 10 4. PGPR或內生菌之共存性 11 貳、研究動機與目的 12 參、 材料與方法 13 一、供試植株與栽培條件 13 二、供試菌株培養與保存 13 三、內生細菌菌種鑑定 14 1. Genome DNA萃取 14 2. 聚合酶連鎖反應 (polymerase chain reaction, PCR) 15 3. 搭配 TA cloning 進行16S rDNA定序 15 四、內生菌之特性分析 17 1. 促進生長能力測試 17 2. 拮抗病原菌能力測試 18 3. 化學藥劑感受性 18 4. 內生菌親和性試驗 19 五、測試菌株內生特性分析 20 1. 浸泡處理時間對共生效果的影響 20 2. 內生細菌於植物中分布的位置 20 六、病原菌接種試驗 20 1. 青枯病 20 2. 細菌性斑點病 21 七、非生物性逆境處理 21 1. 高溫逆境 21 2. 乾旱逆境 21 3. 鹽害逆境 22 4. 淹水逆境 22 八、相對含水量測定 22 九、生理活性分析測定 22 1. 脯胺酸 (Proline) 測定 22 2. 脂質過氧化程度測定 23 3. Peroxidase (POD) 測定 23 十、統計分析 24 肆、結果 25 一、篩選具有 ACC deaminase 活性之菌株 25 二、初步篩選具提高番茄抗逆境潛力之菌株 25 三、候選菌株對病原菌之拮抗作用 26 四、接種內生菌對番茄抗生物性逆境之影響 27 1. 青枯病菌接種試驗 27 2. 細菌性斑點病菌接種試驗 28 五、接種內生菌對番茄抗非生物性逆境之影響 28 1. 高溫逆境 28 2. 乾旱逆境 29 4. 淹水逆境 32 六、XP1-6 和 XH1-2a 之內生特性分析 34 1. 浸泡處理時間對纏據效果 (colonization) 之影響 34 2. 共生位置 34 3. 潛力內生菌的定殖效果 35 七、相關酵素之活性測定 35 伍、討論 37 陸、結論 42 柒、參考文獻 43 捌、表 50 玖、圖 68 拾、附錄 79 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 提昇番茄抗生物及非生物逆境之內生菌特性分析研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Characterization of endophytes with the ability to enhance tomato tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鍾嘉綾,洪挺軒,鄧文玲,葉信宏 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 番茄,內生細菌,非生物逆境,生物性逆境, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Solanum lycopersicum,endophytic bacteria,abiotic stress,biotic stress, | en |
dc.relation.page | 85 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201904164 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-10-07 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 植物醫學碩士學位學程 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 植物醫學碩士學位學程 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.24 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。