請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74886
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 許聿廷(Yu-Ting Hsu) | |
dc.contributor.author | Ming-Yi Tseng | en |
dc.contributor.author | 曾明儀 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T09:09:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-04 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-11-04 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-10-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 王天佑, & 蕭震洋. (2013). 應用無人載具航拍及非常規攝影量測進行土石流三維地形重構. 中興工程, (120), 3-12.
許添本, 韓復華, 范俊海, 林貴璽, 羅仕京, 藍健綸, 林育瑞, 孫將瓴, & 翁國祐. (2012). 交通技術研發與人才培育規劃研究(2/4). 中華民國交通部出版. 黃家耀, 李子璋, 陳彥佑, 劉品均, 羅湘盈, 廖家慧, ... & 黃維皓. (2015). 混合車流模擬技術研發-機車行為研究 (Vol. 1010403444). 中華民國政府出版品. 曾子峻. (2011). 多軸飛行器於橋梁檢測之應用研究. 國立高雄應用科技大學土木工程與防災科技研究所學位論文. 羅湘盈. (2017). 圓環的混合車流特性及行為分析. 交通大學運輸與物流管理學系學位論文, 1-57. Amundson, F., & Hyden, C. (1977). Proceedings of first workshop on traffic conflicts. Institute of Economics, Oslo. Beitel, D., Stipancic, J., Manaugh, K., & Miranda-Moreno, L. (2017). Exploring Cyclist-Pedestrian Interactions in Shared Space Using Automated Video Conflict Analysis (No. 17-01960). Brosseau, M., Zangenehpour, S., Saunier, N., & Miranda-Moreno, L. (2013). The impact of waiting time and other factors on dangerous pedestrian crossings and violations at signalized intersections: A case study in Montreal. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 21, 159-172. Cooper, P. J. (1984). Experience with traffic conflicts in Canada with emphasis on “post encroachment time” techniques. International Calibration Study of Traffic Conflict Techniques (pp. 75-96). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Gol, G., Bayraktar, N. F., & Kiyak, E. Determination of the Vehicles Density with Qudrocopter. In Theoretical and Applied Aspects of Cybernetics. Proceedings of the 3rd International Scientific Conference of Students and Young Scientists—Kyiv: Bukrek, 2013.—336 p. ISBN 978-966-399-538-0 (p. 240). Grayson, G. B. (Ed.). (1984). The Malmö Study: A Calibration of Traffic Conflict Techniques. Institute for Traffic Safety Research SWOV. Hydén, C. (1996). Traffic conflicts technique: state-of-the-art. Traffic Safety Work with Video Processing, (37), 3-14. Jensen, S. U. (2013, January). Pedestrian and bicycle level of service at intersections, roundabouts, and other crossings. In 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Lee, T. C., Polak, J. W., & Bell, M. G. (2008). Trajectory Extractor user manual version 1.0. Centre for Transport Studies, Imperial College London, United Kingdom. www. cts. cv. ic. ac. uk/documents/publications/iccts01155. pdf. Accessed July, 1, 2008. Li, B., Xiong, S., Li, X., Liu, M., & Zhang, X. (2015). The Behavior Analysis of Pedestrian-cyclist Interaction at Non-Signalized Intersection on Campus: Conflict and Interference. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 3345-3352. Li, Y., & Fernie, G. (2010). Pedestrian behavior and safety on a two-stage crossing with a center refuge island and the effect of winter weather on pedestrian compliance rate. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(4), 1156-1163. Liao, C. H. (2017). 運用影像資料進行混合車流的安全評估方式. 交通大學運輸與物流管理學系學位論文, 1-53. Liu, P., Chen, A. Y., Huang, Y. N., Han, J. Y., Lai, J. S., Kang, S. C., ... & Tsai, M. H. (2014). A review of rotorcraft unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) developments and applications in civil engineering. Smart Struct. Syst, 13(6), 1065-1094. Papadimitriou, E., Lassarre, S., & Yannis, G. (2016). Introducing human factors in pedestrian crossing behaviour models. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 36, 69-82. Parker Jr, M. R., & Zegeer, C. V. (1989). Traffic Conflict Techniques for Safety and Operations: Observers Manual (No. FHWA-IP-88-027, NCP 3A9C0093). United States. Federal Highway Administration. Parkin, J., Wardman, M., & Page, M. (2007). Models of perceived cycling risk and route acceptability. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39(2), 364-371. Perkins, S. R., & Harris, J. L. (1968). Traffic conflict characteristics-accident potential at intersections. Highway Research Record, (225). Saunier, N., & Sayed, T. (2007). Automated analysis of road safety with video data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2019), 57-64. Sayed, T., Brown, G., & Navin, F. (1994). Simulation of traffic conflicts at unsignalized intersections with TSC-Sim. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 26(5), 593-607. Sayed, T., Zaki, M. H., & Autey, J. (2013). Automated safety diagnosis of vehicle–bicycle interactions using computer vision analysis. Safety Science, 59, 163-172. Taylor, D., & Jeffrey Davis, W. (1999). Review of basic research in bicycle traffic science, traffic operations, and facility design. Transportation Research Record, 1674(1), 102-110. Van der Horst, A. R. A. (1990). A Time Based Analysis of Road User Behaviour in Normal and Critical Encounters (No. HS-041 255). Vogel, K. (2003). A comparison of headway and time to collision as safety indicators. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 35(3), 427-433. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74886 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 近年來,自行車的日益普及引發針對自行車騎士道路使用權的爭論。考量永續運輸發展及安全因素,許多城市發展出自行車專用道,將自行車騎士與其他交通運具分離,但自行車專用道的效率與使用率常受到質疑。本研究旨在探索有關自行車專用道的存在對於自行車與行人間之衝突與自行車之行為模式,為當前的設計手冊提供經驗和定量的分析。考慮到數據收集便利性,本研究選擇以號誌路口發生的自行車與行人間之衝突為調查主軸,因號誌路口具高密度人流與自行車流,可預期發生衝突的頻率更高。影像攝於國立臺灣大學校總區周圍之號誌路口,本研究提取影像中所選週期之每個自行車騎士與行人的移動路徑,用以分析穿越行為模式。本研究將衝突分為八類,並觀察到283起衝突事件。在所有衝突中,以對向自行車與行人之對撞衝突和對向自行車與行人之側撞衝突最多。研究使用泊松回歸模型,結果顯示衝突傾向於發生在綠燈周期的前20秒,且衝突數量會隨著行人流量的增加而增加。本研究認為拓寬穿越道、號誌分離、劃設行人等待區與自行車等待區、重新劃設機車待轉區位置有助於降低自行車與行人間之衝突,增進穿越效率。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The growing popularity of cycling induces the argument over the right of way for cyclists. Many cities have deployed dedicated bike lanes to separate cyclists from other traffic flows in light of sustainable transportation development and safety concerns. However, the effectiveness of dedicated bike lanes is questioned in terms of their utilization rates. This research seeks to explore the behavioral patterns related to cyclist-pedestrian conflicts against the presence of dedicated bike lanes, so as to provide both empirical and quantitative insights for the current design guidelines. Upon the consideration of data collection, this research chooses to focus on the cyclist-pedestrian conflicts occurring at signalized crossings, where higher frequencies of conflicts can be expected. Video streams were filmed over the signalized crossings around a university campus in Taipei, Taiwan. Movements of individual cyclist and pedestrian were abstracted to identify the aggregate behavioral pattern of crossing streets with the presence of dedicated bike lanes. Eight conflict types have been classified, and 283 conflict events were observed. Among all the conflicts, cyclist-pedestrian head-on conflict in opposite directions and cyclist-pedestrian sideswipe conflict in opposite directions are the most. The Poisson regression model was employed, it showed that conflicts tend to appear in the first 20s of the green interval, and they increase as the pedestrian flow increase. This research suggest that widening the crossings, using pedestrian scramble, marking separated waiting areas, and rearranging the position of the two-stage left-turn area will help reduce the conflict between cyclists and pedestrians and improve the efficiency of crossing. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T09:09:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R06521501-1.pdf: 23584624 bytes, checksum: 8df940a64e64562ed59b6bcbb21ac54f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 I
誌謝 II 中文摘要 III ABSTRACT IV CONTENTS V LIST OF FIGURES VII LIST OF TABLES VIII CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Motivation and Objective 2 1.3 Organization 3 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 4 2.1 Conflict Analysis 4 2.2 Data Collection 5 2.3 Behavior and Interaction 7 2.4 Bike Facility Design 8 2.4.1 Geometric Design and Level of Service 8 2.4.2 Waiting Time 9 CHAPTER 3 DATA COLLECTION & DESCRIPTION 10 3.1 Survey Design 10 3.2 Data Description 13 CHAPTER 4 METHODOLOGY 21 4.1 Research Design 21 4.1.1 Time-to-collision (TTC) 21 4.1.2 Types of Conflicts 22 4.2 Data Analysis 24 4.2.1 Database Establishment 24 4.2.2 Characteristics of Conflict 27 4.3 Poisson Regression Analysis 30 CHAPTER 5 RESULT 31 5.1 Observed Conflict Events 31 5.2 Poisson Regression 39 5.3 Discussion 42 5.4 Suggestion 47 CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS & FUTURE WORK 49 6.1 Conclusions 49 6.2 Future Work 50 REFERENCES 51 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 透過自行車與行人之衝突分析探索號誌路口之自行車車流型態 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Exploring Cyclist Flow Patterns at Signalized Crossing: Perspective of Cyclist-pedestrian Conflict Analysis | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃家耀,陳柏華 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 自行車與行人之衝突,自行車專用道,行人行為模式,自行車行為模式,號誌路口,泊松回歸模型, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Cyclist-pedestrian Conflict,Dedicated Bike Lane,Pedestrian Behavior,Cyclist Behavior,Signalized Crossing,Poisson Regression Model, | en |
dc.relation.page | 53 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201904206 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-10-15 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 23.03 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。