請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7486
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 戚樹誠 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chih-Peng Chang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 張志鵬 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-19T17:44:42Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-18 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-19T17:44:42Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-18 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-08-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部份
1. Jim Collins(2002)從A到A+。台北市,遠流出版社。 2. 何永福、楊國安(1993)。人力資源管理。臺北市三民出版社 3. 李順能(2005)。組織變革下員工之變革認知、工作態度與工作績效之相關研究-以A軍用航空發動機修護工廠為例。樹德科大經營管理研究所碩士論文。 4. 張曉慧與李君如(2006),領導型態、員工成熟度與工作績效、組織承諾關係之研究-以台中市國際觀光旅館為例,2006餐旅管理學術與實務研討會,頁44-45 5. 黃冠寧(2017),如何找到適任人才?以銀行第一線服務人員之甄選雨訓練成效為例。東吳大學企管所碩士論文。 6. 余慶華(1999)消費金融人員工作投入、工作滿足、薪酬福利與工作績效之相關性研究-以高雄地區銀行為例。中山大學人資所碩士論文。 7. 黃彩霖(2003)醫院行政人員的人格特質、工作壓力、工作投入、專業承諾及工作績效之相關性研究。南華大學管理研究所碩士論文。 8. 曹國雄(1998)個人特徵、工作特徵和個人知覺及其相關因素對薪資滿足的影響。中原學報 ; 26卷4期 (1998 / 11 / 01) , P9 – 20 9. 鄭伯壎(1977)。領導方式、情境因素與人格屬性對工人工作滿足感的影響。國立台灣大學心理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。 10. 卓筱琳(2008)人格特質與工作表現、工作滿意及離職傾向之關係探討:以某量販店客收人員為例。中央大學人力資源管理碩士論文。 11. 王郁智、章淑娟、朱正一(2006),升遷機會、社會支持、工作滿意度 與留任意願之相關性研究,志為護理學報, P90-101. 12. 莊璦嘉、林惠彥(2005)個人與環境適配對工作態度與行為之影響,台灣管理學刊第五卷第一期,pp123~148 13. 莊璦嘉、蘇弘文(2005)主觀適配的特質環境前因與工作態度後果之探討,人力資源管理學報 2005 春季號 第五卷第一期 PP 001- 027 14. 房美玉、徐雅慧(2004)個人特徵、工作滿意度與工作績效關係之探討─以 H 公司為例。中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。 15. 周新富(2008)社會階級對子女學業成就的影響⎯⎯ 以家庭資源為分析架構,臺灣教育社會學研究 八卷一期 16. 李威龍(2013) 家庭環境對創業意向與創業行為之影響:以兩岸創業家為例,多國籍企業管理評論 ; 7卷1期, P71 – 94 17. 曾妙音、王雅玲、李瓊雯、張恬瑜(2001)父母社經地位與國中生學習動機、學業成就之相關性研究,家庭教育雙月刊(32), 頁, 2011 - 140.130.196.175 18. 吳育任 (2005)「新進員工求職行為、工作滿足與離職傾向之關聯性探討—以會計師事務所為研究對象」,交通大學經營管理研究所,碩士論文 19. 王濟川、郭志剛 (2008)。 Logit 迴歸模式-方法及應用. 台北市: 五南圖書出版有限公司。 20. 呂奇傑、李天行、蕭書涵、許柏榮(2012)。應用資料探勘分類技術於人才甄選之研究,7卷2期 21. 宋曜廷、蔡順良、陳柏熹、蕭孟莛、趙子揚。(2010)。金融人才性格測驗計畫結案報告。金融研訓院。 22. 蔡宗廷、張育菱(2015)。金融人才性格測驗對工作滿意、工作 績效與留任意願之效標關聯驗證─ 以 P 銀行為例。兩岸金融季刊 第三卷第三期 23. 魏文欽、朱聖和(2008)。人格特質、工作態度、服務品質、工作績效及顧客滿意度關連性之實證研究-以國內金融控股公司為例。International Journal of LISREL 1。1(2),1-24。 英文部分 1. Barrick,M.R.,&Mount,M.K.(1991).TheBigFivepersonalitydimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26. 2. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9-30. 3. Blumberg & Pringle (1982). The missing opportunity in Organizational research : Some implications for a theory of work performance. Academy of Management Review, 7, 560-69 4. Cable, D. M.,Judge, T. A.(1996).Person-organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,67(3),294-311 5. Cotton, J. L.,Tuttle, J. M.(1986).Employee turnover: A meta-analysis and review with implication for research.Academy of Management Review,11(1),55-70 6. Costa, P. T., Jr., R. R. McCrace, and J. L. Holland. (1984) “Personality and vocational interests in an adult sample,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 390-400. 7. Dalton, Dan R., Todor, William D., & Krackhardt, David M. (1982). Turnover Overstated: The Functional Taxonomy. Academy of Management Review, 7(1), pp.117-123. 8. Deming, W. E.(1986).Out of the crisis.Cambridge, MA:MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study. 9. De Cenzo,D.A.& Robbins.S.P(1986).Human resource management. 10. Evans,W.R. & Davis,W.D. (2005).High-performance work Systems and Organixational Performance :The Mediating Role of Internal Social Structure. Journal of Management,31(5),758-775 11. Galton, Francis, 1886. “Regression towards Mediocrity in Hereditary Stature.” The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 15: 246-263 12. Gatewood, R. D. and Field, H. S., (2001). Human Resources Selection, 5th, USA, Mike Roche. 13. Grimsley, G,Jarrett, H. F(1975).The relation of past managerial achievement to test measures obtained in the employment situation: Methodology and results11.Personnel Psychology,28,215-231. 14. Igharia & Greenhaus, J. H., (1992), Determinants of MIS Employees’ Turnover Intentions:A Structural Equation Model. Personal Management, 35(2), pp. 34–49. 15. Kolenko, T. A.,R. J. Aldag(1989).Congruence perceptions and managerial career/work outcomes: An exploratory analysis.Paper presented at the meeting of the National Academy of Management. 16. Korman, A.K.(1968)”Task success、tack population and self-esteem as influences on task liking”,Journal of Applied Psychology, p.52. 17. Korman (1977),Organizational Behavior by Abraham K. Korman (1977, Book, Illustrated) 18. Lovelock, C. H.,Wirtz, J.(2010).Service Marketing: People, Technology, Strategy(7th ed.).Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall. 19. Lauver, K. J., & Kristof-Brown, A. (2002). Distinguishing between employees’ perceptions of person-job and person-organization fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(1), 454-470 20. McClelland, D. C.,Burnham, David H.(1976).Power is the Great Motivator.Harvard Business Review,54(2),100-110. 21. Mobley,W.H., Horner,S. O., & Hollingsworth, A. T. (1978) ,‘An evaluation of precursors of hospital emp 22. Mobley, W. H. (1982). Employee Turnover: Causes, Consequences, and Control. 23. Mowday, R. T.,L. W. Porter,R. M. Steers(1982).Employee-Organization Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover.New York:Academic Press. 24. Mowday, R. T.,R. M. Steers,L. W. Porter(1979).The Measurement of Organizational Commitment.Journal of Vocational Behavior,14,224-247 25. Mowday, R.T., Koberg, C.S. & McArthur, A.W. (1984). The psychology of the withdrawal process : a cross-validational test of Mobley's intermediate linkages model of turnover in two samples. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1) : 79-94. 26. Muchinsky, P.M. (1993). Psychology Applied to Work : An Introduction to Industrialand Organizational Psychology (4th ). California : Brooks/Cole Published. 27. McClelland, D. C., (1973), Testing for Competence Rather than for Intelligence, American Psychologist, 1(1): 1-14. 28. McClelland, D. C.,Atkinson, J. W.,Clark, R. A.,Lowell, E. L.(1953).The achievement motive.New York:Appleton-Century-Crofts. 29. Neuman, G. A. W., J. (1999). Team effectiveness: Beyond skills and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 376-389. 30. Neuman, G.A., Wagner, S.H., and Christiansen, N.D. (1999), “The relationship between work-team personality composition and the job performance of teams.” Group & Organization Management, 24(1),pp.28-45. 31. Ones, D,Viswesvaran, C,Schmidt, F. L(1993).Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance.Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph,78,679-703. 32. O`Reilly, C. A.,Chatman, J.,Caldwell, D.(1991).People and organization culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit.Academy of Management Journal,34(3),487-516. 33. Judge, T. A.,Ferris, G. R.(1992).The Elusive Criterion of Fit in Human Resources Staffing Decisions.Human Resource Planning,15(4),47-67 34. McClelland & Burnham ( 1976). Power is the great motivator. Harvard Business Review, 54, 2, 100-110, Mar-Apr 76 35. Paul M. Muchinsky (1999), Psychology Applied to Work, P129-130. 36. Pettman, B.D.(1973). Some factors influencing labor turnover : A review of the literature. Industrial Relations Journal, 4, 43-61. 37. Phillips, J. D.,(1990). The Price Tag on Turnover, Personnel Journal, 69(l2), pp.58-61. 38. Posthuma, R. A., Morgeson, F.P., and Campion, M.A. (2002) Beyond employment interview validity: A comprehensive narrative review of recent research and trends over time. Personnel Psychology, 55 (1), 1-81. 39. Wanberg, C.R., Watt, J.D., & Rumsey, D.J.(1996). “Individuals without jobs: an empirical study of job seeking behavior and reemployment 40. Wanberg, C. R.,Watt, J. D.,Rumsey, D. J.(1996).Individuals without Jobs: An Empirical Study of Job Seeking Behavior and Reemployment.Journal of Applied Psychology,81,76-87. 41. Saks, A. M.,Ashforth, B. E.(1997).A longitudinal investigation of the relationships between job information sources, applicant perceptions of fit, and work outcomes.Personnel Psychology,50(2),395-426. 42. Schermerhorn. (1999).”Using Electronic Student Portfolios in Management .Education: A Stakeholder Perspective Chappell and Schermerhorn Journal of Management. 43. Seashore and Taber (1975), “Job Satisfaction and Their Correlates”, American Behavioral Scientist. 44. Shooshtarian, Z., Ameli, F., & Aminilari, M. (2013). The Effect of Labor's Emotional Intelligence on Their Job Satisfaction, Job Performance and Commitment. Iranian Journal of Management Studies (IJMS) 6(1), 29-45. 45. Spencer, L. M.,Spencer, S. M.(1993).Competence at work: Models for superior performance.New York:John Wiley & Sons. 46.Schwab D.P.,Rynes S.L., & Aldag R.J.(1987), “Theories and research on job search and choice”, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 5, pp.129-166 47. Sherman,A.W. & Bohlander,G.W.(1992), Managing human resources.OH:South-Western Publishing Co. 48. Stewart, U L.,M. R. Barrick,A. M. Ryan(2003).Toward an Understanding of the Multilevel Role of Personality in Teams.Peronality and Work: Recosidering the role of personality in organizations. 49. Salgado(1997)The Five Factor Model of Personality and Job Performance in the European Community, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1):30-43. 50. Stevens, C. K.,A. L. Kristof(1995).Making the Right Impression: A Field Study of Applicant Impression Management during Job Interviews.Journal of Applied Psychology,80(5),587-60 51. Stephen P.Robbins. (2001).Basic motivation concepts. Organizationl Behavior,(9), 154-187 52. Stephen P.Robbins(1998), ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR. PRENTICE HALL, INC., NEW JERSEY, 5TH EDITION. P.642 53. Weiss, H. M.,Adler, S.(1984).Personality and organizational behavior.Research in Organizational Behavior,6,1-50. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7486 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究以個案銀行2013年新進員工共1016位人員,從其應徵時填寫之工作經驗、教育程度、學校類別、學校體系、家庭狀況、履歷自傳及兵役等背景資料,與人格特質問卷資料,預測其實際工作績效及留任情形。另外,研究者以工作職務作為調節變項,探討前後台職務是否與前述因素產生交互作用影響效果。研究結果如下:
一、應徵者背景包含教育程度、學校類別、學校體系、企業負責人家庭及履歷自傳完整性等對工作績效有正向預測力,且曾任軍中管理職之新進人員相較於未在軍中擔任管理職者,其工作績效顯著較佳。 二、應徵者人格特質越傾向人際親和型及謹慎負責型,其工作績效越佳。 三、應徵者越具有工作經驗或是本身為相關科系之畢業生,日後越可能傾向不留任。 四、應徵者人格特質越傾向人際親和型、謹慎負責型,日後越可能傾向留任;應徵者人格特質越傾向創意思考型、領導管理型,日後越可能傾向不留任。 五、針對工作職務之調節作用,應徵者之教育程度、學校類別、企業家負責人的家庭,若其工作為後台職務者,這些變項對工作績效之預測力較佳。另外,應徵者之人格特質傾向人際親和型,若其工作為前台職務者,此變項對工作績效之預測力較佳。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In this study, a total of 1016 new employees of the case bank in 2013 were selected to observe their background information such as the work experience, education level, schooling type, schooling system, family status, curriculum vitae and military service status, and personality traits to expect their actual job performance and job retention. In addition, the researcher uses the job title as the moderating variable to explore whether the front and back office positions interact with the aforementioned factors. The research results are as follows:
1.The job applicant’s background, including the educational level, the schooling type, schooling system, family background (whether the job applicant is a family member of a superintendent in a company), curriculum vitae and biography, can be the positive indicator to predict the job applicant's work performance, and the newly recruited personnel who have served in the management position in the military exhibit significantly better performance than those who have not. 2.The more the job applicant’s personality traits indicate a tendency to be approachable, cautious and responsible, the better the job applicant's work performance tends to be. 3.The more work or academic experience the job applicant has, the less likely the job applicant will remain on the job in the future. 4.The more the job applicant’s personality traits indicate a tendency to be approachable, cautious and responsible, the more likely the job applicant will remain on the job in the future. The more the job applicant’s personality traits indicate a tendency to be creative or capable of leadership and management, the less likely the job applicant will remain on the job in the future. 5.Variables such as the educational level, the schooling type, and family background (whether the job applicant is a family member of a superintendent in a company) of the job applicant can be used to adjust the role and job title taken by the job applicant. And if the job applicant serves the back office positions, those variables can better predict the job applicant's work performance. In addition, the more the job applicant’s personality traits indicate a tendency to be approachable, the better the job applicant's work performance tends to be than expected if the job applicant serves the front office positions. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-19T17:44:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-P05E41030-1.pdf: 2404972 bytes, checksum: b0a2848179ffef88af6002854b9fff1d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 研究流程 5 第二章 文獻探討 6 第一節 甄選 6 第二節 留任與離職 8 第三節 人格特質 11 第四節 工作績效 16 第三章 研究方法 19 第一節 個案銀行簡介 19 第二節 研究架構 22 第三節 研究假設 23 第四節 統計分析方法 26 第五節 研究變項 28 第四章 研究結果 34 第一節 敘述統計 34 第二節 相關分析 35 第三節 應徵者特質與工作績效之分析 37 第四節 應徵者特質與留任之分析 43 第五節 工作職務與甄選特質之交互作用對工作績效及留任之影響效果 46 第五章 結論與建議 52 第一節 研究結果與管理意涵 52 第二節 後續研究建議 58 第三節 總結 58 參考文獻 60 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 以應徵者背景因素與人格特質預測工作績效與留任
-A銀行2013年新進人員為樣本之分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Using Applicants’ Demographics and Personality Traits to Predict Work Performance and Retention - Analyses of the New Recruits of Bank A in 2013 | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃家齊,許碧芬 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 甄選,人格特質,工作績效,金融業,應徵者背景資料, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Selection,Applicants’ Demographics,Work performance,Financial industry,Personality Traits, | en |
dc.relation.page | 66 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201803060 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-08-13 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 進修推廣學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 事業經營碩士在職學位學程 | zh_TW |
dc.date.embargo-lift | 2023-08-18 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 事業經營碩士在職學位學程 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf | 2.35 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。