請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74840
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林照真 | |
dc.contributor.author | Ting Wei Chang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 張庭瑋 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T09:08:37Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-12-03 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-12-03 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-11-05 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 方念萱&蘇彥豪(1998)。〈網路傳播中的對話與對峙-以女性主義連線版的言說 為例〉,《新聞學研究》,56,183-218。 王維菁、馬綺韓&陳釗偉(2013)。〈網際網路時代的社會運動: 以台灣環境運 動組織為例〉,《資訊社會研究》,25,1-22。
王錦義、林毅璋(2010 年 5 月 8 日)。慣寶寶? 網友回罵老闆被慣壞。自由時 報電子報。取自 http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/paper/393923 余貞誼(2016)。〈「我說妳是妳就是」:從 PTT「母豬教」的仇女行動談網路性霸凌的性別階層〉,《婦研縱橫》,105,22-29。 李丁讚(2004)。《公共領域在台灣: 困境與契機》。台北:桂冠。 李玥慧(2006)。《從審議式民主觀點論我國媒體改革方向》。國立臺灣大學法律學院法律學研究所碩士論文,台北。 李紹良(2012)。《十五萬人的 BBS 是如何煉成的: 批踢踢實業坊技術演變歷程之研究 (1995-2008)》。國立政治大學社會所碩士論文,台北。 李宗祐(2010年5月5日)。「慣寶寶」大學生 業界嘆難用。 中國時報。A5版。 李禮君(1999)。〈網路中的女性集結與動員初探〉,《婦女與兩性學刊》,10,105-165。 吳翠松。(2001)。〈報紙中的同志─十五年來台灣同性戀議題報導的解析〉,《同志研究》。台北:巨流。 吳學展(2015年11月12日)。【解構 PTT】有自己的法律、法院和貨幣,沒被臉書淘汰的 PTT 是台灣民主化的重要推手。報橘。取自https://buzzorange.com/2015/11/12/ptt/ 周芷萱(2016年5月3日)。周芷萱:陣頭小孩、母豬教,與台灣女體政治。 端傳媒 。取自https://theinitium.com/article/20160503-opinion-dintaochildren/ 林宇玲(2014)。〈網路與公共領域:從審議模式轉向多元公眾模式〉,《新聞學研究》,118,55-85。 林宇玲(2002)。《網路與性別》。台北:華之鳳科技。 林宇玲(2000)。〈解讀全球資訊網上的台灣女性網站: 由網站論述表現看性別與科技之關係〉。《婦女與兩性學刊》,11,1-33。 林照真(2010)。〈收視率與公共領域的弔詭或矛盾?〉,黃瑞祺(編)《溝通、批判和實踐 哈伯瑪斯八十論集》,頁277-312,台北:允晨文化。 林意仁(2011)。《網路群眾文化及其民主意涵-以 PTT Gossiping 看板為例》。 政治大學社會學研究所學位論文,台北。 林鶴玲, & 鄭陸霖(2001)。〈台灣社會運動網路經驗: 一個探索性的分析〉,《臺灣社會學刊》,25,111-156。 洪貞玲、劉昌德(2004)。〈線上全球公共領域?網路的潛能、實踐與限制〉,《資訊社會研究》,6,341-364。 倪炎元(2002)。〈台灣女性政治精英的媒體再現〉,《新聞學研究》,70,17-58。 夏春祥(2004)。〈尋找公共領域:論台灣社會中的新聞論述〉,李丁讚 (編)《公共領域在台灣:困境與契機》,頁 215-297。台北:桂冠。 翁嫆琄(2014年9月16日)。連沒網軍?PTT站長多重分身遭揭露。新頭殼。取自https://newtalk.tw/news/view/2014-09-16/51475 莊泰富(2018年9月20日)。【男人想想】從「女權自助餐」看見男性對父權的控訴(上)。想想。取自https://www.thinkingtaiwan.com/content/7189 陳明鴻&張恬君(2005)。《圖解設計類型與圖片真實性對國中生物教學適當性之影響—以遺傳單元為例 (Doctoral dissertation)》。國立交通大學應用藝術研究所碩士論文,新竹。 陳婉琪,張恒豪, & 黃樹仁(2016)。〈網絡社會運動時代的來臨? 太陽花運動參與者的人際連帶與社群媒體因素初探〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》,28(4), 467-501。 陳韻如(1998)。〈哈伯瑪斯的公共領域模式-女性主義觀點的探討〉,《中華傳播學會年會手冊》。臺北。 張玉琦(2007)。〈PTT 技術老掉牙 75 萬網友還是最愛它〉,《數位時代雙周刊》,147,82。 張為竣(2016年6月5日)。〈教主被水桶 鄉民來亂板 藍綠、男女… 都為豬吵翻天〉。《聯合晚報》。A8板 張凱強(2016)。〈論復仇式色情這當代厭女文化下的網路獵巫行動〉,《婦研縱橫》,105,16-21。 張軒豪、柯建志&廖凱弘(2001)。〈網路誹謗類型之初探-從網路謠言談起〉,《傳播與管理研究》,1(1),21-44。 張錦華(1997)。〈從公共領域理論及多元化報導觀點探討我國選舉新聞報導-以 78 年, 81 年, 以及 84 年選舉新聞中的統獨議題為例〉,《新聞學研究》,55, 183-202。 黃上銓(2013)。〈[鄉民] 的誕生: 線上論壇中認同語意及娛樂功能之歷史考察〉。臺灣大學社會學研究所學位論文,台北。. 黃啟龍(2002)。〈網路上的公共領域實踐:以弱勢社群網站為例〉,《資訊社會研究》,3,85-111。 黃厚銘(2016)。《婉君妳好嗎?:給覺醒鄉民的PTT進化史》。新北: 群學。 黃瑞祺(1996)。《批判社會學-批判理論與現代社會學》。台北:三民。 楊意菁(2008)。〈網路民意的公共意涵: 公衆, 公共領域與溝通審議〉,《中華傳播學刊》,14,115-167。 楊意菁(2013)。〈網路意見的新聞在線與公眾想像:「網友說」新聞的內容與論述分析〉,《中華傳播學刊》,24,119-164。 福嶋亮大(2012),蘇文淑譯。《當神話開始思考:網路社會的文化論》,台北:大藝。 鄭宇君, & 陳百齡(2016)。〈探索線上公眾即時參與網絡化社運-以臺灣318 運動為例〉,《傳播研究與實踐》,6(1),117-150。 潘淑滿(2003)。《質性研究:理論與應用》。台北:心理,144-145。 劉詠聰(1993)。〈魏晉以還史家對后妃主政之負面評價〉,鮑家麟編著,《中國婦女史論第三集》,頁93-130。台北:心理。 劉慧雯(2008)。〈網際網路公共領域角色的反思: 以東海劈腿事件與鴻海打壓新聞自由事件為例〉,《新聞學研究》,97,45-81。 數位時代(2016 年 2 月)。〈解讀 ptt:台灣最有影響力的網路社群〉,《數位時 代》。取自 https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/38609/bn-2016-01-29-161210-178 戴育賢(2001)。〈重返公共領域: 哈伯瑪斯, 女性主義, 羅逖, 文化研究〉,《新聞學研究》,62,119-142。 羅燦煐(2003)。〈線上性別 vs. 線下性別: 網路互動中的性別形構〉。《新聞學研究》,76,43-90。 顧忠華(2004)。〈公共領域的社會基礎〉,李丁讚(編),《公共領域在 台灣:困境與契機》, 141-175。台北:桂冠。 顧燕翎(主編)(2000)。《女性主義理論與流派(再版)》。台北:女書文化。 Cheshire, C. (1997). Leaving home: Reflections on lesbianism and feminism. 中譯 本,張娟芬譯(1997)。《同女出走》。台北:女書文傳播符號學理論化。 Fiske, J. (1982). Introduction of Communication Studies. 中譯本,張錦華等譯(1995)。《傳播符號學理論》。台北:遠流。 Jensen, K. B & Jan- kowski, N. W. (1991). A handbook of qualitative methodologies for mass communication research. 中譯本,唐維敏譯(1996)。《大眾傳播研究方法》。台北:五南。 Pariser, E. (2012). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. 中譯本,宋瑛堂譯(2013)。《搜尋引擎沒告訴你的事》。台北: 左岸文化。 Sunstein, C. (2001). Republic.com. 中譯本,黃維明譯(2002)。《Republic.com 網路會顛覆民主嗎?》。臺北市:新新聞文化。 Arterton, F. C. (1987). Teledemocracy: Can technology protect democracy? Newsbury Park, CA: Sage. Baehr, H., & Gray, A. (Eds.). (1996). Turning it on: A reader in women and media. New York, NY: Arnold. O Baoill, A. (2000). Slashdot and the public sphere. First Monday, 5(9). doi:https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v5i9.790 Beauvior, Simone de (1972). The second sex. London: Penguin. Becker, M. B. (1994). The emergence of civil society in the eighteenth century: A privileged moment in the history of England, Scotland, and France. Indiana, IN: Indiana University Press. Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Blair, C. (1998). Netsex: Empowerment through discourse. In B. Ebo(Ed.), Cyberghetto or cybertopia? Race, class and gender on the Internet (pp.205-218). London, England: Prageger. Boyd, D. (2015). Social media: A phenomenon to be analyzed. Social media + Society. Available to URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115580148 Braidotti, R. (1996). Cyberfeminism with a difference. Futures of critical theory: Dreams of difference, 239-259. Available to: URL https://books.google.com.tw/books?hl=zh-TW&lr=&id=KtQ7zXRQq54C&oi=fnd&pg=PA239&ots=ZZIskd7wV5&sig=6IytbMl4Zcq7sYQ3ESkB5X51Brg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. New York, NY: Polity Pr. Dahlgren, P. (1991). Introducation. In P. Dahlgren & C. Sparks (Eds.), Communication and citizenship: Journalism and the public sphere in the new media age (pp. 1-24). New York, NY: Routledge. Dahlgren, P. (1995). Television and the public sphere: Citizenship, democracy and the media. London, England: Sage. Dahlgren, P. (2005). The internet, public sphere, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political communication, 22, 147-162. Dahlgren, P. (2001). The transformation of democracy? In B. Axford & R. Huggins (Eds.), New media and politics (pp. 64-88). London, England: Sage Publication. David, R. (2003). From bulletin boards to blogs. Technology review, 106, 7. Dietrich, D. (1997). Woman: Gender and textuality in the cybercultural matrix. In Jones, S. (Ed.), Virtual culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety(pp. 169). London, England: Sage. Dryzek, John S. (1990). Discursive democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Elias, N., & Jephcott, E. (1978). The civilizing process (Vol. 1). Oxford: Blackwell. Fenton, N. (2008). Mediating solidarity. Global media and communication, 4(1), 37-57. Fernback, J., & Thompson, B. (1994). Reifying Cyberspace: The Internet as a Democratic Site for Dissent, Paper Presented in 1994 International communication Association Annual Conference, Fleming, M. (2013). Women and the' Public Use of Reason'. In Feminists read Habermas (RLE Feminist Theory) (pp. 133-154). London, England: Routledge. Fraser, N. (1990). Rethink the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social text, (25/26): 56-80. Fraser, N. (1987). Women, welfare and the politics of need interpretation. Thesis eleven, 17(1), 88-106. Fraser, N. (1997). Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the' postsocialist' condition. London, England: Routledge. Frederick, H. (1993). Computer networks and the emergence of global civil society. In L. M. Harasim (Eds.), Global networks: Computers and international communication, (pp.283-295), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Forbes, J. S. (1996). Disciplining women in comtemporary discourses of sexuality. Journal of Gender Studies, 5(2): 177-189. Fuchs, C. (2014). Social media and the public sphere. tripleC: communication, capitalism & critique. Open access journal for a global sustainable information society, 12(1), 57-101. Goffman, E. (1978). The presentation of self in everyday life. London, England: Harmondsworth. Gouldner, A. V. (1976). The dialectic of ideology and technology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Habermas, J. (1989[1962]). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Habermas, J. (1991). The theory of communicative action. Boston, MA: Beacon press.. Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. New York, NY: Routledge. Herring, S. C. (1995, October). Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. In computerization and controversy (2nd ed.) (pp. 476-489). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press. Hiltz,S.R & Turoff, M. (1978). The network nation: Human communication via computer. Reading. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley. Huh, S., & Williams, D. (2010). Dude looks like a lady: Gender swapping in an online game. In Online worlds: Convergence of the real and the virtual (pp. 161-174). London, England: Springer. Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., & Clinton, K. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture. Media Education for the 21st century. Chicago, IL: MacArthur Foudation. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: where old and new media collide. New York, NY: New York University Press. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2012). Social media: back to the roots and back to the future. Journal of systems and information technology, 14 (2), 101-104. Landes, J. B. (1988). Women and the public sphere in the age of the French revolution. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Liwen, J. (2008). Chinese Online BBS Sphere: What BBS Has Brought to China (Doctoral dissertation, Thesis (SM), Massachusetts Institute of Technology). Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (Vol. 10). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Marvin, C. (1998). When old technology were new: Thinking about electric communication in the late nineteenth century. New York, NY: Oxford university. Mazali, T. (2011). Social media as a new public sphere. Leonardo, 44(3), 290-291. McLaughlin, M. L. (1996). The art site on the World Wide Web. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 46(1): 51-79. Meikle, G., & Young, S. (2011). Media convergence: Networked digital media in everyday life. Basingstoke, England: Macmillan International Higher Education. Negt, O., & Kluge, A. (1993). Public sphere and experience: Toward an analysis of the bourgeois and proletarian public sphere. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Nuñez Puente, S. (2011). Feminist cyberactivism: Violence against women, internet politics, and Spanish feminist praxis online. Continuum: Journal of media & cultural studies, 25(03), 333-346. O'reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications & strategies, (1): 17-37. Papacharissi, Z., & de Fatima Oliveira, M. (2012). Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of communication, 62, 266-282. Peters, J. D. (1993). Distrust of representation: Habermas on the public opinion. Media, Culture and Society, 15, 541-571. Plant, S. (1997). Zero + Ones: Digital women + the new technoculture. New York, NY: Doubleday. Pariser (2011). Beware online 'filter bubbles” Available to URL: https://www.ted.com/talks/eli_pariser_beware_online_filter_bubbles? Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. NY: HarperPerennial. Rivers, C. (1996). Slick spins and fractured fact: how cultural myths distort the news. New York, NY: Columbia University. Schäfer, M. S. (2015). Digital public sphere. The international encyclopedia of political communication, 1-7. Sunstein, C. R. (2002). The law of group polarization. Journal of political philosophy, 10(2), 175-195. Shirky, C. (2011). The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political change. Foreign affairs, 28-41. Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: How digital networks transform our ability to gather and cooperate. New York, NY: Penguin Press. Spender, D. (1996). Nattering on the net: Women, power and cyberspace. Melbourne, Australia: Spinifex Press. Stacey, J. (1983) Patriarchy and Socialist Revolution in China. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Tehranian, M. (1990). Technologies of power: Information machines and democratic prospects. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press. Available to URL: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001/acprof-9780199970773-chapter-1 Wakeford, N. (1997). Networking women and grrrls with information/communication technology: Surfing tales of the world wide web. In Terry, J. and Calvert, M. (Eds.). Processed lives: Gender and technology in everyday life (pp51-66). New York, NY: Routledge. Webler, T. (1995). “Right” discourse in citizen participation: an evaluative yardstick. In Fairness and competence in citizen participation (pp. 35-86). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. Wise, P. (1997). Always already virtual: feminist politics in cyberspace. In David Poter (Ed.), Internet culture (pp.180-196). New York, NY: Routledge. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74840 | - |
dc.description.abstract | PTT 是目前台灣使用人次最多、最具代表性的網路社群論壇。PTT 社群長期吸 引大量臺灣年輕民眾加入,因而建構出極大規模的社群,各種類型的話題都能 在 PTT 上發問、推文、回覆,激盪出討論的熱潮。加上社群平台即時性互動的 高效率,使 PTT 成為台灣最大的網路討論空間,頗能反映公共領域原型。對女 性議題卻未必如此。
本論文以 PTT 最大、也是最熱門的八卦板為研究對象,分析其文章和留言,如 何再現性犯罪中的女性角色、母職及妻職、人生觀與愛情觀以及女權等議題。 檢視這個以男性為主的社群平台(PTT 八卦板),能否理性溝通女性議題。 經過文本分析,本研究有以下發現:八卦板上有關性犯罪事件的再現,主要以女性誣告的新聞主題為大宗,文章的回覆和留言內容呈現「男性加害者無罪」、甚至「男性才是受害者」的觀點。八卦板上的鄉民也會用「母豬」和「台女」這兩個負面標籤,形容與傳統價值觀相左的女性,試圖重塑女性服從男性的傳統價值。 本論文深度訪談男性鄉民,發現八卦板上的言論和性別意識,是由八卦板上的多數使用者-男性鄉民共同營造。他們期待在板上尋求認同和關注,所以以「批評女性」為主題的內容引起廣大男性共鳴。另外,鄉民們的線下生活,也影響了八卦板上,討論女性議題的氛圍和性別意識的呈現。 綜合兩種研究方法後,本論文發現在八卦板討論女性議題的情況,仍然看到太多情緒性發言,不但讓女性的線上形象變得單一而扁平,也顯現出男性鄉民線下生活不安焦慮的一面。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | PTT is currently the most used online forum and the most representative discussion community in Taiwan. This forum has attracted a large amount of Taiwanese’ young generation to join, and these participants has thus constructed a very large-scale community. Various types of topics can be questioned, discussed, and replied on PTT, which has stirred up the discussion. Plus the high efficiency of instant interaction of the social media online, PTT has become Taiwan's largest online discussion space, which reminds people of its’ potential to become public sphere in this era, except the issues about women.
This study takes PTT's largest and most popular board- Gossip as the research object, analyzes its posts and replies, how they reproduce female characters in sexual crimes incidents, the maternity and role of wives, their outlook of life and love, and the issue of feminism. Also to review if this online forum which is mainly composed of men can rationally communicate women's issues. After text analysis, the study has the following findings: the reproduce of sexual crimes on the gossip board, mainly based on the news subject of false accusation by women, the reply shows the point of view of “male assaulters are innocent” or even “men are the real victims”. In addition, the netizens on the gossip board often use the negative labels such as 'sow' and 'Taiwanese women' to describe women who are contrary to traditional values and try to reshape the traditional values of women obeying men. According to in-depth interviews with netizens on the gossip board, This research found that the speech and gender awareness on the gossip board are created by the majority of users on the Gossip board - male users. Their expectation of seeking approval and attention on the board, they tend to 'criticize women' in order to resonate with others male users. In addition, their offline lives of the interviewees also affect the atmosphere of discussing women's issues and the gender awareness on Gossip board. Based on the results of the two research methods, this study found that in the discussion of women's issues on Gossip board, there are still too many emotional speeches, which not only makes women's image online become single and flat, but also shows that male has uneasy anxiety offline. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T09:08:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R06342020-1.pdf: 1666341 bytes, checksum: 47a0884d47f2a60f43bf1ace266a2ef2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 研究背景........................1
一. 前言與問題意識............................1 二. 研究目的...........................................5 第二章 文獻回顧.....................................7 一. 公共領域.............................................7 1. 公共領域內涵與原型 .................................. 7 2. 女性公共領域 ...................................... 11 3. 媒體與公共領域轉型 ............................ 12 二. 社群媒體..........................................16 1. 社群媒體的特性 ......................................16 2. 社群媒體與公共領域 ............................18 第三章 研究方法...............................23 一. 文本分析...............................23 二. 半結構式深度訪談..........................27 第四章 文本分析研究結果.....................28 一. PTT 八卦板上的性暴力事件的再現.................28 1. 從男性加害者無罪到男性為受害者 ............28 2. 遭性暴力女性罕見同情 ............................... 34 3. 責任在女性受害者身上 ............................... 36 二. 重塑女性服從男性的傳統價值 ...................39 1. 與傳統價值觀相左女性 =「台女」/「母豬」 ...............39 2. 男性是女性爭取權益的受害者 ...................44 三. 父權體制下的女性...............................49 1. 女性要守「婦道」 ..............................49 2. 女性有擔任母親/妻子的義務......................52 第五章 深度訪問研究結果.....................55 一. 八卦板使用者建構 PTT 看板風氣 ...............56 1. 仇女言論有助於炒熱版面氣氛 .....................56 2. 男性鄉民藉八卦板發洩情緒 .......................56 二. 線下經驗影響線上行為 ..............................59 1. 線下現代男性角色受到壓抑 .........................59 2. 鄉民企圖鞏固傳統的性別角色 ......................61 三. 女生活該,誣陷男生受害...........................63 四. 小結 ..........................................65 第六章 結論與討論...................................67 一. 八卦板以男性為主,女性議題討論單一化 ................68 二. 八卦板上充滿情緒性發言.........................70 三. 研究限制和建議.......................................72 參考文獻.............................................. 74 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 社群公共領域的性別思考:以 PTT 八卦板為研究案例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The thoughts on gender of social media as public sphere: A case study of PTT Gossip | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 方念萱,林思平 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 社群網路,公共領域,PTT,八卦板,性別角色, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | social media, public sphere,PTT,gossip,gender awearness, | en |
dc.relation.page | 81 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201904230 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-11-05 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 新聞研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 新聞研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.63 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。