請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74767
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 江淳芳(Chun-Fang Chiang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chun-Wei Chang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 張君瑋 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T09:07:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-15 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-01-15 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-12-09 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Anthony Downs, 'An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy,' Journal of Political Economy 65, no. 2 (Apr., 1957): 135-150.
Arceneaux, Kevin. 2008. “Can Partisan Cues Diminish Democratic Accountability?” Political Behavior 30: 139–60. Bargh, John A. (1999). The cognitive monster: the case against the controllability of automatic stereotype effects. In Shelly Chaiken and Yaacov Trope (eds.), Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology, pp. 361–382. New York: Guilford. Boudreau, C., & MacKenzie, S. A. (n.d.). Informing the electorate? How party cues and policy information affect public opinion about initiatives.American Journal of Political Science. Forthcoming. Bullock, John. 2011. “Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate.” American Political Science Review 105(3): 496–515. Cacioppo, John T., and Petty, Richard E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42: 116–131. Cohen, Geoffrey L. 2003. “Party over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (November): 808–22. Rahn, Wendy M. 1993. “The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (May): 472–96. Druckman, J., Peterson, E., & Slothuus, R. (2013). How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 57-79. doi:10.1017/S0003055412000500 Eagly, Alice H., and Shelly Chaiken. 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt. Eelco Harteveld, Andrej Kokkonen & Stefan Dahlberg (2017) Adapting to party lines: the effect of party affiliation on attitudes to immigration, West European Politics, 40:6, 1177-1197. Hamilton, Lawrence C. 2008. “Who Cares about Polar Regions?” Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 40:671–8. Kam, Cindy D. 2005. “Who Toes the Party Line? Cues, Values, and Individual Differences.” Political Behavior 27(2): 163–82. Lippmann, Walter ([1922]1997). Public Opinion. New York: Free Press. Nicholson, Stephen P. 2011. “Dominating Cues and the Limits of Elite Influence.” Journal of Politics 73(4): 1165–77. Popkin, Samuel L. 1994. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press Riggle, Ellen D., Victor C. Ottati, Robert S. Wyer, James Kuklinski, and Norbert Schwarz. 1992. “Bases of Political Judgments: The Role of Stereotypic and Non stereotypic Information.” Political Behavior 14 (March): 67–87. Slothuus, Rune, and Claes H. de Vreese. 2010. “Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Issue Framing Effects.” Journal of Politics 72(3): 630–45. Taber, Charles S., and Milton Lodge. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50: 755–69. Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74767 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本文探討政黨的政策立場與政策相關資訊對民眾的政策偏好的影響。為了測試過去相關文獻對此問題提出的三個理論,本文以網路問卷的形式詢問民眾對一項政策的支持與否。這項政策是為了增進機車騎士的行車安全而實施,且與政黨的意識形態無關。本實驗中被分配到不同組別的受試者接收到的訊息會在兩項資訊上不同:1.受試者會收到一則資訊提到馬英九或蔡英文為本項政策發布時的執政者,或是沒有提到任何政治人物與此政策相關。2.有一半的受試者會收到本政策在國外的成功實施經驗,另一半則無。在本次實驗中,我們有三個主要的結果:1.當訊息提到馬英九為政策發布者時,馬英九的支持者對政策的支持度會大於當訊息提到蔡英文為政策發布者時,馬英九的支持者對政策的支持度。2.若提供本政策在國外的成功實施經驗,受試者不會受到政策發布者的影響。3.不支持且不反對馬英九或蔡英文的受試者在收到國外成功實施經驗後,提升的政策支持度最大,且會更認同此政策可以提升機車騎士的行車安全。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | We studied the influence of partisan cues on citizens’ policy preferences and the effects of policy-relevant information. To test three hypotheses proposed by previous studies, we conducted an online survey experiment that collected respondents’ attitudes toward a nonpartisan policy intended to enhance traffic safety. The experiment followed a two-layer design. In the first layer, respondents received information in which Ma Ying-Jeou, Tsai Ing-wen or no one was the policy maker. In the second layer, half of the respondents received information about a successful foreign implementation experience. We identified three main findings. First, Ma Ying-Jeou supporters were more likely to support the policy if the policy was issued by Ma than by Tsai. Second, party cues had no effect when policy-related information was provided. Third, respondents who were neutral toward Ma Ying-Jeou or Tsai Ing-Wen were more likely to support the policy when they were presented with a successful implementation experience from Japan and the European Union. Furthermore, respondents were more likely to support the policy because they were more likely to agree that the policy could increase scooter riders’ safety. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T09:07:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R06323031-1.pdf: 1876463 bytes, checksum: 493ff434d55d606f8b2452c26bb81cfb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 i
Abstract ii Content iii List of Tables iv List of Figures v 1.Introduction 1 2. Literature Review 5 2.1 Dual-Process 6 2.2 Countervailing Arguments against Dual-Process 7 2.3 Motivated Reasoning 9 3. Background: A nonpartisan policy to enhance traffic safety 10 4. Experimental Design 12 4.1 Experimental Procedure 13 4.2 Posttreatment measurements 15 5. Method 18 5.1 Specifications and subsample 18 5.2 Predictions based on theories 19 6. Results 22 6.1 Party Cue Effects 22 6.2 Policy Information Effects 24 6.3 Party Cues with Information 24 6.4 Potential Mechanism 27 6.5 Heterogeneous Treatment Effect 28 7. Conclusion 31 References 33 Appendix A 48 Appendix B: Questionnaire 51 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 政黨立場與政策資訊對民眾政策偏好的影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | How Party Cues and Policy Information Affect Citizens’ Policy Preference | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 郭銘傑(Jason Kuo),陳儀(Josie Chen) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 隨機實驗,政黨偏好,政策偏好,政策資訊,非政黨政策, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Randomized controlled experiment,Political preference,Policy preference,Policy information,Nonpartisan policy, | en |
dc.relation.page | 68 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201902594 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-12-10 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.83 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。