請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74687
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 張佑宗 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chia-Yang Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳家洋 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T09:06:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-16 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-01-16 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-01-09 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 壹、中文部份
Ettoday新聞雲,〈他為韓國瑜站台「狂批同婚」:2020改回來!現場謎之尷尬 網狂譏:豬隊友〉,tinyurl.com/ub9rfdd,2019/06/08。 Ettoday新聞雲,〈快訊/反同大勝陷內戰!護家盟封殺專法:反對「愛家公投」第12案〉,tinyurl.com/yc3phufl,2018/11/25。 Ettoday新聞雲,〈服貿議題辯論電爆楊泰順 網友盛讚黃國昌戰神〉, tinyurl.com/sul4mgt,2014/03/30。 Ettoday新聞雲,〈曾是夥伴現翻臉 妖西臉書留言:想打林飛帆一拳〉, tinyurl.com/tek9yqj,2014/04/04。 Ettoday新聞雲,〈賤民解放區發起人吳永毅:糾察過度管理引起很大反彈〉, tinyurl.com/sn9e9y2,2014/04/03。 Ettoday新聞雲,〈韓國瑜批「經濟被推向邊緣」蔡英文:台商回流7千億會持續增加〉,tinyurl.com/s6vcfn3,2019/11/23。 Ettoday新聞雲,〈蘇貞昌聲援學生喊:林佳龍凍蒜 網友怒嗆「不要作秀」〉,tinyurl.com/ug2s99o,2014/03/22。 二樓奴工,〈二樓奴工退場聲明〉,https://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/78167,2014/04/10。 三立新聞網,〈獨家/林飛帆17分演講稿曝光 後台即興創作〉,https://www.setn.com/News.aspx?NewsID=18485,2014/03/31。 上報,〈韓國瑜深夜發文「我是庶民」 地表上雲端的人不少,雲端下地表的不多〉,tinyurl.com/yxfyobd9,2019/06/11。 下一代幸福聯盟,〈台灣教育危機驚!不當教材入侵校園|公民愛家行動〉,tinyurl.com/wm3fagk,2017/01/20。 下一代幸福聯盟,〈同性婚姻可以,那多人婚,人獸婚,全部都可以嗎?〉,tinyurl.com/wyw7m5j。 下一代幸福聯盟,〈呼籲社會大眾,請疼惜我們的下一代!〉, tinyurl.com/tu4afr3,2013/11/28。 下一代幸福聯盟,〈幸福盟與家長團體共同聲明|「同志教育」變成「性別認同、性傾向教育」? 請教育部遵守公投結果,反對國中小實施同志教育!〉,tinyurl.com/yx7vkgay,2019/03/29。 下一代幸福聯盟,〈維護家庭價值、反對同性婚姻入法〉, tinyurl.com/gl9fjp4。 下一代幸福聯盟,〈譴責政府假尊重、真踐踏公投! 2020選舉期盼人民真正作主!〉, tinyurl.com/slrwskq,2019/05/24。 中央選舉委員會,〈107年公民投票第7至16案投票結果〉,http://web.cec.gov.tw/central/cms/RefResults7to16,2018/12/03。 中時電子報,〈家長團體挺李佳芬國小教肛交、性高潮是校園現象〉,tinyurl.com/yxyt7twj,2019/11/12。 中時電子報,〈黑箱服貿懶人包正在綁架你〉,tinyurl.com/rbmntas,2014/03/21。 中時電子報,〈謙卑謙卑再謙卑?! 韓國瑜狠諷蔡:權力權力愛權力〉,tinyurl.com/t5bzzen,2019/06/01。 中時電子報,〈護家盟舉標語新北遞交陳情書〉,tinyurl.com/wmvaloa,2017/05/12。 中華電信工會等,〈工會及工運團體支持「反服貿、反自由貿易」共同聲明〉,https://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/78159,2014/04/05。 公民覺醒聯盟,〈黑箱服貿懶人包〉,tinyurl.com/le4jgd5, 反黑箱服貿民主陣線,「捍衛民主120小時」行動聲明,tinyurl.com/yx4c2r8w,2014/03/18。 天下雜誌,「轉守為攻,出關播種」反服貿學生宣布撤離議場,https://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5057186,2014/04/07。 台灣好新聞,〈韓國瑜與許淑華南投造勢支持者高唱總統選庶民〉, tinyurl.com/rtzzz62,2019/11/24。 台灣英文新聞,〈[台灣總統大選] 韓國瑜:今日香港、明日台灣是胡說八道〉,tinyurl.com/uyc8lyd,2019/09/09。 司法院大法官,〈釋字第748號〉,tinyurl.com/th2ruzr,2017/05/24。 安定力量,〈安定力量秘書長 - 朱竹元發言稿〉,tinyurl.com/wj4sz4d,2019/11/21。 江宜樺,2001,《自由民主的理路》,台北:聯經。 自由時報,〈北市工商婦女會成立韓國瑜後援會李佳芬:感謝挺韓〉,tinyurl.com/uke3ulw,2019/11/01。 自由時報,〈莫讓性平教育成為選舉提款機公民團體疾呼〉,tinyurl.com/tfaj9x4, 2019/11/14。 自由時報,〈媽媽盟抗議不當性平教材教部︰已釐清無不妥〉,tinyurl.com/vs4345b, 2017/05/13。 吳叡人、林秀幸主編,2016,《照破:太陽花運動的振幅、縱深與視域》,台灣:左岸文化。 官曉薇,2019,〈婚姻平權與法律動員 —釋字第 748 號解釋前之立法與訴訟行動〉,臺灣民主季刊,10(1):1-44。 林宗弘,2009,〈台灣的後工業化: 階級結構的轉型與社會不平等, 1992-2007〉, 台灣社會學刊,43: 93-158。 林宗弘,2013,〈失落的年代: 臺灣民眾階級認同與意識形態的變遷〉,人文及社會科學集刊,25(4):689-734。 林宗弘,2015,〈臺灣階級不平等擴大的原因與後果〉,臺灣經濟預測與政策,45(2):45-68。 法廣,〈韓國瑜6.1造勢大會火爆數十萬韓粉誓把“庶民總統送進總統府”〉,tinyurl.com/rterxf6,2019/06/01。 風向新聞,〈不分宗教、黨派!高雄愛家團體齊呼:巿長選國瑜 公投挺愛家〉,tinyurl.com/tqk57eh,2018/11/22。 風向新聞,〈韓國瑜挺一夫一妻 深綠教會助攻選高雄市長〉,tinyurl.com/vdc7mv2,2018/05/29。 風傳媒,〈「這20多年台灣鬼混得很厲害!」韓國瑜在美開嗆:3任台大法律系總統搞殘台灣經濟〉,tinyurl.com/tv5m3m6,2019/04/14。 風傳媒,〈反對同性婚姻合法化,護家盟:學校教「肛交」將有法律依據〉,tinyurl.com/vwegkw5,2017/03/15。 風傳媒,〈同婚公投辯論》孫繼正批「同志性饑渴教育不如拚經濟」 反方以同志大遊行司機一句「好開心」打臉〉,tinyurl.com/qu9mdoq,2018/11/09。 風傳媒,〈安定力量正式組黨!挾帶豐沛教會資源提名10候選人 指標挺同立委選區首當其衝〉,tinyurl.com/uvqan7n,2019/06/09。 風傳媒,〈狂轟扁馬蔡 韓國瑜再質疑馬辦經濟論壇的心理狀態是...〉,tinyurl.com/tnwg26a,2019/04/15。 風傳媒,〈家長團體抗議國中性教育「教自慰」,攤開課本真實內容:教孩子清洗「包皮垢」、避免過度自慰〉tinyurl.com/yx3mf9x4,2019/11/19。 風傳媒,〈新新聞》幸福盟反同婚立專法,要讓同志只能「共同生活」〉,tinyurl.com/yd9tn54e,2018/12/28。 風傳媒,〈韓國瑜、張善政「國政配」登記參選!誓當「庶民蔣經國、數位孫運璿」〉,tinyurl.com/txk2xob,2019/11/18。 風傳媒,〈韓國瑜沒看過性教育教材就開砲 高市議員:請讀了再說〉,tinyurl.com/swtgvxe,2019/01/18。 風傳媒,〈護家盟警告:同性婚姻若合法化,同性戀者會爆增,家長會怒吼和政府拚命〉,tinyurl.com/w8jewdx,2019/10/29。 基督教論壇報,〈【九合一選舉登記截止】信望盟提名四位基督徒參選議員 爭取進政治山頭〉,tinyurl.com/tdmfmb6,2018/08/31。 基督教論壇報,〈適齡性平教育公投聽證 質疑鑑定人立場籲中選會客觀公正〉,tinyurl.com/ux5mpfl,2018/03/15。 張佑宗,2009,〈搜尋台灣民粹式民主的群眾基礎〉,台灣社會研究季刊,75:85-113。 陶儀芬,2008,〈全球化, 民粹主義與公共知識社群〉,思想, 9: 223-231。 游清鑫、蕭怡靖,2007,〈以新選民的政治態度論台灣民主政治的未來〉,臺灣民主季刊,4(3):109-151. 華視,〈韓國瑜再度開炮!稱民進黨「愛錢愛權愛自己」〉,tinyurl.com/refvkhq,2019/10/28。 黃光國,2003,《民粹亡台論》,台北:商周。 黑色島國青年陣線,〈318青年佔領立法院反對黑箱服貿行動宣言〉,tinyurl.com/ramrfzv,2014/03/23。 黑色島國青年陣線,〈人民議會意見書〉,https://www.facebook.com/lslandnationyouth/posts/250439118472675/,2014/04/10。 想想論壇主編,2015,《這不是太陽花學運:318運動全記錄》,台灣:允晨文化。 新頭殼,〈同婚波瀾未止 幸福盟直指公投理由書遭移花接木〉,tinyurl.com/tmhw279,2019/05/21。 新頭殼,〈批鄭秀玲誤導學生經濟部:非老師該做的事〉, tinyurl.com/quaqcqk,2014/03/23。 新頭殼,〈幸福盟理事長現身挺韓大會曾獻瑩:支持韓國瑜作一個愛家好男人!〉,tinyurl.com/umzktal,2019/06/01。 經濟日報,〈韓國瑜:鄉親生活需求很簡單只要安居樂業〉,tinyurl.com/vxugo98,2019/11/24。 葉晉嘉,2012,〈臺灣城鄉後物質價值觀的差異與變遷〉,調查研究-方法與應用, (27):52-79。 臺灣民間真相與和解促進會,2015,《記憶與遺忘的鬥爭:臺灣轉型正義階段報告》,台北:衛城。 鄭秀玲,〈兩岸服貿協議對我國的衝擊分析〉,tinyurl.com/whzcxqd,2013/07/25。 聯合報,〈20年來政府把經濟弄殘韓國瑜:不見得完全怪罪領導人〉,tinyurl.com/y6cokhg6,2019/08/28。 聯合報,〈他站在那,揮旗三十年:同婚第一把手祈家威〉,tinyurl.com/t2ddfqk,2019/05/24。 聯合報,〈吳敦義:沒權貴不權貴沒誰開他的槍〉,tinyurl.com/vcjy9kq,2019/04/24。 聯合報,〈挺韓國瑜老人多?台師大教授:年輕人支持弱是警訊〉,tinyurl.com/v8t837w,2019/06/15。 聯合新聞網,〈「接地氣的力量」韓國瑜哈佛演講主題曝光〉,tinyurl.com/rcz3os6,2019/04/10。 聯合新聞網,〈獨/為韓國瑜站台胡志強:韓流代表庶民大翻身〉, tinyurl.com/vfpz9pr,2019/06/22。 薛健吾、林千文,2014,〈全球化了台灣的什麼? 國際化與台灣的政治經濟變遷〉, 台灣政治學刊,18(2):139-215。 簡至潔,2012,從「同性婚姻」到「多元家庭」-朝向親密關係民主化的立法運動,臺灣人權學刊,1(3):187-201。 關鍵評論,〈曾被要求「放過民進黨」,尤美女的「婚姻平權」漫漫長路逾30年〉,tinyurl.com/wrb73t9,2019/11/29。 護家盟,〈針對大法官釋憲結果,護家盟的回應〉,tinyurl.com/rut83wl,2017/05/24。 護家盟,〈護家盟聲明稿:呼籲立委傾聽人民聲音,勿執意推動傷害全國人民婚姻及家庭之法案〉,tinyurl.com/txgxlkx,2013/10/03。 貳、西文部份 Abts, K., and Rummens, S. 2007. “Populism versus democracy.” Political Studies 55(2): 405-424. Akkerman, A., Mudde, C., and Zaslove, A. 2014. “How populist are the people?Measuring populist attitudes in voters.” Comparative Political Studies 47(9): 1324-1353. Alexander, A. C., & Welzel, C. 2017. “The myth of deconsolidation: Rising liberalism and the populist reaction(No. 10).” ILE Working Paper Series. Arditi, B. 2003. “Populism, or, politics at the edges of democracy.” Contemporary Politics 9(1): 17-31. Bachrach, P. 1967. The theory of democratic elitism: A critique. Boston: Little, Brown. Barr, R. R. 2009. “Populists, outsiders and anti-establishment politics.” Party Politics 15(1): 29-48. Best, H., & Higley, J. 2010. “Introduction: Democratic Elitism Reappraised.” Democratic Elitism 1-22. BRILL. Betz, H. G. 2009. “Xenophobia, identity politics and exclusionary populism in Western Europe.” Socialist Register 39(39). Borchert, J. 2009. “' They Ain't Making Elites Like They Used To': The Never Ending Trouble with Democratic Elitism.” Comparative Sociology 8(3): 345-363. Bornschier, S., & Kriesi, H. 2012. “The populist right, the working class, and the changing face of class politics.” Class politics and the radical right 10-29. Canovan, M. 1984. “‘People’, Politicians and Populism.” Government and Opposition 19(3): 312-327. Canovan, M. 1999. “Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy.” Political studies 47(1): 2-16. Canovan, M. 2004. “Populism for political theorists?.” Journal of Political Ideologies 9(3): 241-252. Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D. 1971. “The politics of agenda-building: An alternative perspective for modern democratic theory.” The Journal of Politics 33(4): 892-915. Dahl, R. A. 1984. “Polyarchy, pluralism, and scale.” Scandinavian Political Studies 7(4): 225-240. Dahl, R. A. 1994. “A democratic dilemma: system effectiveness versus citizen participation.” Political science quarterly 109(1): 23-34. Dahl, R. A. 2006. On political equality. Yale University Press. Elchardus, M., & Spruyt, B. 2016. “Populism, persistent republicanism and declinism: An empirical analysis of populism as a thin ideology.” Government and Opposition 51(1): 111-133. Galston, W. A. 2017. “The 2016 US Election: The Populist Moment.” Journal of Democracy 28(2): 21-33. Gidron, N., & Bonikowski, B. 2013. “Varieties of populism: Literature review and research agenda.”Working Paper Series, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University, No.13-0004 Gidron, N., & Hall, P. A. 2017. “The politics of social status: Economic and cultural roots of the populist right.” The British journal of sociology 68: S57-S84. Gidron, Noam and Bonikowski, Bart. 2013. “Varieties of Populism: Literature Review and Research Agenda.” Working Paper Series, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University, No.13-0004. Goldhammer, A. 2015. “Review: Explaining the Rise of the Front national: Political Rhetoric or Cultural Insecurity?.” French Politics, Culture & Society 33(2): 134-142 Hartleb, F. 2015. “Here to stay: anti-establishment parties in Europe.” European View 14(1): 39-49. Hawkins, K. A. 2009. “Is Chávez populist? Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 42(8): 1040-1067. Hawkins, K. A. 2010. Venezuela's chavismo and populism in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press. Hawkins, K. A., Kaltwasser, C. R., & Andreadis, I. 2018. “The activation of populist attitudes.” Government and Opposition 1-25. Hays, J. 2017. “Embedded Liberalism and the Populist Backlash.” University of Pittsburgh. Working Paper Hayward, J. 1996. “The populist challenge to elitist democracy in Europe.” Elitism, Populism, and European Politics 1(9): 10-33. Inglehart, R. F. 2016. “How much should we worry?.” Journal of Democracy 27(3): 18-23. Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. 2017a. “Trump and the populist authoritarian parties: the silent revolution in reverse.” Perspectives on Politics 15(2): 443-454. Inglehart, R.,& Norris, P. 2017b. “Trump and the xenophobic populist parties: The silent revolution in reverse.” Perspectives on Politics 15(2): 443-454. Inglehart, Ronald F. and Norris, Pippa, Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash (July 29, 2016). HKS Working Paper No. RWP16-026. Kalb, D. 2009. “Conversations with a Polish populist: Tracing hidden histories of globalization, class, and dispossession in postsocialism (and beyond).” American Ethnologist 36(2): 207-223. Kemmers, R., van der Waal, J., & Aupers, S. 2016. “Becoming politically discontented: Anti-establishment careers of Dutch nonvoters and PVV voters.” Current Sociology 64(5): 757-774. Liang, C. S. 2016. “Europe for the Europeans: the foreign and security policy of the populist radical right.” In Europe for the Europeans 19-50. Routledge. Mair, P. 2002. “Populist democracy vs party democracy.” Democracies and the populist challenge: 81-98. Manin, B. 1997. The principles of representative government. Cambridge University Press. Mather, R. D., & Jefferson, K. W. 2016. “The Authoritarian Voter? The Psychology and Values of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders Support.” Journal of Scientific Psychology 1-8. Mazzoleni, G. 2003. “The media and the growth of neo-populism in contemporary democracies. ” The media and neo-populism: A contemporary comparative analysis: 1-20. Moffitt, B., & Tormey, S. 2014. “Rethinking populism: Politics, mediatisation and political style.” Political studies 62(2): 381-397. Mounk, Y. 2014. “Pitchfork politics: The populist threat to liberal democracy.” Foreign Affairs 93(5): 27-[ii]. Mudde, C. 2004.“The populist zeitgeist.” Government and opposition 39(4): 541-563. Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. 2012. “Populism and (liberal) democracy: a framework for analysis.” Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or corrective for democracy, 1(5). Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. 2013. “Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America.” Government and Opposition 48(2): 147-174. Mughan, A., Bean, C., & McAllister, I. 2003. “Economic globalization, job insecurity and the populist reaction.” Electoral Studies 22(4): 617-633. Norris, Pippa. 2017. “Is Western Democracy Backsliding? Diagnosing the Risks,” Working Paper Series rwp17-012, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government. Pasquino, G. 2008. “Populism and democracy.” Twenty-First Century Populism: 15-29 Pastor, L., & Veronesi, P. 2018. Inequality aversion, populism, and the backlash against globalization. National Bureau of Economic Research. Peffley, M., & Rohrschneider, R. 2007. “Guardians of democracy? elite beliefs and the theory of democratic elitism.” The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior: 193-212. Plattner, M. F. 2010. “Populism, pluralism, and liberal democracy.” Journal of Democracy 21(1): 81-92. Rodrik, D. 2018. “Populism and the Economics of Globalization.” Journal of International Business Policy 1(1-2): 12-33. Rooduijn, M. 2014. “The nucleus of populism: In search of the lowest common denominator.” Government and Opposition, 49(4): 573-599. Rooduijn, M., & Pauwels, T. 2011. “Measuring populism: Comparing two methods of content analysis.” West European Politics 34(6): 1272-1283. Rooduijn, M., Van der Brug, W., & De Lange, S. L. 2016. “Expressing or fuelling discontent? The relationship between populist voting and political discontent.” Electoral Studies 43: 32-40. Salmela, M., & von Scheve, C. 2017. “Emotional roots of right-wing political populism.” Social Science Information 56(4): 567-595. Sandel, M. J. 2018. “Populism, liberalism, and democracy.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 44(4): 353-359. Schedler, A. 1996. “Anti-political-establishment parties.” Party Politics 2(3): 291-312. Scheve, K., & Slaughter, M. J. 2004. “Economic insecurity and the globalization of production.” American Journal of Political Science 48(4): 662-674. Schulz, A., Müller, P., Schemer, C., Wirz, D. S., Wettstein, M., & Wirth, W. 2017. “Measuring populist attitudes on three dimensions.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 30(2): 316-326. Schumpeter, J. A. 1942. Socialism, capitalism and democracy. Harper and Brothers. Spruyt, B., Keppens, G., & Van Droogenbroeck, F. 2016. “Who supports populism and what attracts people to it?.” Political Research Quarterly 69(2): 335-346. Taggart, P. 1995. “New populist parties in Western Europe.” West European Politics 18(1): 34-51. Taggart, P. 2000. Populism: Concepts in the Social Sciences. Philadelphia: Open. Weyland, K. 1999. “Neoliberal populism in Latin America and eastern Europe.” Comparative Politics 31(4): 379-401. Woods, D. 2014. 'The Many Faces of Populism: Diverse but not Disparate.' Research in Political Sociology 22: 1-25. Zakaria, F. 2016. “Populism on the March: Why the West is in Trouble.” Foreign Affair 95(6): 9:16. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74687 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 隨著民粹主義在歐美政治的興起,其重要性日益受到關注,研究框架從政治領導人的供給側轉向至民粹群眾的需求側,但此研究議題在台灣較少被探討,本文將先從意識形態面向去建構民粹主義,再從目前兩個相互競爭的理論去探討台灣民粹主義的社會群眾基礎,亦即經濟或文化焦慮將導致民粹主義態度。
本文分成兩個部份檢驗台灣民粹主義的群眾基礎,首先利用東亞民主動態調查第四波與第五波的台灣問卷進行統計分析,並發現民粹主義群眾在兩波資料中具有低教育程度、高齡與傳統主義的特徵,但在馬英九執政時期的第四波資料中,以泛綠陣營較為民粹,而在蔡英文執政時期的第五波資料中,以泛藍陣營較為民粹,再根據迴歸模型分析,驗證本文經濟與文化焦慮的研究假設。 第二部分將以台灣民粹主義的政治現象驗證假設,提供初步的質化研究,分別以太陽花學運與韓國瑜現象各自代表國民黨與民進黨執政下的民粹現象,前者一定程度符合經濟不安全感的假設,而後者同時符合了經濟與文化不安全感的假設。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Populism has dominated the research agenda since it gained public support in Western countries. Scholars have moved their research agenda from the supply side of political elites to the demand side of the mass in recent years. However, this research framework hasn’t been applied to Taiwan’s case study. Therefore, this thesis will start with constructing populism from its ideological features. We will then examine the mass basis of populism in Taiwan’s society with two competing theories. The economic approach proposes that populist attitude stems from economic anxiety which results from rapid modernization and globalization. On the other hand, the cultural approach claims that cultural anxiety associated with the silent revolution of post-materialism results in populist attitude.
The research consists of two parts to examine the mass basis of populism in Taiwan. The first part uses the fourth and fifth waves of Asian Barometer Survey in Taiwan. The statistical analyses demonstrate that people with populist attitude tend to be low-educated, older and conservative in two wave surveys. Furthermore, people who identify themselves as supporters of Pan-Green Coalition tend to be more populist in fourth wave survey conducted under KMT governance. On the contrary, people from Pan-Blue Coalition will be more populist under DPP rule according to the fifth wave survey. At last, the regression models confirm both economic and cultural hypotheses. The second part focus on populist movements in Taiwan’s politics, which provides preliminary qualitative research. Sun Flower Movement and Guo-Yu, Han Phenomenon respectively represent populist movements under KMT and DPP rule. The former could corroborate the economic hypothesis to some extent, and the latter fits both economic and cultural hypotheses. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T09:06:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-109-R07322003-1.pdf: 2775139 bytes, checksum: 1e2f13e07bbbd9cc9e37858b1ede19af (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 I
謝辭 II 中文摘要 IV 英文摘要 V 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 問題意識 1 第二節 文獻回顧 1 第三節 理論與假設 10 第四節 研究設計 21 第五節 章節安排 31 第二章 實證分析 33 第一節 遺漏值處理 33 第二節 民粹主義測量題組的效度檢測 33 第三節 政治傾向的群眾分布 36 第四節 政治傾向者的群眾特徵 41 第五節 模型與統計結果 56 第三章 理論與模型解釋 59 第一節 太陽花學運 59 第二節 韓國瑜現象 71 第三節 民粹政治現象與理論對話 82 第四章 結論與建議 85 第一節 研究限制 85 第二節 研究發現與結論 86 第三節 未來方向與建議 87 參考文獻 89 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 物質主義的反撲:台灣社會民粹主義的群眾基礎 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Backlash of Materialism:The Mass Basis of Populism in Taiwan’s Society | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳親恩,蔡佳泓 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 民粹主義,文化反撲,物質主義,全球化,需求側, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Populism, Cultural Backlash,Materialism,Globalization,Demand Side, | en |
dc.relation.page | 100 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202000065 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-01-10 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 政治學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-109-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.71 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。