請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74621
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 童涵浦 | |
dc.contributor.author | Shi-Tzu Lo | en |
dc.contributor.author | 羅晞姿 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T08:46:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-12 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-08-12 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-08-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson. (2000). Why Did the West Extend the Franchise Democracy Inequality and Growth in Historical Perspective. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4), 1167-1199.
Acemoglu, Daron and James Robinson. (2006). The economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ahlquist, John S. and Erik Wibbels. (2012). Riding the Wave: World Trade and Factor-Based Models of Democratization. American Journal of Political Science, 56(2), 447–464. Allison, Paul David. (2009). Fixed effects regression models. Los Angeles, California: SAGE. Ansell, Ben W. and David J. Samules. (2014). Inequality and Democratization:An Elite-Competition Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press. Aslaksen, Silje. (2010). Oil and Democracy: More than a Cross-country Correlation? Journal of Peace Research, 47(4), 421-431. Benabou, Roland and Efe A. OK. (2001). Social Mobility and the Demand for Redistribution: The Poum Hypothesis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 447-487. Berman, Yonatan. (2017). Understanding the Mechanical Relationship between Inequality and Intergenerational Mobility. Blaydes, Lisa. (2010). Elections and Distributive Politics in Mubarak's Egypt. New York: Cambridge University Press. Blyth, Mark. (2002). Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: New York:Cambridge University Press. Boix, Carles. (2003). Democracy and redistribution. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press. Boix, Carles and Milan W. Svolik. (2013). The Foundations of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions, Commitment, and Power-Sharing in Dictatorship. Journal of Politics, 75(2), 300-316. Boix, Carles and Susan C. Stokes. (2003). Endogenous Democratization. World Politics, 55(4), 517-549. Bollen, Kenneth A. and Robert W. Jackman. (1985). Political Democracy and the Size Distribution of Income. American Sociological Association, 50(4), 438-457. Brown, A. (1984). The Soviet Succession: From Andropov to Chernenko. World Today, 40(4), 134-141. Brownlee, Jason. (2007a). Authoritarianism in the Age of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Brownlee, Jason. (2007b). Hereditary succession in modern autocracies. World Politics, 59(4), 595-628. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce. (2005). The logic of political survival. Cambridge, Mass; London: MIT Press. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Alastair Smith. (2009). Political Survival and Endogenous Institutional Change. Comparative Political Studies, 42(2), 167-197. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Alastair Smith. (2010). Leader Survival, Revolutions, and the Nature of Government Finance. American Journal of Political Science, 54(4), 936-950. Burkhart, Ross E.(1997). Comparative Democracy and Income Distribution: Shape and Direction of the Causal Arrow. The Journal of Politics, 59(1). Capoccia, Giovanni. (2015). Critical Junctures and Institutional Change. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press. Capoccia, Giovanni, and R. Daniel Kelemen. (2007). The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism. World Politics, 59(April), 341-369. Clarke, Kevin A. and Stone, Ransall W. (2003). Democracy and the Logic of Political Survival. American Political Science Review, 102(3), 387-392. Corak, Miles. (2013). Income Inequality, Equality of Opportunity, and Intergenerational Mobility. IZA Discussion Paper No. 7520. Cox, Gary. (2009). Authoritarian elections and leadership succession, 1975-2004. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Dahl, Robert A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press. Dunnung, Thad. (2008). Crude Democracy: Natural Resource Wealth and Political Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ellis, Chritopher J. and John Fender. (2010). Information Cascades and Revolutionary Regime Transitions. The Economic Journal, 121, 763-792. Epstein et al, David et al. (2004). Democratic Transitions. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 551-569. Frantz, Erica and Elizabeth A. Stein. (2016). Countering Coups: Leadership Succession Rules in Dictatorships. Comparative Political Studies, 50(7), 935-962. Freeman JR, Quinn DP. (2012). The Economic Origins of Democracy Reconsidered. American Political Science Review, 2012, 58-80. Gallagher, Mary E. and Jonathan K. Hanson. (2015). Power Tool or Dull Blade? Selectorate Theory for Autocracies. Annual Review of Political Science, 18, 367-385. Galor, Oded and Omer Moav. (2004). From Physical to Human Capital Accumulation:Inequality and the Process of Development. Review of Economic Studies, 71, 1001-1026. Gandhi, Jennifer. (2008). Political Institutions under Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Gandhi, Jennifer and Adam Przeworski. (2007). Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats. Comparative Political Studies, 40(11), 1279-1301. Geddes, Babarra. (1999). What Do We Know About Democratization After 20 Years? Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 115-144. Geddes, Babarra, Joseph Wright, and Erica Frantz. (2014). Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Data Set. Perspectives on Politics, 12(2), 313-331. Geddes, Babarra, Joseph Wright and Erica Frantz. (2018). How Dictatorships Work?New York: Cambridge University Press Goldberg, Ellis, Eric Wibbels, and Eric M. (2008). he. 2008. 'Lessons from Strange Cases: Democracy, Development, and the Resource Curse in the U.S. States. Comparative Political Studies, 41, 447-514. Greif, Avner and David D. Laitin. (2004). A Theory of Endogenous Institutional Change. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 633-652. Gubler, Joshua and Loel Selway. (2012). Horizontal Inequality, Crosscutting Cleavages, and Civil War. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56(2), 206-232. Haber, Stephen and Victor Menaldo. (2011). Do Natural Resources Fuel Authoritarianism? A Reappraisal of the Resource Curse. American Political Science Review, 105(1), 1-26. Haggard, Stephan and Robert R. Kaufman. (2012). Inequality and Regime Change: Democratic Transitions and the Stability of Democratic Rule. American Political Science Review, 106(3), 495-516. Hall, Peter. (2010). Historical Institutionalism in Rationalist and Sociological Perspective. Cambridge, UK: New York: Cambridge University Press. Houle, Christian. (2009). Inequality and Democracy: Why Inequality Harms Consolidation but Dose Not Affect Democratization? World Politics, 61(4), 589-622. Houle, Christian. (2016a). Inequality, Economic Development, and Democratization. Studies in Comparative International Development, 51(4), 503-529. Houle, Christian. (2016b). Why class inequality breeds coups but not civil wars. Journal of Peace Research, 53(5), 680-695. Houle, Christian. (2017a). Inequality, ethnic diversity, and redistribution. Journal of Economic Inequality, 15(1), 1-23. Houle, Christian. (2017b). Social Mobility and Political Instability. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1-27. Jensen, Nathan, and Leonard Wantch. (2004). Resource Wealth and Political Regimes in Africa. Comparative Political Studies, 37, 816-841. Jerrin, John, and Lindsey Macmillian. (2015). Income Inequality, Intergenerational Mobility, and the Great Gatsby Curve: Is Education the Key? Social Forces, 94(2), 505-533. Kennedy, Ryan (2009). Survival and Accountability: An Analysis of the Empirical Support for ‘‘Selectorate Theory’’. International Studies Quarterly, 53(3), 695-714. Kim, Wonik and Jennifer Gandhi. (2010). Coopting Workers under Dictatorship. The Journal of Politics, 72(3). Kokkonen, Andrej & Sundell, Anders. (2014). Delivering Stability—Primogeniture and Autocratic Survival in European Monarchies 1000–1800. American Political Science Review, 108(2), 438-453. La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny. (1999). The Quality of Government. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 15(1), 222-279. Landry, Pierre. (2009). Decentralized Authoritarianism in China: The Communist Party's Control of Local Elites in the Post-Mao Era. New York: Cambridge University Press. Levitsky, Steven and Lucan A. Way. (2010). Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lipset, Seymour Martin. (1959). Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69-105. Lizzeri, Alessandro. and Nicola Persico. (2004). Why Did the Elites Extend the Suffrage? Democracy and the Scope of Government, with An Application to Britain’s ’Age of Reform’ Quarterly Journal of Economics, 199(2), 705-763. Lust, Ellen, and David Waldner. (2015). Unwelcome Change: Understanding, Evaluating, and Extending Theories of Democratic Backsliding. Retrieved from Magaloni, Beatriz. (2008). Credible Power-Sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule. Comparative Political Studies, 20, 715-741. Mahoney, James and Kathleen Thelen. (2010). A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press. Malesky, Edmund. (2011). The Single-Party Dictator’s Dilemma: Information in Elections without Opposition. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 36(4), 491-530. Malesky, Edmund & Schuler, P. (2010). Nodding or Needling: Analyzing Delegate Responsiveness in an Authoritarian Parliament. American Political Science Review, 104(3), 382-502. Malesky, Edmund & Schuler, P. (2013). Star Search: Do Elections Help Nondemocratic Regimes Identify New Leaders? Journal of East Asian Studies, 13(1), 35-68. Mattes, Michaela., Brett Ashley Leeds and Naoko Matsumura. (2016). Measuring change in source of leader support: The CHISOLS dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 53(2), 259-267. Meltzer, Allan H. and Scott F. Richard. (1981). A Rational Theory of the Size of Government. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 914-927. Midlarsky, Manus I. (1992). The Origins of Democracy in Agrarian Society: Land Inequality and Political Rights. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 36(3), 454-477. Muller, Edward N. (1988). Democracy, Economic Development, and Income Inequality. American Sociological Review, 53(1), 50-68. Muller, Edward N.(1995). Economic Determinants of Democracy. American Sociological Association, 60(6), 966-982. North, Douglass C.(1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press. Ortega, Daniel and Francisco Rodriguez. (2006). Are Capital Shares Higher in Poor Countries? Evidence from Industrial Surveys. Typescript. Prgapanaio, Elias and Gregorios Siourounis. (2008). Economic and Social Factors Driving the Third Wave of Democratization. Journal of Comparative Economics, 36, 365-387. Przeworski, Adam et al., Michael E. Alvarez, Jose Antonio Cheibub, and Fernado Limongi. (2000). Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950-1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Putnam, Robert D. (2016). Our Kids: The American Dream in Crisis. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks. Rodrik, Dani. (1999). Democracies Pay Higher Wages. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 707-738. Roeder, PG. (1993). Red Sunset: The Failure of Soviet Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Ross, Michael. (2001). Does Oil Hinder Democracy. World Politics, 53, 325-361. Schmidt, Vivien A. (2008). Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. The Annual Review of Political Science(11), 303-326. Scott, Richard W. (2001). Institutions and Organizations:Ideas, Interests, and Identities. Los Angeles: Sage Publications. Shepsle, Kenneth. (2005). Rational Choice Institutionalism. Oxford [England]: New York: Oxford University Press. Shepsle, Kenneth A.(1979). Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models. American Journal of Political Science, 23(1), 27-59. Shirk, Susan. (1993). The Political Logic of Economic Reform in China. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University California Press. Simpser, Alberto. (2013). Why governments and parties manipulate elections: Theory, practice, and implications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Slater, Dan. (2010). Altering Authoritarianism: Institutional Complexity and Autocratic Agency in Indonesia. In James Mahoney and Katheleen Thelen (Eds.), Explaining Institutional Change. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press. Slater, Dan, Benjamin Smith, and Gautam Nair. (2014). Economic Origins of Democratic Breakdown? The Redistributive Model and the Postcolonial State. Perspectives on Politics, 12(2), 353-374. Smith, Benjamin. (2007). Hard Times in the Land of Plenty: Oil Politics in Iran and Indonesia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Soifer, Hillel David. (2016). State Power and the Economic Origins of Democracy. Studies in Comparative International Development, 48(1), 1-22. Solt, Frederick. (2009). Standardizing the World Income Inequality Database. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 231–242. Solt, Frederick. (2016). Standardizing the World Income Inequality Database. Social Science Quarterly, 97(5), 1267-1281. Svolik, Milan W. (2015). Equilibrium Analysis of Political Institutions (Jennifer Gandhi and Ruben Ruiz-Runo (Eds.): Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge. Svolik, Milan W. (2012). The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Thelen, Kathleen. (2004). How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press. Truex, Rory. (2014a). Representation Within Bounds. (PhD), Yale University. Tung, Hans H. (2016). Compliments or Substituted? Autocratic Survival Through Power-Sharing and Co-Optation Institutions. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting. Turex, Rory. (2014b). The Returns to Office in a “Rubber Stamp” Parliament. American Political Science Review, 108(2), 235-251. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74621 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本文旨在探索威權國家中,分配衝突形成個人式威權的過程,以及透過跨國資料驗證分配衝突對個人式威權的影響。在理論上從童涵浦老師的威權制度替代性假設出發,當威權政治菁英其他條件不變情況下,若面對社會的革命威脅升高時,會選擇予以社會攏絡制度投資來減少社會革命的推翻風險,然而,獨裁者面對政治菁英的權力分享因此而減少,使得威權政體往個人式威權的方向移動。本文近一步實證的解釋「社會流動」與「經濟不平等」這兩個分配衝突的來源,對個人式威權的影響,使用1980-2010年104個威權國家的時間序列橫斷面資料,結果顯示,社會流動相較於經濟不平等,對政體個人式威權影響較大,其中社會流動程度對個人式威權分數有負向影響,而當經濟不平等程度很高且社會流動程度很低時,會影響個人式威權分數升高,經濟不平等不會單獨影響個人式威權的升高。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | There is a paucity of literature regarding personalism and redistributive conflict in dictatorships. This paper explores the possible link between redistributive conflict and personalism in dictatorships. Specifically, based on SAI hypothesis (Tung, 2017), dictators invest in social co-optation institutions would squeeze power-sharing institutional investments. When redistributive conflict increase, dictators invest in social co-opting institutions by undermining the investment in power-sharing institutions, that is, regimes become more personalist. Empirically, I posit that social mobility increase the level of personalism and the effects of inequality is conditional on low social mobility level. Based on a number of statistical models, the empirical evidences support social mobility increase the level of personalism. On the other hand, high inequality and low social mobility together increase the level of personalism. Taken together, the results can be interpreted as inequality doesn't present revolutionary threat to dictators but social mobility from the disenfranchised does, redistributive conflict as a source of personalism in dictatorships. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T08:46:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R04322016-1.pdf: 1448643 bytes, checksum: 6a979d62d82a8323a97bcacf6f473ddb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 錄 1
圖表目次 3 第一章 緒論 5 第一節 研究動機 5 第二節 研究問題與研究目的 6 第二章 文獻回顧 9 第一節 制度變遷理論 9 第二節 威權制度及其變遷 11 第三節 分配衝突與民主化 16 第三章 研究架構 23 第一節 分配衝突與威權制度變遷 24 第四章 研究設計 29 第一節 資料的測量 29 第五章 研究結果 35 第一節 主要模型 35 第二節 穩健度檢查 39 第六章 結論 43 參考文獻 45 附錄一 社會流動指標使用問題 55 附錄二 國家歷年表 56 附錄三 敘述性統計 58 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 探索個人式威權主義:社會流動與經濟不平等的影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Exploring Personalism: The Effects of Social Mobility and Inequality | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳文欽,吳親恩 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 社會流動,經濟不平等,個人式威權,威權制度變遷,分配衝突, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | PERSONALISM,SOCIAL MOBILITY,INEQUALITY,INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE,REDISTRIBUTIVE CONFLICT, | en |
dc.relation.page | 59 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201902171 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-08-06 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 政治學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.41 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。