請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7461完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 王能君 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ching-Yin Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林景瑩 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-19T17:44:10Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-08-19 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-19T17:44:10Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-19 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2018-08-15 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文文獻（依作者姓名之筆劃順序）
（一）書籍 林佳和（2014）。《勞動與法論文集I─勞動法基礎理論與法制發展、同盟與集體勞動法》，臺北：元照。 William B. Gould IV（著），焦興鎧（譯）（1996）。《美國勞工法入門》，台北：國立編譯館。 焦興鎧（2006）。〈美國不當勞動行為裁決機制之研究〉，《法律哲理與制度（公法理論）─馬漢寶教授八秩華誕祝壽論文集》，頁459-490，台北：元照。 （二）期刊論文 王文霞（1999）。〈英國工會主義的起源與工會的發展（上）(1800-1880)〉，《西洋史集刊》，第9期，頁269-311。 吳育仁（2003）。〈美國勞資集體協商政策中經營管理權和工作權之界線：從協商議題之分類與法律效果觀察〉，《臺大法學論叢》，32卷1期，頁81-117。 吳育仁（2011）。〈美國工會承認之法律政策─陷入制度性困境？〉，《臺灣民主季刊》，8卷1期，頁133-176。 許繼峰（2009）。〈Samuel Gompers務實主義對美國工運之影響〉，《止善》，6期，頁61-76。 （三）學位論文 林良榮（1997）。《論企業內工會活動之權利保障—以日本戰後學說及判例發展為中心》，國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文。 林祖佑（2014）。《美國排他性協商代表制之研究及對台灣之啟示》，國立臺灣大學科際整合法律學研究所碩士論文。 （四）研討會論文 陳建文（2011）。〈工會行動權的事理思考與法理探討〉，發表於：《工會行動權學術研討會》。政治大學法學院勞動法與社會法研究中心（主辦），台北。 二、英文文獻 （一）書籍 American Bar Association Section of Labor and Employment Law(2012). The Developing Labor Law: The Board, the Courts, and the National Labor Relations Act, 101(6th ed.). Chicago: Bloomberg BNA. Michael R. Carrell & Christina Heavrin(2013). Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining : Private and Public Sectors (10th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc. Neil W. Chamberlain & James W. Kuhn(1965). Collective Bargaining (2d ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. Robert A. Gorman & Matthew W. Finkin(2004). Basic Text On Labor Law : Unionization and Collective Bargaining (2nd ed.). Thomson/West. William B. Gould IV(2013). A Primer On American Labor Law (5th ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. John Godard(2004). Trade Union Recognition: Statutory Unfair Labor Practice Regimes in the USA and Canada. London: DTI. International Labour Office(1981). Collective Bargaining In Industrialised Market Economies (4th ed.). Switzerland: International Labour Organization. David E. Strecker(2011). Labor Law : A Basic Guide to The National Labor Relations Act. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Robert L. Sauer & Keith E. Voelker(1993). Labor Relations: Structure And Process (2d ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. Arthur A. Sloane & Fred Witney(2009). Labor Relations (13th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc. （二）期刊論文 Cynthia L. Estlund (1994). Labor, Property, and Sovereignty after Lechmere, Stanford Law Review, 46, 305-359. Robert A. Gorman (1991). Union Access to Private Property: A Critical Assessment of Lechmere, Inc. v. NLRB, Hofstra Labor Law Journal, 9, 1-24. Alan Gladstone & Muneto Ozaki (1975). Trade Union Recognition for Collective Bargaining Purposes. International Labour Review, 112, 163-188. DeChiara, Peter D. (1992). No Solicitation Allowed: Union Organizer Access after Lechmere, Inc., v. NLRB, Labor Law Journal, 43, 593-601. Richard Townshend-Smith (1981). Trade Union Recognition Legislation - Britain and America Compared, Legal Studies, 1, 190-212. Michael L. Stevens (1992). The Conflict Between Union Access and Private Property Rights: Lechmere, Inc. v. NLRB and the Question of Accommodation, Emory Law Journal, 41, 1317-1370. John W. Jr. Teeter (1991). Banning the Buttons: Employer Interference with the Right to Wear Union Insignia in the Workplace, Kentucky Law Journal, 80, 377-430. （三）NLRB裁決 Armour & Company, 8 NLRB No. 137 (1938). Andrews Wire Corporation, 189 NLRB No. 24 (1971). Alberts, Inc., 213 NLRB No. 94 (1974). Ace Machine Co., 249 NLRB No.73 (1980). Asociacion Hospital Del Maestro, Inc., 283 NLRB No. 71 (1987). Asociacion Hospital Del Maestro, Inc. v. NLRB, 842 F.2d 575 (1988). Allied Stores Corporation, 308 NLRB No. 39 (1992). Albis Plastics, 335 NLRB No. 74 (2001). Babcock & Wilcox Co., 109 NLRB No. 82 (1954). Bankers Club, Inc., 218 NLRB No. 7 (1975). Beth Israel Hospital, 223 NLRB No. 188 (1976). Baptist Hospital, Inc., 223 NLRB No. 34 (1976). Baylor University Medical Center, 225 NLRB No. 102 (1976). Baylor University Medical Center, 247 NLRB No. 178 (1980). Burger King Corp., 265 NLRB No. 191 (1982). Big Y Food, Inc., 315 NLRB No. 135 (1994). Brockton Hospital, 333 NLRB No. 165 (2001). Brandeis Machinery and Supply Company, 342 NLRB No. 46 (2004). Carter Carburetor Corporation, 48 NLRB No. 48 (1943). Caldwell Furniture Co., 97 NLRB No. 240 (1952). Caterpillar Tractor Co., 113 NLRB No. 37 (1955). Campbell Soup Co., 159 NLRB No. 18 (1966). Central Hardware Co., 181 NLRB No. 74 (1970). Container Corporation of America, 244 NLRB No. 53 (1979). Chicago Metallic Corporation, 273 NLRB No. 207 (1985). Champion International Corporation, 303 NLRB No. 11 (1991). Casa San Miguel, Inc., 320 NLRB No. 50 (1995). Caterpillar, Inc., 321 NLRB No. 163 (1996). Crowne Plaza Hotel, 352 NLRB No. 55 (2008). Caterpillar Inc., 359 NLRB No. 97 (2013). Denver Tent And Awning Co., 47 NLRB No. 76 (1943). De Vilbiss Co., 102 NLRB No. 133 (1953). Davison-Paxon Company, 191 NLRB No. 10 (1971). Dunes Hotel, 284 NLRB No. 96 (1987). Double Eagle Hotel & Casino, 341 NLRB No. 17 (2004). Evergreen Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center, Inc., 198 NLRB No. 101 (1972). Essex International, Inc., 211 NLRB No. 112 (1974). Eastern Maine Medical Center, 253 NLRB No. 24 (1980). E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company, 311 NLRB No. 88 (1993). Easter Omni Constructor, Inc., 324 NLRB No. 102 (1997). Eby-Brown Company L.P., 328 NLRB No. 75 (1999). Floridan Hotel of Tampa, Inc., 137 NLRB No. 161 (1962). Fabri-Tek, Inc., 148 NLRB No. 156 (1964). Florida Steel Corporation, 215 NLRB No. 23 (1974). Fluid Packaging Company, 247 NLRB No. 196 (1980). Flamingo Hilton-Laughlin, 330 NLRB No. 34 (1999). Farm Fresh, Inc., 332 NLRB No. 156 (2000). Goldblatt Bros., Inc., 77 NLRB No. 204 (1948). Gimbel Bros., Inc., 147 NLRB No. 62 (1964). Guyan Valley Hospital, Inc., 198 NLRB No. 28 (1972). Groendyke Transport, Inc., 211 NLRB No.139 (1974). Gemco, 271 NLRB No. 193 (1984). Guardsmark, LLC, 344 NLRB No.97 (2005). Husky Oil NPR Operations, 245 NLRB No. 68 (1979). Honeywell, Inc., 262 NLRB No. 177 (1982). Harolds Club, 267 NLRB No. 141 (1983). Hawkins-Hawkins Co., Inc., 289 NLRB No. 158 (1988). Hospital Pavia Perea, 352 NLRB No. 60 (2008). Intermedics, Inc., 262 NLRB No. 178 (1982). Ichikoh Manufacturing, Inc., 312 NLRB No. 153 (1993). J.C. Penney Co., 266 NLRB No. 210 (1983). Jean Country, 291 NLRB No. 4 (1988). Jay Metals, Inc. and Larry McCoy, 308 NLRB No. 40 (1992). Komatsu America Corp., 342 NLRB No. 62 (2004). Le Tourneau Company of Georgia, 54 NLRB No. 189 (1944). Lake Superior Lumber Corp., 70 NLRB No. 20 (1946). Lutheran Hospital of Milwaukee, 224 NLRB No. 36 (1976). Lechmere, Inc., 295 NLRB No. 15 (1989). Lucile Salter Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford, 318 NLRB No. 49 (1995). Long Beach Memorial Medical Center 366 NLRB No. 66 (2018). Marshall Field & Co., 34 NLRB No. 1 (1941). May Department Stores Co., 59 NLRB No. 188 (1944). Meier & Frank Co., Inc., 89 NLRB No. 114 (1950). Monolith Portland Cement Co., 94 NLRB No. 211 (1951). Marshall Field & Co., 98 NLRB No. 11 (1952). Monarach Machine Tool Co., 102 NLRB No. 134 (1953). Miller-Charles & Co., 148 NLRB No. 158 (1964). McDonald’s of Palolo, 205 NLRB No. 78 (1973). Marriott Corp., 223 NLRB No. 141 (1976). McBride’s of Naylor Road, 229 NLRB No. 120 (1977). Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc., 256 NLRB No. 134 (1981). Midstate Telephone Corp., 262 NLRB No. 167 (1982). Mesa Vista Hospital, 280 NLRB No. 27 (1986). Meijer, Inc., 318 NLRB NO. 3 (1995). MBI Acquisition Corp., 324 NLRB No. 188 (1997). Meijer, Inc. and Robert Lee Caldwell, 344 NLRB No. 115 (2005). Nordstrom, Inc., 264 NLRB No. 95 (1982). New York New York Hotel, LLC, 334 NLRB No. 87 (2001). Nations Rent, Inc., 342 NLBR No. 19 (2004). North Hills Office Services, Inc., 346 NLRB No. 96 (2006). Nova Southeastern University, 357 NLRB No. 74 (2011). North Memorial Health Care, 2016 NLRB LEXIS 564, 364 NLRB No. 61 (2016). Ozan Lumber Co., 42 NLRB No. 196 (1942). Orleans Mfg. Co., Inc., 170 NLRB No. 9 (1968). Our Way, Inc., 268 NLRB No. 61 (1983). Peyton Packing Company, Inc., 49 NLRB No. 119 (1943). Presbyterian Medical Center, 227 NLRB No. 135 (1977). Plastic Film Products Corp., 238 NLRB No. 22 (1978). Publishers Printing Co., Inc., 246 NLRB No. 36 (1979). Pay’N Save Corporation, 247 NLRB No. 184 (1980). Photo Drive Up, 267 NLRB No.56 (1983). Pathmark Stores, Inc., 342 NLRB No. 31 (2004). Republic Aviation Corporation, 51 NLRB No. 186 (1943). Ranco, Inc., 109 NLRB No. 149 (1954). Scullin Steel Co., 49 NLRB No. 54 (1943). Seamprufe, Inc., 109 NLRB No. 2 (1954). Standard Fittings Co., 133 NLRB No. 95 (1961). Stoddard-Quirk Manufacturing Co., 138 NLRB No. 75 (1962). S. & H. Grossinger’s Inc., 156 NLRB No. 20 (1965). Summit Nursing and Convalescent Home, Inc., 196 NLRB No. 110 (1972). St. John’s Hospital & School of Nursing, Inc., 222 NLRB No. 182 (1976). Southern Maryland Hospital Center, 293 NLRB No. 136 (1989). Santa Fe Hotel, Inc., 331 NLRB No. 88 (2000). Sam’s Club, 349 NLRB No. 94 (2007). Starbucks Corp., 354 NLRB No. 99 (2009). Saint Johns Health Center, 357 NLRB No. 170 (2011). Triplex Screw Co., 25 NLRB No. 119 (1940). Tabin-Picker & Co., 50 NLRB No. 133 (1943). The Ohio Masonic Home, 205 NLRB No. 65 (1973). Tri-County Medical Center, 222 NLRB No. 174 (1976). The Jewish Home For The Elderly Of Fairfield County, 343 NLRB No. 117 (2004). The Guard Publishing Company, 351 NLRB No. 70 (2007). The Guard Publishing Company, 357 NLRB No. 27 (2011). United States Cartridge Co., 47 NLRB No. 115 (1943). United Aircraft Corporation, 67 NLRB No. 80 (1946). UCSF Stanford Health Care, 335 NLRB No. 42 (2001). Vassar Brothers Hospital, 243 NLRB No. 67 (1979). William Davies Co., Inc., 37 NLRB No. 105 (1941). Walton Manufacturing Co., 126 NLRB No. 93 (1960). Winchester Spinning Corp., 168 NLRB No. 60 (1967). W.W. Grainger, Inc., 229 NLRB No. 22 (1977). Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 340 NLRB No. 76 (2003). （四）上訴巡迴法院判決 Baylor University Medical Center v. NLRB, 578 F.2d 351 (1978). Baylor University Medical Center v. NLRB, 593 F.2d 1290 (1979). Baylor University Medical Center v. NLRB, 662 F.2d 56 (1981). Burger King Corp. v. NLRB, 725 F.2d 1053 (1984). Brandeis Machinery and Supply Company v. NLRB, 412 F.3d 822 (2005). Carter Carburetor Corporation v. NLRB, 140 F.2d 714 (1944). Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. NLRB, 230 F.2d 357 (1956). Campbell Soup Co. v. NLRB, 380 F.2d 372 (1967). Central Hardware Co. v. NLRB, 439 F.2d 1321 (1971). Caterpillar, Inc. v. NLRB, 138 F.3d 1105 (1998). Caterpillar Inc. v NLRB, 803 F.3d 360 (2015). Davison-Paxon Company v. NLRB, 462 F.2d 364 (1972). Double Eagle Hotel & Casino v. NLRB, 414 F.3d 1249 (2005). Eastern Maine Medical Center v. NLRB, 658 F.2d 1 (1981). Easter Omni Constructor, Inc. v. NLRB, 170 F.3d 418 (1999). Fabri-Tek, Inc. v. NLRB, 352 F.2d 577 (1965). Florida Steel Corp. v. NLRB, 529 F.2d 1225 (1976). Guardsmark, LLC v. NLRB, 475 F.3d 369 (2007). Husky Oil NPR Operations v. 669 F.2d 643 (1982). Hughes Properties, Inc. v. NLRB, 758 F.2d 1320 (1985). Lechmere, Inc. v. NLRB, 914 F.2d 313 (1990). Midland Steel Products Co. v. NLRB, 113 F.2d 800 (1940). Marshall Field & Co. v. NLRB, 200 F.2d 375 (1952). Meijer, Inc. v. NLRB, 130 F.3d 1209 (1997). Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc. v. NLRB, 692 F.2d 1115 (1982). Midstate Telephone Corp. v. NLRB., 706 F.2d 401 (1983). Meijer, Inc. v. NLRB, 463 F.3d 534 (2006). NLRB v. William Davies Co., Inc., 135 F.2d 179 (1943). NLRB v. Denver Tent And Awning Co., 138 F.2d 410 (1943). NLRB v. Peyton Packing Co., Inc., 142 F.2d 1009 (1944). NLRB v. May Department Stores Co., 154 F.2d 533 (1946). NLRB v. Lake Superior Lumber Corp., 165 F.2d 147 (1948). NLRB v. Caldwell Furniture Co., 199 F.2d 267 (1952). NLRB v. Ranco, Inc., 222 F.2d 543 (1955). NLRB v. Seamprufe, Inc., 222 F.2d 858 (1955). NLRB v. Babcock & Wilcox Co., 222 F.2d 316 (1955). NLRB v. Floridan Hotel of Tampa, Inc., 318 F.2d 545 (1963). NLRB v. Miller, 341 F.2d 870 (1965). NLRB v. S. & H. Grossinger’s Inc., 372 F.2d 26 (1967). NLRB v. Orleans Mfg. Co., Inc., 412 F.2d 94 (1969). NLRB v. Summit Nursing and Convalescent Home, 472 F.2d 1380 (1973). NLRB v. Beth Israel Hospital, 554 F.2d 477 (1977). NLRB v. Silver Spur Casino, 623 F.2d 571 (1980). NLRB v. Honeywell, Inc., 722 F.2d 405 (1983). NLRB v. Chicago Metallic Corporation, 794 F.2d 527 (1986). NLRB v. Southern Maryland Hospital Center, 916 F.2d 932 (1990). NLRB v. Jay Metals, Inc., 12 F.3d 213 (1993). NLRB v. Starbucks Corp., 679 F.3d 70 (2012). New York New York Hotel, LLC v. NLRB, 313 F.3d 585 (2002). Nova Southeastern University v. NLRB, 807 F.3d 308 (2015). North Memorial Health Care v. NLRB, 860 F.3d 639 (2017). Pioneer Hotel, Inc. V. NLRB, 182 F.3d 939 (1999). Republic Aviation Corp. v. NLRB , 142 F.2d 193 (1944). St. John’s Hospital & School of Nursing, Inc. v. NLRB, 557 F.2d 1368 (1977). Triplex Screw Co. v. NLRB, 117 F.2d 858 (1941). The Ohio Masonic Home v. NLRB, 511 F.2d 527 (1975). The Guard Publishing Company v. NLRB, 571 F.3d 53 (2009). UCSF Stanford Health Care v. NLRB, 325 F.3d 334 (2003). Winchester Spinning Corp. v. NLRB, 402 F.2d 299 (1968). W.W. Grainger, Inc. v. NLRB, 582 F.2d 1118 (1978). Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. NLRB, 400 F.3d 1093 (2005). （五）聯邦最高法院判決 Beth Israel Hospital v. NLRB, 437 U.S. 483 (1978). Lechmere, Inc. v. NLRB, 502 U.S. 527 (1992). NLRB v. Babcock & Wilcox Co., 351 U.S. 105 (1956). NLRB v. Baptist Hospital, Inc., 442 U.S. 773 (1979). Republic Aviation Corp. v. NLRB , 324 U.S. 793 (1945). | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7461 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 現代社會中，工會已成為團結勞工力量、爭取權利，以對抗雇主的重要角色。工會要能展現集體力量與雇主抗衡，必然要從組織工會開始，宣傳行為便是組織活動中的重要一環，也必然與雇主發生權利上的衝突。因此，本文希望能從美國實務見解中，整理出美國實務在面臨雇主禁止工會進行宣傳行為時，如何平衡兩者間的衝突，以及如何建立出合法性原則的判斷標準，最後提出台灣應如何以此為借鏡。
本文第一章將先介紹研究動機、研究方法及本文的架構。第二章將先從美國工會發展的歷史、法制和制度進行介紹，以了解美國的背景如何影響到美國工會的宣傳行為。另外，在工會進行宣傳行為時，又如何與雇主財產權和經營利益發生衝突，成為美國實務在處理此類型不當勞動行為，所面臨的核心爭議。第三章將討論受僱者勞工進行宣傳行為時，面臨到雇主禁止招募拉票、禁止發放傳單、禁止穿戴工會標誌以及禁止使用雇主設施的規定，並整理出美國實務所認為的合法性判斷標準。第四章則討論非受僱者的工會組織者或工會代表在進行宣傳行為時，面臨到的主要爭議為與雇主的財產權發生衝突，本章將整理美國實務面臨此爭議，所提出的合法性判斷標準。 第五章為本文的結論。本文認為美國實務在判斷工會宣傳行為的合法性時，認為需要平衡勞工受國家勞工關係法第7條保障的權利，以及雇主基於財產權、經營管理的利益，應可作為我國的參考。然而美國實務在處理非受僱者宣傳行為的爭議時，應注意到美國實務似乎忽略對於溝通交流的保障，以及使得個案中失去彈性判斷的機會，我國不應直接援引。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In modern society, unions played an important role to organize workers, fight for workers’ rights and stand against employers’ economic power, and organization is the key to achieve these goals. Union propaganda is a crucial part of organizational activities. National Labor Relations Act section 7 guarantees employees to for self-organization, however, it caused conflicts between this right, employers’ property rights and managerial interests. This thesis aims to provide some inspirations for Taiwan to ease the conflicts, by conducting research on decisions and judgments from National Labor Relations Board, United States Court of Appeals and Supreme Court of the United States, which have long been engaged in adjustment between the rights of employees and employers.
Chapter 1 introduces the research motivation and the structure of this thesis. Chapter 2 introduces the historical evolution of labor relations, collective bargaining and legal framework, and explain how the union recognition influences union organizational activities. In addition, this chapter discusses union organizational activities, which may conflict with employers’ rights. Chapter 3 focuses on basic presumptions and exceptions of the rules, including no-solicitation, no-distribution, forbidding wearing union insignia and forbidding using employer’s property. Chapter 4 concentrates on general principles relating to prohibition of entry against non-employee union organizers from employers’ property set by employers. Finally, Chapter 5 concludes that the best way to solve the disputation is to reconcile between employee organization rights and employer property rights. Taiwan can learn from the basic presumptions and exceptions of employees’ union organizational activities relating to union propaganda. The substantive distinction between the rights of those who are employees and non-employees is that an employer can lawfully exclude nonemployees from employer’s property. The distinction is made because property rights of the employer may not be yielded unless the union shows that the employees cannot be reached by other reasonable means. However, this standard may erode the ability of employees to communicate for self-organization, or lose the possibilities to balance employees’ organization rights and employers’ property rights. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-19T17:44:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R03a41003-1.pdf: 1380823 bytes, checksum: de8a65003246aca4b5c262d00fb33216 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第一項 問題緣起 1 第二項 我國工會法第35條第1項第5款之規定 3 第三項 美國國家勞工關係法（National Labor Relations Act, NLRA）之規定 4 第二節 研究方法 5 第三節 本文架構 6 第二章 美國工會與組織活動中之宣傳行為 8 第一節 團體協商（collective bargaining）作為美國工會之核心內容 8 第一項 美國工會發展與團體協商 8 一、早期工會發展 8 二、美國勞工聯合會（American Federation of Labor）對團體協商的推廣 10 第二項 美國法制與團體協商 12 一、國家勞工關係法制定前 12 二、國家勞工關係法的制定 14 第二節 國家勞工關係法的工會承認（union recognition）制度 16 第一項 制度背景 16 第二項 制度內容 18 第三節 與雇主產生衝突之工會宣傳行為 20 第一項 招募拉票（solicitation）和發放傳單（distribution） 21 第二項 穿戴工會標誌（union insignia） 22 第三項 使用雇主設施 22 第四項 進入公司或工廠 22 第三章 禁止受僱者的宣傳行為之不當勞動行為 24 第一節 禁止招募拉票（No-solicitation） 24 第一項 實務初期見解 24 第二項 Republic Aviation Corp. v. NLRB 29 一、事實關係 29 二、NLRB見解 30 三、上訴巡迴法院見解 31 四、聯邦最高法院見解 31 第三項 合法性判斷原則之建立 33 第四項 Beth Israel Hospital v. NLRB 35 一、事實關係 35 二、NLRB見解 36 三、上訴巡迴法院見解 38 四、聯邦最高法院見解 38 第五項 NLRB v. Baptist Hospital, Inc. 42 一、事實關係 42 二、NLRB見解 45 三、上訴巡迴法院見解 47 四、聯邦最高法院見解 48 五、上訴巡迴法院及NLRB後續判決及裁決 51 第六項 合法性判斷原則之例外 51 一、醫療照顧機構 51 二、零售業、餐飲業、賭場和飯店業 58 第二節 禁止發放傳單（No-distribution） 65 第一項 實務初期見解 65 第二項 Republic Aviation Corp. v. NLRB 65 一、事實關係 65 二、NLRB見解 66 三、上訴巡迴法院見解 68 四、聯邦最高法院見解 68 第三項 合法性判斷原則之建立 69 第三節 禁止穿戴工會標誌（union insignia） 71 第一項 實務初期見解 71 第二項 Republic Aviation Corp. v. NLRB 72 一、事實關係 72 二、NLRB見解 73 三、上訴巡迴法院見解 74 四、聯邦最高法院見解 74 第三項 合法性判斷原則之建立 74 第四節 禁止使用雇主設施 82 第五節 小結 84 第一項 禁止招募拉票和禁止發放傳單 84 第二項 禁止穿戴工會標誌 85 第三項 禁止使用雇主設施 86 第四章 禁止非受僱者的宣傳行為之不當勞動行為 87 第一節 實務初期見解 87 第二節 NLRB v. Babcock & Wilcox Co. 91 第一項 事實關係 91 第二項 NLRB見解 91 第三項 上訴巡迴法院見解 92 第四項 聯邦最高法院見解 93 第三節 實務中期見解 94 第四節 Lechmere, Inc. v. NLRB 97 第一項 事實關係 97 第二項 NLRB見解 97 第三項 上訴巡迴法院見解 98 第四項 聯邦最高法院見解 99 第五節 合法性判斷原則之建立 102 第六節 禁止承包商聘僱之勞工的宣傳行為 103 第七節 小結 105 第五章 結論─對我國之啟示 108 參考文獻 114 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 美國勞動法上組織活動中關於宣傳行為之保障 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Guarantee of Organizational Activities Concerning Union Propaganda in American Labor Law | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 徐婉寧,李玉春 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 國家勞工關係法,不當勞動行為,工會宣傳行為, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | National Labor Relations Act,unfair labor practice,union organizational activities,union propaganda, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 125 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201803263 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2018-08-15 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 法律學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 科際整合法律學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2023-08-19 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 科際整合法律學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-107-1.pdf | 1.35 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。