請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74559
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 洪美仁(Mei-Jen Hung) | |
dc.contributor.author | Ching-Yen Lan | en |
dc.contributor.author | 藍景彥 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T08:42:40Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-07 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-08-07 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-08-07 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 壹、中文部分
王宏文、陳淳文、宮文祥,2016,《食安風暴下的農產品標章制度-臺灣實證研究》,臺北:華藝。 林穎禎,2013,〈歐盟對有機農產品之規範〉,《農政與農情》,253:65-85。 吳定,2003,《公共政策》,臺北:空大。 陳玠廷、蕭崑杉,2010,〈臺灣「有機農業」的發展與未來展望〉,《農業推廣文彙》,55:233-234。 陳榮五,2009,〈臺灣有機農業發展之瓶頸〉,《有機農業產業發展研討會專輯》,彰化:行政院農業委員會台中區農業改良場。 陳雅琴,2005。美國有機農業的認證標準與市場概況。上網日期:2005檢自http://www.rest.org.tw/upload/2014072223105322.pdf。 黃國光,2015,《研究方法:入門與實務》,臺北:雙葉書廊。 黃玉瓊,2009。「有機農產品生產與認驗證制度之管理」,《農業生產季刊》。18:14-17。 許南雄,1999,《各國人事制度》,第四版,台北:商鼎文化。 黃璋如,2003,〈有機農業驗證制度與標章之研究〉,《2002年臺灣地區有機農業產業發展研討會專刊》:33-51。 黃樹民,2013,〈臺灣有機農業的發展及其限制:一個技術轉變簡史〉,《臺灣人類學刊》,11(1):9-34。 楊玉婷,2014,〈深富自然及人文關懷的親土精神-我國有機農業發展策略分析〉,《台灣經濟研究月刊》,37(3):42-48。 謝順景,2010,〈臺灣一百多年來的有機農業發展之歷史回顧〉,《臺中區農業改良場研究彙報》,107:1-12。 貳、西文部分 Albersmeier, F., Schulze, H., Jahn, G., and Spiller, A. 2009. “The reliability of third-party certification in the food chain: from checklists to risk-oriented auditing.” Food Control,20: 927–935. Edwards, G.C., and I. Sharkansky. 1978. The policy predicament: Making and implementing public policy. San Francisco: WH Freeman. Edwards, G. C. 1980. Implementing public policy. Congressional Quarterly Press. Fatemi, D. J. 2013. “New Evidence on an Old Question: Does Lowballing Undermine Auditors’ Independence or their Clients’ Investment Decisions?” Current Issues in Auditing, 7(1):22-29. Hargrove, E.C. 1975. The missing link: The study of the implementation of social policy. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Hatanaka,M., C. Bain, and L. Busch. 2005. “Third-Party Certification in the Global Agrifood System.” Food Policy, 30(3): 354–69. Jahn, G., M. Schramm, and A. Spiller. 2004. Differentiation of Certification Standards: The Trade-off between Generality and Effectiveness in Certification Systems. http://www.ifama.org/conferences/2004Conference/Papers/Jahn1024.pdf,accessed August 2010. Konefal, J., and M. Hatanaka. 2010. “Enacting third-party certification: A case study of science and politics in organic shrimp certification.” Journal of Rural Studies,27:125-133. Liehardt, W., and R. Harwood. 1985.Organic farming. In 'Technology public policy and the changing structure of american agriculture'. Vol-background papers. No.21 Office of technology assessment. Congress of the United States. Lotter, D. W. 2003. ”Organic agriculture.” Journal of sustainable agriculture,21(4): 3-5 McLaughlin, M. W. 1976. ”Implementation as mutual adaptation change in classroom organization.” Teachers College Record, 77(3):339-351. Monette, D.R.; Sullivan, T.J.; DeJong, C.R. 1986. Applied social research: tool for the human services. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, NY, USA. 512 PP Monteiro, D.S., and S. Anders. 2009. “Third-party certification, food standards and quality assurance in supply chains.” Journal on Chain and Network Science,9(2). Meter Van, Donald S., and Carl E. Van Horn. 1975. 'The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework.' Administration & Society 6.4: 445-488. Pressman, J.L., and A. B. Wildavsky. 1973. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland. Berkeley: CA University of California Press Smith, Thomas B. 1973. 'The policy implementation process.' Policy Sciences 4.2: 197-209. Tanner, B. 2000. “Independent assessment by third-party certification bodies.” Food Control, 11: 415–417. Tate, W. B. 1994. The development of the organic industry and market: an international perspective. In: The Economics of Organic Farming, N. H. Lampkin and S. Padel, Editor. CAB: Wallingford, UK.:11-26. Taylor, SJ., and R. Bogdan. 2015. Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook and Resource. New York: John Wiley. USDA, 2001. National Organic Program, from https://www.ams.usda.gov/about-ams/programs-offices/national-organic-program Zollschan, G. K. 1964. Working papers in the theory of institutionalization. Explorations in Social Change.Boston: Houghton Mifflin:89. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74559 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 近年來,隨著對於環境以及健康的意識高漲,有機農業漸漸的受到民眾的重視,投入有機農業耕種的人數逐年成長,也有越來越多的消費者購買有機農產品。過去較少消費者的時期,消費者直接向農民購買,可以親眼確認是否為真的有機耕種的農產品。但隨著需求增加,消費者無法直接向農民購買,因此政府訂定了相關規範來確保有機農產品。政府發行了有機標章,透過驗證的方式來確保有機農產品,制度也從原先農委會獨立執行驗證,發展到農委會認證民間機構,由民間機構進行驗證,最終發展到現在的第三方驗證。第三方驗證是由第三方的認證機構,認證驗證機構,並由驗證機構去執行驗證。其中有機驗證的執行,除了農委會、認證機構及驗證機構外,受到許多因素的影響。
傳統探討有機農業,大多探討有機標章對於消費者的效果,較少有探討前端有機驗證執行的過程,本研究試圖透過政策執行的觀點,檢視我國有機驗證的政策執行過程。傳統探討政策執行,學者透過政策執行模式,歸納出常常影響政策執行的因素。其中包含:政策目標與標準、上級機關、執行機構以及環境因素。前面提到,有機驗證執行過程中,有許多因素會影響,是個非常複雜的過程。本研究旨在透過政策執行模式,檢視目前有機驗證的執行上是否遇到問題。 本研究採取深度訪談法,在2016至2019年間訪談了農委會、驗證機構、專家學者以及農民共13位,後續透過政策執行模式框架針對資料進行分析。本研究分析後發現,上述提到的各個因素中確有影響有機驗證執行的問題。主要問題包含:主管機關輔導及管制立場的衝突以及績效評估標準無法反映現實、上級機關多頭馬車的管理、驗證機構收費及流程彈性可能造成的惡性競爭、稽核人員的聘用及現場表現影響驗證品質、景氣程度以及民眾影響有機驗證的執行。針對這些問題,本研究提出建議如將輔導業務有效的委託、績效評估標準納入更多指標、加強上級機關間的聯繫、加強針對稽核員的管理機制以及有機驗證導入科技應用。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In recent years, with the awareness of the environment and health, organic agriculture has gradually received the attention of the people. The number of people who have invested in organic farming has grown year by year, and more and more consumers are buying organic agricultural products. In the past when consumers were not a lot, consumers could directly purchase from farmers and could see for themselves whether they were organically cultivated agricultural products. But as demand increases, consumers cannot buy directly from farmers, so the government has set relevant regulations to ensure organic produce. The government issued an organic seal to ensure organic agricultural products through verification. The system has also been independently verified by the former COA, developed to the CCA-certified civil institutions, verified by private institutions, and finally developed to the current third-party verification. The third-party verification is performed by a third-party certification body, a certification verification agency, and a verification agency to perform verification. The implementation of organic verification, in addition to the COA, certification bodies and certification bodies, is affected by many factors.
Traditionally, organic agriculture has been discussed. Most of them discuss the effect of organic seals on consumers. There are few processes to explore the implementation of front-end organic verification. This study attempts to examine the policy implementation process of organic verification in China through the perspective of policy implementation. Traditionally, policy implementation is implemented. Scholars use the policy implementation model to summarize the factors that often affect policy implementation. It includes: policy objectives and standards, higher authorities, executing agencies, and environmental factors. As mentioned earlier, there are many factors that affect the execution of organic verification, which is a very complicated process. This study aims to examine whether there are problems with the implementation of organic verification through the policy implementation model. In this study, an in-depth interview method was conducted. During the period from 2016 to 2019, 13 committees of the COA, certification agencies, experts, scholars and farmers were interviewed, and the data were analyzed through the policy implementation model framework. After analysis of this study, it is found that the various factors mentioned above do have problems affecting the implementation of organic verification. The main issues include: conflicts between the competent authorities' counseling and regulatory positions and performance evaluation standards that do not reflect the reality, the management of the multi-horse carriages of the higher authorities, the vicious competition that may result from the charging of the certification agencies and the flexibility of the process, the employment of the auditors and the quality of the on-site performance. The degree of prosperity and the implementation of organic verification of public influence. In response to these problems, this study proposes to include effective entrustment and performance evaluation criteria for counseling services into more indicators, strengthen linkages between higher authorities, strengthen management mechanisms for auditors, and introduce organic verification into technology applications. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T08:42:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R04343010-1.pdf: 2525993 bytes, checksum: c8ae607ac4f09d65c72aa220ee85d1ca (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
謝辭 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 v 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究問題與目的 3 第三節 研究範圍及章節安排 6 第二章 有機農業介紹 7 第一節 有機農業歷史沿革 7 第二節、我國有機農業簡介 11 第三章 文獻回顧 21 第一節 政策執行理論 21 第二節 第三方驗證制度 31 第四章 研究架構與設計 45 第一節 研究架構 45 第二節 研究方法與設計 47 第三節 受訪者基本資料 53 第五章 研究發現 55 第一節 政策目標及標準 55 第二節 有機驗證上級機關 68 第三節 有機驗證的執行機構 81 第四節 有機驗證的環境因素 101 第五節 綜合分析 113 第六章 結語 127 第一節 研究結論 127 第二節 政策建議 133 第三節 研究限制 138 參考文獻 141 附錄一 訪談提綱 145 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 以政策執行觀點檢視我國有機農業驗證機構的運作與管理 | zh_TW |
dc.title | An Operation and Management Analysis of Taiwan Organic Certification Bodies from the View Point of Policy Implementation | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李仲彬,許輔 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 有機驗證,有機農業,有機標章,第三方驗證,政策執行, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Organic Certification,Organic Agriculture,Organic Mark,Third-Party-Certification,Policy Implementation, | en |
dc.relation.page | 146 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201902734 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-08-07 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共事務研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 公共事務研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.47 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。