Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74532
Full metadata record
???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 黃俊豪 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chun-Hao Wang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 王君豪 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T08:41:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2029-08-01 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-08-27 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-08-07 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Adriani, W., Spijker, S., Deroche-Gamonet, V., Laviola, G., Le Moal, M., Smit, A. B., & Piazza, P. V. (2003). Evidence for enhanced neurobehavioral vulnerability to nicotine during periadolescence in rats. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23(11), 4712-4716.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211. Ajzen, I. (2006). Constructing a theory of planned behavior questionnaire. Available at people. umass. edu/aizen/pdf/tpb. measurement. pdf. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Alesci, N. L., Forster, J. L., & Blaine, T. (2003). Smoking visibility, perceived acceptability, and frequency in various locations among youth and adults. Preventive medicine, 36(3), 272-281. Alvarado, G. F., & Breslau, N. (2005). Smoking and young people's mental health. Current opinion in psychiatry, 18(4), 397-400. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta‐analytic review. British journal of social psychology, 40(4), 471-499. Arrazola, R. A., Ahluwalia, I. B., Pun, E., de Quevedo, I. G., Babb, S., & Armour, B. S. (2017). Current tobacco smoking and desire to quit smoking among students aged 13–15 years—Global youth tobacco survey, 61 countries, 2012–2015. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 66(20), 533. Asma, S., Song, Y., Cohen, J., Eriksen, M., Pechacek, T., Cohen, N., & Iskander, J. (2014). CDC Grand Rounds: global tobacco control. MMWR. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 63, 277-280. Barendregt, J. J., Bonneux, L., & van der Maas, P. J. (1997). The health care costs of smoking. New England Journal of Medicine, 337(15), 1052-1057. Bashirian, S., Hidarnia, A., Allahverdipour, H., & Hajizadeh, E. (2012). Application of the theory of planned behavior to predict drug abuse related behaviors among adolescents. Journal of research in health sciences, 12(1), 54-59. Bell, K., & Keane, H. (2014). All gates lead to smoking: The ‘gateway theory’, e-cigarettes and the remaking of nicotine. Social Science & Medicine, 119, 45-52. Biglan, A., Duncan, T. E., Ary, D. V., & Smolkowski, K. (1995). Peer and parental influences on adolescent tobacco use. Journal of behavioral medicine, 18(4), 315-330. Bond, L., Butler, H., Thomas, L., Carlin, J., Glover, S., Bowes, G., & Patton, G. (2007). Social and school connectedness in early secondary school as predictors of late teenage substance use, mental health, and academic outcomes. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40(4), 357. e359-357. e318. Breslau, N., & Peterson, E. L. (1996). Smoking cessation in young adults: age at initiation of cigarette smoking and other suspected influences. American Journal of Public Health, 86(2), 214-220. Brown, A. K., Moodie, C., Hastings, G., Mackintosh, A.-M., Hassan, L., & Thrasher, J. (2010). The association of normative perceptions with adolescent smoking intentions. Journal of adolescence, 33(5), 603-614. Brown, B. B. (2004). Adolescents’ relationships with peers. Handbook of adolescent psychology, 2, 363-394. Chen, Y.-H., Chen, P.-L., Huang, W.-G., Chiou, H.-Y., Hsu, C.-Y., & Chao, K.-Y. (2010). Association between social climate for smoking and youth smoking behaviors in Taiwan: An ecological study. International journal of nursing studies, 47(10), 1253-1261. Choi, S., Rankin, S., Stewart, A., & Oka, R. (2008). Effects of acculturation on smoking behavior in Asian Americans: a meta-analysis. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 23(1), 67-73. Cruz, J. E., Emery, R. E., & Turkheimer, E. (2012). Peer network drinking predicts increased alcohol use from adolescence to early adulthood after controlling for genetic and shared environmental selection. Developmental psychology, 48(5), 1390. Dewey, J. D. (1999). Reviewing the relationship between school factors and substance use for elementary, middle, and high school students. Journal of Primary Prevention, 19(3), 177-225. Diego, M. A., Field, T. M., & Sanders, C. E. (2003). Academic performance, popularity, and depression predict adolescent substance use. Adolescence, 38(149), 35. Elkind, D. (1967). Egocentrism in adolescence. Child development, 1025-1034. Ellickson, P. L., Tucker, J. S., & Klein, D. J. (2001). High-risk behaviors associated with early smoking: results from a 5-year follow-up. Journal of Adolescent Health, 28(6), 465-473. Emory, K., Buchting, F. O., Trinidad, D. R., Vera, L., & Emery, S. L. (2018). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) view it differently than non-LGBT: Exposure to tobacco-related couponing, e-cigarette advertisements, and anti-tobacco messages on social and traditional media. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. Eriksen, M., Mackay, J., & Schluger, N. (2015). The tobacco atlas. 5th edn. Atlanta, GA: The American Cancer Society: Inc. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Food, U., & Administration, D. (2012). Harmful and potentially harmful constituents in tobacco products and tobacco smoke; established list. Fed Regist, 77(64), 20034-20037. Gamarel, K. E., Mereish, E. H., Colby, S. M., Barnett, N. P., Hayes, K., & Jackson, K. M. (2018). Sexual minority disparities in substance use willingness among youth. Substance use & misuse, 53(1), 170-175. Godin, G., & Kok, G. (1996). The theory of planned behavior: a review of its applications to health-related behaviors. American Journal of Health Promotion, 11(2), 87-98. Golub, A., & Johnson, B. D. (2001). Variation in youthful risks of progression from alcohol and tobacco to marijuana and to hard drugs across generations. American Journal of Public Health, 91(2), 225. Greene, K., Krcmar, M., Walters, L. H., Rubin, D. L., & Hale, L. (2000). Targeting adolescent risk-taking behaviors: the contributions of egocentrism and sensation-seeking. Journal of adolescence, 23(4), 439-461. Guo, Q., Johnson, C. A., Unger, J. B., Lee, L., Xie, B., Chou, C.-P., . . . Pentz, M. (2007). Utility of the theory of reasoned action and theory of planned behavior for predicting Chinese adolescent smoking. Addictive behaviors, 32(5), 1066-1081. Health, U. D. o., & Services, H. (2000). Reducing tobacco use: a report of the Surgeon General: US Department of Health and Human Services. Health, U. D. o., & Services, H. (2012). Preventing tobacco use among youth and young adults: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 3. Hendry, L. B., Roberts, W., Glendinning, A., & Coleman, J. C. (1992). Adolescents' perceptions of significant individuals in their lives. Journal of adolescence, 15(3), 255-270. Hoffman, B. R., Monge, P. R., Chou, C.-P., & Valente, T. W. (2007). Perceived peer influence and peer selection on adolescent smoking. Addictive behaviors, 32(8), 1546-1554. Hoving, C., Reubsaet, A., & de Vries, H. (2007). Predictors of smoking stage transitions for adolescent boys and girls. Preventive medicine, 44(6), 485-489. Huang, G. C., Unger, J. B., Soto, D., Fujimoto, K., Pentz, M. A., Jordan-Marsh, M., & Valente, T. W. (2014). Peer influences: the impact of online and offline friendship networks on adolescent smoking and alcohol use. Journal of Adolescent Health, 54(5), 508-514. Jessor, R. (1987). Problem‐behavior theory, psychosocial development, and adolescent problem drinking. British journal of addiction, 82(4), 331-342. Kandel, D. (1975). Stages in adolescent involvement in drug use. Science, 190(4217), 912-914. Kandel, D., & Yamaguchi, K. (1993). From beer to crack: developmental patterns of drug involvement. American Journal of Public Health, 83(6), 851-855. Kandel, D. B., Yamaguchi, K., & Klein, L. C. (2006). Testing the gateway hypothesis. Kecojevic, A., Jun, H. J., Reisner, S. L., & Corliss, H. L. (2017). Concurrent polysubstance use in a longitudinal study of US youth: associations with sexual orientation. Addiction, 112(4), 614-624. Klein, H., Sterk, C. E., & Elifson, K. W. (2013). Initial smoking experiences and current smoking behaviors and perceptions among current smokers. Journal of addiction, 2013. Korhonen, T., Huizink, A. C., Dick, D. M., Pulkkinen, L., Rose, R. J., & Kaprio, J. (2008). Role of individual, peer and family factors in the use of cannabis and other illicit drugs: a longitudinal analysis among Finnish adolescent twins. Drug and alcohol dependence, 97(1), 33-43. Leonardi-Bee, J., Jere, M. L., & Britton, J. (2011). Exposure to parental and sibling smoking and the risk of smoking uptake in childhood and adolescence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax, thx. 2010.153379. Libbey, H. P. (2004). Measuring student relationships to school: Attachment, bonding, connectedness, and engagement. The Journal of school health, 74(7), 274. MacKintosh, A., Harris, F., Hastings, G., Borland, R., Cummings, M., & Dresler, C. (2008). Measuring the effectiveness of tobacco marketing restrictions. IARC Handbook on Tobacco Control II, 12. Mason, M. J., Mennis, J., & Schmidt, C. D. (2011). A social operational model of urban adolescents’ tobacco and substance use: A mediational analysis. Journal of adolescence, 34(5), 1055-1063. Mays, D., Gilman, S. E., Rende, R., Luta, G., Tercyak, K. P., & Niaura, R. S. (2014). Parental smoking exposure and adolescent smoking trajectories. Pediatrics, 133(6), 983-991. Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological bulletin, 129(5), 674. Michaelidou, N., Dibb, S., & Ali, H. (2008). The effect of health, cosmetic and social antismoking information themes on adolescents’ beliefs about smoking. International Journal of Advertising, 27(2), 235-250. Mokdad, A. H., Marks, J. S., Stroup, D. F., & Gerberding, J. L. (2004). Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. Jama, 291(10), 1238-1245. Murnaghan, D. A., Blanchard, C. M., Rodgers, W. M., LaRosa, J. N., MacQuarrie, C. R., MacLellan, D. L., & Gray, B. J. (2010). Predictors of physical activity, healthy eating and being smoke-free in teens: A theory of planned behaviour approach. Psychology and health, 25(8), 925-941. Organization, W. H. (2017). WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2017: monitoring tobacco use and prevention policies: World Health Organization. Proctor, R. N. (2001). Tobacco and the global lung cancer epidemic. Nature Reviews Cancer, 1(1), 82-86. Rice, D. P., Hodgson, T. A., Sinsheimer, P., Browner, W., & Kopstein, A. N. (1986). The economic costs of the health effects of smoking, 1984. The Milbank Quarterly, 489-547. Simons-Morton, B. G., & Farhat, T. (2010). Recent findings on peer group influences on adolescent smoking. The journal of primary prevention, 31(4), 191-208. Sitas, F., Egger, S., Bradshaw, D., Groenewald, P., Laubscher, R., Kielkowski, D., & Peto, R. (2013). Differences among the coloured, white, black, and other South African populations in smoking-attributed mortality at ages 35–74 years: a case-control study of 481 640 deaths. The Lancet, 382(9893), 685-693. Su, X., Li, L., Griffiths, S. M., Gao, Y., Lau, J. T., & Mo, P. K. (2015). Smoking behaviors and intentions among adolescents in rural China: The application of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the role of social influence. Addictive behaviors, 48, 44-51. Sussman, S., Pokhrel, P., Ashmore, R. D., & Brown, B. B. (2007). Adolescent peer group identification and characteristics: A review of the literature. Addictive behaviors, 32(8), 1602-1627. Tucker, J. S., Martinez, J. F., Ellickson, P. L., & Edelen, M. O. (2008). Temporal associations of cigarette smoking with social influences, academic performance, and delinquency: a four-wave longitudinal study from ages 13-23. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22(1), 1. Valente, T. W., Unger, J. B., & Johnson, C. A. (2005). Do popular students smoke? The association between popularity and smoking among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37(4), 323-329. Watson, R. J., Goodenow, C., Porta, C., Adjei, J., & Saewyc, E. (2018). Substance use among sexual minorities: has it actually gotten better? Substance use & misuse, 53(7), 1221-1228. Watson, R. J., Lewis, N. M., Fish, J. N., & Goodenow, C. (2018). Sexual minority youth continue to smoke cigarettes earlier and more often than heterosexuals: Findings from population-based data. Drug and alcohol dependence, 184, 64-70. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74532 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 背景:菸害防制為重要之公共衛生議題,吸菸亦被證實為最能被預防之死因,而在青少年族群中,菸害議題更加令人憂心:首先,根據Surgeon General之報告,八成規律吸菸者自青少年時期即開始吸菸;其次,越早開始吸菸則越難戒除菸癮,且造成更多之健康傷害;最後,成癮物質入門理論 (Gateway Drug Theory) 指出,吸菸為使用非法成癮物質之重要預測因子。然而,雖青少年之吸菸比例似乎有所下降,但根據國民健康署之調查,由國中進入高中階段後,其吸菸比例卻有明顯升高之趨勢,凸顯國中生菸害防制之重要性。
目的:本研究係以計劃行為理論 (Theory of Planned Behavior, TPB) 為基礎,設計並執行青少年菸害防制衛教介入課程,藉以檢視計劃行為理論構念預測國中生吸菸意圖之能力,並透過隨機分派實驗(randomized controlled trial),探討是否能透過以計劃行為理論為基礎之衛教介入課程,降低國中生之吸菸意圖。 方法:立意取樣兩所臺灣北部具可比較性之公立國中,透過隨機分派實驗研究設計,將參與學校隨機分派為實驗組(425人)及對照組(392人),之後,進行連續兩周、每週一次各45分鐘之衛教課程,兩組分別為「以計劃行為理論為基礎之衛教介入」及「一般衛教介入」之課程,並藉由匿名自陳式問卷,於介入之前一週與三個月後,分別進行資料收集。統計分析時,運用性別分層以檢視其調節作用。 結果:多變項線性自迴歸分析結果顯示,實驗組於三個月後延宕後測時的吸菸意圖 (β=-.090 至 -.060) 皆顯著較對照組低,證實以計劃行為理論為架構之菸害防制衛教介入課程具有效益。其次,行為態度之正向轉變,特別是針對因吸菸所導致的立即影響 (β=.067至.099),可預測青少年吸菸意圖之上升;主觀規範之正向轉變中,若學生感受到健康教育老師支持其吸菸,會顯著影響學生之吸菸意圖 (β=.123);青少女於有利情境下之自覺行為控制若有正向轉變時,其吸菸意圖會顯著上升 (β=.112),且於阻礙情境下,其吸菸意圖會受性取向調節 (β=.212)。 結論:整體而言,為降低青少年之吸菸意圖,需著重於降低其對於吸菸之正向態度,特別是針對吸菸所帶來之立即影響,而對於青少男,則可著重於降低其重要他人之支持程度,對於青少女,於行為態度之外,則可戮力於減少有利情境之發生,值得一提的是,青少女之性取向為影響其吸菸意圖之調節因子。因此,未來需針對不同性別與性取向之青少年,規劃適性之菸害防制課程,且以計劃行為理論為架構,優化衛教介入之成效。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Smoking prevention is a crucial public health issue, and smoking has also been proven to be the most preventable cause of death. Youth smoking, in particular, is worrisome in the following ways: First, according to the Surgeon General’s report, almost 80% of regular smokers start smoking since adolescence. Second, smoking is more difficult to quit and more harmful for young smokers. Finally, the Gateway Drug Theory posits that smoking predicts the use of other addictive substances. Although the prevalence of smoking among Taiwanese adolescents seemed to have declined, according to the 2017 Taiwan Health Promotion Administration survey, the prevalence of smoking jumped from 2.7% among junior high to 8.3% among senior high school students, highlighting the importance of smoking prevention for junior high school students.
Objectives: Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), this randomized controlled trial evaluated whether the smoking prevention program could lower the smoking intention among junior high school students. Methods: Two comparable public junior high schools in northern Taiwan were selected through purposive sampling and randomly assigned to the experimental group (n=425) and the control group (n=392). Two weekly 45-minute health education sessions were provided to the participants, with “TPB-based” and “general” health education intervention in the experimental and control groups, respectively. Data were collected using an anonymous self-administered questionnaire at pretest and 3-month follow-up. Statistical analysis was stratified by gender to examine its moderating effects. Results: The multivariate linear autoregression models revealed that, after adjusting for students’ smoking intention at pretest, background characteristics, and TPB constructs, the students’ smoking intention of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group (β=-.090 to -.060) at 3-month follow-up, demonstrating that the TPB-based intervention was effective in reducing smoking intention among junior high school students. Further, positive changes in the following TPB constructs between pretest and follow-up predicted students’ higher smoking intention at follow-up: (1) ATB, especially for short-term outcomes of smoking (β = .067 to .099); (2) SN, when students perceived health educators to be supportive or not strongly unsupportive of their smoking (β=.123); (3) PBC, among girls under facilitating conditions of smoking (β=.112), and only among non-heterosexual girls under constraining conditions (β=. 212). Conclusions: In order to reduce junior high school students’ smoking intention, future smoking prevention campaigns can employ the TPB as the theoretical framework for the development and implementation of their health education programs. To decrease students’ smoking intention, efforts should be made to change their positive attitudes toward smoking, especially about the short-term effects of smoking. For boys, decreasing their perceived support for smoking from salient others should be emphasized. By contrast, for girls, focus should be on reducing the facilitating conditions for smoking. Notably, girls’ sexual orientation had moderating effects on their smoking intention. As such, different strategies should be tailored for students of different genders and sexual orientation. These empirical findings can inform future smoking prevention programs for junior high school students. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T08:41:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R02848002-1.pdf: 2093237 bytes, checksum: bc8ce404e6bef4415b41ed182612a91f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 I
Abstract III 誌謝 VI Contents X List of Tables XI List of Figures XII Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Health Effects and Health Care Burden of Smoking 1 1.2 Prevalence of Smoking Among Adolescents 4 1.3 Theory of Planned Behavior and Related Studies 5 1.4 Factors Associated with Adolescent Smoking Behavior 7 1.5 The Current Study 12 Chapter 2 Methods 13 2.1 Participants 13 2.2 RCT Design 13 2.3 Measures 14 2.4 Procedure 17 Chapter 3 Results 20 3.1 Background Characteristics of the Students Enrolled in this RCT 20 3.2 Pretest versus 3-Month Follow-Up and Between-Groups Differences in Smoking Intention and TPB Measures Between the Experimental and Control Groups 20 3.3 Multivariate Linear Autoregressive Models of Predictors Associated with Smoking Intention at 3-Month Follow-Up 21 Chapter 4 Discussion 26 4.1 Smoking Intention in the Experimental Group Significantly Reduced Compared with the Control Group at 3-Month Follow-Up 26 4.2 Positive Changes in ATB Predicted Higher Smoking Intention 26 4.3 Supportive SN versus Other Norms in Predicting Smoking Intention 28 4.4 Changes in Multiple-Item PBC Factors Predicted Higher Smoking Intention 29 4.5 Possible Influences of Other Background Characteristics on Smoking Intention 31 4.6 Limitations and Future Directions 33 Chapter 5 Conclusions 35 References 36 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 以計劃行為理論檢視青少年吸菸意圖及衛教介入成效分析:臺灣北部國中生之隨機分派實驗 | zh_TW |
dc.title | An Examination of Adolescent Smoking Intention and Effectiveness Evaluation of a Health Education Intervention Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Randomized Controlled Trial among Junior High School Students in Northern Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 莊?智,張齡尹 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 隨機分派試驗,計劃行為理論,吸菸意圖,衛教介入,國中生,臺灣, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Randomized Controlled Trial,Theory of Planned Behavior,Smoking Intention,Health Education,Junior High School Students,Taiwan, | en |
dc.relation.page | 52 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201902529 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-08-08 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 健康政策與管理研究所 | zh_TW |
Appears in Collections: | 健康政策與管理研究所 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf Restricted Access | 2.04 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.