請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74377
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 曾建元(Chien-Yuan Tseng) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Ching Lu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 呂宜靜 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T08:32:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-07-29 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-08-18 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-08-12 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74377 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 自2012年中國大陸領導人習近平上任之初,強調欲「實現中華民族偉大復興的中國夢」並且要「完善國家安全戰略和工作機制,高度警惕和堅決防範敵對勢力的分裂、滲透、顛覆活動確保國家安全」。2014年中共中央設置國家安全委員會,習近平在該委員會第一次會議上首次提出「總體國家安全觀」,開啟「中國特色國家安全道路」,積極加強國家安全相關法制建設。顯示中國共產黨正透過調整其國家安全觀,建構更完整更有利於中國共產黨領導以及維持政權的國家安全體制。
本文主要從民主國家、憲政主義的視角,檢視中國大陸國家安全觀以及人權概念;觀察中國大陸以政治安全為核心的國家安全觀演變以及國家安全立法變化。聚焦在習近平時期2014年到2018年間,代表性國家安全立法內容:《中華人民共和國國家安全法》、《中華人民共和國反間諜法》、《中華人民共和國反恐怖主義法》、《中華人民共和國境外非政府組織境內活動管理法》、《中華人民共和國網絡安全法》、《中華人民共和國國家情報法》等等,賦予辦理危害國家安全案件單位:公安、國安機關、檢察院、法院職權與業務變化;以及對公民義務、權利變化。輔以遭國家安全事由限制境內外人士人身自由的代表性個案綜合分析,凸顯中國大陸國家安全立法與國際人權公約保障、社會普世價值之落差。最後,透過比對美國以及台灣的國家安全立法演變,加以凸顯民主國家與中國大陸國家安全目的、法制之不同。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Since Chinese leader Xi Jinping took office in 2012, he emphasized the need to 'achieve the Chinese dream of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation', as well as to 'improve the national security strategy and working mechanism, to be highly vigilant, and to resolutely guard against hostile forces that seek to engage in separatist, infiltration, and subversive activities so as to ensure national security'.
In 2014, the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China set up the National Security Commission (NSC). At the first meeting of the Central Committee, Xi first called for 'an overall national security concept', the implementation of a 'national security system with Chinese characteristics', and also sought to actively push for the strengthening and enacting of laws relating to national security. This demonstrates that the Chinese Communist Party, through its adjustment and fine-tuning of the national security concept, is implementing a national security system that is more holistic and beneficial to the leadership of the Communist Party of China, so that it may maintain its political power and grip. This thesis mainly examines both the concepts of national security and human rights in China from the perspective of a constitutionally democratic country; at its core, this thesis observes the evolution of the national security concept with China's political security, along with changes in China's legislation relating to national security. Focusing on the years from 2014 to 2018 of Xi's reign, this thesis examines the following legislations relating to national security: 'National Security Law of the People's Republic of China', 'Anti-Espionage Law of the People's Republic of China', 'Anti-Terrorism Law of the People's Republic of China', 'Law of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Activities of Overseas Non-Governmental Organizations within the Territory of China', 'The Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China', 'National Intelligence Law of the People's Republic' et al., and how such legislations which grant authority to various agencies such as the public security organs, the state security organs, procuratorates and the courts, have altered these agencies' powers which in turn affect citizens' rights and obligations. Moreover, this thesis also analyzes certain representative cases where the Chinese Communist Party utilizes law enforcement agencies to restrict the personal freedoms of both Chinese and foreign individuals in the name of national security. Such case examples only highlight the stark discrepancies between China's legislations relating to national security when compared to international human rights conventions and universally-accepted societal values. Finally, by comparing the evolution of legislations relating to national security in the United States and that of Taiwan, this thesis highlights the differences in national security objectives and legal systems between democratic countries and mainland China. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T08:32:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R04341037-1.pdf: 12342849 bytes, checksum: 29217403db5b5d4c58bae112fc740a93 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第壹章、 緒論 ...1
第一節 研究背景、動機與研究目的 ...1 第二節 研究途徑與研究方法 ...5 第三節 研究範圍與研究限制 ...7 第四節 研究架構與章節安排 ...9 第五節 文獻回顧 ...13 第貳章、國家安全與人權保障概念 ...22 第一節 國家安全概念 ...22 第二節 人權保障概念 ...28 第三節 問題根源:中國大陸缺少「憲政」與「人權」 ...37 第參章、中國大陸國家安全觀演變與國家安全法制發展過程 ...40 第一節 中國大陸國家安全觀演變 ...41 第二節 中國大陸國家安全法制發展過程 ...49 第三節 中國大陸國家安全相關機關職權行使與公民義務權利變化 ...69 第肆章、中國大陸以危害國家安全為由限制境內外人士人身自由案例分析 ...89 第一節 危害國家安全相關案件統計、限制對象以及限制人身自由強制手段 ...89 第二節 以違反國家安全相關法律規定限制人身自由之個案 ...101 第三節 各界對中國大陸加強國家安全法制不當限制人身自由的批判 ...153 第伍章、對比美國、台灣關於國家安全與人身自由保障之平衡 ...160 第一節 美國的國家安全法演變 ...160 第二節 台灣的國家安全法演變 ...168 第三節 中國大陸國家安全法特色 ...171 第陸章、結論 ...177 第一節 研究發現 ...177 第二節 後續研究建議 ...182 參考文獻 ...185 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 論中國大陸國家安全立法對人身自由之影響(2014-2018) | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Impact of China's National Security Legislation
on Personal Freedoms (2014-2018) | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 邱榮舉(Rong-Jeo Chiu) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李酉潭,陳顯武 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 習近平,國家安全,國家安全立法,人身自由, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Xi Jinping,National Security,Legislation relating to national security,Personal Freedoms, | en |
dc.relation.page | 216 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201902672 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-08-12 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 國家發展研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 國家發展研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 12.05 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。