請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74297
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林書妍 | |
dc.contributor.author | Hung-Ping Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃弘斌 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T08:28:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-19 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-08-19 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-08-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 江佩錚. 2007. 不同成熟度金柑抗氧化活性及其有效成分之研究. 國立宜蘭大學食品科學系碩士論文. 宜蘭.
2. 吳擢溪、潘文忠、陳鴻、吳大張、宏梓. 2004. 金柑栽培與開發利用研究進展. 林業科技開發18(6):6-9. 3. 呂明雄. 1995. 柑桔. p.24. 臺灣農家要覽農作篇(二). 財團法人豐年社. 臺北. p. 24 4. 李建瑩、徐仲禹、陳任芳、賴信順、巫宣毅. 2013. 金柑健康管理生產體系之研究. 102年度重點管理生產體系及關鍵技術之研發成果討論會論文集 p.109-113. 5. 李建瑩、陳任芳、徐仲禹、陳季呈、倪禮豐、徐煇妃. 2017. 金柑健康管理技術專刊. 行政院農業委員會花蓮區農業改良場. 花蓮. 6. 李建瑩、陳任芳、徐仲禹、陳季呈. 2018. 金柑全12月份栽培管理技術專刊. 行政院農業委員會花蓮區農業改良場. 花蓮. 7. 李建瑩、蔡依真、洪嘉樺、謝文棟. 2018. 溫室栽培及修剪對長實金柑果實生產及病蟲害之影響. 花蓮區農業改良場彙報 36:55-66. 8. 李建瑩. 2013. 金柑健康管理生產體系介紹. 花蓮區農業專訊 83:23-25. 9. 李國明. 1997. 金柑果實採收適期及其催色與貯藏試驗. 花蓮區農業改良場研究彙報 13:35-43. 10. 孟鵬. 2009. 金柑的研究現狀及其開發前景. 農產品加工學刊 190: 35-37. 11. 幸沛華、林連雄、張允瓊. 2017. 修剪對長實金柑生育特性之影響. 宜蘭大學生物資源學刊 13:65-79. 12. 林書妍. 2004. 銅鑼地區野生柑橘的形態特徵與RAPD分子標誌鑑定. 國立臺灣大學園藝暨景觀學系碩士論文. 臺北. 13. 林詠洲、陳邦華、蔡雲鵬. 2013. 柑橘生長與栽培管理. 行政院農業委員會農業試驗所. 臺中. 14. 林毓慧. 2012. 修剪與溫度對長實金柑開花與生長之影響. 國立臺灣大學園藝暨景觀學系碩士論文. 臺北. 15. 邱祝櫻. 2017. 檸檬產期條節技術. p.16-20. 檸檬健康管理專刊. 行政院農業委員會高雄區農業改良場. 屏東. 16. 唐佳惠、呂明雄、蔡武雄. 2013. 金柑新品種‘台農1 號 (黃水晶)’ 之育成. 臺灣農業研究 62(1):83-91. 17. 崔德珍. 1988. 金柑花芽分化研究. 中國柑桔 17(2):8-11. 18. 張允瓊. 2014. 金乾生育特性及花期調節之研究. 國立臺灣大學園藝暨景觀學系博士論文. 臺北. 19. 郭怡伶. 2014. 溫度對長實金柑生殖與營養生長之影響. 國立臺灣大學園藝學系碩士論文. 臺北. 20. 陳右人、邱祝櫻、阮素芬、李文豪. 2017. 柑橘類的產期調節. p.59-84. 果樹產期調節研究發展與產業調適研討會論文輯. 行政院農業委員會臺中區農業改良場. 臺中. 21. 陳如茵. 黃志平. 蔡美珠. 2010. 金柑果皮萃取物對心血管疾病相關發炎生化指標的影響. 臺灣農業化學與食品科學48(3):112-119. 22. 陳素瓊、張允瓊. 2012. 宜蘭地區金材產銷現況調查與分析. 宜蘭大學生物資源學刊8(1):59-62. 23. 黃阿賢、陳祈男. 2011. 金柑的種類與形態. 農業試驗所技術服務 87:9-12. 24. 黃桂香、劉麗君、劉福平、黃志強. 2009. 融安滑皮金柑花粉發育特性及開花結果習性觀察. 廣西熱帶農業122:15-18. 25. 楊乃博. 1983. 柑橘與金柑的器官發生研究. 植物學生通訊6:33-37. 26. 葉佑橋. 2015. 採收期與疏花對金柑開花與果實之影響. 國立臺灣大學園藝暨景觀學系碩士論文. 臺北. 27. 廖國英、徐信次、吳啟智、郭長生、李金龍、林金和. 1999. 台灣的小果柑橘. 中國園藝 45(1):37-41. 28. 劉邦基. 1984. 檸檬產期調節I. 以乾旱和藥劑處理法提高Eureka 檸檬冬花數量之研究. 柑橘類的產期調節. p.65-76 果樹產期調節研討會專集. 臺中區農業改良場特刊1號. 29. 蔣明南. 1988. 園藝作物開花創始之研究. 中國園藝34(1):1-12. 30. 黎紀烈、張慧、王衛、李忠海. 2008. 金橘黃酮抑菌作用研究. 食品與機械24(5):38-40. 31. 賴怡婷. 2005. 強剪與溫度對四季橘花芽形成與開花之影響. 國立臺灣大學園藝暨景觀學系碩士論文. 臺北. 32. 小野拓生、萩原宏幸、岩崎直人. 2010. ‘ネイハ’キンカンにおける土壌乾燥処理が葉の水ポテンシャル、アブシジン酸、炭水化物含量ならびに開花に及ぼす影響. 園学研 9(2):209–213. 33. 小野拓生、萩原宏幸、安田直登、竹川弘志、岩崎直人. 2012. ネイハキンカンの開花調節における土壌乾燥処理効果の変動と大気相対湿度の関係. 園学研 11(1):81-85. 34. 井上宏. 1989. ウンシュウミカンの花芽分化に及ぼす土壌乾燥と温度条件. 園学雑 58(3):581-585. 35. 岩崎直人、早崎宏靖、田中慎一郎. 2000. ネイハキンカンの着花に及ぼす土壌乾燥処理の影響. 生物環境調節38(2):105-109. 36. 岩崎直人、山口徹. 2004. 土壌乾燥期間がネイハキンカンの着花および果実収量に及ぼす影響. 生物環境調節42(3):241-245. 37. 岩崎直人、國島浩介. 2006. ネイハ'キンカンにおける土壌乾燥処理が開花習性、炭水化物含量、GA様活性およびABA含量に及ぼす影響. 明治大学農学部研究報告 55(4):169-175. 38. 藤川和博、河野明宏、木崎賢哉、德留秀昭. 1995. 寧波キンカン'の花芽分化期における温度条件が着花に与える影響. 九州農業研究 57:226. 39. Amasino, R. 2010. Seasonal and developmental timing of flowering. The Plant J. 61:1001-1013. 40. Anjum, S. A., U. Ashraf, A. Zohaib, M. Tanveer, M. Naeem, I. Ali, T. Tabassum, and U. Nazir. 2017. Growth and developmental responses of crop plants under drought stress A-review. Zemdirbyste 104(3):267-276. 41. Ávila, C., J. L. Guardiola, and S. G. Nebauer. 2012. Response of the photosynthetic apparatus to a flowering-inductive period by water stress in Citrus. Trees 26:833-840. 42. Behboudian, M. H., and T. M. Mills. 1997. Deficit irrigation in deciduous orchards. Hortic. Rev. 21:105. 43. Blázquez, M. A. and D. Weigel. 2000. Integration of floral inductive signals in Arabidopsis. Nature 404:889. 44. Boss, P. K., R. M. Bastow, J. S. Mylne, and C. Dean. 2004. Multiple pathways in the decision to flower: enabling, promoting, and resetting. Plant Cell 16:18-31. 45. Brosh, P. and S.P. Monselise. 1977. Increasing yields of ‘Topaz’ mandarin by gibberellin and girdling in the presence of ‘Minneola’ pollinizers. Scientia Hort. 7: 369–372. 46. Bryla, D. R., T. J. Bouma, and D. M. Eissenstat. 1997. Root respiration in citrus acclimates to temperature and slows during drought. Plant. Cell and Environ. 20:1411 -1420. 47. Carr, M. K. V., 2012. The water relations and irrigation requirements of citrus (Citrus spp.): A-review. Experimental Agric. 48:347-377. 48. Cheng, Y., M. C. De Vicente, H. Meng, W. Guo, N. Tao, and X. Deng. 2005. A set of primers for analyzing chloroplast DNA diversity in Citrus and related genera. Tree Physiol. 25:661-672. 49. Cho, L. H., J. Yoon, and G. An. 2017. The control of flowering time by environmental factors. Plant J. 90:708-719. 50. Davies, F. S. and L. G. Albrigo. 1994. Taxonomy, cultivars and breeding, p.12-44. In: F. S. Davis and L. G. Albrigo (eds.). Citrus. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK. 51. Ferers, E., G. Cruz-romero, G. j. Hoffman and S. L. Rawlins. 1979. Recovery of orange trees following sever water stress. J. Appl. Ecol. 16:833-842. 52. Gancel, A. L., P. Ollitrault, Y. Froelicher, F. Tomi, C. Jacquemond, F. Luro, and J. M. Brillouet. 2003. Leaf volatile compounds of seven citrus somatic tetraploid hybrids sharing willow leaf mandarin (Citrus deliciosa Ten.) as their common parent. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51:6006-6013. 53. García-Tejero, I., R. Romero-Vicente, J. A. Jiménez-Bocanegra, G. Martínez-García, V. H. Durá-Zuazo, J. L. Muriel-Fernádez. 2010. Response of citrus trees to deficit irrigation during different phenological periods in relation to yield, fruit quality, and water productivity. Agr. water Manage. 97:689–699. 54. Goldberg-Moeller, R., L. Shalom, L. Shlizerman, S. Samuels, N. Zur, R. Ophir, E. Blumwald, and A. Sadka. 2013. Effects of gibberellin treatment during flowering induction period on global gene expression and the transcription of flowering-control genes in Citrus buds. Plant Sci. 198:46–57. 55. González-Altozano, P. and J. R. Castel. 2000. Regulated deficit irrigation in ‘Clementina de Nules’ citrus trees. II: Vegetative growth. The J. of Hort. Sci. and Biotechnol. 75:388-392. 56. González, L., and M. González-Vilar. 2001. Determination of relative water content. p.207-212. In: M. J. R. Roger(ed.). Handbook of plant ecophysiology techniques. Kluwer. New York. US. 57. Guerra., M. 1993. Cytogenetics of rutaceae. V. High chromosomal variability in Citrus species revealed by CMA/DAPI staining. Heredity 71:234-241. 58. Harborne, J. B. and C. A. Williams. 2000. Advances in flavonoid research since 1992. Phytochem. 55(6):481–504. 59. Hussain, S., M. F. Khalid, M. Saqib, S. Ahmad, W. Zafar, M. J. Rao, R. Morillon, and M. A. Anjum. 2018. Drought tolerance in citrus rootstocks is associated with better antioxidant defense mechanism. Acta Physiol. Plant. 40:135. 60. Iwasaki, N., Y. Nakano, K. Suzuki, and A. Mochizuki. 2017. Relationships between the number of first-flush flowers and leaf water potential. Environ. Con. Biol. 55(2):59-64. 61. Jung, Y. H., H. M. Kwon, S. H. Kang, J. H. Kang, and S. C. Kim. 2005. Investigation of the phylogenetic relationships within the genus Citrus (Rutaceae) and related species in Korea using plastid trnL-trnF sequences. Scientia. Hort. 104:179-188. 62. Kardailsky, I., V. K. Shukla, J. H. Ahn, N. Dagenais, S. K. Christensen, J. T. Nguyen, J. Chory, M. J. Harrison, and D. Weigel. 1999. Activation tagging of the floral inducer FT. Sci. 286:1962-1965. 63. Kawaii, S., Y. Tomono, E. Katase, K. Ogawa, and M. Yano. 1999. Quantitation of flavonoid constituents in citrus fruits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 47:3565-3571. 64. Kobayashi, Y., H. Kaya, K. Goto, M. Iwabuchi, and T. Araki. 1999. A pair of related genes with antagonistic roles in mediating flowering signals. Sci. 286:1960-1962. 65. Koshita, Y., T. Takahara. 2004. Effect of water stress on flower-bud formation and plant hormone content of satsuma mandarin. Scientia Hort. 99: 301-307. 66. Ladaniya., M. S. 2008. Commercial fresh citrus cultivars and producing countries. In: M. S. Ladaniya(ed). Citrus fruit biology, technology and evaluation. Elsevier Inc., USA. 67. Li, D., C. Liu, L. Shen, Y. Wu, H. Chen, M. Robertson, C.A. Helliwell, T. Ito, E. Meyerowitz, and H. Yu, 2008. A repressor complex governs the integration of flowering signals in arabidopsis. Dev. Cell 15:110-120. 68. Li, J. X., X. J. Hou, J. Zhu, J. J. Zhou, H. B. Huang, J. Q. Yue, J. Y. Gao, Y. X. Du, C. X. Hu, C. G. Hu, and J. Z. Zhang. 2017. Identification of genes associated with lemon floral transition and flower development during floral inductive water deficits: a hypothetical model. Front. Plant Sci. 8:1013. 69. Lord, E. M. and K. J. Eckard. 1985. Shoot development in Citrus sinensis L. (Washington Naval). I. Floral and inflorescence ontogeny. Bot. Gaz. 146:320–326. 70. Lord, E. M. and K. J. Eckard. 1987. Shoot development in Citrus sinensis L. (Washington Naval). II. Alteration of developmental fate of flowering shoots after GA3 treatment. Bot. Gaz. 148:17–22. 71. Manja, K. and M. Aoun. 2019. The use of nets for tree fruit crops and their impact on the production: A-review. Scientia Horti. 246:110-122. 72. Melgar, J. C., J. M. Dunlop, L. G. Albrigo, and J. P. Syvertsen. 2010. Winter drought stress can delay flowering and avoid immature fruit loss during late-season mechanical harvesting of ‘Valencia’ oranges. Hort. Sci. 45(2):271-276. 73. Miranda, L., F. Ikeda, T. Endo, T. Moriguchi, and M. Omura. 1997. Comparative analysis on the distribution of heterochromatin in Citrus, Poncirus and Fortunella chromosomes. Chromosome Res. 5:86-92. 74. Monselise, S. P., and A. H. Halevy. 1964. Chemical inhibition and promotion of citrus flower bud induction. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 84:141–146. 75. Moon, J., H. Lee, M. Kim, and I. Lee. 2005. Analysis of flowering pathway integrators in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 46(2): 292–299. 76. Morgan, K. T., S. Barkataky, D. Kadyampakeni, R. Ebel, and F. Roka. 2014. effects of short-term drought stress and mechanical harvesting on sweet orange tree health, water uptake, and yield. Hort. Sci. 49:835-842. 77. Nagajima, Y., S. Susanto, and K. Hasegawa. 1993. Influence of water stress in autumn on flower induction and fruiting in young pomelo trees (Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck). J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 62(1):15-20. 78. Nishikawa, F. 2013. Regulation of floral induction in Citrus. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 82 (4):283–292. 79. Nishikawa, F., M. Iwasaki, H. Fukamachi, K. Nonaka, A. Imai, and T. Endo. 2011. Seasonal changes of citrus flowering locus T gene expression in kumquat. Bul. Natl. Inst. Fruit Tree Sci. :27-32. 80. Nishikawa, F., T. Endo, T. Shimada, H. Fujii, T. Shimizu, M. Omura, and Y. Ikoma. 2007. Increased CiFT abundance in the stem correlates with floral induction by low temperature in Satsuma mandarin (Citrus unshiu Marc.). J. Exp. Bot. 58:3915-3927. 81. Ohshima S., M. Murata, W. Sakamoto, Y. Ogura, F. Motoyoshi. 1997. Cloning and molecular analysis of the Arabidopsis gene terminal flower 1. Mol. Gen. Genet. 254:186-194. 82. Patrick, O., and L. Navarro. 2012. Citrus, p.628-622. In: M. L. Badenes and D. H. Byrne(eds). Fruit breeding. Springer Sci. Business Media. New York. 83. Peña, L., M. Martín-Trillo, J. Juárez, J. A. Pina, L. Navarro1, and J. M. Martínez-Zapater. 2001 Constitutive expression of Arabidopsis LEAFY or APETALA1 genes in citrus reduces their generation time. Nat. Biotechnol. 19(3):263-7. 84. Rahman, M. M., and N. Nito. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships in the kumquat (Fortunella) as revealed by isozyme analysis. Sci. Hort. 57:17-28. 85. Ruiz-Sánchez, M. C., R. Domingo, R. Savé, C. Biel, and A. Torrecillas. 1997. Effects of water stress and rewatering on leaf water relations of lemon plants. Biol. Plant. 39:623-631. 86. Samach, A., H. Onouchi, S. E. Gold, G. S. Ditta, Z. Schwarz-Sommer, M. F. Yanofsky, and G. Coupland, 2000. Distinct roles of constans target genes in reproductive development of arabidopsis. Sci. 288:1613-1616. 87. Sarkar, J., A. Ray, B. Chakraborty, and U. Chakraborty. 2016. Antioxidative changes in Citrus reticulata L. induced by drought stress and its effect on root colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Eur. J. Biol. Res. 6(1):1-13. 88. Savé, R., C. Biel, R. Domingo, M. C. Ruiz-Sánchez, and A. Torrecillas. 1995. Some physiological and morphological characteristics of citrus plants for drought resistance. Plant Sci. 110:167-172. 89. Southwick, S. M., and T. L. Davenport. 1986. Characterization of water stress and low temperature effects on flower induction in Citrus. Plant Physiol. 81:26-29. 90. Syvertsen, J. P. 1981. Minimum leaf water potential and stomatal closure in citrus leaves of different ages. Ann. Bot. 49:827-834. 91. Wang, Y. C., Y. C. Chuang, and H. W. Hsu. 2008. The flavonoid, carotenoid and pectin content in peels of citrus cultivated in Taiwan. Food Chem. 106(1):277–284. 92. Yasuda, K., M. Yahata, and H. Kunitake. 2016. Phylogeny and classification of kumquats Fortunella spp. inferred from CMA karyotype composition. Hort. J. 85:115-121. 93. Yoo, S. K., K. S. Chung, J. Kim, J. H. Lee, S. M. Hong, S. J. Yoo, S. Y. Yoo, J. S. Lee, and J. H. Ahn. 2005. Constans activates suppressor of overexpression of constans 1 through flowering locus T to promote flowering. Plant Physiol. 139:770-778. 94. Zandalinas, S. I., D. Balfagón, V. Arbona, and A. Gómez-Cadenas, 2017. Modulation of antioxidant defense system is associated with combined drought and heat stress tolerance in Citrus. Frontiers in Plant Sci. 8:953. 95. Zhang, J. Z., X. Y. Ai1, L. M. Sun, D. L. Zhang, W. W. Guo, X. X. Deng, and C. G. Hu. 2011. Transcriptome profile analysis of flowering molecular processes of early flowering trifoliate orange mutant and the wild-type Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf. by massively parallel signature sequencing. BMC Genomics. 12:63. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74297 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本試驗藉由土壤水分含量40-45%及30-35%兩種乾旱程度處理長實金柑,於處理期間採樣進行石蠟切片,並記錄葉片水分張力及葉片水分潛勢,了解乾旱處理期間花芽分化情形及葉片乾旱指標的變化,觀察乾旱結束後抽梢及開花情形,探討乾旱對長實金柑生長開花之影響。2018年2月2日至2月23日於日夜溫25/20℃走入式人工生長箱進行第1次乾旱試驗,試驗期間植株發生大量落葉。2018年4月23日至5月14日於室外塑膠遮雨棚下進行21日的第2次乾旱試驗,乾旱期間乾旱處理葉片水分潛勢最低達-3.06 MPa及- 3.48 MPa,水分含量最低達49.7%及43.4%,兩者復水後水分含量皆回升至與對照組相近。2019年3月29日至4月16日於玻璃水牆溫室內進行18日的第3次乾旱試驗,乾旱期間乾旱處理葉片水分潛勢最低達-1.71 MPa及-2.24 MPa,水分含量最低達48.8%及45.1%。兩次乾旱處理組的葉片水分潛勢與含水量,於處理期間皆顯著低於對照組,顯示 乾旱處理確實對長實金柑造成逆境。第1次乾旱試驗,乾旱處理組於復水後第6週每盆累積平均抽梢數為6.2與7.8,與對照組無差異。第2次乾旱試驗,乾旱處理組於復水後第6週每盆累積平均抽梢數為8.6及8.0,顯著高於對照組。第3次乾旱試驗,乾旱處理組於復水後第6週,每盆累積平均抽梢數為6.9與5.3,與對照組無差異,顯示乾旱處理影響長實金柑盆栽抽梢數的效果不穩定。第2次試驗,乾旱處理組於復水第2週累積開花數分別為6.54及6.41顯著高於對照組;乾旱處理組於復水第2週一次梢開花比例皆為87.5%,顯著高於對照組,但於復水第3週分別降至33.3%及25.0%,顯示乾旱具有集中一次梢花期與增加花數之效果。第3次試驗,乾旱處理組累積開花數及一次梢開花比例與對照組無差異,推測其開花情形與第2次乾旱不同,由環境溫度差異導致。長實金柑芽體經土壤水分含量40-45%及30-35%處理後,約在乾旱第2週可分化至花萼原體形成,達到花芽分化之不歸點。長實金柑的芽體經乾旱處理,花芽分化各階段所需時間減少,顯示乾旱具有加快芽體花芽分化之效果。第2次乾旱的乾旱處理組芽體平均分化階段高於第3次乾旱的處理組芽體平均分化階段,且第3次芽體有較高比例處於花芽分化階段,並維持較長的時間。綜合上述結果,乾旱雖具有加速芽體分化之可能,但溫度對長實金柑開花影響力仍相當重要。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In this research, we discussed change of soil water content 40-45% and 30-35% drought treatments on fortunella margarita. During the drought, we collected bud for paraffin section, recorded leaf water potential and leaf water content. After rehydration, shoot flush and flowering were recorded. During the first drought treatment in day/night temperature 25/20℃ chamber, from February 2nd to February 23rd,2018, the plants were severe defoliated. During the second drought treatment at outdoor plastic canopy, from April 23rd to May 14th 2018, the low leaf water potential of drought treatment was -3.06 MPa and -3.48 MPa, and the lowest leaf water content of drought treatments were 49.7% and 43.4%. During the third drought treatment at water wall green house, from March 29th to April 16th,2019 the low leaf water potential of drought treatment were -1.71 MPa and –2.24 MPa and the low leaf water content of drought treatment were 48.8% and 45.1%. Leaf water potential and water content of both drought treatment were lower than control. Indicated the drought treatments did cause water stress to Fortunella margarita. On the first drought treatment, the average flush number of potted plants in drought treatment were 6.20 and 7.80, which were similar to control. On the second drought treatment, the average flush number of potted plants in drought treatment were 8.6 and 8.0, which were higher than control. On the third drought treatment, the average flush number of potted plants in drought treatment were 6.9 and 5.3, which were similar to control. The shoot of plant in drought treatments flushed in 2 weeks of all drought treatments. The change of drought treatment in flush number of potted F. margarita was unstable. In the first drought treatment, F. margarita did not blossom because of the high moisture and low light. In the second drought treatment, the flower number of drought treatment were 6.54 and 6.41, which were higher than control at the second week after rehydration. The ratio of flowering 1st flush of drought treatment was 87.5%, which were higher than control at the second week after rehydration. The ratio of flowering 1st flush of drought treatment was 33.3% and 25.0%, which were similar to control at the third week after rehydration. Drought treatments increased flower number of 1st flush and concentrated flowering period of 1st flush. In the third drought treatment, the flower number of drought treatments were similar to control. The ratio of flowering 1st flush was similar to control. The difference of flowering performance between the second drought treatment and the third drought treatment were caused by environment temperature. The sepal premordia of bud was observed at the second week after drought treatment. The period of flower bud differiation stages were shorten after drought treatment. The average bud stage of the second drought treatment was high than the third drought treatment. The ratio of bud in flower bud differentiation of the third drought treatment was lower than the second treatment, and higher ratio of bud in the third drought treatment were differetiantion stage for long period. The result demonstrates that the period of flower bud differentiation of F. margarita are shorten by drought treatment, but the effect of temperature is still important for flowering of F. margarita | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T08:28:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R05628130-1.pdf: 1734196 bytes, checksum: dab848db675f37c4443c9569cc7595b8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 目錄 v 表目錄 vi 圖目錄 vii 前言 1 文獻回顧 2 材料與方法 13 結果與討論 16 一、乾旱對長實金柑生長與開花之影響 16 二、乾旱對長實金柑花芽形成之影響 22 結論 27 參考文獻 54 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 乾旱處理對長實金柑花芽形成及開花之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Effects of Drought in Flower Bud formation and Flowering of Fortunella margarita. | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳右人,阮素芬 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 花芽分化,石蠟切片,土壤水分含量, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | flower bud differentiation,paraffin section,soil water content, | en |
dc.relation.page | 65 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201903076 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-08-13 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝暨景觀學系 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 園藝暨景觀學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.69 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。