請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74137
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 黃奎隆(Kwei-Long Huang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Hsin Wang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 王語新 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T08:21:26Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-19 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-08-19 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-08-13 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Abad PL(1996), “Optimal pricing and lot-sizing under conditions of perishability and partial backordering” , Management Science, Vol.42(8): 1093–1104
Agnetis A, Hall NG, Pacciarelli D(2006), “Supply chain scheduling: Sequence coordination”, Discrete Applied Mathematics, Vol.154(15): 2044–2063 Agyapong GKQ(2011), “The Effect of Service Quality on Customer Satisfaction in the Utility Industry – A Case of Vodafone (Ghana)”, International Journal of Business and Management, Vol.6(5): 203-210 Cachon GP, Lariviere MA(1999a), “An equilibrium analysis of linear, proportional and uniform allocation of scarce capacity”, IIE Transaction, Vol.31(9): 835-849 Cachon GP, Lariviere MA(1999b), “Capacity allocation using past sales: When to turn-and-earn”, Management Science, Vol.45(5): 685–703 Cachon GP, Lariviere MA(1999c), “Capacity choice and allocation: Strategic behavior and supply chain performance”, Management Science, Vol.45(8): 1091–1108 Chakravarty AK, Balakrishnan N(2004), “Real-time revision of order quantities with capacity constraints: A single period model”, Production and Operations Management, Vol.13(2): 171–185 Chen Y, Su X, Zhao X(2012), “Modeling bounded rationality in capacity allocation games with the quantal response equilibrium”, Management Science, Vol.58(10): 1952-1962 Chen F, Li J, Zhang H(2013), “Managing Downstream Competition via Capacity Allocation”, Production and Operations Management, Vol.22(2): 426-446 Cho SH, Tang CS(2014), “Technical Note—Capacity Allocation Under Retail Competition: Uniform and Competitive Allocations”, Operations Research, Vol.62(1): 72-80 D Cohen-Vernik, Purohit D(2014), “Turn-and-Earn Incentives with a Product Line”, Management Science, Vol.60(2): 400-414 Deshpande V, Schwarz LB(2005), “Optimal capacity choice and allocation in decentralized supply chains”, Working paper, Krannert School of Management, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN 47907 Fisher ML(1997), “What is the right supply chain for your product?”, Harvard Business Review, Vol.75(2): 105-116 Hall NG, Liu Z(2010), “Capacity Allocation and Scheduling in Supply Chains”, Operations Research, Vol.58(6): 1711-1725 Iyer AV, Deshpande V, Wu Z(2003), “A Postponement Model for Demand Management”, Management Science, Vol.49(8): 983-1002 Karabuk S, Wu SD(2005), “Incentive schemes for semiconductor capacity allocation: A game theoretic analysis”, Production and Operations Management, Vol.14(2): 175-188 Kilicay-Ergin N, Lin C-Y, Okudan GE(2015), “Analysis of dynamic pricing scenarios for multiple-generation product lines”, Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, Vol.24(1):107-129 Kuo C-W, Huang K-L(2011), “Dynamic pricing of limited inventories for multi-generation products”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.217(2): 394-403 Lee HL, Padmanabhan V, Whang SJ(1997), “Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect”, Management Science, Vol.43(4): 546-558 Li J, Yu N, Liu Z, Cai X(2017), “Allocation with Demand Competition: Uniform, Proportional, and Lexicographic Mechanisms”, Naval Research Logistics, Vol.64(2): 85-107 Liu Z(2012), “Equilibrium Analysis of Capacity Allocation with Demand Competition”, Naval Research Logistics, Vol.59(3-4): 254-265 Liu Y, Cooper WL(2015), “Optimal Dynamic Pricing with Patient Customers”, Operations Research, Vol.63(6): 1307-1319 Lu LX, Lariviere MA(2012), “Capacity Allocation over a Long Horizon: The Return on Turn-and-Earn”, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, Vol.14(1): 24-41 Mallik S, Harker PT(2004), “Coordinating supply chains with competition: Capacity allocation in semiconductor manufacturing”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.159(2): 330-347 Su X(2007), “Intertemporal pricing with strategic customer behavior ”, Management Science, Vol.53(5): 726–741 Su X, Zhang F(2008), “Strategic Customer Behavior, Commitment, and Supply Chain Performance”, Management Science, Vol.54(10): 1759-1773 Xiao T, Qi X(2008), “Price competition, cost and demand disruptions and coordination of a supply chain with one manufacturer and two competing retailers”, Omega, Vol.36(5): 741-753 Yang Z, Hu X, Gurnani H, Guan H(2014), “Multichannel Distribution Strategy: Selling to a Competing Buyer with Limited Supplier Capacity”, Management Science, Vol.64(5): 2199-2218 Zarley C, Damore K(1996), “Backlogs plague HP: Resellers place phantom orders to get more products”, Computer Resellers News, 247 Zhao L, Tian P, Li X(2011), “Dynamic pricing in the presence of consumer inertia”, Omega, Vol.40(2): 137-148 Zhou J, Tang Z, Zhou D, Fang T(2015), “A study on capacity allocation scheme with seasonal demand”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol.53(15): 4538-4552 Zeng H-Q, Zhang Y-L(2014), “Multi-generation Product Optimal Pricing with Strategic Customer Behavior”, IEEE 數位時代:全球智慧型手機出貨放緩,三星仍是銷量龍頭、華為再度超越蘋果位居第二:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/53128/idc-data-2019-q1-smartphones-shipping, 2019 中時電子報:為了搶iPhone8首發配貨權 電信三雄被逼吃舊iPhone: https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20170731000021-260202?chdtv, 2017 聯合新聞網:蘋果新機買不下手! iPhone7、8大降價 最低不用1.6萬: https://udn.com/news/story/12467/3364715, 2018 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74137 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 隨著現代消費者消費習慣改變,產品生命週期愈來愈短,推陳出新的速度愈來愈快,多時代產品共存於市場的情形因此愈來愈普遍,尤其是在高科技產品方面。由於新產品剛上市時產能通常有限,因此要如何分配稀有的產能給下游零售商是本論文研究重點。本研究假設市場中有一家供應商分別販售新舊世代產品給兩家互相競爭且服務品質相異之零售商,時間軸分為兩階段,第一階段為新產品上市前,只銷售舊世代產品,第二階段則是新產品上市後,只銷售新世代產品。每個階段中,消費者會衡量心中對產品的願付價格、零售商的服務品質與產品零售價之差異大小來決定是否購買。本研究比較轉嫁分配(Turn and earn allocation)策略與固定均分(Fixed allocation)策略下供應商所得利潤,討論在上述兩策略下零售商於第一階段之定價策略,並利用數學方法建構模型,以逆向歸納法求得供應商在各情況下之利潤,再以數值分析求出特定情況下供應商之最佳決策。本研究結果發現在大部分情況下,轉嫁分配策略較有優勢,而零售商得知供應商策略後,會在第一階段作出相對應的定價動作,以在第二階段能獲得較好之分配量,並最大化自身之利潤。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | As the rapid change of the consuming habit nowadays, the life cycle of various kinds of products are much shorter than before, especially the high-tech computer, communication, and consumer electronics. Due to the fast innovation of products, the coexistence of multiple-generation products is even more often in the market. It’s common that the capacity of new generation products is limited while launched to the market. Hence, how to allocate scarce capacity to retailers and the quantity should be allocated are the main challenge in the aspect of the supplier. This research will focus on this issue and discuss what pricing actions that retailers can take when facing the different capacity allocation strategy adopted by the suppliers. Consider one supplier providing different generation products to two retailers with different service quality. We present a two-phase model where former phase selling old generation product and the later phase selling new generation product. In every phase, customers will compare their willing to pay with the service quality of retailers and the selling price and then decide whether to buy or not. This research aims to find the best capacity allocation rule for the supplier among turn-and-earn and fixed allocation rules and also observe the reaction of retailers in pricing and ordering quantity. According to the numerical analysis, turn-and-earn allocation rule is always better than fixed allocation rule and will depends on the value of parameters that supplier chooses. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T08:21:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R06546021-1.pdf: 2934991 bytes, checksum: f27aa0d00970f83ba8d7e8106b70718f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝……… i
摘要……… ii Abstract….. iii 目錄……… iv 圖目錄……. vi 表目錄…… vii 第1章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 研究動機與目的 3 1.3 研究架構 4 第2章 文獻回顧 6 2.1 產能分配策略 6 2.2 供應鏈合作契約設計 9 2.3 多世代產品定價策略 9 2.4 消費者行為對定價影響 10 第3章 問題描述與模型建構 11 3.1 問題描述及定義 11 3.1.1 供應商設定 13 3.1.2 零售商設定 13 3.1.3 消費者設定 14 3.2 模型建構與求解 15 3.2.1 第二階段需求量 18 3.2.2 第二階段零售商訂購量 19 3.2.3 第一階段需求量 21 3.2.4 第一階段零售商訂價 22 3.2.5 供應商利潤與產能分配策略 37 第4章 數值分析 40 4.1 利潤分析 40 4.1.1 新產品產能限制K對利潤影響 42 4.1.2 新舊產品批發價對利潤之影響 46 4.1.3 新產品售價p_2對利潤之影響 48 4.2 產能分配策略分析 49 4.2.1 新舊產品批發價w_2與w_1對產能分配策略選擇之影響 49 4.2.2 新產品售價p_2與轉嫁比例e對產能分配策略選擇之影響 51 第5章 延伸模型 53 5.1 第一階段零售商最適定價 53 5.2 數值分析 55 5.2.1 參數變動時零售商第一階段定價變化 55 5.2.2 參數變動時對利潤及產能策略之影響 56 第6章 結論與建議 59 6.1 研究總結 59 6.2 未來延伸與建議 60 參考文獻…. 61 附錄1……. 65 附錄2……. 70 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 有限產能下供應商的多世代產品產能分配對零售商定價之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Multiple-generation Product Capacity Allocation under Limited Capacity and the Impact on Pricing of Retailers | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 郭佳瑋(Chia-Wei Kuo),孔令傑(Ling-Chieh Kung) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 產能分配,賽局理論,供應鏈管理,最適定價, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | capacity allocation,game theory,supply chain management,pricing, | en |
dc.relation.page | 70 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201903435 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-08-14 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 工業工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 工業工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.87 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。